Obama Shifts, Says He May Back Offshore Drilling

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Obama Shifts, Says He May Back Offshore Drilling stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

MIKE GLOVER | August 1, 2008 10:57 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill. answers an audience member's question, Friday, Aug. 1, 2008, during a town hall meeting in St. Petersburg, Fla. (AP Photo/Mike Carlson)

ST. PETERSBURG, Fla. — Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama said Friday he would be willing to support limited additional offshore oil drilling if that's what it takes to enact a comprehensive policy to foster fuel-efficient autos and develop alternate energy sources.

Shifting from his previous opposition to expanded offshore drilling, the Illinois senator told a Florida newspaper he could get behind a compromise with Republicans and oil companies to prevent gridlock over energy.

Republican rival John McCain, who earlier dropped his opposition to offshore drilling, has been criticizing Obama on the stump and in broadcast ads for clinging to his opposition as gasoline prices topped $4 a gallon. Polls indicate these attacks have helped McCain gain ground on Obama.

"My interest is in making sure we've got the kind of comprehensive energy policy that can bring down gas prices," Obama said in an interview with The Palm Beach Post.

"If, in order to get that passed, we have to compromise in terms of a careful, well thought-out drilling strategy that was carefully circumscribed to avoid significant environmental damage _ I don't want to be so rigid that we can't get something done."

Asked about Obama's comment, McCain said, "We need oil drilling and we need it now offshore. He has consistently opposed it. He has opposed nuclear power. He has opposed reprocessing. He has opposed storage." The GOP candidate said Obama doesn't have a plan equal to the nation's energy challenges.

In Congress, both parties have fought bitterly over energy policy for weeks, with Republicans pressing for more domestic oil drilling and Democrats railing about oil company profits. Despite hundreds of hours of House and Senate floor debate, lawmakers will leave Washington for their five-week summer hiatus this week with an empty tank.

"The Republicans and the oil companies have been really beating the drums on drilling," Obama said in the Post interview. "And so we don't want gridlock. We want to get something done."

Story continues below
advertisement

Later, Obama issued a written statement warmly welcoming a proposal sent to Senate leaders Friday by 10 senators _ five from each party. Their proposal seeks to break the impasse over offshore oil development and is expected to be examined more closely in September after Congress returns from its summer recess.

The so-called Gang of 10 plan would lift drilling bans in the eastern Gulf of Mexico, but retain an environmental buffer zone extending 50 miles off Florida's beaches and in the South Atlantic off Virginia, the Carolinas and Georgia, but only if a state agrees to the oil and gas development along its coast. The states would share in revenues from oil and gas development.

Drilling bans along the Pacific coast and the Northeast would remain in place under this compromise.

The plan also includes energy initiatives Obama has endorsed. "It would repeal tax breaks for oil companies so that we can invest billions in fuel-efficient cars, help our automakers re-tool, and make a genuine commitment to renewable sources of energy like wind power, solar power, and the next generation of clean, affordable biofuels," Obama noted.

"Like all compromises, it also includes steps that I haven't always supported," Obama conceded. "I remain skeptical that new offshore drilling will bring down gas prices in the short-term or significantly reduce our oil dependence in the long-term, though I do welcome the establishment of a process that will allow us to make future drilling decisions based on science and fact."

Nevertheless, Obama said the plan, put forward by mostly moderates and conservatives led by Sens. Kent Conrad, D-N.D., and Saxby Chambliss, R-Ga., "represents a good faith effort at a new bipartisan beginning."

Earlier in the day, Obama pushed for a windfall profits tax to fund $1,000 emergency rebate checks for consumers besieged by high energy costs, a counter to McCain's call for more offshore drilling.

The pitch for putting some of the economic burden of $4-a-gallon gasoline on the oil industry served a dual purpose for Obama: It allowed him to talk up an economic issue, seen by many as a strength for Democrats and a weakness for Republicans, and at the same time respond to criticism from McCain that Obama's opposition to offshore drilling leads to higher prices at the pump.

In linking McCain to the unpopular President Bush, Obama struck a theme from Ronald Reagan's successful 1980 campaign against President Jimmy Carter by asking a town-hall audience in St. Petersburg: "Do you think you are better off than you were four years ago or eight years ago? If you aren't better off, can you afford another four years?"

Obama primed the crowd by noting new government figures showing 51,000 jobs lost last month and citing 460,000 jobs lost over the last seven months. He tied other bad economic news from the Bush administration to McCain and offered his energy program as one route to relief.

"This rebate will be enough to offset the increased cost of gas for a working family over the next four months," Obama said during a two-day campaign swing in Florida. "It will be enough to cover the entire increase in your heating bills. Or you could use the rebate for any of your other bills, or even to pay down your own debt."

(This version CORRECTS paragraph 10 that compromise would retain a buffer zone of 50 miles off Florida Gulf beaches, instead of allow drilling within 50 miles.)

ST. PETERSBURG, Fla. — Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama said Friday he would be willing to support limited additional offshore oil drilling if that's what it takes to enact a compr...
ST. PETERSBURG, Fla. — Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama said Friday he would be willing to support limited additional offshore oil drilling if that's what it takes to enact a compr...
Filed by Dan Duray  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
4616
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next › Last » (62 pages total)
photo

Accept it. Your candidate just demonstrated for the world that not only did he not have a realistic or salable energy plan but that he is in fact the most ordinary of politicians.

Your comments below are proof that you will believe and argue all day long, whatever line you are fed by your leadership, even if diametrically opposite, from one day to the next. You are a party of sheep.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:15 PM on 08/03/2008

Well, at least the guy gives nice speeches and looks the part. Very snappy suits. GQ cover material. And he listens to hip hop on his Ipod.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:46 PM on 08/03/2008
photo

OK. I'll concede that. However, McCain plays the accordion and is a vicious bridge player.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:02 PM on 08/03/2008
- blueshield I'm a Fan of blueshield 86 fans permalink

America is dependent on oil, and on the corporations and nations that supply us, who increasingly profit from our dependence. The Repug party has increased this dependency by protecting substantial tax subsidies and royalty breaks for oil companies; deregulating speculators; pushing foreign policies that have increased our nation's oil consumption, and debt to oil producing nations; while blocking measures to ensure alternative energy sources become more widely used.

Today Repugs propose we should hand over more of the public's energy resources (offshore leases) without compensation, or modification of the above, despite the fact the recipient corporations already hold vast tracts of unexplored leases, and are announcing record after record profits from Americans.

O has proposed to put a few of these offshore leases on the table, for negotiation, in exchange for cutting tax subsidies, increased royalties, returning a tiny fraction of the windfall profits to the American people, and other concessions.

If Americans are "sheep", like you, they'll elect McC and continue to pay big oil our tax dollars to be raped.

If they don't like big oil's hands around their necks, they'll vote for the only politician with the cajones to fight of a deal that actually benefits the American people.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:01 PM on 08/03/2008
- theMightyT I'm a Fan of theMightyT 175 fans permalink

Actually he proved just the opposite. Your feeble bleating doesn't change that fact.

A nuanced, thoughtful approach to drilling as a temporary measure while still promoting alternatives. Ya. what a sellout.

Ah, republicans. You can always count on them for entertainment value.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:02 PM on 08/03/2008
photo

"A nuanced, thoughtful approach to drilling"?!

Yes of course!! Where'd I hear that? That's right! The Republicans.

LOL?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:10 PM on 08/03/2008
- JimR I'm a Fan of JimR 38 fans permalink

No, what he demonstrated is that he willing to work with Republicans to get things done, rather than dig his heels in the ground and refuse to compromise, which would lead to more gridlock.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:16 PM on 08/03/2008

Sure, it has nothing to do with the polls showing 70% support for more drilling. Ask yourself -- why has every single one of Obama's compromises and shifts gone in the direction of a more poll-friendly position? Will he ever take and hold an unpopular position and let the chips fall where they may? I doubt it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:39 PM on 08/03/2008
- Ramirez I'm a Fan of Ramirez 280 fans permalink
photo

O is taking ALL the arguments away from the Republicans!

Tax cuts. check
FISA. check
Faith/based check
Surge check
Iran/grave threat check
2nd Amendment check
off shore drilling check

coming soon...
RoeVwade!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:23 PM on 08/03/2008
- smoo I'm a Fan of smoo 2 fans permalink

Yep he sure is, and they know it. So when the debats come around, he is going to rip McCain a new one. Why because he not going to allow them to claim complete ownership of any issue. On all the major republican issues the Democratic candidate will have solid compremise plans. You can just be for or against any of this stuff. For everything you mention, you have to elevate or advance beyond the "for-or-against" grid lock by respecting the real concerns of the parties involved. By doing so you force your opponent to move beyond the talking points.
Consider this:

Obama's position:
considering $4 gas and growth in global demand for oil, with the right trade-offs and constraints, we need to at least plan for the possiblity of drilling.

McCain's rebuttal:
“Well, the fact is he still opposes offshore drilling,” McCain said

This shows that McCain has no clue of what's happening beyond his "sound-bite" position on the issues. This is going to harm him deeply.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:41 PM on 08/03/2008
photo

Agreed, I expect he'll be running as a republican shortly.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:06 PM on 08/03/2008
photo

Actually...for the most part there really isn't much difference between the democratic party and the republican party. Obama is just someone who fooled people into thinking that the word change was a new word.

He is just repackaged Bill Clinton. Same old thing. Watch he will do an about face on is all about change already...change for him and his family....change for him and his ego..

He will create as much change in this country and world as say.....no one...

I worry about us...I really do...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:41 PM on 08/03/2008

No matter how you spin this its just another big Flip-Flop. Its one thing to change your mind over several years but when you change your mind over a few days then you can’t be trusted.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:13 PM on 08/03/2008
- theMightyT I'm a Fan of theMightyT 175 fans permalink

guess you can't trust mccain either then.

my oh my what are you going to do come november?

let me guess.

Vote McCain.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:50 PM on 08/03/2008

I intend on voting for the best candidate possible. That would be RedRover.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:28 PM on 08/03/2008

He is a politician. That is what politicians do. Some more than others. He seems to have become very good at it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:50 PM on 08/03/2008
- Lemeritus I'm a Fan of Lemeritus 109 fans permalink
photo

Just an anecdotal observation here... every time Obama "compromises", his polling numbers fall, which seems to mean he's not successfully courting the marginal Republicans, nor convincing (what one writer called) the "empty center", or even shoring up support within in own base. You may believe these compromises are signs of genius -- I'm not so sure.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:58 PM on 08/03/2008

ExxonMobil's effective income tax rate for this past quarter was 49%. Not low by any means.

http://www.exxonmobil.com/Corporate/Files/news_release_supp2q08.pdf
see page 3

I am an Obama supporter, but I wonder how much more he wants them to pay if half of Exxon's income already goes to the federal government in taxes, .

By way of contrast, Apple's effective tax rate is 29%,

See page 29 of Apple's financial report for this: http://library.corporate-ir.net/library/10/107/107357/items/301504/AAPL_10Q_Q3FY08.pdf

Exxon's profit margin was 10.85%, Apple's was almost 15%. Exxon had huge profits in terms of actual dollars because they are such a huge company, but their profit margin was lower than many companies, including Apple for example.

Once again, I am an Obama supporter, and I hate high fuel prices as much as the next person, but I question that taxing a company like Exxon even more than the nearly 50% they are paying already will lower fuel prices in the long run. The easiest way to make up for an additional expense is to pass it on to the consumer and we don't need more of that.

The best approach is to think long term about alternative energy sources, better fuel efficiency. Short term pain but long term gain.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:38 PM on 08/03/2008

But taxing Exxon gives everybody that warm glowing feeling of satisfaction. What else besides that can a politician really promise to the people to make them feel better about their situation ?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:04 AM on 08/04/2008
- funnyman26 I'm a Fan of funnyman26 6 fans permalink

You know things can be expected.
1) During "W" campaign in 2000, it was quite apparent from his history that anything he touches will fail. Now we see what happens when he touches the presidency (Tremendous debt, Failed international policy, Failed Energy, Us vs Them sentiment)

2) Now we have Obama who is promising us many things, Unfortunately, he does not have the experience to know that Things will be harder to change once in office. We'll see much more of this flip flopping..

3) Hillary Clinton was the only one with the background/experience to really provide change. She knows her stuff and is careful when promising things, as she knows what its like once your in office.

If Obama wins, it will only be a 4 year term. We'll then be back to a more RIGHT Conservative Government.... :(

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:19 PM on 08/03/2008
- Heyman I'm a Fan of Heyman 2 fans permalink

I'm glad I bought a Prius!
By the time the new American oil hits the market? Electric cars will be the norm! lol...
Alaskan oil is sold to Asian markets. Not us. And by the way...Canada is our biggest importer of crude oil. Venezuela is our second importer.
Why blame the Middle East? Got to have a reason to make record profits!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:10 PM on 08/03/2008
photo

Any idea how they are going to produce all this electricity?
California can just barely get through a summer without rolling brown-outs now.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:48 PM on 08/03/2008
- harriscrl3 I'm a Fan of harriscrl3 191 fans permalink

You know what this is so stupid. THey complain and groan that the man is too stubborn that he is like Dubya he changes his mind on something and suddenly he cant be trusted because he is a flip flopper.

People can't make up their mind thats why they elect idiots to do it for them and then byotch and complain and then the next elction they vote for the same idiot.

I wonder if people in this country will ever grow a brain or will the continue to be scared stupid.

Carol

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:23 AM on 08/03/2008

He is consistent. I can't name a single issue he has not "refined" in the last 6 weeks.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:02 AM on 08/04/2008
- riley85 I'm a Fan of riley85 2 fans permalink

I'm not sure what kind of fantasy world Obama lives in. Perhaps the one where he thinks we are all deaf and stupid.

Now he is saying he hasn't changed his stance on drilling. Even though he a few days ago called it a scheme. And when McCain flipped on drilling Obama said it was an "election-year conversion" and that he would not support drilling just because it was the popular thing to do.

Losing 9 pts.in the polls in one week, and being laughed at for saying we should all just check our tires----that's why he "didn't change his stance on drilling.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:11 AM on 08/03/2008

He is first and foremost a politician. Not a new one, but a Chicago politician.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:39 PM on 08/03/2008
- JimR I'm a Fan of JimR 38 fans permalink

Let's try a little quiz. He only agreed to some offshore drilling IF...

Do you know the answer? It's in the article, if you read the whole thing.

I know you can do it!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:21 PM on 08/03/2008
- theMightyT I'm a Fan of theMightyT 175 fans permalink

are you kidding the naysayers don't read anything but the headline (if that) and then proceed directly to the comments where they trash O. They do this because they got NOTHIN but snark.

It's kind of funny in a sad and pathetic way... they must be so disappointed in their candidate. One can't really blame them...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:28 PM on 08/03/2008
photo

LMFAO...watch the Huffpo lemming scramble to defend this one!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:02 AM on 08/03/2008
photo

LMFAO!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:50 PM on 08/03/2008
- WFV I'm a Fan of WFV 13 fans permalink
photo

I am definitely not thrilled with this new option, but if you take a step back and look at the entire picture, his position is more than reasonable. Will it help much with the cost of transportation? No, probably not. Have the oil companies utilized all the acres they already have leased for oil exploration? No.

Will allowing this codicil open the door to other policies that will have a significant impact? Yes. Will it move us forward toward alternative energy choices? Yes.

We are all so used to the 'my way or the highway' method of governing, we are unable to understand compromise for the bigger goal anymore. I don't like it, but I do support what he's doing.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:58 AM on 08/03/2008

Yes. As much as we might not like to admit it, we must have both Dems and Repubs around the table. We must again learn the art of compromise for the larger goal. Hey, at least O has a larger goal - that's something! He has actually articulated intelligent positions, and has shown a willingness to compensate for his relative inexperience by surrounding himself with persons very knowledgeable. He's our next president for sure if we all just get out and vote.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:29 PM on 08/03/2008

What intelligent positions has he articulated? He has several positions on most any issue you can name. FISA, drilling, Paris Hilton, drilling, iraq, etc.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:54 PM on 08/03/2008

just another evidence that he will do or say anything to get elected.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:52 AM on 08/03/2008

It is rather funny as he's changing his views on just about everything. Don't need to say more.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:01 AM on 08/03/2008

He appears to be shifting to the center right ,completely away from the far left issues.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:55 PM on 08/03/2008
- JimR I'm a Fan of JimR 38 fans permalink

Yes, he is saying he will work with Republicans in order to get a comprehensive, responsible energy plan enacted.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:25 PM on 08/03/2008
photo

Well, I'm all for that. However, he seems only to become inspired to work with Republicans on a compromise when polls demonstrate his position is a loser and sinking fast. This has been a consistent pattern. I would be far more impressed had that been his position from the beginning, rather than a fall-back position.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:37 PM on 08/03/2008
- zendem1 I'm a Fan of zendem1 112 fans permalink

Hmm..let's see..your opponent frames you as a notorious flipper, so you find a major issue and flip on it. Brilliant....

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:27 AM on 08/03/2008
photo

Indeed! Opponent tells the world you have no principals, so you find a major issue and prove he's right. Brilliant!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:39 AM on 08/03/2008
- reshas1 I'm a Fan of reshas1 4 fans permalink

Barack Obama has proven himself slippery on oil for the second time in his campaign. In April, he accused his opponents of taking money from oil lobbies, when in fact Obama himself not only did the same thing but had oil executives as major bundlers to his campaign. Now he’s reversed himself on drilling, and he did it in a remarkable place — Florida:
"U.S. Sen. Barack Obama said today he would be willing to open Florida’s coast for more oil drilling if it meant winning approval for broad energy changes.
“My interest is in making sure we’ve got the kind of comprehensive energy policy that can bring down gas prices,” Obama said in an interview with The Palm Beach Post.
“If, in order to get that passed, we have to compromise in terms of a careful, well thought-out drilling strategy that was carefully circumscribed to avoid significant environmental damage - I don’t want to be so rigid that we can’t get something done,” Obama said."
Of course, this comes shortly after Obama called off-shore drilling “the latest scheme”, telling his supporters that drilling wouldn’t solve anything. How shortly? 48 hours! Here’s Obama in Springfield, Missouri, insisting that drilling wouldn’t work.

AGAIN, Obama-flipflop-a-rama-lama-dingdong

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:06 AM on 08/03/2008
- Phil123 I'm a Fan of Phil123 4 fans permalink

Obama holds no true position on anything, except that he's a hard-core socialist.

His "position" is 100% pole-driven. This is hardly "change." We might as well have had Clinton. At least she had experience.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:26 AM on 08/03/2008
- theMightyT I'm a Fan of theMightyT 175 fans permalink

how do you drive opinions with poles? What kind of poles ARE they? Telephone poles? Steel poles of some kind? Are they imported or domestic poles?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:42 PM on 08/03/2008
- JimR I'm a Fan of JimR 38 fans permalink

A javeline pole? Or are you referring to the Polish people?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:29 PM on 08/03/2008
photo

JimR and theM's fall back position, inspect your grammar and punctuation.

LOL!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:40 PM on 08/03/2008
- theMightyT I'm a Fan of theMightyT 175 fans permalink

actually it's more like garbage in, garbage out... how else do you respond to nonsense. I could quote jabberwocky to you and it would STILL make more sense than your arguments.

But it would be as big a waste of time as trying to debate your candidate's "postitions" because in about 12 hours he will have stolen O's ideas, flipped on his position, claimed that O "doesn't understand", and released another ad with paris and britney.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:33 PM on 08/03/2008
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next › Last » (62 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect