Sirius-XM Merger Close To Approval After Companies Agree To $20M Fine

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Sirius-XM Merger Close To Approval After Companies Agree To $20M Fine stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

JOHN DUNBAR | July 24, 2008 05:21 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It

WASHINGTON — Approval of a merger of the nation's only two satellite radio companies was imminent Thursday after the pair agreed to pay $19.7 million to settle charges they violated federal rules.

Sirius Satellite Radio Inc.'s proposed $3.6 billion buyout of rival XM Satellite Radio Holdings Inc. has been before the Federal Communications Commission for 16 months.

The five-member commission is deadlocked at 2-2, but Republican Deborah Taylor Tate was expected to cast the deciding vote approving the deal once a consent decree outlining the enforcement action is circulated for a vote.

"This was an issue that Commissioner Tate thought was important for us to deal with prior to her supporting the merger," FCC Chairman Kevin Martin said Thursday. "I think that this was a significant issue that we can take off the table that I think will allow us to move forward soon on finishing up the merger."

Tate had apparently sought a fine of $8 million, according to FCC officials who asked not to be named because the deal was not yet final.

Martin said the agency reached an agreement late Wednesday night where XM will pay $17.5 million and Sirius will pay $2.2 million to resolve interference complaints and violations related to land-based signal repeaters operated by the companies.

Martin said XM's penalty was greater because the company's offense was more egregious. He said that XM had operated more than 300 repeaters that were in violation of FCC rules.

"And even more significantly," Martin said, "XM had continued to operate their repeaters without authority when they were in violation."

Story continues below
advertisement

The agency was free to pursue the enforcement action against the companies outside of the merger process, but Tate apparently wanted the matter settled before approval. Tate has not responded to requests for comment.

The Justice Department approved the deal in March without conditions, saying the companies don't really compete because customers must buy equipment that is exclusive to either XM or Sirius, and subscribers rarely switch providers.

DOJ also agreed with the companies' argument that they compete with other forms of audio entertainment, including digital radio, Internet-based radio stations and even devices like Apple Inc.'s iPod.

FCC approval faced a steeper climb because the companies were prohibited from combining under terms of their licenses. The agency struggled to come up with a way to show that allowing a satellite radio monopoly was in the public interest.

The companies voluntarily agreed to a set of conditions, including a three-year price cap and an 8 percent set-aside of "full-time audio channels" for public interest and minority programming. They will also adopt an "open radio" standard that may lead to a greater variety of features in radios and greater competition among manufacturers.

Sirius and XM also have promised to include a limited "a la carte" offering that would be available within three months of the close of the deal and allow listeners to pay only for the channels they want to receive.

The vote on the buyout will apparently be split along party lines. Democratic commissioners Michael Copps and Jonathan Adelstein have both voted against the merger while Martin and fellow Republican commissioner Robert McDowell have voted in favor.

Adelstein had sought further concessions from the company but withdrew his offer on Wednesday after it failed to draw support.

The two companies have a combined subscriber base of more than 18 million, according to the most recent figures. XM is based in Washington DC while Sirius is in New York City.

Under the buyout, XM shareholders will receive 4.6 shares of Sirius stock for every share of XM stock. Shares of Sirius stock fell 26 cents or nearly 10 percent Thursday, dropping the value of the deal to $3.6 billion.

___

On the Net:

Federal Communications Commission: http://www.fcc.gov

Sirius: http://www.sirius.com

XM: http://www.xmradio.com

WASHINGTON — Approval of a merger of the nation's only two satellite radio companies was imminent Thursday after the pair agreed to pay $19.7 million to settle charges they violated federal rule...
WASHINGTON — Approval of a merger of the nation's only two satellite radio companies was imminent Thursday after the pair agreed to pay $19.7 million to settle charges they violated federal rule...
Filed by Danny Shea  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
17
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
- Ozarks I'm a Fan of Ozarks 43 fans permalink
photo

I don't voluntarily do business with monopolies. I expect their "a la carte" offering allegedly available within three months of the close of the deal and allow listeners to pay only for the channels they want to receive" to just be a window dressing. Alleged "ala carte" will be just a disguise of their real intent to gouge customers. My subscription ends in September and I will not renew it. The very fact that they are paying 20 Million in penalties shows their disregard of any supposed oversight by the FCC.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:40 PM on 07/25/2008

I expect to cancel my subscription within a year of the merger.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:16 AM on 07/25/2008
- NTO08 I'm a Fan of NTO08 19 fans permalink

I don't get the repeater nonsense..­.what interference?

In some cities, satellite radio would be impossible to receive without repeaters.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:45 AM on 07/25/2008

This merger should have been allowed last year. Even with the merger the company might go bust. I too am worried about corporate control of the media. This isn't the battle front!!!!!!!!! Get real.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:10 PM on 07/24/2008

The only real upside to this Merger is that The Young Turks just signed with XM so hopefully more people will get to hear the best progressive talk show in America.

www.theyoungturks.com

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:52 PM on 07/24/2008

So Cenk was on Sirius, bolts for Air America, fails there, and now gets picked up by Sirius/XM.

He's good, but the best Left talkers are Alex Bennett and Mike Malloy.

Still, glad that Cenk will be available to hear again.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:39 PM on 07/24/2008
- geobushono I'm a Fan of geobushono 15 fans permalink

Alex Bennett is typical of Sirius' s Talk Left, that is to say they're more interested in bashing Barack and then they fall back that "back in the day, I was a radical" nonsense.


Bennett is just unlistenable if you have any progressive inclinatio­n....

ON the other hand, Mike Malloy is the ONLY groundbreaking Leftist on radio.
In a genre that allows a redneck centrist like ED SCHULTZ to pass himself off as a progressive is almost laughable.

I have both XM (great programming), and Sirius (slipping in content).
Allowing these two to merge is bad for consumers.­.........r­emember that Sirius gave Howard Stern $500 MILLION...­..........­.That is pissing away the stockholders investment.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:31 AM on 07/25/2008

I tried listening to Sirius left, but I think the channel labeling was screwed up, and it was actually the right channel.

The guy was going on and on about how Obama sucks, all the Democrats suck, and how much he loves John McCain. That was the Alex Bennett show.

Haven't listened to that once since. Do they actually have a left channel? Where is it? It would be nice to the hear someone attempt to counter all the right wingers like Alex Bennett..

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:24 AM on 07/25/2008

I'm very disappointed that this has been allowed by the FCC. "Never" in any kind of government agreement cannot be believed (going back to the Indian treaties and beyond). We, the public (who in theory own the airwaves), will suffer for it. We have very serious problems with the multinational media corporations as it is, and we really don't need to exacerbate those problems with issues such as this. I especially cringe at the vagueness of "limited 'a la carte' offerings.­" How long does anyone think that will last? To end on an upbeat note, special kudos to Commissioners Copps and Adelstein for trying to prevent this travesty.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:07 PM on 07/24/2008

What the hell are you talking about?

This is more freedom, more choice for the public.

If you did any research you would know that the 'a la carte' menu is pretty straight forward, and plans to get more extensive.

This merger is a good deal, and a great day for America. Those who are tired of the same old garbage that terrestrial radio shoves down our throat... we will continue to have a place to go to escape it.

God Bless Sirius!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:41 PM on 07/24/2008

More "Freedom?" More "Choice"? There will now be only ONE subscription radio service. The Corporate Powers That Be can decide on which content to air to their subscribers. Take a hard look at Clear Channel with over 1,000 stations nationwide. That Corporation banned the Dixie Chicks from their ubiquitous airwaves because of a statement the Dixie Chicks made (out of the country) against the administration. That Corporation is currently ignoring Harry Shearer.

Is it really beyond the realm of possibility that the newly merged subscription services into only ONE subscription service would totally ignore anything one of their broadcasters would say against the Corporate policy and just leave them alone to their own devices? That the Coporation will let one of its broadcasters air a scathing report against the newly merged Corporation if it's warranted?

I believe both Corporations should go out of business due to incorrect management (that is the capitalistic way, isn't it?) and let some other entrepreneurs have a shot at subscription radio.

I've also decided that the newspeak definition of "never" means "only ten years."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:09 PM on 07/25/2008
- suec03 I'm a Fan of suec03 11 fans permalink

The competitive model has not been working for satellite radio. The equipment is proprietary and incompatible with the other provider. When your favorite programs/channels bolt for the other company, you do without or pony up the money for all new equipment. I am still hanging on to Sirius which I chose for NPR and PRI. PRI is gone. CSPAN left. Air America left. I'm just not ready to pay for new equipment to receive XM, and will wait to see what develops with the merger. The sub prices have stayed the same for the last few years, unlike cable TV. Out here in the desert, satellite radio is worthwhile, giving access to types of programming not found on terrestrial radio in our area.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:12 AM on 07/25/2008
- geobushono I'm a Fan of geobushono 15 fans permalink

sueco3-spend the 85 bucks for an XM receiver. I'm sure you'll never look back and miss Sirius....­....I recently canceled my Sirius....­..it lost it's way.......­...it's nice to have CSPAN radio.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:33 AM on 07/25/2008

When they were first allowed to buy the spectrum, they promised to make have receivers that could receive both satellites. They also promised they would never merge.

Now they are promising that the merger will be good for subscribers. Believe that? I have a great bridge that you might want to buy.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:18 AM on 07/25/2008

It wasn't :the competitive model" that made Sirius spend $500 million on Howard Stern, then complain that they are losing money.

That was just plain simple bad management­.Replace the management with someone who has some brains, and turn the company around. It doesn't take a merger.

The merger will lower quality, raise prices, and drive more customers away.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:24 AM on 07/25/2008
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect