Los Angeles To Vote On Fast Food Ban

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

CHRISTINA HOAG | July 29, 2008 11:42 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »

Customers enter a McDonald's restaurant in Los Angeles on Monday, July 28, 2008. In South Los Angeles, fast food is also the easiest cuisine to find, and that's a problem for elected officials who see it as an unhealthy source of calories and cholesterol. The City Council is poised to vote Tuesday on a moratorium on new fast-food restaurants in a swath of the city where a proliferation of such eateries goes hand in hand with more fat adults and chunky children than other areas of Los Angeles. (AP Photo/Matt Sayles)

LOS ANGELES — City officials are putting South Los Angeles on a diet. The City Council voted unanimously Tuesday to place a moratorium on new fast food restaurants in an impoverished swath of the city with a proliferation of such eateries and above average rates of obesity.

The yearlong moratorium is intended to give the city time to attract restaurants that serve healthier food. The action, which the mayor must still sign into law, is believed to be the first of its kind by a major city to protect public health.

"Our communities have an extreme shortage of quality foods," City Councilman Bernard Parks said.

Representatives of fast-food chains said they support the goal of better diets but believe they are being unfairly targeted. They say they already offer healthier food items on their menus.

"It's not where you eat, it's what you eat," said Andrew Pudzer, president and chief executive of CKE Restaurants, parent company of Carl's Jr. "We were willing to work with the city on that, but they obviously weren't interested."

The California Restaurant Association and its members will consider a legal challenge to the ordinance, spokesman Andrew Casana said.

Thirty percent of adults in South Los Angeles area are obese, compared to 19.1 percent for the metropolitan area and 14.1 percent for the affluent Westside, according to the Los Angeles County Department of Public Health.

Research has shown that people will change eating habits when different foods are offered, but cost is a key factor in poor communities, said Kelly D. Brownell, director of Yale University's Rudd Center for Food Policy and Obesity.

Story continues below
advertisement

"Cheap, unhealthy food and lack of access to healthy food is a recipe for obesity," Brownell said. "Diets improve when healthy food establishments enter these neighborhoods."

A report by the Community Health Councils found 73 percent of South Los Angeles restaurants were fast food, compared to 42 percent in West Los Angeles.

South Los Angeles resident Curtis English acknowledged that fast food is loaded with calories and cholesterol. But since he's unemployed and does not have a car, it serves as a cheap, convenient staple for him.

On Monday, he ate breakfast and lunch _ a sausage burrito and double cheeseburger, respectively _ at a McDonald's a few blocks from home for just $2.39.

"I don't think there's too many fast food places," he said. "People like it."

Others welcomed an opportunity to get different kinds of food into their neighborhood.

"They should open more healthy places," Dorothy Meighan said outside a Kentucky Fried Chicken outlet. "There's too much fried stuff."

Councilwoman Jan Perry said that view repeatedly surfaced at the five community meetings she held during the past two years. Residents are tired of fast food, and many don't have cars to drive to places with other choices, she said.

Los Angeles' ban comes at a time when governments of all levels are increasingly viewing menus as a matter of public health. On Friday, California became the first state in the nation to bar trans fats, which lower levels of good cholesterol and increase bad cholesterol.

The moratorium, which can be extended up to a year, only affects standalone restaurants, not eateries located in malls or strip shopping centers. It defines fast-food restaurants as those that do not offer table service and provide a limited menu of pre-prepared or quickly heated food in disposable wrapping.

The definition exempts "fast-food casual" restaurants such as El Pollo Loco, Subway and Pastagina, which do not have drive-through windows or heat lamps and prepare fresh food to order.

The ordinance also makes it harder for existing fast-food restaurants to expand or remodel.

Rebeca Torres, a South Los Angeles mother of four, said she would welcome more dining choices, even if she had to pay a little more.

"They should have better things for children," she said. "This fast food really fattens them up."

LOS ANGELES — City officials are putting South Los Angeles on a diet. The City Council voted unanimously Tuesday to place a moratorium on new fast food restaurants in an impoverished swath of th...
LOS ANGELES — City officials are putting South Los Angeles on a diet. The City Council voted unanimously Tuesday to place a moratorium on new fast food restaurants in an impoverished swath of th...
 
Comments
17
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
photo

What about the fat azzes that lurk in white neighborhoods. Is LA gonna play Daddy-Knows-Best with them too? This seems dumb and discriminatory. These folks are poor. If the market could support a Whole Grain Cafe and Tofu Diner, it would have already done so.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:39 PM on 07/30/2008

what people eat is none of the L.A. government's business.

it's a choice people have the right to make.

if people want to eat Mickey's D's then by god eat it. if people want to eat tofu and bean sprouts, same thing.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:31 AM on 07/30/2008

Welcome to the Peoples Republic of Los Angeles.......liberals are the neo commies.

And Nancy Pelosi says she's saving the planet.....next they will outlaw Wal Marts, then SUV's, then smoking. Meanwhile, theres a bunch of guys in Al Queda trying to kill us. A fact that dawned on Barry Obama last week. Liberals are too busy outlawing food and plastic bags......wait???? u mean Al Queda wants to kill US>?

Wake up people......we need government focused on protecting us from outside threats.....not a government that protects us from ourselves

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:21 PM on 07/29/2008
photo

written like the true neocon neanderthal that you are. if we didnt have our asses over there where we dont belong then we could protect our borders and the al queda threat. and yeah...we should ban plastic bags, food that is killing our citizens, mega corporations who exploit foreign workers so we can buy cheap stuff, and yep...we gotta get rid of the suvs. so there.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:45 PM on 07/29/2008

Welcome to the nanny state, where decisions are made for you.

The general public, especially the "poor" ones, are too stupid to make their own decisions.

They need Libs to do it for them.

I guess you get what you vote for.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:01 PM on 07/29/2008

All this ban is going to do is punish the low-income people even more. Now, they'll spend more time, money, and gas going to a fast-food restaurant outside the banned area.
Or, alternately, since the law allows the already-existing fast food restaurants to remain, it will stifle competition and enable those restaurants to raise their prices without fear that competition will keep prices low.
Either way, the L.A. City Council is taking money out of the pockets of poor people.
If they're going to go to the trouble of banning certain types of restaurants, why not just pass a law dictating what people can and can't eat?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:54 PM on 07/29/2008

Will I need a prescription from my Doctor to get a cheeseburger?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:06 PM on 07/29/2008
photo

IN AND OUT! IN AND OUT! IN AND OUT! IN AND OUT! IN AND OUT! IN AND OUT!
IN AND OUT! IN AND OUT! IN AND OUT! IN AND OUT! IN AND OUT! IN AND OUT!
IN AND OUT! IN AND OUT! IN AND OUT! IN AND OUT! IN AND OUT! IN AND OUT!
IN AND OUT! IN AND OUT! IN AND OUT! IN AND OUT! IN AND OUT! IN AND OUT!
IN AND OUT! IN AND OUT! IN AND OUT! IN AND OUT! IN AND OUT! IN AND OUT!
IN AND OUT! IN AND OUT! IN AND OUT! IN AND OUT! IN AND OUT! IN AND OUT!
IN AND OUT! IN AND OUT! IN AND OUT! IN AND OUT! IN AND OUT! IN AND OUT!
IN AND OUT! IN AND OUT! IN AND OUT! IN AND OUT! IN AND OUT! IN AND OUT!
IN AND OUT! IN AND OUT! IN AND OUT! IN AND OUT! IN AND OUT! IN AND OUT!
IN AND OUT! IN AND OUT! IN AND OUT! IN AND OUT! IN AND OUT! IN AND OUT!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:49 PM on 07/29/2008
photo

lol....i agree that they are the best burgers anywhere but no one outside of california knows what you are talking about. that said, i met some euro tourists the other day who ask me to direct them to the nearest in-and-out. love it

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:46 PM on 07/29/2008

This is another unfortunate example of the government responding to a national concern by doing the least effective, yet most headline worthy action possible. Healthy food is expensive food. One of the major reasons fast food is so popular is that you can get a full meal for a small price. It is also very convenient. Someone with little time can get a meal on the go. These days, more and more people have less time and money to spend on food. This increases the popularity of cheap food, either from a restaurant or the grocery store. I admit, I do not have a good solution to this problem. But make no mistake, not letting McDonald's put another store in LA isn't going to do the trick.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:50 PM on 07/29/2008
photo

I really like it when the government thinks for and protects me from myself. But instead of limiting my choices of where to eat can they just plan my meals for me? We could have a national dinner czar!

If the people of this part of LA wanted healthy food wouldn't those evil capitalist have already swooped in and opened a store for this? People might say they want healthy food, they might claim they will pay extra for healthy food but the facts don't support it. Remember the McLean hamburger of the 1990's? It was 91% fat free and a McFlop. Nobody would eat it.

Are resturants and health food stores currently prohibited from opening shop in this part of town? If a juice bar were to open up would the local police lock the doors and arrest everyone inside? If there is no prohibition how come none have come to this community? How will forcibly closing a few fast food places, and firing their attending employees, help matters?

Many fast food places offer healthy fare in addition to their greasy bread and butter. If we run some of these resturants out of town we run that healthy food out with them and no one will take their place. Whole Foods isn't going to open a new store in Compton.

Healthy food is available to the people if they want it, they choose what they will eat. Individual freedom is the best way to make choices available to people.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:46 PM on 07/29/2008

oh, hey, i have another one for you. so this company is trading, like, trillions of dollars per day, and the CEO made 13.4 million per year, but he didn't do a good job and the company's on the verge of going bankrupt. then, the government steps in and bails it out with taxpayers' dollars. is that also evil to you? it should be because it's alot more socialist than outlawing fast food in one part of la. and guess what? a republican did it!!! if you want to whine and cry about socialism being scary, do it about something that matters.

one of my favorite things about san francisco is the lack of fast food restaurants, and believe me, there are plenty of poor people in sf and they still manage to eat. wether it's something better than burger king is up for debate. but does america really need any more fast food restaurants? i'm all for this as well as the bans on trans-fats in new york.

and besides, nobody's closing down any restaurants, they are just prohibiting the opening of new ones. read the article more carefully next time.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:08 PM on 07/29/2008
photo

I didn't mention anything about socialism but we can agree that there should be no federal bailout of any company. Republican, Democrat... they're all the same which is why I am Libertarian.

I will confess I misread about the stores not being closed down but rather no new stores can now open but I still object to this law. If I own a tract of land there and I want to open a resturant why shouldn't I be able to? If the people in that area like my resturant then they will support it and I will prosper. If they don't like what I have to serve the customers will stay away and I will close my doors. The people decided for themselves, why is that unreasonable?

You neglected to respond to my question of why there are no health food stores in that area now. Is there a likewise prohibition on health food stores opening in that area like the fast food stores prohibition that was just introduced? How will this new prohibition change things? Will the city give tax dollars to health food stores to open in this area and keep them afloat? Is taxing the poor and then giving their money to corporations to open stores the poor don't want to shop at really benefiting the poor?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:09 AM on 07/30/2008

The people who live in California should demand a Vote on the issue.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:27 AM on 07/30/2008

The government has to do something. They can't solve the energy problem, economic problems, school problems, etc. This one was probably a no-brainer for the Pelosi crowd.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:34 AM on 07/31/2008

i'm sure people will site all sorts of reasons why this is trampling on personal liberty.

but as a medical student with a masters in public health.. i am extremely pleased to see the government have the courage to step in to curb some of the most fatal and easily preventable diseases known in our time.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:50 PM on 07/29/2008
photo

As a medical student, you should support outlawing all driving of cars, as some of the most fatal and easily preventable emergency room accidents come from driving cars.

You can't protect people from life. And why would you want to?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:44 PM on 07/29/2008
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in  or  Connect