Judge: White House Aides Can Be Subpoenaed

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Judge: White House Aides Can Be Subpoenaed stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS


First Posted: 07-31-08 11:08 AM   |   Updated: 08- 8-08 05:12 AM

I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Miers

WASHINGTON — President Bush's top advisers are not immune from congressional subpoenas, a federal judge ruled Thursday in a long-running dispute between the two political branches.

Congressional Democrats called the ruling a ringing endorsement of the principle that nobody is above the law. They swiftly announced that the Bush officials who have defied their subpoenas, including Bush's former top adviser Karl Rove, must appear as part of a probe of whether the White House directed the firings of nine federal prosecutors. Democrats announced plans to open hearings at the height of election season.

The Bush administration was expected to appeal.

In his ruling, U.S. District Judge John Bates said there's no legal basis for Bush's argument and that his former legal counsel, Harriet Miers, must appear before Congress. If she wants to refuse to testify, he said, she must do so in person. The committee also has sought to force testimony from White House chief of staff Joshua Bolten.

"Harriet Miers is not immune from compelled congressional process; she is legally required to testify pursuant to a duly issued congressional subpoena," Bates wrote. He said that both Bolten and Miers must give Congress all nonprivileged documents related to the firings.

Bates, who was appointed to the bench by Bush, issued a 93-page opinion that strongly rejected the administration's legal arguments. He noted that the executive branch could not point to a single case in which courts held that White House aides were immune from congressional subpoenas.

"That simple yet critical fact bears repeating: the asserted absolute immunity claim here is entirely unsupported by existing case law," Bates wrote.

The ruling is a blow to the Bush administration's efforts to bolster the power of the executive branch at the expense of the legislative branch. Disputes over congressional subpoenas are normally resolved through political compromise, not through the court system. Had Bush prevailed, it would have dramatically weakened congressional authority in oversight investigations.

Story continues below
advertisement

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., left open the prospect of a full House vote on a contempt citation against Rove, who defied his subpoena to appear before the Judiciary Committee on July 10.

"It certainly strengthens our hand," she said of Bates' ruling. "This decision should send a clear signal to the Bush administration that it must cooperate fully with Congress and that former administration officials Harriet Miers and Karl Rove must testify before Congress."

That wasn't clear at all to the White House or Rove's attorney.

Bush administration lawyers were still considering whether to appeal, but there was no doubt what they thought of the ruling.

"We disagree with the district court's decision," White House spokeswoman Dana Perino said.

With only a few months left in Bush's presidency, there appeared to be no sense of urgency to come to a decision.

"I have not yet talked with anyone at the White House ... and don't expect that this matter will be finally resolved in the very near future," Rove attorney Robert Luskin said in an e-mail.

The House Judiciary Committee's senior Republican, Rep. Lamar Smith of Texas, said he was pleased the court ruled in Congress' favor, but he cautioned that an ongoing showdown in federal court could ultimately curtail Congress' powers, and he urged Democrats and the White House to strike an agreement.

"Unfortunately, today's victory may be short-lived," Smith said in a statement. "If the administration appeals the ruling, our congressional prerogatives will once again be put at risk."

The chairmen of the House and Senate Judiciary Committees quickly demanded that the White House officials subpoenaed appear before their panels.

Rep. John Conyers, D-Mich., chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, signaled that hearings would commence in September on the controversy that scandalized the Justice Department and led to the resignation of a longtime presidential confidant, Attorney General Alberto Gonzales.

"We look forward to the White House complying with this ruling and to scheduling future hearings with Ms. Miers and other witnesses who have relied on such claims," Conyers said in a statement. "We hope that the defendants will accept this decision and expect that we will receive relevant documents and call Ms. Miers to testify in September."

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., said, "I look forward to working with the White House and the Justice Department to coordinate the long overdue appearances."

___

Associated Press reporters Laurie Kellman and Ben Evans contributed to this story.

WASHINGTON — President Bush's top advisers are not immune from congressional subpoenas, a federal judge ruled Thursday in a long-running dispute between the two political branches. Congressiona...
WASHINGTON — President Bush's top advisers are not immune from congressional subpoenas, a federal judge ruled Thursday in a long-running dispute between the two political branches. Congressiona...
Filed by Rachel Weiner  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
245
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next › Last » (9 pages total)

Let's hope it sticks. I have lost so much faith over the last few years. The media is whining about Obama being arrogant while Bush has stole the Constitution!

What the hell is wrong with Americans? Are most of us just stupid?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:57 AM on 07/31/2008
photo

I'm not sure you want an answer to that (very important) question, I'm afraid...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:17 PM on 07/31/2008

Yes, most Americans are stupid

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lj3iNxZ8Dww

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:47 PM on 07/31/2008

"What the hell is wrong with Americans? Are most of us just stupid?"

I wouldn't say "most" - more like "enough to influence an election".

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:55 PM on 07/31/2008
- colleen2 I'm a Fan of colleen2 5 fans permalink

This ruling is particularly sweet because this judge was appointed by Dubya and is the one who dismissed Valerie Plame's suit against Cheney,Rove Libby and Armitage. This is the judge who dismissed the GAO's efforts to learn who was on Cheney's so called Energy Task force.This is the judge who insisted that Kuchinich (and Congress) had no standing to dispute Bush's withdrawal from the ABM treaty without congressional approval.

I guess this time their forum shopping diidn't pay off.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:57 AM on 07/31/2008
- captnEarl I'm a Fan of captnEarl 5 fans permalink

It's almost party time ,now if our chicken s**t congress will do their job,the DC jails system will be happy to get them!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:56 AM on 07/31/2008
- kay I'm a Fan of kay 172 fans permalink

Conservative lawyers were wrong. Again.

"Entirely unsupported by case law" means they made it up.

I'm not willing to pay for the Federalist Society to invent new privileges.

I think the Right should pay their own way. If they want to stonewall and protect the cabal 'o crooks, let them cover costs.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:56 AM on 07/31/2008

"Conservative lawyers" aka political hacks. It all ties together, including the hiring of ONLY political partisans in sensitive national security positions they are unqualified for. In one sense, Bush's Presidency is the greatest ever. By this I mean, there's never been another President who has so completely, and tirelessly, worked to change EVERYTHING it touched. There's never been another that has so completely denied all legal jurisprudence in everything it does.

This President's oath of office should have gone something like this...Do you swear to attack and destroy the Constitution of the United States of America and remove all laws that are inconvenient for you? Do you accept the title of King of America? Do you accept your right to do anything you want, whenever you want to do it, for whatever reason you want to do it, including torture and murder? Yes? I now pronounce you KING OF AMERICA, with all the privileges and responsibilities this office provides. Who would you like killed my Lord?

It is ALL cult of personality, aka politics. That's why one of the questions Monica Goodling illegally asked of hiring candidates was, why do you want to serve George W. Bush? Not how would you serve the Constitution, but how would you provide fealty to the King of America? The sycophantic obsessive compulsion evidenced by trolls in this blog, and all neo-CON supporters, is based in the cult of personality that IS the Bush Presidency.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:54 PM on 07/31/2008
- SanityNow I'm a Fan of SanityNow 17 fans permalink

Prediction:
The goal posts will be moved . . . .again.
It's what they do.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:56 AM on 07/31/2008
photo

Congress- Run, dont walk to have these freaks testify. Stop all the excuses for crying out loud, now a Judge is on you side, if you dont do this immediately, I hope everyone of you in the leadership lose your positions.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:56 AM on 07/31/2008
- heal57 I'm a Fan of heal57 26 fans permalink

We'll see what happens but so far Rove and the other thugs get away scot free. Ms. Pelosi doesn't help either. I'll believe it when I see it, though Bravo for Judge Bates.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:55 AM on 07/31/2008
- gevan I'm a Fan of gevan 18 fans permalink

As Andrew Jackson might have said, "Judge Bates has made his decision; now let him enforce it."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:54 AM on 07/31/2008

Why bother - they will simply "forget" everything.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:54 AM on 07/31/2008
- kay I'm a Fan of kay 172 fans permalink

It's important they appear before Americans.

Conservatives are big on law and order. Under their rule, we currently have more Americans incarcerated than at any time in our history. Prisons are a growth industry, and profitable.

I think the least they could do is occasionally agree to show up and stonewall, in person.

As a matter of fact, I insist they appear.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:59 AM on 07/31/2008
- spiffarino I'm a Fan of spiffarino 10 fans permalink

Correction: Conservatives are big on law and order for everyone but those who have the money and power to slither out of trouble.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:04 PM on 07/31/2008
- doctorwang I'm a Fan of doctorwang 189 fans permalink
photo

How true- the Albert@ G@nzales defense tactic of 'I can't recall'. At best, they'll be made to look like fools.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:07 PM on 07/31/2008
- jhoughton1 I'm a Fan of jhoughton1 10 fans permalink

"That simple yet critical fact bears repeating: the asserted absolute immunity claim here is entirely unsupported by existing case law."
And it always was.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:53 AM on 07/31/2008

Good news! No one should be above the law exept the law itself!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:50 AM on 07/31/2008
- HallStyle I'm a Fan of HallStyle 11 fans permalink
photo

NO EVEN THE LAW ISN'T ABOVE THE LAW BECAUSE THE LAW CAN BE AMENDED!!! THAT BEING SAID WE DO NEED TO HOLD POLITICIANS TO THE SAME LAWS AS THE GENERAL PUBLIC.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:58 AM on 07/31/2008
- colleen2 I'm a Fan of colleen2 5 fans permalink

Excellent. It's odd how, after so many years, even the faint possibility of eventual justice improves my day immeasurably.
This ruling is particularly sweet because this judge was appointed by Dubya and is the one who dismissed Valerie Plame's suit against Cheney,Rove Libby and Armitage. This is the judge who dismissed the GAO's efforts to learn who was on Cheney's so called Energy Taskforce.­This is the judge who insisted that Kuchinich (and Congress) had no standing to dispute Bush's withdrawal from the ABM treaty without congressional approval.
I guess this time their forum shopping didn't pay off. I hope Karl Rove and Dick Cheney are feeling worried.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:49 AM on 07/31/2008
- pesfb I'm a Fan of pesfb 6 fans permalink
photo

Sadly, this too will pass by largely unnoticed by the Press and unacted upon by the cowardly Dems in Congress.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:49 AM on 07/31/2008
- RnR I'm a Fan of RnR 25 fans permalink

Complicit rather than cowardly

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:55 AM on 07/31/2008
- pesfb I'm a Fan of pesfb 6 fans permalink
photo

Complicit AND cowardly.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:01 PM on 07/31/2008
- spiffarino I'm a Fan of spiffarino 10 fans permalink

I say it's both.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:07 PM on 07/31/2008

The headline should be: "Judge Upholds Laws". Congress is almost as good at twisting laws as bushco.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:48 AM on 07/31/2008

Gotta love it.

Not only is it now two branches to one, but the Honorable John D. Bates was appointed by.... Duhbya.

I can hear the fat lady clearing her throat.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:47 AM on 07/31/2008
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next › Last » (9 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect