Brad And Angelina's Guards Fight With Paparazzi On Chateau Grounds

RSS stumble digg reddit del.ico.us news trust mixx.com Share this on Facebook

JOHN LEICESTER | July 25, 2008 01:57 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »

Show your support.
Buzz this article up.
In this May 31, 2008 file photo, a view of Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt's Miraval property in Correns, France, is seen. French police say camouflaged paparazzi who managed to get onto the grounds of Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt's chateau in southern France on Thursday fought with the Hollywood couple's guards. (AP Photo/Lionel Cironneau, file)

PARIS — It sounds like a scene from "Fight Club."

French police say camouflaged paparazzi who managed to get onto the grounds of Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt's chateau in southern France on Thursday fought with the Hollywood couple's guards. Both the paparazzi and the Jolie-Pitt's head of security confirmed the confrontation but gave widely different versions of events.

Freelance photographer Luc Goursolas said he broke a guard's finger and bit another until he bled, and that they hit him with a walkie-talkie, punched and kicked him, leaving a head wound that required three stitches.

"I was pouring blood. I threw myself at them, put blood all over them, and told them that I had HIV so they would stop hitting me," Goursolas told The Associated Press on Friday.

Tony Webb, head of security at the Miraval estate, said Goursolas went "berserk" without provocation and denied that his guards punched the photographer.

He said Jolie and Pitt may be forced to move if their privacy is not respected, and that the couple feels besieged. He said local police are not taking the problem seriously enough.

"If they get invasion of their privacy like this then they would have no option, and they would have to go somewhere where the laws are upheld a bit better," Webb told the AP.

"It's just not fair, they are in their own property and you've got him (Goursolas) and there could be another dozen out there that we can't find" on the 1,235-acre property, he said. "They are just a couple trying to bring up their young family."

Story continues below
advertisement

Goursolas said he wasn't on the property but in woods nearby where the guards, on quad bikes, found him. "The forest belongs to everyone," he said, adding that he walked five hours to get there. "I wasn't in their garden."

He said he didn't take any photos. The colleague who was with him, camerawoman Marianne Saint-Arroman, said she didn't take any video. She confirmed they were wearing khaki and camouflage to avoid being seen in the woods. "We weren't going to wear a red sweater," she said.

Webb, however, said the paparazzi were on the property, about 600 yards from the house, on a wooded hill from where Webb suspects that previous shots were taken of Jolie and Pitt in their garden with their children. He said Goursolas had also camouflaged his equipment and that he was "there for a good stay."

Jolie returned last weekend to the estate after the July 12 birth of her twins, Knox Leon and Vivienne Marcheline, in the Mediterranean city of Nice, about 60 miles away.

Goursolas claimed that Pitt came out to speak to them after the fight. "He told me, 'What you are doing is bad, I am fed up with my private property being violated' ... and then he said, 'If you want war you will get it.'"

Webb said he wasn't on hand at that point but added that he didn't think Pitt said that.

Police spokeswoman Capt. Olivia Poupot said both sides filed legal complaints accusing the other of battery and causing injury. Goursolas said he also filed complaints for illegal detention and arrest.

The police spokeswoman said the injured personnel from the estate got doctors' notes giving them four days off from work, but that the photographers did not. Police took everyone downtown to the nearby village of Carces and took statements. A judge will rule on whether the legal complaints should be pursued further, she said.

"One can imagine that if you discover someone in your garden who is taking your photo then you're not necessarily going to politely show them the way out," she said.

Poupot said it was the first time the chateau has called on police to intervene since the Jolie-Pitts settled there earlier this year, ahead of the twins' birth.

But she said she had no other information.

"This kind of thing is really not the type of problem that interests us," she said. "There are, in my opinion, far more important things than paparazzi taking photos of a glamour couple."

(This version CORRECTS from 125 acres to 1,235 acres. )

PARIS — It sounds like a scene from "Fight Club." French police say camouflaged paparazzi who managed to get onto the grounds of Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt's chateau in southern France on Thu...
PARIS — It sounds like a scene from "Fight Club." French police say camouflaged paparazzi who managed to get onto the grounds of Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt's chateau in southern France on Thu...
 
 

Comments
40
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
- JayInDallas See Profile I'm a Fan of JayInDallas permalink

Arm the guards with paintball guns. May as well make it fun. If you come onto the property, you take your chances. Paintballs are messy and they frickin' HURT.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:18 AM on 07/28/2008
- ForRichardorPoorer See Profile I'm a Fan of ForRichardorPoorer permalink

Yes, I agree....

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:16 PM on 07/30/2008
- SlippingInTheDip See Profile I'm a Fan of SlippingInTheDip permalink

Jolie should skip a months rent and but some new dresses. That green and brown dress that she has worn for over a year has to be smelly. Also, but some shoes for the PuPs.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:40 AM on 07/27/2008
- GrandyK See Profile I'm a Fan of GrandyK permalink

HUH?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:42 PM on 07/27/2008
- ForRichardorPoorer See Profile I'm a Fan of ForRichardorPoorer permalink

not that i like brad or angelina, if a couple of people were walking around on MY property in camouflaged outfits pointing things (camera's, guns) etc. their next of kin would have to be notified.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:31 AM on 07/27/2008
- SlippingInTheDip See Profile I'm a Fan of SlippingInTheDip permalink

This is story #2. Yesterdays was better in my opinion. It was almost funny. It had 4 words that were telling: 600 yards--woods---garden--camouflafe. 600 yards is almost a half mile in distance, and a person wearing camouflage in the woods at that distance couldnt be spotted. And why would Jolieis garden be in the woods a half mile away. And it also said that the "Guards" were hurt more than the intruders. Guess the "Guards" were also temp maids. Maybe tomorrow we will get the 3rd story.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:14 AM on 07/26/2008
- GrandyK See Profile I'm a Fan of GrandyK permalink

I'd like to see you welcome a nutter like these two on your back stoop putting a lenses through your window to take photos of you and your kids since you're fine with exposong your family in that sort of way.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:03 AM on 07/26/2008
- jaslyn See Profile I'm a Fan of jaslyn permalink

When you live your life in the public eye, and do things that attract attention, expect what you get. They don't do much to stay out of the public eye, and I think enjoy all their notoriety. All the attention they get wherever they go is because they live so largely. What family needs a place that big? And the French police are supposed to care so much that they guard their privacy?? Get real. They are, like most celebrities, black holes of need for attention, and because they do charity work may feel exempt. They want their cake and eat it too; they care about the downtrodden and the poor, yet want to live in chateaux , and carry 6,000$ handbags. They want to enjoy the excesses of celebrities, yet show the world they're down to earth and care. so don't hate them for it. I bet they have the carbon footprint of Bigfoot.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:34 AM on 07/26/2008
- GrandyK See Profile I'm a Fan of GrandyK permalink

They are trying to stay out of the public eye and have for three years. They live very quietly when they aren't working. What makes you think they have forfeited their right to privacy and their right to protect their children. Should Brad and Angelina take their family to live on the moon? Would that satisfy you? By your logic Julie Roberts and Steven Spielberg should be fine with people in their back yards with cameras as they fly in private jets or Arnold Schwartzenegger, right? Since Victoria Beckham has expensive handbags her kids should be followed and filmed 24/7? Why?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:11 AM on 07/26/2008
- herronsmith See Profile I'm a Fan of herronsmith permalink

Instead of buying/renting a huge villa in France (might as well have a big red X on the roof) they should have checked into a Howard-Johnson's in North Dakota. No one would find them there and those who did wouldn't care. North Dakota was chosen randomly. I am sure there are many other states are just as worthy.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:47 AM on 07/27/2008
- CKieffer See Profile I'm a Fan of CKieffer permalink

And yet... people don't do that to Spielberg, Roberts, Streep or Depp for that matter. I am not defending these intruders or saying that trespassing is okay in any way - - but seriously.. why are these two the only ones who have this degree of papparazzi insanity around them? Because they court it... whether or not you want to admit it, they feed this. And, a perfect example was how they conducted themselves in NYC (where I live, btw). There was NO reason Maddox had to walk past all those photographers every day. Jolie CHOSE to make that happen.

I understand your loyalty to them but, objectively... you have to wonder why these two are such "victims" of it and so many other famous actors are not.

The simple fact is that the $11 or $20 million dollar price tag on that first photo of the twins has made matters worse; not better.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:48 PM on 07/26/2008
- BigMike75 See Profile I'm a Fan of BigMike75 permalink

Wow, tell us how you really feel. Believe me I'm the last person to sympathize with entitled over paid actors, but that still doesn't excuse slimy paparazzi sneaking onto the property of these people. When their out and about in public their fair game, but their is a time honoured tradition of a man's home is his castle, and invasion of privacy is a major issue. I couldn't be in that position, because I'd be in court every other month settling lawsuits as a result of the smashing I would lay on paparazzi for invading me and my kids privacy.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:47 AM on 07/26/2008
- MelDel7365 See Profile I'm a Fan of MelDel7365 permalink

Ugh - they need to leave Jolie and Pitt alone. There is an argument that these people court the attention, and use it to further both their carreers and their causes. True. But this is different. She hid this for quite some time, and these are their CHILDREN. They may have sold pictures of their twins -- but that does not give every money-hungry nut with a camera a right to have at their family....the fact of the matter is, people would have gotten picts anyway - this way the matter is resolved and the money is going to a good cause -- they are not profiting off of it. Plus, there is something unseemly about trying to take pictures, the exclusive rights to which have been sold FOR CHARITY...probably a children's charity - so these photographers and the publicantions who purchase the ill-gotten picts would - literally - take food and health care from needy children to serve themselves.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:00 PM on 07/25/2008
- herronsmith See Profile I'm a Fan of herronsmith permalink

I almost bought your defense until the part about selling pictures of their kids. That statement concerns me. Selling pictures of your children. Why not give a family interview to a respected reporter (I know, an oxymoron) and let them take some pics of the kids without paying for it. To me it sounds homey and genuine. I might then want to respect their privacy.
I can't believe I wrote this out loud.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:54 AM on 07/27/2008
- GrandyK See Profile I'm a Fan of GrandyK permalink

Maybe that is exactly what they had planned on doing herronsmith. Has it escaped everyone's notice the Jolie-Pitts haven't sold any photos of their twins? Just like Halle Berry and they are having intrusive photos taken of their family, Berry was photographed in her nightgown & robe and Angelina was photographed on the terrace in her dressing gown with Brad's father and Zahara. That is disgusting! What is the common denominator there?

What is it you think they need defending on? Do you really believe AJ/BP have no right to privacy anywhere or anytime?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:50 PM on 07/27/2008
- avraamjack See Profile I'm a Fan of avraamjack permalink

.
They need to get a bunch of dogs.
.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:13 PM on 07/25/2008
- KC4NM See Profile I'm a Fan of KC4NM permalink

I think you're missing the point. SOMEONE is going to take a picture of these babies. I don't believe they are "cashing in" whether for charity or not. They are trying to keep some sort of control over who takes the pictures & make sure the money does someone some good.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:05 PM on 07/25/2008
- plaidlemur See Profile I'm a Fan of plaidlemur permalink

Shoot a couple of them, maybe they'll get the point.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:24 PM on 07/25/2008
- SignedSealedDelivered See Profile I'm a Fan of SignedSealedDelivered permalink

well, maybe that old fashioned a$$ whuppin' will serve as a warning

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:51 PM on 07/25/2008
- Wigelah See Profile I'm a Fan of Wigelah permalink

This is ridiculous. It's stalking, pure and simple, and it should not be tolerated or rewarded. If you are one of the people buying the rags involved in perpetuating these kinds of crimes, you are guilty by association. Don't read them, don't buy them, don't contribute to the problem.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:50 PM on 07/25/2008
- GrandyK See Profile I'm a Fan of GrandyK permalink

These are human beings. They are entitled to the basic right of privacy. Their jobs should not strip them of this basic right. I agree that paparazzi should safely be able to take pictures of them when they go out shopping, etc. But they should NOT be able to use these telephoto lenses to get pictures of them at their houses, inside their houses, out on their patios, etc. Also- when they chose to get into "the business" of being a 'celebrity' it was not as psychotic as it is now... Sure- you're in a few movies- maybe get some gossip written about you in a magazine- whatever... but now they can't even go to a hospital and deliver a baby without worrying about blacking out the windows. They can't even live in their own homes without getting pictures of them taken. They deserve some privacy.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:58 PM on 07/25/2008
- FeelinGroovy See Profile I'm a Fan of FeelinGroovy permalink

Actually I think the paparazzi should only be allowed to photograph celebrities when they are making a public appearance such as awards shows or promoting a film. They should be required to leave the celebs alone when they are being regular people such as shopping or eating out with their families. Much less in their own homes. Sheesh.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:13 PM on 07/25/2008
- DocWylie See Profile I'm a Fan of DocWylie permalink

What would Frank Sinatra have done?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:23 PM on 07/25/2008
- FeelinGroovy See Profile I'm a Fan of FeelinGroovy permalink

He would have had 'his people' have a little 'chat' with their employers and 'encouraged' them to leave him alone :)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:13 PM on 07/25/2008
- andvoodoo2 See Profile I'm a Fan of andvoodoo2 permalink

Can you say "cement shoes"?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:14 PM on 07/25/2008
- SilentShout See Profile I'm a Fan of SilentShout permalink

The thing that worries me most about the papparazzi is the kind of people they are. These people are already doing something reprehensible for money, if they'll take a pic of the babies would they also kidnap one if the price was right? Actually, it seems like pretending to be a pap would be a great cover for a stalker/kidnapper, since they have legal protections a regular citizen doesn't. I have nothing but sympathy for people who have to deal with them. How would you like some scumball shouting at you and taking your picture every time you leave your house? Very scary. It's only a matter of time until one of them gets killed by a fed up victim.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:11 PM on 07/25/2008
- Philippa See Profile I'm a Fan of Philippa permalink

Tresspassing!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:26 PM on 07/25/2008
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in