Ford Aims To Save Itself By Bringing Small European Cars To U.S.

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Ford Aims To Save Itself By Bringing Small European Cars To U.S. stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

DEE-ANN DURBIN and TOM KRISHER | July 24, 2008 03:45 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
In this April 23, 2007 file photo, a Ford Sport Trac is shown in production on the line at the Ford Assembly Plant in Louisville, Ky. Ford Motor Co. said Thursday, July 24, 2008, it lost $8.67 billion in the second quarter largely because of a reduction in the value of assets. (AP Photo/Brian Bohannon, file)

DEARBORN, Mich. — Ford Motor Co. posted the worst quarterly performance in its history Thursday, losing $8.67 billion in the second quarter.

The company also said it will retool two more North American truck and sport utility vehicle plants to build small, fuel-efficient vehicles, and it announced plans to bring six new small vehicles to North America from Europe by the end of 2012.

The net loss includes $8.03 billion worth of write-offs because the sharp decline in U.S. truck and SUV sales has reduced the value of Ford's North American truck plants and Ford Motor Credit Co.'s lease portfolio. Even excluding those items, Ford lost 62 cents per share, worse than Wall Street expected. Twelve analysts surveyed by Thomson Financial, on average, expected a 27 cent loss per share.

Including the write-downs, Ford lost $3.88 per share in the April-June quarter, compared with net profit of $750 million, or 31 cents per share, in the same quarter a year ago.

The second-quarter loss surpassed Ford's previous record quarterly loss, $6.7 billion in the first quarter of 1992.

Second-quarter revenue was $38.6 billion, down $5.6 billion from the year-ago period. Analysts expected $34.6 billion.

Ford has been successful selling cars in Europe, and the company is banking on the new European models to boost sales and revenue as it deals with a market shift from trucks to cars brought on by high gasoline prices.

The company said it has sufficient liquidity to weather the latest downturn in the U.S. auto market without additional borrowing. Ford borrowed $23.4 billion in 2006 to fund its North American turnaround.

Story continues below

"We are pleased that we went to the capital markets at the right time," Ford President and CEO Alan Mulally said in a conference call with investors and media. "We have the scale, the expertise and the financing to execute our plan."

Wall Street wasn't impressed, at least initially. Ford shares dropped 58 cents, or 9.6 percent, to $5.45 in morning trading.

The company said it will retool the Michigan Truck plant in suburban Detroit, shifting its products from large SUVs to make global vehicles off the European Focus platform by 2010.

The SUVs made at Michigan Truck _ the Lincoln Navigator and Ford Expedition _ will be shifted to the Kentucky Truck plant in Louisville, which makes Ford Super Duty pickups.

The company also will retool the Louisville Assembly Plant, which now builds the Ford Explorer midsize SUV, to produce vehicles on the European Focus frame, starting in 2011.

The company had previously announced it would retool its pickup truck factory in Cuautitlan, Mexico, to build the Fiesta subcompact for North America starting in 2010.

Ford also said its Twin Cities Assembly Plant in St. Paul, Minn., will continue producing the Ranger small pickup through 2011. The plant was scheduled to close next year, but Ranger sales are down just 4 percent in the first half of this year, versus 18 percent for the U.S. light truck market as a whole.

The company also plans to revamp the body shops in nearly all its North American assembly plants so that they will be more flexible and able to respond more quickly to changes in market demands. Chief Financial Officer Don Leclair said it costs about $250 million per plant to make those changes.

Leclair said Ford's capital expenditures will reach $6 billion annually between now and 2010 because of the cost of revamping plants and introducing new products and engines. Ford plans to upgrade or replace all of its engines by 2010.

"What you're seeing is kind of a bubble that we're going to go through ... but early on we're going to see cost savings because of the economies of scale that we're getting as we develop more and more vehicles off of fewer platforms," he said.

Cost cuts also will come from employee layoffs. Ford said 4,000 U.S. hourly workers took buyouts in the second quarter, and the company will continue offering buyouts at targeted U.S. plants. Ford also has announced plans to cut its salaried costs by Aug. 1 through voluntary and involuntary layoffs.

The company said its write-offs included $5.3 billion in North American auto operations and $2.1 billion for Ford Credit because of the drop in the value of the plants and equipment that make trucks and SUVs, and the lower price Ford Credit can fetch for them at auction when leases expire. Leclair said 85 percent of the Ford Credit write-down was triggered by the drop in truck and SUV values.

Ford reported a pretax loss of $1.3 billion in North America because of the deteriorating U.S. market and the shift away from trucks. U.S. sales overall were down 10 percent in the first half of the year, with Ford's sales down 14 percent.

The company, though, continued to be profitable overseas, posting a $582 million profit in Europe and $388 million in South America. The company also made $50 million at its Asia-Pacific-Africa division.

"The second half will continue to be challenging, but we have absolutely the right plan to respond to the changing business environment and begin to grow again for the long term," Mulally said in a statement.

Ford said it does not expect a U.S. economic recovery to start until early 2010.

The company identified only three of the European small vehicles it will bring to North America: the Transit Connect small van, the European Focus and the subcompact Fiesta. Most will be built in North America, and Leclair said some might be exported. Ford already has announced that the Transit Connect will be imported from Turkey.

Ford said the other three vehicles would be identified later, including one that is unique within its segment.

Other possible vehicles are the Kuga small crossover, the C-Max small van and the Mondeo midsize car.

Ford also announced that the next-generation Ford Explorer midsize SUV will come out in 2010 and be built on car underpinnings, making it more fuel efficient than the current truck-based model. And it announced it will build a seven-passenger car-based crossover vehicle for Lincoln in mid-2009.

___

On the Net:

http://www.ford.com

DEARBORN, Mich. — Ford Motor Co. posted the worst quarterly performance in its history Thursday, losing $8.67 billion in the second quarter. The company also said it will retool two more North ...
DEARBORN, Mich. — Ford Motor Co. posted the worst quarterly performance in its history Thursday, losing $8.67 billion in the second quarter. The company also said it will retool two more North ...
Filed by Dave Burdick  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
247
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next › Last » (5 pages total)
- blytzd I'm a Fan of blytzd 4 fans permalink

Ford should start selling all those big ass SUVs/Trucks over in Iran where the fuel is cheap. They already stuck a fork in our country once at least this betrayal would save their ass instead of bury it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:12 PM on 07/24/2008
- Annette I'm a Fan of Annette 15 fans permalink

Like the Iranians are dumb enough to buy US vehicles. They are a lot closer to Europe.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:51 PM on 07/25/2008

It will be very interesting to see whether there is any correlation between a shrinking car and a shrinking waistline.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:13 PM on 07/24/2008
photo

I don't know - it always seems to me that you see a disproportionate number of huge obese people crammed into tiny little cars

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:14 PM on 07/24/2008

And to think I had a tarus 1989 and 1998 that both got 33 miles or better on a trip and now the cars brag about 25 to 28 miles a gallon.
Ford , GM and other corporations want our economy to fail.
That way they can deleted workers benefits , cut the wages and stop the pollution standards against their plants.
Hell GM and Ford is in partner ship overseas with these companies for cheap labor , no taxes and they have no benefits to pay,.
Saudi Arabia with the selling of their oil gives their citizens "FREE" social programs.
They do not pay property tax , social security for the education or retirement funds.
Corporation have been building and "investing" in foreign countries with the money they have been stealing from the American workers and their benefits.
Corporation are in control of our government and have pushed every bit of progress the American workers has made in the past 100 under the bus.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:31 PM on 07/24/2008
- dgscol I'm a Fan of dgscol 4 fans permalink
photo

A little protection for US startups would go a long way.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:10 PM on 07/24/2008

Protection from what?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:27 AM on 07/25/2008
- dgscol I'm a Fan of dgscol 4 fans permalink
photo

What's wrong? Are they out of steel or something? Why can't they make small cars here? They go from SUV's to selling foreign imports. Make sense of that!

Americans are more technically sophisticated than ever, and would be happy to participate in making quality autos competitively. Why don't these guys wake up?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:00 PM on 07/24/2008
- PDQ I'm a Fan of PDQ permalink

Did you READ the article? They're retooling their AMERICAN plants to make SMALL cars that are based on EUROPEAN designs already in production. Why take 7 years to develop something brand new from scratch if you can reconfigure something that's already in the company stable?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:05 PM on 07/24/2008
- dgscol I'm a Fan of dgscol 4 fans permalink
photo

The US will not become more competitive this way : copying another design and utilizing the same assembly line practices. What they need is more pioneering spirit. : a Pioneer.

I am told the main problem is no desire to break new ground and outlay fund for new tech, and the claim is made that Detrioters are not that bright. they even thought of a startup in San Francisco, but those people out there are crazy.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:18 PM on 07/24/2008
photo

''plans to bring six new small vehicles to North America from Europe by the end of 2012."

2012...Toyata will rule the road in the USA if it takes that long for ford to get smaller cars to the USA.

They have to re-tool to be able to build a NEW model

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:30 PM on 07/24/2008

I work in lower Manhattan, where the asphalt is barely wider than your outstretched arms. Down there, the distinction between sidewalk and street is a loose philosophical construct - except, when one of these behemoths comes barreling down, looking for a garage. As I hop onto the sidewalk to avoid an undignified demise, I gloat on how much these invariably bloated rubes (usually from New Jersey) must be paying for gas, just for the privilege of parking in the city.
Ford and GM deserve whatever they get for their cynical short-sightedness. It's terrible their workers will be the ones to pay the price, but perhaps those geniuses who mismanaged this game out to the last possible second will be unable to find any kind of suitable employment from those with greater sense.
It leaves me little hope for our species when I realize that the very people at these companies who pushed for more SUV's, have children, whose futures they apparently have given no thought to. Everyone seems to think they'll be able to buy themselves out of cataclysm, when it comes, and only the other guy will suffer. Read Poe's "Masque of the Red Death" for a refresher.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:56 PM on 07/24/2008
- PDQ I'm a Fan of PDQ permalink

I didn't realize that lower Manhattan is the center of the automotive universe. That'll certainly be news to people in the rest of New York as well as the other 49 states.

All bow to the little island of Manhattan!!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:05 PM on 07/24/2008

If Ford had made an informed market decision 20 years ago and decided to make a shift towards more fuel-efficent cars, not only would THEY be in a better position today, the world might not be facing the catastrophic effects of SUV-driving. I.e. global warming and obesity.

http://www.saibotchilizm.org

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:41 PM on 07/24/2008
photo

They're not entirely to blame. They produced what Americans wanted to buy.

As long as soccer moms want Excursions, Expeditions, Suburbans, Tahoes, Hummers, etc etc etc and that's what's selling, the car makers will continue to make them.

With gas at $4+ per gallon? Not so much any more...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:54 PM on 07/24/2008

People want this heavy medal is because Detroit and Madison Avenue could sell the high priced gas pigs at a higher per unit profit margin.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:58 AM on 07/25/2008
photo

And few would have bought them, detroit made what people wanted to buy - SUVs, minivans, trucks, big cars

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:42 PM on 07/24/2008
- Annette I'm a Fan of Annette 15 fans permalink

Doesn't make Americans look too bright does it? Willing to waste money for no good reason. Big cars in some Americans minds are some sort of reason to boast. It is like boasting that you have stupid children.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:41 AM on 07/26/2008
- ejay579 I'm a Fan of ejay579 9 fans permalink
photo

Saw a show the other day about electric driven streetcars as public transportation. You could have knocked me over with a feather when it showed how extensive such a system use to be in Los Angelese. It also indicated that automobile manufacturers had bought many inter-city transportation systems at one time. Although it down played this, the way I heard it was that the automobile manufacturers did this after WW II then ran them into the ground to sell more cars.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:27 PM on 07/24/2008
- PDQ I'm a Fan of PDQ permalink

Did the report indicate that Henry Huntington's main business was real estate, not railroads? Did it mention that he'd buy land around his Pacific Electric rail stops, subdivide it and sell home sites that encouraged urban sprawl?

The Pacific Electric Red Car railroad had about 1,000 miles of track and carried 250,000 people per day in 1920 which was when it peaked. Cars in Los Angeles at that time were roughly split in thirds between gas, electric and steam models. In 1921 oil was discovered in Signal Hill near Long Beach and it quickly became one of the most productive oil fields in the world. Gas was suddenly easy to come by and gasoline powered car sales took off. The electric rail lines couldn't keep up with the ever increasing urban sprawl that car ownership fostered and they didn't try to.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:13 PM on 07/24/2008

I remember riding the Red Car (electric driven streetcar) with my mom when I was a small child in L.A.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:35 PM on 07/24/2008
- Annette I'm a Fan of Annette 15 fans permalink

So did I they were pretty fast, and cheap. I know you could take them from Pasedena to Long Beach as fast as you could drive it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:42 AM on 07/26/2008
- Maanu I'm a Fan of Maanu 8 fans permalink

Just watch "Who Framed Roger Rabbit?" again. It's all about how the trolleys in LA were scrapped to favor "FREEWAYS" and the rubber & cement lobbies. Real talk.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:46 PM on 07/24/2008

Maybe it's time to bring back that Wal-Mart special, the Yugo. They're so cheap and inexpensive, when they break you can just go buy another one.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:21 PM on 07/24/2008
- ejay579 I'm a Fan of ejay579 9 fans permalink
photo

Back in the day, a local Toyota dealer was giving away a Yugo if you bought a new Toyota. The thing I liked about the Yugo was its air conditioning system - a fan on the dashboard.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:28 PM on 07/24/2008

ejay579, don't forget the roll down windows, that counts, too.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:33 PM on 07/24/2008
photo

FINALLY the Yugo gets what it deserved. Actually, this is quite a bit MORE than it deserved!!


http://magliery.com/Graphics/YugoArt/

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:47 PM on 07/24/2008
- MajorKong I'm a Fan of MajorKong 419 fans permalink
photo

The Yugo had a rear window defroster to keep your hands warm while you were pushing it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:58 AM on 07/25/2008

Is this going to impact the sales of the 2009 Infiniti FX, now being touted as fuel efficient. It gets 14mpg in the city and 20mpg on the highway. Now that's progress!?!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:37 PM on 07/24/2008
- marijam I'm a Fan of marijam 48 fans permalink
photo

Are you kidding me? 2010, 2012? Bring em over as imports NOW.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:23 PM on 07/24/2008

I have been eyeing the small British trucks for awhile. Wish there were some alternative vehicles for those of us in the trades who need to haul alot of stuff, i.e., not just the wet retriever or the golf clubs in the back of a gas guzzeling F-250.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:14 PM on 07/24/2008
- PDQ I'm a Fan of PDQ permalink

Ford Ranger?
Dodge Dakota?
Chevrolet Colorado?
GMC Canyon?

Or a full size pickup with a fuel sipping DIESEL?????

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:41 PM on 07/24/2008
photo

Rangers are wonderful little trucks - i have owned a few of them and they are rock solid reliable - never had to do more than routine maintanence to them

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:59 PM on 07/25/2008
- MajorKong I'm a Fan of MajorKong 419 fans permalink
photo

If you don't need the open bed of a pickup truck, Dodge sells a European cargo van called a "Sprinter" that gets 20 mpg or so.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:58 AM on 07/25/2008
photo

Someone, somewhere needs to get to the bottom of this bulls hit.

My mom has a 1992 Buick Roadmaster with the largest engine made at that time. In town, it gets 19mpg. On the freeway, it gets 30mpg. I drove it on a trip and thought the gas gauge was broken because it didn't move much for over an hour!!

If that behemoth can get 30mpg on the freeway with 1992 technology, WTF is going on with all these little bitty cars claiming that 32mpg is some great deal?

I don't get it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:40 PM on 07/24/2008
photo

Bingo - my mom's old 94 Geo gets 45 in town and 52 on the highway better than most hybrids

The old 60s and 70s beaters with v8s I used to drive all got in the twenties.

Saying that a 32 mpg car with today's technology is good mpg is a joke

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:47 PM on 07/24/2008
photo

The old VW air-cooled engines got about 46 mpg highway, and were a blast to drive.
And that was in the 60's and 70's.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:04 PM on 07/24/2008
- cardtosser I'm a Fan of cardtosser 6 fans permalink
photo

For a long time there has been an active market in the US for small cars. I am curious why Ford hasn't been importing these before now. I know that Ford has made good profits on its larger cars over the last 10-15 years, but the product mix could have been stregnthened with smaller cars too.

I guess the tough CAFE standards that the US automakers have been fighting for years will become acceptable now. If they had been enacted when first proposed we could have been in a more secure energy position now.

Certainly capitalism lends efficiency to an economic system, but sometimes planing as a nation can benefit us all.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:40 PM on 07/24/2008

They enjoyed a greater profit margin on the larger vehicles.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:35 PM on 07/24/2008
photo

And larger cars, pickups and SUVs are what people wanted to buy and tended to avoid small cars

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:36 PM on 07/25/2008
- Woggles I'm a Fan of Woggles 8 fans permalink

The scene: 1925 Kansas

Two farmers are looking at a shiny new Ford "Model-T".

One farmer says to the other, "They say this thing here, gets 25 miles per gallon".

The other farmer replies, "Yeah, but wait eighty years, you won't believe what they'll be getting then".

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:35 PM on 07/24/2008

A model t in 1925 had about 25 horsepower and a top speed of about 50. People in this country want the performance AND fuel economy, you can't have both. Americans are just so used to having that extra power and don't want to give it up if they don't have to.
About the Yugo, my sister had one and it took about an hour to get to highway speeds, just not practical on our roadways, you will get run off the road if try to drive one now.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:07 PM on 07/24/2008
- Nofoolhere I'm a Fan of Nofoolhere 12 fans permalink
photo

What knowledgeable American would buy any Ford product after they recently devastated the livelihoods of 40,000 Americans, and the communities that depended upon them, by shipping their jobs to Mexico in the interest of their "bottom line."

Americans have never been trained to connect the dots. Most cannot even see the dots. They curse Ford for betraying their workers, and then go out and buy Ford products.

The corporate right wing depends on these character defects to have arranged for the eight disastrous years of Bush-Cheney. Now they depend on those same defects to impose four or eight more years of McBush on our stupefied electorate.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:31 PM on 07/24/2008
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next › Last » (5 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect