Obama Shifts, Says He May Back Offshore Drilling

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Obama Shifts, Says He May Back Offshore Drilling stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

MIKE GLOVER | August 1, 2008 10:57 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill. answers an audience member's question, Friday, Aug. 1, 2008, during a town hall meeting in St. Petersburg, Fla. (AP Photo/Mike Carlson)

ST. PETERSBURG, Fla. — Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama said Friday he would be willing to support limited additional offshore oil drilling if that's what it takes to enact a comprehensive policy to foster fuel-efficient autos and develop alternate energy sources.

Shifting from his previous opposition to expanded offshore drilling, the Illinois senator told a Florida newspaper he could get behind a compromise with Republicans and oil companies to prevent gridlock over energy.

Republican rival John McCain, who earlier dropped his opposition to offshore drilling, has been criticizing Obama on the stump and in broadcast ads for clinging to his opposition as gasoline prices topped $4 a gallon. Polls indicate these attacks have helped McCain gain ground on Obama.

"My interest is in making sure we've got the kind of comprehensive energy policy that can bring down gas prices," Obama said in an interview with The Palm Beach Post.

"If, in order to get that passed, we have to compromise in terms of a careful, well thought-out drilling strategy that was carefully circumscribed to avoid significant environmental damage _ I don't want to be so rigid that we can't get something done."

Asked about Obama's comment, McCain said, "We need oil drilling and we need it now offshore. He has consistently opposed it. He has opposed nuclear power. He has opposed reprocessing. He has opposed storage." The GOP candidate said Obama doesn't have a plan equal to the nation's energy challenges.

In Congress, both parties have fought bitterly over energy policy for weeks, with Republicans pressing for more domestic oil drilling and Democrats railing about oil company profits. Despite hundreds of hours of House and Senate floor debate, lawmakers will leave Washington for their five-week summer hiatus this week with an empty tank.

"The Republicans and the oil companies have been really beating the drums on drilling," Obama said in the Post interview. "And so we don't want gridlock. We want to get something done."

Story continues below

Later, Obama issued a written statement warmly welcoming a proposal sent to Senate leaders Friday by 10 senators _ five from each party. Their proposal seeks to break the impasse over offshore oil development and is expected to be examined more closely in September after Congress returns from its summer recess.

The so-called Gang of 10 plan would lift drilling bans in the eastern Gulf of Mexico, but retain an environmental buffer zone extending 50 miles off Florida's beaches and in the South Atlantic off Virginia, the Carolinas and Georgia, but only if a state agrees to the oil and gas development along its coast. The states would share in revenues from oil and gas development.

Drilling bans along the Pacific coast and the Northeast would remain in place under this compromise.

The plan also includes energy initiatives Obama has endorsed. "It would repeal tax breaks for oil companies so that we can invest billions in fuel-efficient cars, help our automakers re-tool, and make a genuine commitment to renewable sources of energy like wind power, solar power, and the next generation of clean, affordable biofuels," Obama noted.

"Like all compromises, it also includes steps that I haven't always supported," Obama conceded. "I remain skeptical that new offshore drilling will bring down gas prices in the short-term or significantly reduce our oil dependence in the long-term, though I do welcome the establishment of a process that will allow us to make future drilling decisions based on science and fact."

Nevertheless, Obama said the plan, put forward by mostly moderates and conservatives led by Sens. Kent Conrad, D-N.D., and Saxby Chambliss, R-Ga., "represents a good faith effort at a new bipartisan beginning."

Earlier in the day, Obama pushed for a windfall profits tax to fund $1,000 emergency rebate checks for consumers besieged by high energy costs, a counter to McCain's call for more offshore drilling.

The pitch for putting some of the economic burden of $4-a-gallon gasoline on the oil industry served a dual purpose for Obama: It allowed him to talk up an economic issue, seen by many as a strength for Democrats and a weakness for Republicans, and at the same time respond to criticism from McCain that Obama's opposition to offshore drilling leads to higher prices at the pump.

In linking McCain to the unpopular President Bush, Obama struck a theme from Ronald Reagan's successful 1980 campaign against President Jimmy Carter by asking a town-hall audience in St. Petersburg: "Do you think you are better off than you were four years ago or eight years ago? If you aren't better off, can you afford another four years?"

Obama primed the crowd by noting new government figures showing 51,000 jobs lost last month and citing 460,000 jobs lost over the last seven months. He tied other bad economic news from the Bush administration to McCain and offered his energy program as one route to relief.

"This rebate will be enough to offset the increased cost of gas for a working family over the next four months," Obama said during a two-day campaign swing in Florida. "It will be enough to cover the entire increase in your heating bills. Or you could use the rebate for any of your other bills, or even to pay down your own debt."

(This version CORRECTS paragraph 10 that compromise would retain a buffer zone of 50 miles off Florida Gulf beaches, instead of allow drilling within 50 miles.)

ST. PETERSBURG, Fla. — Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama said Friday he would be willing to support limited additional offshore oil drilling if that's what it takes to enact a compr...
ST. PETERSBURG, Fla. — Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama said Friday he would be willing to support limited additional offshore oil drilling if that's what it takes to enact a compr...
Filed by Dan Duray  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
4616
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next › Last » (62 pages total)
- Oldbuck I'm a Fan of Oldbuck 8 fans permalink
photo

Obama you had better understand the marketing of oil on the world market this in no way effect the price of oil and will not make gasoline one dime cheaper. We will have to buy this oil at world market prices and pay for them with the devalued dollar. We are between a rock and a hard place. Even T. Boone Pickins says we can't drill our way out of this problem.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:56 PM on 08/02/2008
photo

I'll tell you one thing a load is off my mind and probably 0bama's as well.

You know how hard it is to argue that offshore drilling will not affect gas prices in the near future to an ignorant American public?

I'm glad that 0bama and the Democrats got this elephant off their backs trying to explain their high minded opinion on offshore drilling to a public that cannot do basic math.

The best part now is that the Dems and 0bama can have it both ways now.

If oil prices fall they can blame it on the speculators for inflating the oil market to start.

If oil prices rise they can say the offshore drilling has no immediate affect on prices.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:35 PM on 08/02/2008
- k6007 I'm a Fan of k6007 237 fans permalink
photo

What a depressing post.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:39 PM on 08/02/2008
- Actionmac I'm a Fan of Actionmac 10 fans permalink
photo

but true. you see how many people don't get the what he is saying in the article. I am talking about the people that read the article before making a post.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:44 PM on 08/02/2008
photo

The ignorance of most American is depressing as hell, but it is still true.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:57 PM on 08/02/2008
- genseric13 I'm a Fan of genseric13 6 fans permalink

"the near future" You guys sure don't believe in planning ahead, do you? The basic math is that the US producing more oil produces jobs, lowers the federal deficit, lowers the trade deficit, makes the dollar stronger, makes us less dependent and increases our national security. When you went to college, did you say, "well, no point in going, I won't have a degree for 4 years". Conservatives have always been better at planning ahead then liberals. If a liberal cannot get something today, they are against it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:48 PM on 08/02/2008
- WLA I'm a Fan of WLA 323 fans permalink
photo

"Conservatives have always been better at planning ahead then liberals. "

====

Total and complete BS.

http://i13.tinypic.com/8a15hlj.gif

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:48 PM on 08/02/2008
- Actionmac I'm a Fan of Actionmac 10 fans permalink
photo

you haven't got a clue of what your talking about... reduce trade deficit and make us less dependent on foreign oil... to use as a trade item then how does it make us less dependent.

If a redumblican can spin the issue they can't intelligently talk about it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:54 PM on 08/02/2008

So great conservative guru, why is Interior still refusing to open acreage with known oil deposits in and around Alaska? There are billions of barrels available not in ANWR. Good planning? By the Republican-controlled Interior department?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:56 PM on 08/02/2008
- Viper I'm a Fan of Viper 320 fans permalink

The repug planning of the past 30 years has allowed them to run up 90% of the national debt, cut our MFG base by 80% and out source our high paying jobs..

Excuse me we saw repug planning in Iraq..LOL!

We saw it again in New Orleans....

We saw it in deregulation of the Savings and Loans, the Commodities and credit markets...

So while I Agree with you on offshore drilling.... we will always need the oil for plastics and etc.. into much of the future

nd we have seen what $150 Oil does to the world economy and how it causes a switch to far dirtier coal. No sense trying to plug the oil wells before you have a plan to switch and bring down the world economy and in fact have a dirtier planet as people turn to coal.

Burt as for repug planning... Reagan killed the move away from renewabvle energy 30 years agoo... yep real planning.

And it was Reagan and Bush 1 who placed the first ban on offshore drilling at the request of the Oil industry to drive down supply and increase prices since oil was at $8 /barrel.

Regards

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:03 PM on 08/02/2008
- tbone99 I'm a Fan of tbone99 107 fans permalink
photo

Yeah thats why we've got millions of miles of soon to be useless freeways .They planned ahead alright ... for car dealers and and the oil industry...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:32 PM on 08/02/2008
photo

Alternative sources of energy is the answer to the energy crisis we are in now. That is if we are talking about issues. I don't agree that we should be playing games with the environment in order to win an election. I do understand about compromise in getting legislation passed and I know there are some good things in the bill.

I heard Rachel Madeow on the radio one day and she said something that I always think about when O has some shift in his position, she said: "Between Republican lite and Republican the voters will always choice the real thing."

I am still voting for BO.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:56 PM on 08/02/2008
- WLA I'm a Fan of WLA 323 fans permalink
photo

You do realize that lifting the ban will only allow the states to decide. The Guhhvernator already said he will veto any drilling offshore in CA.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:57 PM on 08/02/2008
photo

George I agree with you and if 0bama is elected hopefully before the offshore drilling begins we will be well on our way to alternate energies.

0bama is the only won offering a serious and substantial energy plan. $15MM/year for 10 years to develop alternate energies is not chicken scratch. While McBush is offering nuclear power and gimmicks where we would be in the same shape four years from now as we are in today. The difference is that McBush would be counting on the offshore drilling coming on line.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:54 PM on 08/02/2008

"You know how hard it is to argue that offshore drilling will not affect gas prices in the near future to an ignorant American public?"

I see. So if an increase in production won't affect gas prices, then I guess shutting down all of our current production wouldn't increase it either, right?

You need to give up the nonsensical talking points. Obackarama has realized it's too stupid to try to sell anymore.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:15 PM on 08/02/2008

It won't increase production in the near future or anytime in the foreseeable future. They don't even drill most of the land that they have lease to now. And much of what they do drill, they export.

It's a fairy tail, and he's right to treat it as such and move on.

In the meantime, the Republicans blocked a bill that would have released 10% of the strategic oil reserves...something that would actually have an effect on gas prices in the short-term, but wouldn't profit the oil companies.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:25 PM on 08/02/2008
- bikerdude I'm a Fan of bikerdude 77 fans permalink
photo

I think he made a mistake in even alluding to backing increased off shore drilling. It looks like capitulation to the Mc C ain demands, and makes him look politically weak and undecisive.
The strategy has been and should continue to be change. Having to explain and diminish his statement does not serve him well.
Lay out your strategy, develop tactics and stay on course.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:24 PM on 08/02/2008
- k6007 I'm a Fan of k6007 237 fans permalink
photo

As another, so astutely noted-

'Why should repubes have a lock on lying to get elected'? ~(;-)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:31 PM on 08/02/2008
- Actionmac I'm a Fan of Actionmac 10 fans permalink
photo

Like I said... offshore drillig is now a neutralized issue O.bama has REACHED ACROSS the isle with a compromise that will put the so called maverick at odds with his own issue.

Why? because he did not reach across the isle, what he said he does, with a way to forward the energy issue and stop gridlock. O.bama took the maverick and made him a staunch redumblican who would rather make accusations and blame the other party.

Basically O.bama has FLIPPED the table on a FLOPPED mcsad issue.

Stay tuned for more Britney, Paris, and Skinny gate.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:39 PM on 08/02/2008
- Actionmac I'm a Fan of Actionmac 10 fans permalink
photo

Well it seems the only people he has to explain it to are folks like you... and you still don't understand.

Offshore drilling is now a DEAD issue because a well thinking candidate for president REACHED ACROSS the isle to move the energy issue forward for progress and in that process BROADENED the energy issue. The question is what will the redumblicans do?

Flipped the table on a Flopped issue for mcsad.

Can you say NEUTRALIZED.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:33 PM on 08/02/2008
- marijam I'm a Fan of marijam 49 fans permalink
photo

It opens him up to "...I was against it before I was for it..." criticism.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:35 PM on 08/02/2008
- k6007 I'm a Fan of k6007 237 fans permalink
photo

Who, mc? Goodness knows he has flipped, flopped, and flipped again.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:38 PM on 08/02/2008
photo

And in McCheesy's case, he was rewarded handsomely for his flip-flop by big oil.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:40 PM on 08/02/2008
- Actionmac I'm a Fan of Actionmac 10 fans permalink
photo

no it opens up the debate as to why mcsad didn't offer a compromise being the so called maverick because he supposedly reaches across the isle. Instead he accused and blamed the other party for not agreeing doing it HIS WAY.

get what happen now?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:49 PM on 08/02/2008
- k6007 I'm a Fan of k6007 237 fans permalink
photo

In other words, lower our level of critical thinking, to that of the drill, drill, drill crowd.

No thanks, progress isn't made by doing things the same way our parents did.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:36 PM on 08/02/2008
photo

The course, in this case, breaking the gridlock on a much-needed comprehensive energy policy.

Are you saying that O shouldn't negotiate and be open to compromise for the greater good? That sounds like the same old "my way or the highway" politics we've had from the repubes the past 8 years.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:36 PM on 08/02/2008
- Actionmac I'm a Fan of Actionmac 10 fans permalink
photo

thanks for making it plain and simple for the plain simple.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:43 PM on 08/02/2008
- Beninn I'm a Fan of Beninn 33 fans permalink
photo

The compromise already took place, has happened throughout the years, several times, when oil companies were given federal lands to drill on which they haven't drilled on.

Do you give your kids another helping of food before they've finished what's on their plates?

What about if they haven't even touched the food that's already on their plates?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:45 PM on 08/02/2008

As a democrat, I would like to see energy independence achieved via non-fossil fuels in my lifetime, but that is not going to happen until every last drop of oil is sucked out of the ground. Oil companies and their share holders have absolutely no reason to change they way they do business. Democrats might as well get on board to promote off shore drilling and the opening of ANWR. Whether both produce significant gains or almost none, at least it will be the beginnings of some kind of energy policy. Perhaps then we can look to the next stage.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:12 PM on 08/02/2008
- genseric13 I'm a Fan of genseric13 6 fans permalink

Since US oil reserves have more then doubled in the last 5 or 6 years, I wouldn't hold your breath.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:36 PM on 08/02/2008
- Beninn I'm a Fan of Beninn 33 fans permalink
photo

There won't be a "next stage". This is it, this is the time. This is civilization's last stand.

It's not theoretical, it's not "we've got time to work towards". This is it.

You're talking about more carbon in the atmosphere. You're talking about irreversible, catastrophic climate change, unrestrained malignant growth & development, mass migration of people as has never occurred before, wars over dwindling resources like food and water, ALL IN OUR LIFETIME.

We've always known that there was oil here in the US, even in the wells in Texas and Oklahoma & Bakersfield, but we imported because it was too expensive to get it out of our ground. We always knew that when the price of oil rose enough, it would be worth the oil companies' while to go after it here. What wasn't factored in was the impact of all this carbon on the atmosphere, and then that impact squared when nations like China (with its 1.3 billion people) and India (with its 1.13 billion people and no one-child policy) developed after getting rich off our outsourcing of Americans' jobs.

The price of oil is never going to go down to any appreciable extent. Our typically American way of life, with our cavalier attitude toward squandering resources, is over. We're living the capitalist meme gone bad, with the rich scrambling to squeeze as much money from everyone into their own pockets as fast as they can, and run to high ground.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6514270139930450081

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:16 PM on 08/02/2008
- Daniboy I'm a Fan of Daniboy 19 fans permalink

Will Nancy and Harry now call the houses back into session to vote on oil drilling now that the all knowing Barck has spoken?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:11 PM on 08/02/2008
- Actionmac I'm a Fan of Actionmac 10 fans permalink
photo

Not until the all unknowing mcsad has had his say on the campaign trail.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:25 PM on 08/02/2008
- Marcee I'm a Fan of Marcee 2 fans permalink

Yes, after weeks of Congressional gridlock, Obama embraced a ten-person bi-partisan effort to break Congress's energy impasse with legislation that expands off-shore oil exploration in EXCHANGE for including ambitious energy efficiency and alternative fuels development efforts. This sounds to my wildly independent spirit as a sensible centrist, compromise --- something we have seen little of during the last 8 years of gridlock and partisan politics. So what's so awful about that especially since McCain has changed his opposition to off-shore drilling as well? If policy is written in cement, we are doomed to more years of a do nothing, bitterly partisan Congress.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:09 PM on 08/02/2008

Good. Maybe he can convince the congressional Queen Bee allow a vote.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:08 PM on 08/02/2008

This headline is misleading. He is not "backing offshore drilling". He is saying he remains skeptical of offshore drilling but may not consider it a deal-breaker for an entire energy bill if the bill contains the investment in alternative energy that he supports. I happen to both agree with this stance and think it's smart politics.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:08 PM on 08/02/2008
photo

if I had a nickel for every misleading Huffpo headline...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:14 PM on 08/02/2008
- bikerdude I'm a Fan of bikerdude 77 fans permalink
photo

He sounds like he's apologizing for what he said. This is not the way to appear decisive. This yeah, but stuff is making him look weak. Maybe Senator and ex President Clinto n can tutor him a bit.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:24 PM on 08/02/2008
- WLA I'm a Fan of WLA 323 fans permalink
photo

Pfft! Tutor him on how to be divisive?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:04 PM on 08/02/2008
- Actionmac I'm a Fan of Actionmac 10 fans permalink
photo

stop spoiling the fun as the redumblicans and PUMAs make comments with out reading... and when they do can't comprehend.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:27 PM on 08/02/2008

The same lame-@ss leadership he showed with FISA. Great. What's next? Compromises on torture and secret prisons?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:34 PM on 08/02/2008
- WLA I'm a Fan of WLA 323 fans permalink
photo

I do too.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:03 PM on 08/02/2008
- the964kid I'm a Fan of the964kid 67 fans permalink
photo

Some of you all need to calm down on this. This is another classic GOP straw-man argument. The reality is that big oil companies have thousands of sites they have permits for and they're already not drilling on, and they have not asked for this. Maybe you didn't notice the record earnings of big oil companies this last quarter; they want things to stay just like they are: limited supply driving up demand. This is not a real issue, except in the minds of ignorant americans who actually think this solution would work anytime soon. But guess what - there are lots of ignorant Americans - just look at how many people voted for Bush in 2004 as proof. People on the left should not fall into this trap of thinking that this will ever happen. Big oil doesn't want it to happen, because more oil would lower their profits. This is a gimmick. It was smart for O to take this off the table now.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:07 PM on 08/02/2008
- SisterAnn I'm a Fan of SisterAnn 5 fans permalink

It is mind boggling that the corporate media and republicans have managed to blame the Democrats for the high price of gas.

There is something the oil companies want from the leases for off shore drilling in the ocean and the land in Alaska. Maybe there is something under the water that is more valuable than gold. Maybe it is control of certain areas. The last thing we need is for the oil companies to get more leases and more control of anything.

I met a man that took pictures of what is below the surface for the oil companies 15 years ago. They know what is under most areas. I don't know how the pictures were done, with xrays or what.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:06 PM on 08/02/2008

What a dissapointment. I have to assume he is pandering and doesn't honestly doesn't believe this is a sensible solution. The worst part is - he doesn't even need to pander to people on this issue. This issue is not going to make or break him. Opposing this practice is not going to repel large segments of the electorate. I never set my hopes high for Obama, but man my hopes are sinking, and sinking fast!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:02 PM on 08/02/2008
- EarthToZoey I'm a Fan of EarthToZoey 227 fans permalink
photo

Clenbuterol, I just took a quick look at your profile. The majority of your comments not only lack original thought, but are simplistic reductions and skewed perspective.

And I think this one, in particular, gives us all a peek into your psyche:

"Apparently Barry thinks affirmative action applies to the presidency.
posted Jul 31, 2008 at 18:58:59"

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:02 PM on 08/02/2008
- the964kid I'm a Fan of the964kid 67 fans permalink
photo

Maybe it should be 'Klan-buterol'

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:08 PM on 08/02/2008
- EarthToZoey I'm a Fan of EarthToZoey 227 fans permalink
photo

Le Snap!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:45 PM on 08/02/2008
- k6007 I'm a Fan of k6007 237 fans permalink
photo

Apparently it's correct. After all, both boosh and mc, got to where they are, thanks to nepotism.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:22 PM on 08/02/2008
- califlefty I'm a Fan of califlefty 10 fans permalink

"It is only a truly dysfunctional system that would buy into the perverse logic that the short-term answer to high gasoline prices is drilling for more oil ten years from now. Am I the only one who finds it strange that our government so often adopts a so-called solution that has absolutely nothing to do with the problem it is supposed to address? When people rightly complain about higher gasoline prices, we propose to give more money to the oil companies and pretend that they're going to bring gasoline prices down. It will do nothing of the sort, and everyone knows it. If we keep going back to the same policies that have never ever worked in the past and have served only to produce the highest gasoline prices in history alongside the greatest oil company profits in history, nobody should be surprised if we get the same result over and over again." Al Gore - last week
In 2005 When Bush clamoured to open up offshore oil drilling, how many of you applauded his call to "compromise" and political civility? Please raise your hands. Now some of you call it that because it'd Obama doing the pandering. Now some of you stand foursquare with the likes of Jeb Bush and Gail Norton. Shame on those who would sellout the future for political expedience today.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:01 PM on 08/02/2008
- molonlabe I'm a Fan of molonlabe 16 fans permalink

NIce. When McCain changes positions, it's called a "flip-flop." When Obama changes positions, it's called a "shift."

What media bias?

One thing IS for certain; Obama's campaign is full of "change."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:59 PM on 08/02/2008
- RobtBrock I'm a Fan of RobtBrock 6 fans permalink

I like the idea of drilling offshore in states with Republican governors. Dig 'em up, I say! Rigs on the beach look kind of cool...like Long Beach and Signal Hill kinda cool.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:58 PM on 08/02/2008
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next › Last » (62 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect