Obama Shifts, Says He May Back Offshore Drilling

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Obama Shifts, Says He May Back Offshore Drilling stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

MIKE GLOVER | August 1, 2008 10:57 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill. answers an audience member's question, Friday, Aug. 1, 2008, during a town hall meeting in St. Petersburg, Fla. (AP Photo/Mike Carlson)

ST. PETERSBURG, Fla. — Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama said Friday he would be willing to support limited additional offshore oil drilling if that's what it takes to enact a comprehensive policy to foster fuel-efficient autos and develop alternate energy sources.

Shifting from his previous opposition to expanded offshore drilling, the Illinois senator told a Florida newspaper he could get behind a compromise with Republicans and oil companies to prevent gridlock over energy.

Republican rival John McCain, who earlier dropped his opposition to offshore drilling, has been criticizing Obama on the stump and in broadcast ads for clinging to his opposition as gasoline prices topped $4 a gallon. Polls indicate these attacks have helped McCain gain ground on Obama.

"My interest is in making sure we've got the kind of comprehensive energy policy that can bring down gas prices," Obama said in an interview with The Palm Beach Post.

"If, in order to get that passed, we have to compromise in terms of a careful, well thought-out drilling strategy that was carefully circumscribed to avoid significant environmental damage _ I don't want to be so rigid that we can't get something done."

Asked about Obama's comment, McCain said, "We need oil drilling and we need it now offshore. He has consistently opposed it. He has opposed nuclear power. He has opposed reprocessing. He has opposed storage." The GOP candidate said Obama doesn't have a plan equal to the nation's energy challenges.

In Congress, both parties have fought bitterly over energy policy for weeks, with Republicans pressing for more domestic oil drilling and Democrats railing about oil company profits. Despite hundreds of hours of House and Senate floor debate, lawmakers will leave Washington for their five-week summer hiatus this week with an empty tank.

"The Republicans and the oil companies have been really beating the drums on drilling," Obama said in the Post interview. "And so we don't want gridlock. We want to get something done."

Story continues below
advertisement

Later, Obama issued a written statement warmly welcoming a proposal sent to Senate leaders Friday by 10 senators _ five from each party. Their proposal seeks to break the impasse over offshore oil development and is expected to be examined more closely in September after Congress returns from its summer recess.

The so-called Gang of 10 plan would lift drilling bans in the eastern Gulf of Mexico, but retain an environmental buffer zone extending 50 miles off Florida's beaches and in the South Atlantic off Virginia, the Carolinas and Georgia, but only if a state agrees to the oil and gas development along its coast. The states would share in revenues from oil and gas development.

Drilling bans along the Pacific coast and the Northeast would remain in place under this compromise.

The plan also includes energy initiatives Obama has endorsed. "It would repeal tax breaks for oil companies so that we can invest billions in fuel-efficient cars, help our automakers re-tool, and make a genuine commitment to renewable sources of energy like wind power, solar power, and the next generation of clean, affordable biofuels," Obama noted.

"Like all compromises, it also includes steps that I haven't always supported," Obama conceded. "I remain skeptical that new offshore drilling will bring down gas prices in the short-term or significantly reduce our oil dependence in the long-term, though I do welcome the establishment of a process that will allow us to make future drilling decisions based on science and fact."

Nevertheless, Obama said the plan, put forward by mostly moderates and conservatives led by Sens. Kent Conrad, D-N.D., and Saxby Chambliss, R-Ga., "represents a good faith effort at a new bipartisan beginning."

Earlier in the day, Obama pushed for a windfall profits tax to fund $1,000 emergency rebate checks for consumers besieged by high energy costs, a counter to McCain's call for more offshore drilling.

The pitch for putting some of the economic burden of $4-a-gallon gasoline on the oil industry served a dual purpose for Obama: It allowed him to talk up an economic issue, seen by many as a strength for Democrats and a weakness for Republicans, and at the same time respond to criticism from McCain that Obama's opposition to offshore drilling leads to higher prices at the pump.

In linking McCain to the unpopular President Bush, Obama struck a theme from Ronald Reagan's successful 1980 campaign against President Jimmy Carter by asking a town-hall audience in St. Petersburg: "Do you think you are better off than you were four years ago or eight years ago? If you aren't better off, can you afford another four years?"

Obama primed the crowd by noting new government figures showing 51,000 jobs lost last month and citing 460,000 jobs lost over the last seven months. He tied other bad economic news from the Bush administration to McCain and offered his energy program as one route to relief.

"This rebate will be enough to offset the increased cost of gas for a working family over the next four months," Obama said during a two-day campaign swing in Florida. "It will be enough to cover the entire increase in your heating bills. Or you could use the rebate for any of your other bills, or even to pay down your own debt."

(This version CORRECTS paragraph 10 that compromise would retain a buffer zone of 50 miles off Florida Gulf beaches, instead of allow drilling within 50 miles.)

ST. PETERSBURG, Fla. — Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama said Friday he would be willing to support limited additional offshore oil drilling if that's what it takes to enact a compr...
ST. PETERSBURG, Fla. — Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama said Friday he would be willing to support limited additional offshore oil drilling if that's what it takes to enact a compr...
Filed by Dan Duray  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
4616
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next › Last » (62 pages total)
- RedEyes I'm a Fan of RedEyes 3 fans permalink
photo

The next energy flip by 0bama will be to support nuclear. just wait and see.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:58 PM on 08/02/2008
- EarthToZoey I'm a Fan of EarthToZoey 227 fans permalink
photo

He supports nuclear energy with improved safety measures.

What is it with people not understanding nuance? The world doesn't operate in black and white.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:04 PM on 08/02/2008
- RedEyes I'm a Fan of RedEyes 3 fans permalink
photo

Nuance is fine and good, but it will never do as a message. It gets lost.

And "improved safety" doesn't seem very cogent to me...i've never heard of any major nuclear accidents in the US.

France is so liberal it's socialist, and they rely on nuclear energy. So why do US liberals argue so hard against it?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:15 PM on 08/02/2008
- Beninn I'm a Fan of Beninn 33 fans permalink
photo

"He supports nuclear energy with improved safety measures."

Impossible to achieve.

And with nuclear, you can't afford mistakes. Safe nuclear plants and waste disposal hasn't happened ANYWHERE in the world.

Third incident this month at French nuclear plant left 100 employees contaminated - http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5jqOLAsI3g_zkMWP_ddGjmF6GzaUg

An Account of Events in Nuclear Power Plants Since the Chernobyl Accident in 1986 http://www.greens-efa.org/cms/topics/dokbin/181/181995.pdf

As for affordable? It's not. The true cost of nuclear is astronomical. It's yet another GWB-type scam to funnel taxpayer dollars into his family's and friends' pockets.

http://www.publiccitizen.org/documents/Price%20Anderson%20Factsheet.pdf

http://www.mecgrassroots.org/NEWSL/ISS38/38.07CostNuclear.html

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:24 PM on 08/02/2008
photo

He already supports nuclear. I guess R u s h must have forgotten to mention it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:15 PM on 08/02/2008
- RedEyes I'm a Fan of RedEyes 3 fans permalink
photo

Well then what's holding up the legislation for nuclear? If both sides agree, and we're obviously in an energy crunch, why isn't nuclear being portrayed as the solution?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:18 PM on 08/02/2008
- tbone99 I'm a Fan of tbone99 93 fans permalink

Support it ?- it supports him!- Exceleon , a Illinois nuclear industry helped fund his campaign

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:18 PM on 08/02/2008
- the964kid I'm a Fan of the964kid 63 fans permalink
photo

Nuclear power is already part of his platform, along with wind, solar, clean burning coal, hydrogen engines and ethanol.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:22 PM on 08/02/2008
- RedEyes I'm a Fan of RedEyes 3 fans permalink
photo

Clean coal? Really? Well, at least he's got some sense. I think all those things are great, besides ethanol which has raised the price of commodities and subsequently increased world hunger.

But getting off of oil is unrealistic until a more efficient means of producing energy is found.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:33 PM on 08/02/2008
- the964kid I'm a Fan of the964kid 63 fans permalink
photo

Smart move - take this off the table.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:58 PM on 08/02/2008
- Amerigucci I'm a Fan of Amerigucci 12 fans permalink

Oh yeah, real smart move.

If getting things off the table is the goal, he can sign onto all of the Republican policies.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:07 PM on 08/02/2008
- the964kid I'm a Fan of the964kid 63 fans permalink
photo

In 2004 Kerry didn't address GOP straw-man arguments and didn't get them off the table and what did we get?

Big oil has thousands of permits already that they are not using. This is a faux-argument. Big oil doesn't want more offshore drilling (check their record profit reports - they like things just they way they are) - this is a total gimmick and Dems shouldn't get duped into losing in November by undermining ourselves like we usually do. So yes - IT WAS A SMART MOVE.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:16 PM on 08/02/2008
- tbone99 I'm a Fan of tbone99 93 fans permalink

It does seem this is where we're going.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:20 PM on 08/02/2008
photo

The flippity floppity man strikes again. Before this election is over he's gonna be for AND against everything.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:52 PM on 08/02/2008
- the964kid I'm a Fan of the964kid 63 fans permalink
photo

good thing Grandpa had also flipped on this.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:58 PM on 08/02/2008
photo

And was rewarded handsomely with massive contributions to his campaign coffers by big oil.

Not that the tr0llz will ever hear of this on Fox "News" or from R u s h.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:13 PM on 08/02/2008
- EarthToZoey I'm a Fan of EarthToZoey 227 fans permalink
photo

err... meant to post that here....

Clenbuterol, I just took a quick look at your profile. The majority of your comments not only lack original thought, but are simplistic reductions and skewed perspective.

And I think this one, in particular, gives us all a peek into your psyche:

"Apparently Barry thinks affirmative action applies to the presidency.
posted Jul 31, 2008 at 18:58:59"

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:00 PM on 08/02/2008
photo

before the WEEK is over your candidate is "gonna be for AND against everything­."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:17 PM on 08/02/2008
photo

At least he's not the cut and paste man who says the lame thing over and over again.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:28 PM on 08/02/2008
- geobushono I'm a Fan of geobushono 15 fans permalink

Nationalize Oil Now, and we'll all get a slice of the pie. It may be a small piece, but with $51.5bn profit for the quarter, I say we just take it. Venezuelan gas is .19/gal, and they seem happy with that.
You do know that Mexico's Pemex is state owned, and their gas is about 2.50/gal..­.......I'l­l teach you things you don't learn from Democrats or repugs.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:47 PM on 08/02/2008
- hu.man I'm a Fan of hu.man 9 fans permalink
photo

American people are once again being taken for a ride. Here is how the narrative goes:

"Pump more oil offshore in U.S. and you pay less at the pump."

The reality couldn't be further from truth. Obama needs to make an effort to educate the public against this claptrap. But with all the chaos that is prevailing the domestic politics this may be an insurmountable task now right before the elections.

We all need to line up behind Obama to get him in. Republicans are really desperate and will resort to anything to gain an advantage even if it is blatant misinformation such as the nonsense surrounding the offshore drilling.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:41 PM on 08/02/2008
- darthdarcy I'm a Fan of darthdarcy 48 fans permalink
photo

This is more about throwing the attention off the real cause for the Oil price increase and that's the market manipulation on the Futures Market, the largest being Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley who both gave huge amounts to Obama, Goldman Sachs being the largest of all of those to bundle contributions to him...

http://www.opesecrets.org//pres08/contrib.php?cycle=2008&cid=n00009638

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:39 PM on 08/02/2008

The real reason he keeps 'flip floppin' is that he knows he can't deliver on any of his promises. What a sorry shame that the Democratic Party and the Super Delegates let some fine, capable, experienced candidates fall by the wayside. Needless to say, charisma does not guarantee a good president. However, an 'empty suit' guarantees a poor president. We have had eight years of an arrogant, self-absorbed empty suit and now we may have another period of time with another arrogant empty suit. So glad I am an Independent. How many more 'flip flops' can we expect?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:37 PM on 08/02/2008
photo

so as an independent, i assume you'll be voting for M c B u s h, the flip-flop king. Terrible argument.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:40 PM on 08/02/2008
- the964kid I'm a Fan of the964kid 63 fans permalink
photo

'always learning' what exactly???

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:33 PM on 08/02/2008

Off shore oil drilling is just another step, a tiny one to put off the inevitable. Does anyone think that companies that are bringing in $1500 a second are going to do something to stop this, I don't know I'm skeptical. Why is GM investing $ into hydrogen stations when it is losing 15 Billion $'s. Sometimes easy solutions are not necessarily the best, it hurts my pocket too. But if we the US of A want to lead and get the dollar up in value I think we should go green, fuel cells and wind. Take a look at the pictures of Beijing, the rest of the world could want tp play catch up to green!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:37 PM on 08/02/2008
- Viper I'm a Fan of Viper 267 fans permalink

Bejing is what happmned whe n you use Coal... Its the way our major cities were before the switch to Oil and Natural Gas.

As the price of oil has gone up... there is a move to the far dirtier coal.

The switch over will take 20-30 years... It will never happen if our economy collapses. You are paying more... but 500,000 have lost their jobs already.

Regards

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:43 PM on 08/02/2008

So it begs to question why are they importing more oil if they are moving to far dirtier coal? It also brings into question your statement on before we switched to Oil and Natural Gas. Do you not understand that the good old US of A hardly burns oil to produce electricty (just 2%) while we burn almost all the rest in cars! Most of our electricity is coal produced..­.

The problem is not a switch over as you say, the problem is having the will to take the industry by the horns, in the meantime you will produce good jobs if we decide on leading the transformation from gasoline to fuel cells. We can then export the saved oil to other countries.­..

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:28 PM on 08/02/2008
- EarthToZoey I'm a Fan of EarthToZoey 227 fans permalink
photo

I am addicted to Huffington Post. I must seek treatment.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:32 PM on 08/02/2008
- Lion24 I'm a Fan of Lion24 125 fans permalink
photo

Yes. Let's hear it for the Huffington Post. They ARE on top of the passing scene. More so than anybody else out there.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:37 PM on 08/02/2008
- EarthToZoey I'm a Fan of EarthToZoey 227 fans permalink
photo

Yes! I will toast all of you with my grande cup of non-fat liberal latte!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:49 PM on 08/02/2008
- andvoodoo2 I'm a Fan of andvoodoo2 122 fans permalink
photo

LOL! Check the "Living" section. They might have an article there to help you.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:38 PM on 08/02/2008
- EarthToZoey I'm a Fan of EarthToZoey 227 fans permalink
photo

Haha!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:43 PM on 08/02/2008
photo

I'm addicted also. It's the only place where I feel you can learn and also express yourself.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:44 PM on 08/02/2008
- EarthToZoey I'm a Fan of EarthToZoey 227 fans permalink
photo

The internet is a fantastic means of communication, isn't it?

The major drawback, though, is missing body language and voice intonation. A lot is misunderstood because of that.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:47 PM on 08/02/2008
- barriosbabe I'm a Fan of barriosbabe 242 fans permalink
photo

Refuse to vacation via airplane! Ride a bike! Walk to the store! Carpool to work w/three other people! Grow up, America! Sheesh! If we were all doing that, we wouldn't need these lame ass discussions re oil.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:25 PM on 08/02/2008

Seems the messiah is just another pandering pol without any core set of beliefs or principles­....

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:25 PM on 08/02/2008
- swooge I'm a Fan of swooge 13 fans permalink
photo

WOW! I guess not reading the article is no longer a spectator sport.

Thanks for playing...­Johnny, tell him about his nice parting gift.

heh...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:26 PM on 08/02/2008
- EarthToZoey I'm a Fan of EarthToZoey 227 fans permalink
photo

He will be getting a Bass-O-Matic 76!! It's the one and only Bass-O-Matic that uses the whole fish! Just pop it in the blender and turn it on, simple as that!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:39 PM on 08/02/2008
photo

Core beliefs when they are held stern by each party in a democracy equals gridlock and divisive politics.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:27 PM on 08/02/2008
- EarthToZoey I'm a Fan of EarthToZoey 227 fans permalink
photo

Aptly, accurately, and succinctly put.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:40 PM on 08/02/2008
photo

That is exactly what I thought about Hillary's vote for the war resolution.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:41 PM on 08/02/2008
- Amerigucci I'm a Fan of Amerigucci 12 fans permalink

80% of the American people have realized that Republican policies suck and they want change. They want a clean environment and they want new energy policies which get us off of polluting oil. Anyone's oil.

Democrats, Independents and Republicans voted in the primaries for a candidate who said he was for a new kind of politics in Washington, where special interests like Big Oil didn't get a seat at the table.

Congress's approval is down below the President's. That's because Democrats, the controlling majority, have failed to deliver on their promise to hold Republicans accountable.

And this clown caves.

His paid troIIs can keep posting their support on these websites, but the fact is he's lost my vote, will get no more of my money, and I'm hearing that from my friends and family, too. We couldn't be more angry or feel more betrayed by a party that we've worked for for many years.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:13 PM on 08/02/2008
photo

Do not not like this idea... still voting for O. It is a shift... we will see many more before election day - I hope this works for us as democrats.

"Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama said Friday he would be willing to support limited additional offshore oil drilling..­."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:37 PM on 08/02/2008
photo

I'm ready for a diplomatic president who is willing to negotiate--not another decider. I also believe that we need to stop being selfish, always whining about not getting exactly what we want. Bridges are better than walls, and if we can learn to work together, then perhaps there is hope. But not with a bomb bomb Iran president.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:45 PM on 08/02/2008
photo

earning more Mc.Cain points? I hear if you earn enough of them you can win cool prizes, like a pair of signed John Mc.Cain designer flip flops. Good luck, Nauseous..­.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:23 PM on 08/02/2008
- marijam I'm a Fan of marijam 38 fans permalink
photo

Off-shore drilling is a red herring. When he's negotiating, he needs to find out why the oil companies are n't using the leases they've got. It's like having your pockets full of gold but wanting more, more, more and, to top it all off, it'll go on the global market and be subject to global demand. Increased supply can mean increased demand and it just spirals up and up until, eventually, things fall into equilibrium. This current push for additional drilling leases is just a grab for all that can be had prior to Congress and the presidency going Democratic. Why they think they need to grab all they can, I surely don't know.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:24 PM on 08/02/2008

The aren't using the leases because oil exploration and drilling is costly. Why would they rush to pay out of their own pockets to increase supply and bring down the price, and thus bring down their own profit. They are waiting for you - the taxpayer - to become so desperate that you will pay them to do it. That's the republican plan. Our man has the right idea, lift the drilling prohibitions, but at the same time say no more taxpayer subsidy - we're putting our money into investing into efficiency and new energy. Believe me, none of this drilling will ever take place, federal prohibition or not.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:38 PM on 08/02/2008

That's only a small part of the answer. Oil companies do not now have the necessary equipment to drill there. There is a major equipment shortage. Which of course is just another reason not to open more leases until they can effectively manage what they have.

Still, there are billions of barrels of oil in and around Alaska that are not in ANWR. And the pipelines are already in place to deliver it. Interior opened more than two million acres of it two weeks ago. But there is still more that is not being opened by Interior. Why do you suppose that is? After Interior is controlled by Republicans.

There is no current need to open more offshore leases.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:51 PM on 08/02/2008
- gaebolgaes I'm a Fan of gaebolgaes 16 fans permalink

not only, not only marijam...­when this generation sucks out the last drop of oil...what­s left for our children and grand childrenge­ograpicall­y what will it do to the earths crust and tectonic plate slippage and earthquake probabilities? after the first accident..­we will all shut up about nuclear plants and clean coal and the environmental damage it will cause is idiotic.wi­nd ..solar...­biofuel...­including hemp oil.......­auto free citys with hydraulic and hydrostatic and magnetic light rail conveyance­s...balloo­n and parafoil travel are the wave of the future nicolai tesla figgered it out years ago.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:59 PM on 08/02/2008
- camipco I'm a Fan of camipco 11 fans permalink
photo

I think he's acting like the moderate senator he is. He hasn't changed to say he supports offshore drilling. He's saying he would vote for a compromise bill if it had good enough provisions for alternate energy. This is that bipartisanship that we hear so much about, which normally is just something people say to get elected. This is evidence of a genuine willingness to compromise with Republicans, which he's talked about repeatedly. Compromise means sometimes you have to be willing to let them get what they want, even if what they want is dumb. The money quote from the article is "I don't want to be so rigid that we can't get something done."

It does, however, fall neatly under the Paul Krugman criticism that he'll be an appeaser of the right when we need a warrior (and unlike most criticisms, this is actually based on the content of his policies and speeches). Of course, Obama has argued that what the country needs isn't a liberal revolution, it's healing and moderation. Is he right? I don't know, but I do think it's sincerely his philosophy of governance.

In terms of election strategy, is softening the offshore drilling attack worth feeding the flip-flop charge? My guess is that the calculus was that they gain more in the middle with this, independents like people who are prepared to compromise, than they lose at the left, especially with McCain helpfully energizing our base with his attacks.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:19 PM on 08/02/2008
photo

Good move BO. The polls are showing he has to do this if he wants to win.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:12 PM on 08/02/2008

Oh God!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:22 PM on 08/02/2008
- Viper I'm a Fan of Viper 267 fans permalink

And you find the most fish around drilling platforms.

Regards

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:37 PM on 08/02/2008

Has anyone any info about oil companies who are drilling in the U.S. then sell the oil to subsidiary companies of theirs to refine, then these subsidiary companies sell it to a different subsidiary and so on until the price is equal to what forgein oil costs and then is sold back to the original oil company who drilled for the oil in the first place. This way they justify the price when it gets to the consumer. All of the subsidiarys are owned by the same oil company. My husband saw it on a show. Unfortunately he doesn't remember what show it was. My point is if this is true and I have the facts correct how can we possibly ever believe oil prices will come down by off shore drilling. If true all this will do is line the oil companies with continued huge profits. I am not in the mood to continue lining oil companies with these huge profits if they are cheating the system. If anyone has any info I would appreciate it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:51 PM on 08/02/2008
- the964kid I'm a Fan of the964kid 63 fans permalink
photo

yep - i agree.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:56 PM on 08/02/2008
photo

What will happen know that McBush has ZERO issues to run his campaign on now?

I will build 100 nuclear power plants.

Nuclear energy is green, it may be a florescent glowing green but it is green.

McBush's and 0bama's positions on nuclear power speaks volumes. This is another example of where McBush is a radical and impulsive thinker and 0bama is a moderate strategic thinker. McBush wants to go full speed ahead and build as many plants as possible without consideration of who is going to pay for building those plants and where they are going to put the nuclear waste. 0bama has a moderate plan to build as many nuclear plants that is practical factoring in that we need a better solution for nuclear waste. I love the people who bring up the fact that even socialists build more nuclear plants, why because they have a much higher tax base and subsidize the funding to build those plants and dispose of the waste. So unless McBush raises taxes to subsidize nuclear energy or passes off much higher electricity rates than people are paying with mostly coal plants than he cannot build his 40 plants.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:12 PM on 08/02/2008
- Actionmac I'm a Fan of Actionmac 10 fans permalink
photo

No he still has the O.bama will SURGE your TAXES issue... that one is working as well as the Britney, Paris and too Skinny to run the country. Right? right?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:13 PM on 08/02/2008
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next › Last » (62 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect