Bombings in western Indian city kill 29

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

R.K. MISRA | July 26, 2008 11:25 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »

Yash Vyas, 6, lies on a bed in a ward of the Civil Hospital in Ahmadabad, India, late Saturday, July 26, 2008. Yash lost his father Dushyant Vyas and his brother Rohan was injured in Saturday's blasts. At least 29 people were killed and 88 wounded when a series of small explosions hit the western city on Saturday, a top official said. (AP Photo/Gautam Singh)

AHMADABAD, India — Bombs exploded Saturday near a busy market and a hospital in a western Indian city, killing 29 people and injuring 88 a day after deadly blasts struck the southern technology hub of Bangalore.

A group calling itself the Indian Mujahedeen claimed responsibility for Saturday's attack but offered few other details in e-mails sent to several television news stations, the CNN-IBN station reported. The group was unknown before May when it said it was behind a series of bombings in Jaipur, also in western India, that left 61 people dead.

In its latest e-mail, the group reportedly made no mention of the smaller bombings Friday in Banglaore and it was not clear if the two attacks were connected.

At least 16 bombs went off Saturday evening in several crowded neighborhoods of Ahmadabad _ a crowded and historic city that in 2002 was the scene of some of the worst rioting between India's Hindu majority and its Muslim minority.

The bombs went off in two separate spates. The first, near a busy market, left some of the dead sprawled beside stands piled high with fruit, next to twisted bicycles and in public squares. The second went off near a hospital.

The side of a bus was blown off and its windows shattered while another vehicle was engulfed in flames. Most of the blasts took place in the narrow lanes of the older part of Ahmadabad, which is tightly packed with homes and small businesses. Bomb-sniffing dogs scoured the areas that were hit.

Distraught relatives of the wounded crowded the city's hospitals. One of the wounded was a 6-year-old whose father was killed in the blasts. He lay in a hospital bed with his arms covered in bandages and wounds on his face.

Narenda Modi, the chief minister of Gujarat state where Ahmadabad is located, called the blasts "a crime against humanity." He said the bombings appeared to have be masterminded by a group or groups who "are using a similar modus operandi all over the country."

Story continues below
advertisement

Prithviraj Chavan, a junior minister in the prime minister's office, called the explosions "deplorable" and said they were set off by people "bent upon creating a communal divide in the country" _ language officials usually use to blame Islamic militants.

The militants' attacks are believed to be an attempt to provoke violence between India's Hindu majority and the Muslim minority.

"Anti-national elements have been trying to create panic among the people of our country. Today's blasts in Ahmadabad seem to be part of the same strategy," federal Home Minister Shivraj Patil told reporters in New Delhi.

Those fears were amplified by the history of Ahmadabad's 2002 riots between Muslims and Hindus. That violence killed about 1,000 people, most of them Muslims. It was triggered by a fire that killed 60 passengers on a train packed with Hindu pilgrims. Hindu extremists blamed the deaths on Muslims and rampaged through Muslim neighborhoods, although the cause of the blaze remains unclear.

Ahmadabad is also known for the elegant architecture of its mosques and mausoleums, a rich blend of Muslim and Hindu styles. It was founded in the 15th century and served as a sultanate, fortified in 1487 with a wall six miles in circumference and 12 gates, 189 bastions and 6000 battlements.

The government put out an alert warning other cities of the possibility of attacks similar to those that struck Ahmadabad and Bangalore.

On Friday, seven synchronized small bombs killed two people and injured at least five in Bangalore. On Saturday, police found and defused an eighth bomb near a popular shopping mall in Bangalore, said Srikumar, the director general of police in Karnataka state, where the city is located. Like many Indians, he uses only a single name.

AHMADABAD, India — Bombs exploded Saturday near a busy market and a hospital in a western Indian city, killing 29 people and injuring 88 a day after deadly blasts struck the southern technology ...
AHMADABAD, India — Bombs exploded Saturday near a busy market and a hospital in a western Indian city, killing 29 people and injuring 88 a day after deadly blasts struck the southern technology ...
 
Comments
40
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)

Making converts, one body at a time.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:41 PM on 07/26/2008

The religion of peace.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:05 AM on 07/27/2008

To this editorial board: I have noticed you have suppressed my comments.

I'm going to report you to The Huffington Post publishers for being biased against certain editorials.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:40 PM on 07/26/2008

It is an outrage that innocent people in India have been killed by these terrorist bombs.

But I must chime in that Pakistan automatically gets blamed every time there is a terrorist incident in India and it' s completely unfair. Pakistan has been hit with terror bombs equally badly if not more than India.

There is no blame of Pakistan in this article, but there seems to be the erroneous concept that India and Pakistan are twins and that India is the "angelic" twin and Pakistan is the "evil" twin. This stereotyping should end because it's not based on truth...

I am very fortunate to have visited both India and Pakistan and know the people of both countries pretty well. Both have beautiful cultures and beautiful people.

But what I will say is that India and Pakistan should get off their fannies and settle the Kashmir dispute ASAP because the instability that this conflict is producing not only affects India and Pakistan, but is also endangering the peace of the entire world.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:07 PM on 07/26/2008

Pakistan is the common denominator to all major terrorist acts of the past few years. Pakistan should stop obssessing about Kashmir. Kashmir is not the problem. In fact Pakistan should set its house in order first and get rid of its jihadi mentality which is prevalent among major chunks of the Pakistani security apparatus.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:04 AM on 07/27/2008

Anyone who believes in this rotten G od. M ohamad or A liah the Mo fker are sure gonna rot in hell

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:53 PM on 07/26/2008

Pakistan needs to be N uked!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:52 PM on 07/26/2008

Further evidence that God is love.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:39 PM on 07/26/2008

Pakistan is a source of instability not only to its immediate neighbourhood, but to the rest of the world. Most terrorist activity in India can be directly or indirectly traced to Pakistan. The opposite is however not true. The terrorism we see in Pakistan, is a case of the chickens coming home to roost, a case of reaping what it sowed. The best option for the world is to dismember Pakistan to its ethnic constituents and defang it of its nukes.Pakistan is already a failed state. The danger to the world is it collapsing completely and the nukes falling into the hands of Al-Aqaeda.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:34 PM on 07/26/2008

Isn't Pakistan secular. The people would never go for a religous state. Al-Aqaeda may not even exist. Read the article. Its not about Al-Aqaeda - its OLD hatreds exploited by power freaks and money. Watch War Incorporated.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:41 PM on 07/26/2008

Every time India is hit with any form of terrorism, Pakistan is automatically blamed without a shred of proof or evidence. I am surprised that Pakistan doesn't get blamed when India is hit with natural disasters.

And who is to blame when Pakistan gets dozens and dozens of suicide bombs / Car bombs etc. Pakistan had over 54 suicide bombings and car bombings in it's various cities last year, which killed thousands of innocent people, including Benizer Bhutto.

Did anyone even mention that India could be behind in any of those bombings ?

How many hundreds of thousands of Kashmiries have been killed by the occupation of India? Do we ever hear about them?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:03 PM on 07/26/2008

It is an outrage that these bombs in India have killed so many innocent people.
I am neither Indian nor Pakistani but have dear friends in both countries and I constantly wish that the two countries be at peace. However, Pakistan seems to get blamed without foundation whenever there is a terrorist attack in India. There is an erroneous perception that Pakistan and India are twins with India being the "angelic" twin and Pakistan being the "evil" twin. This stereotype doesn't stand when an outsider intimately knows both countries: Neither one is a perfect angel nor is either one that evil devil either-they both have good and bad traits like every other entity in life.

The bottom line is that both countries should get busy forming a permanent peace because the instability in that part of the world not only affects India and Pakistan but affects the entire world.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:52 PM on 07/26/2008
photo

A direct result of a wildly more radicalized Pakistan. Gotta get that region back in control fast. Pakistan and India both have nukes. This is why more troops on the ground in Afghanistan is dangerous. If we invade eastern Pakistan to get Bin Laden we have to simultaneously lower tensions between India and Pakistan. This whole area of the world could go boom.

J

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:53 PM on 07/26/2008
photo

Spreading the religion of Peace around the world...Mohamed would be pleased...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:12 PM on 07/26/2008
photo

religion ... I don't get it

One People
One Planet

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:46 PM on 07/26/2008
photo

I hear ya...

In the words of the late George Carlin, religion is BS

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MeSSwKffj9o

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:02 PM on 07/26/2008

It is so important that US, EU, Russia, China, India, etc rally together to defeat the islamic insanity; close ALL madrassas; and ensure a more secular education for the next generations of the unfortunate muslim children.

Pakistan has taken over from Afghanistan, and has become the major breeding ground for islamic extremism.

And the USA has unwittingly contributed to the financing of the islamic insanity by sending billions of dollars, which are used to fund the maniac muslims in the Bad Land of Pakistan.

How can the insane islamists be getting so much arms in Pakistan if not by the support of the Pakistani islamic military?

It's a HUGE HUGE MISTAKE to give military aid and military material to muslim countries! Yet the US continues to act recklessly!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:48 PM on 07/26/2008
photo

I agree some, but I disagree some too. First, we shouldn't just go after the muslim extremists. We should go after ALL extremists regardless of their religion. Just getting rid of one side, will only make things easier for the other side to carry out a genocide.

And the Pakistan/Afghanistan comment. Pakistan has ALWAYS been this way. They have never changed, which is why we have always had a rocky relationship with them since they were founded as a country. About the warmest we ever got, was during the late 80's when Bhutto came to power pledging democracy, for which she was run out of the country.Not once, but twice, and murdered on her third try. Afghanistan was destabilized by Pakistan starting around 1994, and helped the Taleban finally rise to power fully in 1996. Their 10's of thousands of troops always fought alongside the Taleban, and even Al Qaeda against the Northern Alliance. And continued til 9/11 happened, when Pakistan still had some 10,000 troops in Afghanistan that they had to evacuate, else 2 nuclear armed countries would invariably come to blows. They continue to harbor and support the Taleban and Al Qaeda. And if you read Musharaff's interview right after the 9/11 attacks, he says it's Pakistans right to meddle in Afghan affairs and to make sure they aren't a threat to Pakistan. ;)

And as far as arming extremist countries, consider this...... we arm both sides of extremism in the Middle East.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:34 PM on 07/26/2008

We have to be careful not to brand all Muslims or for that matter all Muslim countries as terrorists or sponsors of terrorism. You never know who really was behind these latest blasts. Recall that not long ago violence was unleashed on Muslims in Gujarat for burning a train car full of Hindu pilgrims. Evidence to the contrary was ignored until much later. Whenever group of people feel excluded or disenfranchised from the system there is room for instigators to stir up trouble.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:42 PM on 07/26/2008

What is so unwitting about it?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:13 PM on 07/26/2008
photo

I hate it that religious and ethnic violence has to happen everywhere it seems. People killed for no reason than just because they are different. Not that they always look or act different, just because there is some perception that they are different. Sometimes it's simply "if they live here, they must be bad people". I see that in my small southern city even. The seedy "bad" parts of town where people are leery to go. And when crimes happen there, it's largely ignored, or the victim is blamed for daring to be in that area.

And this shows just how ignorant Bush has been about his war on terror. How incredulous his ideologies and mentalities in how to deal with it. You can't just invade one country, then hope it sucks them all in like a vacuum cleaner, all neat and tidy. Real life, the real world, doesn't act like that. I don't know how to solve it either. But more war and more violence sure as hell won't make any progress.

All I can figure is, is we need world role models. Clean up our similar problems here at home, become a shining example for others to be. Espouse tolerance and show it in action. Work with the world community to help deal with problems, crisis' or genocides. One superpower trying to be the world's cop won't work. I think it would require the entire world community to finally stand up together and fix the problems, TOGETHER.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:29 PM on 07/26/2008


...I thought you said you didn't know how to fix it ("solve it")?...
.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:54 PM on 07/26/2008

Life goes on. People in the developing world aren't paralyzed by terrorism. It's a normal part of politics unfortunately. Even I was vacationing in Jaipur (Indian city) a month after a massive bombing killed dozens.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:32 PM on 07/26/2008

Life goes on ??? That was a callous remark. I am from India and how do you know "life goes on" ? And your comment about this being normal part of politics sounds patronizing showing that you know nothing about our politics. You mean to say that we like to kill each other for "politics". These bombings are work of terrorists, not politicians or politics.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:26 PM on 07/26/2008
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in  or  Connect