RSS

Dems Will Gain Seats This Fall -- But How Many?

RSS stumble digg reddit del.ico.us news trust mixx.com

July 25, 2008 11:48 AM


Show your support.
Buzz this article up.

Lost amid the media frenzy over Barack Obama's tour abroad is recognition that this week has arguably been the most successful of the cycle for Senate Democratic candidates.

On Monday, the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee posted its strongest quarter of the election cycle, raising $20.9 million with $46.2 million on hand -- nearly double the $24.6 million available to the National Republican Senatorial Campaign Committee. "With just over 100 days to go until Election Day," wrote DSCC chairman Charles Schumer, "we are exactly where we need to be to run strong winning campaigns and expand our majority."

It's not just the congressional committees. Democratic candidates themselves appear financially well-positioned heading into the fall. From April through June, Minnesota candidate Al Franken raised $2.26 million compared to Sen. Norm Coleman's $2.35 million. Former Mississippi Governor Ronnie Musgrove raised $814,000 to conservative interim Senator Roger Wicker's $822,000. In North Carolina, Democratic nominee Kay Hagan has $1.54 million to Elizabeth Dole's $1.69 million. And in Maine, Democratic Congressman Tom Allen has $1 million to incumbent Susan Collins $1.06 million. The big leads are evident too. In Virginia, Warner has $3 million and Gilmore has less than $500,000. In Oregon, Merkley has $1.42 million and Smith has $1.35 million. In New Mexico, Tom Udall has $2.1 million and Pearce has $1.2 million. In Kentucky, Lunsford has $3.1 million and McConnell has $2.95 million. In Colorado, Mark Udall has $2.04 million to Schaffer's $1.4 million. In Alaska Begich has $1 million to Stevens' $745,000.

The conservative Washington Times felt compelled to publish a dreary editorial bemoaning the state of the congressional Republicans, while even sober analysts are predicting a shift of between five to seven seats into Democratic hands.

"Things are rolling for the Democrats," said Jennifer Duffy of the Cook Political Report. "I don't laugh anymore at eight or nine. A few races have to fall into play but they are close. They have Virginia gone, New Mexico is also gone, and six races are toss ups, including Minnesota, which [despite recent good news for Coleman] will still be a close race."

Indeed, it may no longer be so much of a pipe dream for the Democrats to gain the much-vaunted 60 vote majority needed to bypass GOP filibustering on the Senate floor. It is a long shot, of course, entailing many unforeseen circumstances, including the caucus keeping Sen. Joseph Lieberman among its ranks. And yet, the wheels are clearly rolling.

Take two examples: Alaska and Mississippi, states that have long been hostile turf to Democrats. One year ago, Alaska Republican Ted Stevens was a popular, pork barrel providing, firebrand conservative whose occupancy of his seat had made him a Senate institution. An ongoing FBI investigation into his suspicious relationship with Bill Allen, the founder of an Alaska-based oil services company, however, has spurned criticism of lax ethics and possible corruption.

The FBI detailed last year that Allen provided more than $400,000 in payments to public officials from the state in exchange for propitious energy legislation. It is unclear whether or not Stevens directly received any money in this exchange, but Allen's employees were paid to make major renovations to the Senator' house in 2000. The scandal has brought a discomforting element to the state's traditionally united GOP. Republican Governor Sarah Palin has distanced herself from Stevens, as have a number of key national figures, including John McCain (though the two have a history of butting heads - primarily over earmarks). As a result, Stevens now finds himself in danger of being booted from office by Democratic Anchorage Mayor Mark Begich, who has tied or surpassed Stevens in several recent polls.

Story continues below
advertisement

If Alaska is a Red State that Democrats are hoping to turn blue, Mississippi is deep crimson. When former Senator Trent Lott resigned in 2007 to become a lobbyist, his seat was temporarily appointed to former Rep. Roger Wicker. A special election will take place this fall to permanently fill Lott's seat for the remainder of his six-year term and signs suggest that Wicker, despite being in office for some months, could easily lose his post.

His opponent, Ronnie Musgrove, former Democratic Governor of the state, gained popularity by helping to ensure that Mississippi became the first state to have an internet-accessible computer in every classroom, and brought in over $14 billion in new investments to the state. He is also one of the more moderate Democrats running for Senate, having earned a reputation as a staunch fiscal conservative.

Another advantage may be name recognition. Mississippi's Senate race is a special election, meaning that neither candidate's party will be included on the ballot. Since voting along party lines is not an option, voters are left to chose based on surnames only. Musgrove served as Lieutenant Governor for four years, then as Governor for another four, positions that provided statewide recognition. Wicker has been in the Senate for less than a year and before that served in the House of Representatives.

Even if the Democrats win seats in both Alaska and Mississippi, the chances of achieving 60-vote majority remains slim. Nevertheless experts and even Republicans themselves are of the conviction that the GOP brand is toxic. As the Politico reported on Tuesday, "Republican Senate leaders -- terrified by the prospect of losing five or more seats in November -- have freed their members to vote however they need to vote to get reelected, even if that means bucking the president or the party's leadership."

Nathan Gonzales, political editor of the Rothenberg Political Report, told the Huffington Post: "the decline of the Republican brand rests heavily on President Bush. He is one of the biggest unanswered questions of the election cycle, whether or not John McCain can successfully distance himself from President Bush is still a question." Bottom line, according to Gonzales, "Democrats will gain seats, we just don't know how many."

Lost amid the media frenzy over Barack Obama's tour abroad is recognition that this week has arguably been the most successful of the cycle for Senate Democratic candidates. On Monday, the Democratic...
Lost amid the media frenzy over Barack Obama's tour abroad is recognition that this week has arguably been the most successful of the cycle for Senate Democratic candidates. On Monday, the Democratic...
 
 

Comments
216
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next › Last » (5 pages total)
- lvdragonlady See Profile I'm a Fan of lvdragonlady permalink

Hope they have taken 'Joe' off their list and are not counting him as one of the 60.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:00 PM on 07/27/2008
- livewire19 See Profile I'm a Fan of livewire19 permalink

I think Joe and Chuck cancel each other out.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:55 PM on 07/27/2008
- magen See Profile I'm a Fan of magen permalink

Should we treat them as "well" as they've treated us?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:09 PM on 07/27/2008
- leftLibertarian See Profile I'm a Fan of leftLibertarian permalink

Because they have not impeached the criminals Bush and Cheney, the spineless Democrats do not deserve to win.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:51 AM on 07/27/2008
- 6WaysToSunday See Profile I'm a Fan of 6WaysToSunday permalink

Agree that the current Dems are 'nadless wonders. We need more congressman like Kucinich. I don't care if they have D's or R's after their states/names, just give me more congressional members who have the conviction to make the right choice, not the choice whichthey deem the most politically advantageous.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:29 PM on 07/27/2008
- syllepsis See Profile I'm a Fan of syllepsis permalink

On the merits, they deserve to be run out of the country on a rail.
As do the people they will be running against, of course.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:25 PM on 07/27/2008
- EinChicago See Profile I'm a Fan of EinChicago permalink

I'm torn on the majority issue. Part of me wants so desperately to see a Dem controlled white house and Congress at the same time so that we can repair the damage the similarly GOP controlled trofecta inflicted. But another part of me is scared silly by it. Voters have notoriously short memories and I am scared we're making another "Scapegoat Jimmy" mistake where the GOP (Nix-on/Fo-rd) run the economy into the ground and then hand it off to a Dem scapegoat to whip up anger towards all the painful things necessary to fix things and sail back in once the mess has been cleaned up. When the GOP took the majority, they had Clin-ton's propserity and balanced budgets to play with, which bought them 6 years of solid majority. If Oba-ma and the Dems take a majority in 2008, they effectively have 18 months to turn things around significantly (not just a minor recovery but a full blown recovery/bounce /boom) or we'll just open the doors for another Reagan swing.

So is it exciting to have the prospect of Dem majority? Sure. But I wish it was not such a bad economy going in and just once, we could actually get to benefit from the grown up policies our party implements. Oba-ma and crew will have one helluva job in their first 18 months if we don't want to see the Re-agn revolution/C-arter collapse part deux.

.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:30 AM on 07/27/2008
- livewire19 See Profile I'm a Fan of livewire19 permalink

I don't know..... Jimmy Carter was pretty a dismal president, and left the nation feeling depressed and demoralized. You can't place that blame on anyone else for his shortcomings. I remember those days all too well.

Obama is much more optimistic and inspiring character than Carter could ever be. He will be inheriting an economy that is in better shape than the mainstream doomsday press is reporting. Like Clinton, he will do ok if he has enough Republicans in Congress to temper some of his more outrageous proposals. If he has a Democrat majority, it won't be a good thing for his presidency or the country, and will pave the way for the Republican resurgence.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:50 PM on 07/27/2008
- jcwtts1 See Profile I'm a Fan of jcwtts1 permalink

I understand you concern, I've shared it a little myself. But here is the reality. With a 60 vote majority we can do so many things so quickly that I think we can shift the country to center left in four years. Obama is popular enough, charismatic enough that we can hold the majority during the midterms in his first term. We can move through the New New Deal in the first six months and put people back to work. We don't have to have the economy fixed just moving differently. For example, with a radical upswing in infrastructure jobs, roads, bridges, tunnels, but also schools hospitals and community centers, we can put hundreds of thousands of people to work in the first hundred days. More, these materials needed to build these infrastructure components must all be built here as a matter of national security. That means hundreds of thousands of manufacturing jobs, good union, blue collar jobs that can keep people in the middle class. Now the manufacturing jobs take longer to show up but the construction and infrastructure jobs show up much quicker. We can't do any of that without sixty votes in the senate. Seriously we have to fund these senate races.

J

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:16 PM on 07/27/2008
- lodipete See Profile I'm a Fan of lodipete permalink

I suggest you actually win the election before you start counting majorities.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:53 AM on 07/27/2008
- MrWebster See Profile I'm a Fan of MrWebster permalink

great any bit helps but the same craven leadership...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:10 AM on 07/27/2008
- MBryant See Profile I'm a Fan of MBryant permalink

So if the Dems get 60 in the Senate and a mandate-style majority in the house - can they also get someone who knows what to do with it? Leave Hillary Clinton in the senate and let's have a new senate majority leader (Clinton) and a new Speaker of the House (anyone but Pelosi). Pelosi and Reid were lapdogs for Bush - they'll be worshippers of Obama. Clinton has shown she can lead and provides a nice counterpoint to Obama. And yes, even the messianic Mr. Barack will require constiutional balance of powers. Let's not squander the chance for real change on a Dem leadership team that isn't competent.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:07 AM on 07/27/2008
- MsLiz See Profile I'm a Fan of MsLiz permalink

I don't think HRC is supportive enough of her fellow Democrats to be their leader.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:13 AM on 07/27/2008
- EinChicago See Profile I'm a Fan of EinChicago permalink

Hogwash. Stop being such a bitter kool aid addled kultist for more than 5 seconds.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:31 AM on 07/27/2008
- cwilson See Profile I'm a Fan of cwilson permalink

Anyone who thinks 60 seats is a holy grail is ignorant of history. While Carter was president, Democrats held 62 to 63 Senate seats and and 291 to 292 House seats. What happened? Carter and the Democrats fought each other like dogs. We are already hearing the congressional Democrats bitching about Obama's "arrogance" and seeing the Clinton people (all the happy talk about unity notwithstanding) go their own way.

The underlying issue is that, once you take away Bush fatigue, the Democrats do not have much of any kind of platform or set of unifying themes. It's the elephant in the living room, and no one will talk about it, at least for now.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:01 AM on 07/27/2008
- Doofus See Profile I'm a Fan of Doofus permalink

Back in the day, there were Democrats and there were Democrats.
Hey, it's a Big Tent, remember? Specifically, there were quite a few
'Southern Democrats', once known as 'Dixiecrats', who had their
own unique views, but later became the bedrock of the GOP.

Can you say 'Strom Thurmond'?

There are still huge differences across the spectrum of the Demo
party, but on the whole we are better dealing with that than the
current infestation of hack Repo politicos.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:31 AM on 07/27/2008
- Doofus See Profile I'm a Fan of Doofus permalink

In fact, here's a modest proposal. Eliminate most Repos in Congress.
(Voting them out is sufficient.) Then, create two new
parties out of the Demo super-majority.

Let them be a 'distant memory', like the passenger pigeon.

(Ironically, the Demos were originally known as the
'Democratic Republicans'. Let that take on a new meaning.)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:29 AM on 07/27/2008
- ChristianEcon.com See Profile I'm a Fan of ChristianEcon.com permalink

"What happened? Carter and the Democrats fought each other like dogs."

Yup, conservatives seem to gravitate toward group-think while liberals seem to revel in independent, freer thinking. I'd say it's somewhat ideological. And there was that brain study not long ago pointing out the "inflexibility" of conservative-leaning minds. I think belonging to a faith-based ideological "club" is self-affirming to right-oriented people. That's been my observation, anyway (observation being, as a "liberal," important to me :))

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:13 AM on 07/27/2008
- Trollstakeyourmeds See Profile I'm a Fan of Trollstakeyourmeds permalink

Yep. Say it LOUD and PROUD. I am a LIBERAL. Not a Progressive....a LIBERAL. If there were more of us, the world truly would be a better place. It's time to take back that word and all of it's meaning.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:20 AM on 07/27/2008
- billw8017 See Profile I'm a Fan of billw8017 permalink

The Republicans talk civility while being viciously partisan. Executive actions have undercut overtime laws and diminished Social Security payments by switching the inflation index from wages to prices. Lies and illegal wars are merely part of their heritage. Hatred and loathing are powerful political inspirations, but I'm glad the Democrats are the party of tolerance and conscientious public service. I don't even mind that they are not altogether crazy.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:19 AM on 07/27/2008
- Okieborn See Profile I'm a Fan of Okieborn permalink

Al Franken will be a a great Senator !!
Here is an Okie that is for Franken all the way !!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:24 PM on 07/26/2008
- realwoman See Profile I'm a Fan of realwoman permalink

OK, this is the way I see it. McCain has only one option. He needs to pick Romney. He can say, "I'll take care of al Qaeda, he (Romney) will get us back on track economically". Romney will help in Michigan (his father was a popular governor); Nevada, Utah and Colorado (mormon votes). But he has to wait for Obama to announce first. Obama, if he knows McCain is picking Romney will have to pick Clinton. That will be interesting. McCain/Romney vs. Obama/Clinton. If he waits and makes it seem that he might not pick Romney, Obama might pick Biden or Bayh. Either way it's all in the timing. Thoughts?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:06 PM on 07/26/2008
- ashenthorn See Profile I'm a Fan of ashenthorn permalink

"Obama, if he knows McCain is picking Romney will have to pick Clinton. "

Why? I'd think that Obama would only pick Clinton if his internal polling suggests that he cannot possibly win without her. If he were to select Clinton, it would mean that the core message of the Obama campaign (changing politics, national unity and reconciliation) was an abject failure, and we're right back to the typical partisan Dem vs Repub, red state, blue state, battleground state dynamic of the divided past.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:35 AM on 07/27/2008
- MNmommy See Profile I'm a Fan of MNmommy permalink

If McCain take Pawlenty I think the already in trouble Franken doesn't stand a chance. Darned Republicans seem emboldened here with their convention coming up, and the moderates of the state are falling for the slop being strewn Franken's way. I hope I'm wrong.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:32 AM on 07/27/2008
- MsLiz See Profile I'm a Fan of MsLiz permalink

Pretty boy Romney can get Utah, but that is about it. His father was governor of Michigan over 40 years ago.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:21 AM on 07/27/2008
- JDJase See Profile I'm a Fan of JDJase permalink

It's possible. I love how McCain is displaying "real leadership" by saying hes gonna wait till Obama announces.

My favorite is Evan Bayh...but relating to this article, if he picks Bayh, then that's one Dem seat lost in the Senate

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:59 PM on 07/26/2008
- UnbiasView See Profile I'm a Fan of UnbiasView permalink

Too bad he trails by like 15 points here in Minnesota, that pesky avoiding paying taxes really started him out on the wrong foot . . . especially since he wants to raise taxes on normal people but ignores the laws himself.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:17 PM on 07/26/2008
- JDJase See Profile I'm a Fan of JDJase permalink

Sounds to me like something the typical uneducated voter would say

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:00 AM on 07/27/2008
- TomR See Profile I'm a Fan of TomR permalink

Yes UnbiasView, you sound totally unbiased. Now tell us how you feel about Norm Coleman.

- Tom

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:04 PM on 07/26/2008
- coltraning See Profile I'm a Fan of coltraning permalink

I think the Dems will get to 56-58 WITHOUT Lieberman. The big question is will they drum him out of the caucus for his shameless shilling for Mccain and endless attacks on Obama. Tricky, because on every non-foreign policy issue, he is a mainstream Dem, from tax cuts to health care to the environment. My guess is they will keep him, because Obama is a consensus-builder. It really depends on what he says at the GOP convention. If Obama gets in with a convincing victory AND strengthened majorities in the house and senate, I think surviving "moderate" republican senators INCLUDING McCain, will not want to be seen as obstructionist. This list obviously includes Collins and Smith and Coleman if they survive, as well as Murkowski, Snowe, Lugar, Grassley, Bond, Dole (if not defeated), Voinovich, Specter, Graham, Alexander and we may as well throw in Lieberman. By my count, there are a minimum of 12 GOPPER senators who are wooable/persuadable using an Obama approach, which moves it far over the 60 margin. Other than Iraq, the biggest fight is on tax cuts for the wealthy, but I don't think that taxes can be filibustered. On Health Care, Education and the Environment Obama can easily bring 6-15 Goppers over with a well-crafted plan...