iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

So Long, Scrabulous! Hasbro/Scrabble Wins

First Posted: 07-29-08 03:38 PM   |   Updated: 08- 6-08 05:12 AM

What's Your Reaction?
Scrabulous

What's a nine-letter word for copyright?

Well, er: C-O-P-Y-R-I-G-H-T.

The popular Facebook application Scrabulous, a word-making board game that quite closely resembled Hasbro's Scrabble, is no more. Users who logged in today found the following message:

"Scrabulous is disabled for US and Canadian users until further notice. If you would like to stay informed about developments in this matter, please click here."

It's the latest, and possibly last chapter in the copyright battle after an actual Scrabble-named application recently showed up on Facebook. Per CNET's social networking blog The Social, Scrabulous went down because its makers surrendered:

Facebook users in the U.S. and Canada can no longer access Scrabulous, the faux-Scrabble game that quickly became one of the most popular applications on its developer platform.

This was done independently on behalf of the Scrabulous creators, a Facebook representative told CNET News in an e-mail Tuesday. "In response to a legal request from Hasbro, the copyright and trademark holder for Scrabble in the U.S. and Canada, the developers of Scrabulous have suspended their application in the U.S. and Canada until further notice," the e-mail explained.

Turns out the two brothers -- Rajat and Jayant Agarwall -- who created Scrabulous may have turned down a shot at a cool ten million bucks from the game's owners (including Hasbro and Electronic Arts) to keep some form of Scrabulous online:

According to this New York Times article, Jayant Agarwalla said that he and his brother did not create Scrabulous to make money - they just wanted to play Scrabble on their computers. So why didn't they accept the big check then? The brothers decided to turn down the check, rumored to be around the $10 million mark; apparently, they were holding out for more money. How much more? A multiple of several times $10 million by some accounts. Even though the game, by all fair estimates, was probably only worth around $3-6 million, the brothers felt they deserved more.

If it's us, we take the $10 million. Or the $3 million. But we don't take door #2, which turns out to be a Scrabulous lawsuit from Hasbro. Yeah, that dropped last week.

So, beyond two guys being $10 million poorer than they could have been, what's the impact? Evidently, people are upset. As the news spread across the internerd, Scrabulous-mourning Facebook statuses updated like wildfire according to a Forbes blog. Their sampling:

*DK misses Scrabulous and resents THE MAN.
*RM wonders if she can keep playing Scrabulous if she changes her location to, say, Singapore... anyone try that yet?
*AS is trying to find out why Facebook shut down Scrabulous.
*LH OMG! It's time for a SCRABULOUS riot!

Meanwhile, our friends at Silicon Alley Insider think the brothers Agarwall could still reap some benefit:

Earlier this year we heard the Agarwall brothers had been offered a substantial check from Hasbro and other companies with a claim to the Scrabble brand (there are several), but that they were holding out for more. We still think that in the end, they'll walk away with something, since they've got a wildly popular app on their hands. But the takedown certainly removes a whole lot of leverage, and makes it possible that they'll end up with zilch.

In the meantime, it certainly helps EA's Scrabble Beta, which has 14,956 daily users after five days. Expect that to grow now that Scrabulous (509,505 daily active users) is history.

Give that EA Scrabble Beta a try, or read on about Facebook here at the Huffington Post.

What's a nine-letter word for copyright? Well, er: C-O-P-Y-R-I-G-H-T. The popular Facebook application Scrabulous, a word-making board game that quite closely resembled Hasbro's Scrabble, is no mor...
What's a nine-letter word for copyright? Well, er: C-O-P-Y-R-I-G-H-T. The popular Facebook application Scrabulous, a word-making board game that quite closely resembled Hasbro's Scrabble, is no mor...
Filed by Dave Burdick  |  Report Corrections
 
 
  • Comments
  • 8
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
07:34 AM on 07/30/2008
They were stealing someone else's business--clear an simple. Hearing that they wanted more than $10 million shows them as just thieves. Why is it that Indians can do nothing but steal? I work in the software industry and have yet to meet an Indian with a creative bone in his or her body. They just copy and steal.
01:37 AM on 07/31/2008
your critical thinking skills are truly impressive....
12:11 AM on 07/30/2008
There's this thing going on. Called a presidential campaign for two guys who want to be president of a pretty big country. More important? Yes. But people are usually distracted by shiny things so this isn't a surprise.
photo
DRaymond
Network administrator, voiceovers
09:42 PM on 07/29/2008
They were just plain greedy (I'm meaning the brothers Agarwalla) not to mention stupid. They would lose a copyright suit, hands down. The look, color and function of double and triple word scores, etc. was just too identical and the name too similar. Ten million was extrordinarily generous. Even four to six million was very generous. What value was it really to Hasbro? A few hundred hours of programming time and avoiding the time and legal costs of utterly crushing the brothers in a copyright lawsuit.
06:57 PM on 07/29/2008
Copyright scrabble is a little to close to copyright the alphabet, for comfort.
06:33 PM on 07/29/2008
I'm actually logged in to Bingo Boomers as I type this. Wasn't even aware what was going on, but I'm not in the US or Canada which is why I am still able to play.

If I didn't read Huff Post everyday I wouldn't know about this.
photo
DRaymond
Network administrator, voiceovers
09:48 PM on 07/29/2008
Bingo is not copyrighted or trademarked. The problem wasn't just that Scrabulous was too similar to the name Scrabble, but that the game was a deliberate copy. The former you might have fooled a jury on, but not the latter.
06:23 PM on 07/29/2008
Yeah, big news story. Thanks so much.

Yawn...