Judge: White House Aides Can Be Subpoenaed

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Judge: White House Aides Can Be Subpoenaed stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS


First Posted: 07-31-08 11:08 AM   |   Updated: 08- 8-08 05:12 AM

I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Miers

WASHINGTON — President Bush's top advisers are not immune from congressional subpoenas, a federal judge ruled Thursday in a long-running dispute between the two political branches.

Congressional Democrats called the ruling a ringing endorsement of the principle that nobody is above the law. They swiftly announced that the Bush officials who have defied their subpoenas, including Bush's former top adviser Karl Rove, must appear as part of a probe of whether the White House directed the firings of nine federal prosecutors. Democrats announced plans to open hearings at the height of election season.

The Bush administration was expected to appeal.

In his ruling, U.S. District Judge John Bates said there's no legal basis for Bush's argument and that his former legal counsel, Harriet Miers, must appear before Congress. If she wants to refuse to testify, he said, she must do so in person. The committee also has sought to force testimony from White House chief of staff Joshua Bolten.

"Harriet Miers is not immune from compelled congressional process; she is legally required to testify pursuant to a duly issued congressional subpoena," Bates wrote. He said that both Bolten and Miers must give Congress all nonprivileged documents related to the firings.

Bates, who was appointed to the bench by Bush, issued a 93-page opinion that strongly rejected the administration's legal arguments. He noted that the executive branch could not point to a single case in which courts held that White House aides were immune from congressional subpoenas.

"That simple yet critical fact bears repeating: the asserted absolute immunity claim here is entirely unsupported by existing case law," Bates wrote.

The ruling is a blow to the Bush administration's efforts to bolster the power of the executive branch at the expense of the legislative branch. Disputes over congressional subpoenas are normally resolved through political compromise, not through the court system. Had Bush prevailed, it would have dramatically weakened congressional authority in oversight investigations.

Story continues below
advertisement

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., left open the prospect of a full House vote on a contempt citation against Rove, who defied his subpoena to appear before the Judiciary Committee on July 10.

"It certainly strengthens our hand," she said of Bates' ruling. "This decision should send a clear signal to the Bush administration that it must cooperate fully with Congress and that former administration officials Harriet Miers and Karl Rove must testify before Congress."

That wasn't clear at all to the White House or Rove's attorney.

Bush administration lawyers were still considering whether to appeal, but there was no doubt what they thought of the ruling.

"We disagree with the district court's decision," White House spokeswoman Dana Perino said.

With only a few months left in Bush's presidency, there appeared to be no sense of urgency to come to a decision.

"I have not yet talked with anyone at the White House ... and don't expect that this matter will be finally resolved in the very near future," Rove attorney Robert Luskin said in an e-mail.

The House Judiciary Committee's senior Republican, Rep. Lamar Smith of Texas, said he was pleased the court ruled in Congress' favor, but he cautioned that an ongoing showdown in federal court could ultimately curtail Congress' powers, and he urged Democrats and the White House to strike an agreement.

"Unfortunately, today's victory may be short-lived," Smith said in a statement. "If the administration appeals the ruling, our congressional prerogatives will once again be put at risk."

The chairmen of the House and Senate Judiciary Committees quickly demanded that the White House officials subpoenaed appear before their panels.

Rep. John Conyers, D-Mich., chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, signaled that hearings would commence in September on the controversy that scandalized the Justice Department and led to the resignation of a longtime presidential confidant, Attorney General Alberto Gonzales.

"We look forward to the White House complying with this ruling and to scheduling future hearings with Ms. Miers and other witnesses who have relied on such claims," Conyers said in a statement. "We hope that the defendants will accept this decision and expect that we will receive relevant documents and call Ms. Miers to testify in September."

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., said, "I look forward to working with the White House and the Justice Department to coordinate the long overdue appearances."

___

Associated Press reporters Laurie Kellman and Ben Evans contributed to this story.

WASHINGTON — President Bush's top advisers are not immune from congressional subpoenas, a federal judge ruled Thursday in a long-running dispute between the two political branches. Congressiona...
WASHINGTON — President Bush's top advisers are not immune from congressional subpoenas, a federal judge ruled Thursday in a long-running dispute between the two political branches. Congressiona...
Filed by Rachel Weiner  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
245
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next › Last » (9 pages total)
- JLee I'm a Fan of JLee 4 fans permalink

And Bates a current administration appointee, too. W must be kicking himself over this. Should've appointed a stuffed robe who simply parrots the party line, and the still-President can't even get THAT right?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:54 PM on 07/31/2008
- JackND I'm a Fan of JackND 28 fans permalink

The judge he appoints has no obligation to placate corruption, even that of the guy that hired him.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:06 PM on 07/31/2008
- JLee I'm a Fan of JLee 4 fans permalink

That's why Article III judges are guaranteed their independence, but they could still be ideological fanatics along the lines of Yoo or Bolton. With another W appointee finding against intelligent design in public school (Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District), I find it really interesting that Still-President GWB couldn't find enough pro-administration authoritarians to fill the federal courts. Or maybe guaranteed independence does funny things to these federal judges' brains. Or maybe they're still Americans.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:30 PM on 07/31/2008
- Lion24 I'm a Fan of Lion24 107 fans permalink
photo

Pelosi and Conyers willingly forfeited their duties and responsibilities some time ago. In the end, they will do nothing whatsoever to protect the Constitution -- not in this case or any other case.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:50 PM on 07/31/2008
- chronic I'm a Fan of chronic 71 fans permalink
photo

OK Dems, what are we waiting for?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:48 PM on 07/31/2008
- osage I'm a Fan of osage 292 fans permalink
photo

The "legal" noose is tightening. The only benefits that may be derived from the delay of an appeal are "political" ones, and they may not help Republicans anyway. Delaying the inevitable for "political" purposes will not alter or prevent the "legal" requirement of testifying under oath before congress. This was an incredibly significant ruling because it asserted and confirmed the power of congressional oversight over the Bush administration. Bush can't prevent the truth from eventually being known unless those tesitifying are willing to claim the fifth or lie and run the risk of having a Democratic AG investigate and prosecute them for witholding evidence and or perjury. It was a good day for our founding fathers.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:47 PM on 07/31/2008
- Dangoodbar I'm a Fan of Dangoodbar 5 fans permalink

The question I have is what about pardons. Does Bush have the power to give blanket pardons for any crimes between certain dates even if there are no indictments.

That is can Bush give all his cronies Nixon like pardons?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:46 PM on 07/31/2008
- Wiredwilly I'm a Fan of Wiredwilly 23 fans permalink

Impeach Bush. Now.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:43 PM on 07/31/2008
- Rosey I'm a Fan of Rosey 6 fans permalink

Finally, those (to quote Al Francken's book title) alleged "Lying Liars" ...will be held accountable! That is if the wimps in Congress can get a backbone!!!!! Can't wait til someone decides Rove and Rummy need to be held accountable... Fat Chance! And Bushie the biggest LL will pardon them all! No final court decisions until after Bush is out of office so he cannot pardon them!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:43 PM on 07/31/2008

As soon as September? As soon as September? What's wrong with Monday?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:43 PM on 07/31/2008

How about this afternoon? Congress has been milking this cow for a long time........with no milk production.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:50 PM on 07/31/2008
- Bitsko I'm a Fan of Bitsko 502 fans permalink
photo

Bring out the churn, Pa!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:03 PM on 07/31/2008
- HBeachbum I'm a Fan of HBeachbum 11 fans permalink

They're taking another vacation. First things first.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:52 PM on 07/31/2008

Much better to have it play out during the general election campaign.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:53 PM on 07/31/2008
- Dave01 I'm a Fan of Dave01 9 fans permalink

I totally agree. Let it play out in September and October. This way everyone can be reminded about the links between Bush, Mc"Needs A"Cain and Karl Rove.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:14 PM on 07/31/2008
- dadw5boys I'm a Fan of dadw5boys 278 fans permalink
photo

September is perfect!!!!!!!

As long as Congress is in town then Bush will not be albe to make a move towards attacking Iraq. Which is what many feared will happen when Congress goes into recess.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:33 PM on 07/31/2008
photo

The sad thing that has now been ingrained into our society is, when introduced to someone and then ask them what they do for a living...they said I'm in politics, it's like them saying, I'm in ORGANIZED CRIME!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:41 PM on 07/31/2008
- NotWaldo I'm a Fan of NotWaldo 44 fans permalink
photo

Crime does not pay... as well as politics.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:56 PM on 07/31/2008
photo

Unless it's crime IN politics, and in that case, it pays very well indeed....

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:02 PM on 07/31/2008
- smilodon1 I'm a Fan of smilodon1 7 fans permalink

Sadly Crime=Politics thanks to republicanderthals.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:02 PM on 07/31/2008
photo


No, my comment was not already posted!

No, I won't wait for the slovenly sin-sores.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:38 PM on 07/31/2008
- JoeLib I'm a Fan of JoeLib 10 fans permalink
photo

Oooh! Contempt... of CONGRESS no less... oooOOooooh! Watch out... those brave men and women in the House Democratic Party might begin to think about maybe considering assessment of possible options to initially review choices for potential further consideration!

Yeah. We'll get you Rove... you know... maybe... if that option is still on the table. We're not sure... and kind of afraid to ask Nancy P about the table and what's still on the table because it might make it appear like we're actually doing something to defend the nation against the Bush Administration.

To sum up: Congressional Dems are huge cowards. Thanks Nancy! Way to go Harry! Heckuva job defending that Constitution.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:36 PM on 07/31/2008
photo


So now 'checks and balances' are only a belief?

WTF Nancy? How long are you going to wait for

some one else to do your Constitutional duty??

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:34 PM on 07/31/2008
- noamjunior I'm a Fan of noamjunior 85 fans permalink

for every alcoholic sociopath, there is an enabler- one who looks the other way muttering "It's not that bad"
Mrs Pelosi- why are you enabling the bush administration?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:42 PM on 07/31/2008
- Heavy I'm a Fan of Heavy 232 fans permalink
photo

R0ve has dirt on everyone he can.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:14 PM on 07/31/2008
- elbzee I'm a Fan of elbzee 21 fans permalink
photo

I'd guess she'll let her successor do it. Cuz at this rate, she won't be around long enough to do it herself.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:15 PM on 07/31/2008
- Toonadude I'm a Fan of Toonadude 15 fans permalink

I sure hope that Harriet finds the climate in Paraguay to her liking.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:31 PM on 07/31/2008
photo

How many times can Bush appeal this until it gets to the supreme court? Can anybody answer this for me?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:31 PM on 07/31/2008
- dadw5boys I'm a Fan of dadw5boys 278 fans permalink
photo

4

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:37 PM on 07/31/2008

The American dream is that everyone can become rich and well connected enough to be immune from prosecution. Holding people accountable for things they do and say strikes at the very heart of American life

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:30 PM on 07/31/2008
- Toonadude I'm a Fan of Toonadude 15 fans permalink

If we held the president accountable for things done and said it would eliminate the criminal element from the candidate pool. I don't know who would be left in the pool but I'm betting that the average American would not view him or her as presidential material.

We've come a long way since January 20, 1981.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:48 PM on 07/31/2008
- geobushono I'm a Fan of geobushono 15 fans permalink

I have met many millionaires in my business, and even the good ones are not like you and me. They have an entirely different set of priorities, and rocking the boat is WAY LOW on the list.
They might be for voter rights-gay rights-antiwar.the whole litany of Democratic (stated) positions, but, attacking the corporate tax structure-corporate welfare are not even a passing thought...it doesn't make them bad people, but in a Congress & Senate that is your basic millionaires club, don't expect any real changes.....it is always about the money.....­.....minim­um wage and healthcare are not a problem at the top. And it will not be addressed by either Party populated with millionair­es........­........
..............and for those of you who think you're going to 'make it' to the top, keep dreaming, it fuels the machine with energetic middle managers.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:52 PM on 07/31/2008
- dadw5boys I'm a Fan of dadw5boys 278 fans permalink
photo

I hope to see Miers jailed for her coverup of Bush being AWOL from the National Guard and the Officers involuved jailed for Lieing and hiding a crimnal from justice.

AWOL is serious espically if it last more than 90 days that is deseration and has 5 to 10 years of jail time!!!!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:41 PM on 07/31/2008
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next › Last » (9 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect