FCC Approves Sirius-XM Merger In 3-2 Vote

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - FCC Approves Sirius-XM Merger In 3-2 Vote stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

JOHN DUNBAR | July 25, 2008 11:38 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
In this March 20, 2008 file photo, a sign for XM Satellite Radio hangs over its exhibit space at the New York International Auto Show in New York. Federal regulators formally approved the merger of the nation's only two satellite radio operators Friday, ending a 16-month-long drama closely watched by Washington and Wall Street. Sirius Satellite Radio Inc.'s $3.3 billion buyout of rival XM Satellite Radio Holdings Inc. will mean 18 million-plus subscribers will be able to receive programming from both services. (AP Photo/Mark Lennihan, File)

WASHINGTON (AP) _ Federal regulators formally approved the merger of the nation's only two satellite radio operators Friday, ending a 16-month-long drama closely watched by Washington and Wall Street.

Sirius Satellite Radio Inc.'s $3.3 billion buyout of rival XM Satellite Radio Holdings Inc. will mean 18 million-plus subscribers will be able to receive programming from both services. Executives say it will mean huge cost savings that will lead to a first-ever profit for the relatively nascent industry.

The Federal Communications Commission voted 3-2 to approve the buyout, with the tiebreaker coming Friday night from Republican commissioner Deborah Taylor Tate.

Tate had insisted that the companies settle charges that they violated FCC rules before she would approve the deal. The companies agreed this week to pay $19.7 million to the U.S. Treasury for violations related to radio receivers and ground-based signal repeaters.

FCC Chairman Kevin Martin confirmed the final vote Friday night.

"I think it's going to be, in the end, a good thing for consumers and be in the public interest," Martin told The Associated Press. "Consumers will enjoy a variety of programming at reduced prices and more diversified programming choices."

Subscribers will not have to buy new radios to receive a mix of programming from both services, according to the companies. But if they want to pursue a special pay-per-channel a la carte option, they will need new sets.

The approval appeared to hit a glitch on Friday when a dispute surfaced between the chairman and Tate over the enforcement issue, but differences were quickly resolved.

Story continues below
advertisement

The long-running regulatory review was watched closely by exasperated investors anxious for a resolution as well as satellite radio customers with questions about what impact the merger would have on their service.

The approval was a major blow for the land-based radio industry, which lobbied hard against the buyout. It was also opposed by consumer groups, various members of Congress and state attorneys general, all of whom argued a satellite radio merger would hurt consumers and was not in the public interest.

"They kept each other on their toes," Democratic commissioner Jonathan Adelstein said of the two companies. "I hope they keep their edge and don't become a fat and happy monopoly."

Adelstein voted against the buyout as did fellow Democrat Michael Copps. Joining Martin and Tate in approving the deal was Republican commissioner Robert McDowell.

The companies said the combination would create hundreds of millions of dollars in cost savings and lead to greater choice in programming for subscribers and flexible pricing options.

Tate released a statement Friday night praising the commission's decision to punish the companies for rules violations before acting on the merger and supporting pro-consumer conditions imposed on the deal.

Under the terms of the consent decree, XM will pay $17.5 million and Sirius will pay $2.2 million to resolve interference complaints and violations related to land-based signal repeaters the companies operate to deliver programming.

The final merger agreement did not require the combined company to include a chip in its radios that will allow customers to receive digital signals from land-based radio stations, which would have helped the land-based radio industry.

Tate, who was lobbied intensely by the industry in the final weeks, said she "could not in good conscience support a government-mandated requirement on the backs of American consumers at this time."

Martin said the agreement is nearly identical to what he circulated among other commissioners when he first recommended approval for the deal more than a month ago.

The companies first applied for permission to combine in March 2007. The Justice Department approved the deal in March of this year without conditions, saying the companies don't really compete because customers must buy equipment that is exclusive to either XM or Sirius, and subscribers rarely switch providers.

DOJ also agreed with the companies' argument that they compete with other forms of audio entertainment, including digital radio, Internet-based radio stations and even devices like Apple Inc.'s iPod.

FCC approval faced a steeper climb because the companies were prohibited from combining under terms of their licenses. The agency struggled to come up with a way to show that allowing a satellite radio monopoly was in the public interest.

The companies voluntarily agreed to a set of conditions, including a three-year price cap and an 8 percent set-aside of "full-time audio channels" for public interest and minority programming. They will also adopt an "open radio" standard that may lead to a greater variety of features in radios and greater competition among manufacturers.

Sirius and XM also have promised to include a limited "a la carte" offering that would be available within three months of the close of the deal and allow listeners to pay only for the channels they want to receive.

WASHINGTON (AP) _ Federal regulators formally approved the merger of the nation's only two satellite radio operators Friday, ending a 16-month-long drama closely watched by Washington and Wall Street.
WASHINGTON (AP) _ Federal regulators formally approved the merger of the nation's only two satellite radio operators Friday, ending a 16-month-long drama closely watched by Washington and Wall Street.
Filed by Danny Shea  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
79
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 Next › Last » (3 pages total)

I love that Howard Stern quote about this, "I will never vote for a Democrat again. The fact that these Democrats on the FCC are communists. They’re for communism. They don’t want to see companies – this is gangsteris­m."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:42 AM on 07/28/2008
- ibivi I'm a Fan of ibivi 12 fans permalink
photo

Howard, what a jerk. Now that he's awash in millions he's calling people communists. What happened to competition? Too difficulty?
So let's merge because we're in trouble so being bigger will make it easier to snag customers. Last I heard customers just aren't buying pay radio. So go stuff it Howard!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:57 AM on 07/28/2008
- oogabooga I'm a Fan of oogabooga 9 fans permalink

Any palms get greased in this deal? Time for EchoStar or DirectTV to start another radio service.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:07 PM on 07/27/2008
- Raymondf I'm a Fan of Raymondf 4 fans permalink

Worst move in merger history.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:03 AM on 07/27/2008
- lthuedk 1 I'm a Fan of lthuedk 1 47 fans permalink
photo

Break 'em up in '09.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:59 PM on 07/26/2008
- mick7191 I'm a Fan of mick7191 36 fans permalink
photo

The service can't survive separately. Being able to get great music while sitting around a campfire in the middle of the Rockies make this a monopoly worth having. Don't like it? Start an alternative service.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:43 AM on 07/27/2008

They already have an alternate it's called terrestrial radio.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:40 AM on 07/28/2008
- vabear61 I'm a Fan of vabear61 3 fans permalink
photo

Although I mostly listen to Howard Stern on my Sirius, I'm looking forward to more variety on the other channels when I can hear both. Most of the channels on XM and Sirius are duplicated so no big loss there. The concessions are really dumb- giving away channels to under privileged groups (what ever that means) is what caused terrestial radio to suck so bad. And if any of these big companies that benefited from strong lobbying in the past (Hello Clear Channel) could have provided decent programming, I'd have been happy with good old FM all along. All the "worries" are just a disguise for their lobby efforts. Shame on the Dems for caving. Terrestrial radio sucks and no legislation can change that.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:25 PM on 07/26/2008
- SmellyOne I'm a Fan of SmellyOne 28 fans permalink
photo

"Terrestrial radio sucks and no legislation can change that."

It depends where you live if your terrestrial radio sucks or not.

I think it's funny that so many people were saying that Satellite Radio would kill terrestrial radio, when in fact the two sats had to merge to stay in business!!!! HA HA.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:19 PM on 07/26/2008
- Destin I'm a Fan of Destin 55 fans permalink
photo

I always knew satellite radio was gonna suffer. I mean, free radio you can pick up on existing radio's in your car, versus subscription fee based satellite radio in which you'd have to shell out for an additional reciever in-car and 2nd antenna on-car. Too much for most people to want to shell out, just to only enjoy something occasionally, or on long trips. I can see where the homebound, boom box types would bring in some more folks, but again, why have to pay a fee for it? They are gonna run commercials day/night 24/7/365, so they might as well make it free and only charge for the adverts. Then maybe car stereo and home radio makers would then combine in satellite recievers along with everything else. I got a Grundig little portable, it's got everything except satellite. If it had satellite, fine, then I'd listen to it but only for no monthy/yearly fee. Batteries cost enough as it is. ;)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:48 PM on 07/26/2008
- Destin I'm a Fan of Destin 55 fans permalink
photo

I'm gonna start supporting Citgo whenever I need gas, so that my money doesn't go into the neocon's pockets. And I'm not gonna support either terrrestrial or satellite radio anymore. I'll just go shortwave from now on. Thank goodness for my Grundig. :)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:57 PM on 07/26/2008
- suec03 I'm a Fan of suec03 11 fans permalink

Now that 7-Eleven dropped CITGO gas, are there any CITGO's left in California?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:39 PM on 07/26/2008
- Destin I'm a Fan of Destin 55 fans permalink
photo

I'm in Georgia, and there's at least 1 non-7/11 CITGO station here in town, and it's like right by the mall of all places, hehe. Actually is behind the mall by the rear parking lot.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:27 PM on 07/26/2008
- Destin I'm a Fan of Destin 55 fans permalink
photo

Ah, grand old capitalism. Are we sure it isn't socialism in disguise? How else can you preach competiton, then decry anyone wanting competition while the govt purposely sets up these single entity megacorps??

Look at oil, hehe, only Chevron and ExxonMobil are left, and both are outgrowths of the one-time megamonopoly Standard Oil. ;) Also interesting, the Chairman/CEO of Exxon, and whom was with Pfizer, is a huge Bush donor. Chevron's big shot, makes some $13 million annually, and they are sixth biggest oil company.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Oil#Big_Oil That shows the breakdown of the BIG OIL companies. Most oil in the world as you can see, is run by just 6 companies. And serviced largely by 1, Halliburton. ;)

Whatever happened to the good capitalistic mantra of "competition drives down prices"?? How come that is never used?

And in Georgia, radio is owned largely by either Cumulus or Clear Channel, very, very, very few independents left at all. And both those companies might as well function as one, as they are both heavily neocon and big Bush backers.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:52 PM on 07/26/2008
- suec03 I'm a Fan of suec03 11 fans permalink

There are still Shell, BP, the French company Total, and smaller outfits like Valero and ARCO (the former Atlantic Richfield). Venezuelan CITGO has disappeared from the 7-Elevens in southern California but apparently is available in other parts of the US. True, what with the refinery bottleneck in the US, it does seem we have an oligopoly in the supply of gasoline, not free competition. Oligopolies have their own special distorting effects on price.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:47 PM on 07/26/2008
- Destin I'm a Fan of Destin 55 fans permalink
photo

Interesting you mention Velero, hehe, more on them in a minute. But ARCO is part of BP now I had thought. And back to the Valero, I'm not sure there is a refinery bottleneck in the US, as Valero is the largest US refiner that there is, having bought refineries over the years from the big oil companies.

Now, to be fair, Valero is more an energy company, than an oil company. They don't get oil and ship oil, they buy it and refine it, then sell it on the market. Basically an energy retailer, and run some 17 refineries. Interesting, Exxon is one that usally screams about inability to build refineries, and screams about how refining capacity can't keep up with demand.... so why did Exxon sell one of their biggest refineries to Valero?? If what Exxon said was true about supply not being able to keep up with demand, then why are they selling excess refineries?? ;)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:37 PM on 07/26/2008
- Raymondf I'm a Fan of Raymondf 4 fans permalink

they couldn't pay those gigantanormis salaries alone, they had to murge.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:14 PM on 07/26/2008
- soupson52 I'm a Fan of soupson52 13 fans permalink

You got that right. Sirius started out strong. Then they diluted the stock so much (paying themselves and their buddies $$$$$$$$$$$$$) they almost broke it years ago. I wrote a letter to them and got an official (not form) letter back from one of the vp's defending their choice. All I could think is that they were worried I'd hit a possible illegal button.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:24 PM on 07/26/2008

A bunch of people will be laid off. The price will go up. The selection will go down. Howard Stern will work 4 weeks a year instead of 4 days a week.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:06 PM on 07/26/2008

jobs may be lost, but the price will go down or stay the same, selection will go up.

can't wait!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:31 PM on 07/26/2008
- soupson52 I'm a Fan of soupson52 13 fans permalink

If price goes up on mine I will give up my sirius.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:22 PM on 07/26/2008
- kidshare I'm a Fan of kidshare 2 fans permalink

I love my XM radio, I get baseball games, the two music channels I like (50s rock and bluegrass) and I use it heavily during longer road trips. I live in northern nevada and enjoy the hell out of my XM in the middle of nowhere during 4x4ing.

What I'm worried about is I'm going to have to buy a new radio and have my contract with XM (2 years left) renegotiated without me having a say about it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:01 PM on 07/26/2008

The article stated no you will not have to buy new equipment. That has also been touted by both xm and sirius, did you not pay attention?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:43 AM on 07/28/2008

This was one decision where the Republicans got it right, and the Dems got it wrong.

They let the merger of oil, media, and drug companies go through without a hitch, but for what is technically a luxury item (not for me, I need my Sirius since I travel a bunch), they take almost a year and a half to approve.

This was a prime example of how poisonous the lobbies can be. It should shine yet another light on where we have gone wrong.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:28 PM on 07/26/2008
- olderdem I'm a Fan of olderdem 10 fans permalink

The Dems in this case were an embarrassment, pandering to the interests of Clear Channel and the NAB. Amazing lack of understanding of the massive competition that exists in the audio entertainment market today. So much so that several analysts believe the merged company will still have a tough time competiting.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:12 PM on 07/26/2008
- olderdem I'm a Fan of olderdem 10 fans permalink

The 2 Dems that voted against the merger played into the hands of Clear Channel (who just signed liberal Rush Limbaugh to a $400 million contract) and the National Association of Broadcasters. Those 2 are an embarrassment -- not looking out for consumers, but special interests. I can only hope this part of the Democratic party goes away with Obama as President.

The merger should have been approved long ago. Shameful that it took so long.

Note this quote from the NAB (even as they plead for more consolidation of their broadcasters). Seems they are all for competition as long as its not with them.

"We continue to believe that consumers are best served by competition rather than monopolies," said National Association of Broadcasters Vice President Dennis Wharton, following Friday night's vote.
http://www.forbes.com/2008/07/26/satellite-radio-merger-biz-wash-cx_bw_0726xmsirius.html?partner=yahootix

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:16 PM on 07/26/2008
- heal57 I'm a Fan of heal57 25 fans permalink

I totally disagree; no competition is never good for Americans.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:05 AM on 07/27/2008
- oogabooga I'm a Fan of oogabooga 9 fans permalink

Hey, cut out all of that wasteful competition, right NeoCons? One grocery (Wal-Mart), one gas station (ExxonMobi­lChevronTe­xacoConoco­PhilipsShe­ll), one airline (Air Nightmare), etc. Businesses can really cut those costs! No more competition, no more choice, wheeeeee!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:07 PM on 07/26/2008

Quite the contrary!

Security of my choices! Freedom to reject the media consolidation that is terrestrial radio. Clear Channel who owns 1200 stations dictating what I can listen to?

NO SIR!

Viva the Merger! Viva Freedom!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:19 PM on 07/26/2008

You must not be aware that Clear Channel is a major investor in XM.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:59 PM on 07/26/2008
- Ray46 I'm a Fan of Ray46 5 fans permalink

Big surprise.
Did they ever disapprove a merger in recent history?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:49 PM on 07/26/2008

Expect more commercials, lot and lots of commercials. I will likely cancel my subscription within a year.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:41 PM on 07/26/2008
- Big0725 I'm a Fan of Big0725 23 fans permalink
photo

In favor of what?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:43 PM on 07/26/2008

Not likely, but if you choose to do so that's your choice.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:22 PM on 07/26/2008
Page: 1 2 3 Next › Last » (3 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect