Sorority may link anthrax suspect to NJ letters

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

LARA JAKES JORDAN and MATT APUZZO | August 4, 2008 11:22 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »

People walk by a brick office building 20 Nassau St., in Princeton, N.J., Monday, Aug. 4, 2008. A sorority, Kappa Kappa Gamma, has an office in this building. Former Army scientist Bruce Ivins, the top suspect in the 2001 anthrax attacks was obsessed with a sorority that sat less than 100 yards away from a New Jersey mailbox where the toxin-laced letters were sent, authorities said Monday. (AP Photo/Mike Derer)

WASHINGTON — His decades-long obsession with a college sorority may link a former Army biowarfare scientist to four anthrax-laced letters dropped off at a New Jersey mailbox in 2001, authorities said Monday in the latest twist of one of the most bizarre unsolved crimes in FBI history.

U.S. officials said Bruce Ivins' fixation with Kappa Kappa Gamma could explain one of the biggest mysteries in the case: why the anthrax was mailed from Princeton, N.J., 195 miles from the lab it's believed to have been smuggled from.

Still, authorities acknowledge they cannot place Ivins in Princeton the day the anthrax was mailed. And the curious explanation connecting the scientist and a sorority is unlikely to satisfy his friends and former co-workers who question what motive the married father of two might have had for unleashing the attack.

Ivins, 62, killed himself last week as the Justice Department prepared to indict him on capital murder charges for the deaths of five people who were poisoned by the anthrax in the weeks following 9/11. His attorney maintains he would have been proven innocent were he still alive.

The mailbox just off the campus of Princeton University where the letters were mailed sits about 100 yards away from where the college's Kappa Kappa Gamma chapter stores its rush materials, initiation robes and other property. Sorority members do not live there, and the Kappa chapter at Princeton does not provide a house for the women.

Multiple U.S. officials told The Associated Press that Ivins was obsessed with Kappa Kappa Gamma, going back as far as his own college days at the University of Cincinnati when he apparently was rebuffed by a woman in the sorority. The officials all spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the case publicly.

There is nothing to indicate Ivins was focused on any one sorority member or other Princeton student, the officials said. Instead, officials said, Ivins' e-mails and other documents detail his long-standing fixation on the organization.

An adviser to the Kappa Kappa Gamma chapter at Princeton, Katherine Breckinridge Graham, said Monday she was interviewed by FBI agents "over the last couple of years" about the case. She said she could not provide any details about the interview because she signed an FBI nondisclosure form.

Story continues below
advertisement

However, Graham said there was nothing to indicate that any of the sorority members had anything to do with Ivins.

"Nothing odd went on," said Graham, an attorney and Kappa alumna.

Kappa Kappa Gamma executive director Lauren Paitson, reached at the sorority's headquarters in Columbus, Ohio, initially told an AP reporter Monday afternoon she would provide a comment shortly. She did not answer subsequent phone messages or e-mails seeking that response.

Had he lived, authorities had planned to argue that Ivins could have made the seven-hour round trip to Princeton from the Fort Detrick lab in Frederick, Md., after work. One official said investigators were working off the theory that Ivins chose to mail the letters from outside the sorority's Princeton chapter to confuse the government if he ever were to emerge as a suspect in the case.

Kappa Kappa Gamma also has chapters at colleges in Maryland, Pennsylvania and Washington.

Princeton University referred questions about Ivins to the FBI. The university does not formally recognize sororities and fraternities, but chapters operate off campus. Local police in both Princeton Borough and Princeton Township said Ivins' name did not turn up on any incident reports or restraining orders.

Details about Ivins' alleged obsession with the sorority will be spelled out in court documents that could be made public as early as Tuesday. The Justice Department is expected to decide soon whether to end the "Amerithrax" investigation by concluding Ivins acted alone in carrying out the attacks that killed five and sickened 17.

Even the government officials acknowledged the sorority connection is a strange one, and it's not likely to ease concerns by Ivins' friends and former co-workers who are skeptical about the case against him.

Ivins' attorney, Paul F. Kemp, did not immediately respond to a message seeking comment Monday but has asserted his client's innocence and said he would have been vindicated in court.

At least some of Ivins' former colleagues, as well as others who want to see the FBI's still-secret evidence, question whether he could have created the powder form of the deadly toxin without co-workers noticing.

In August 2002, investigators announced they'd found anthrax spores inside the mailbox on Nassau Street, Princeton's main thoroughfare. FBI agents immediately began canvassing the town, showing residents a photograph of Army scientist Steven J. Hatfill, who at the time was a key "person of interest" in the case.

That theory fell flat and this June, the Justice Department exonerated Hatfill and agreed to a $5.8 million settlement with him.

In the past year, the FBI has turned its attention to Ivins, whom a therapist said had a history of homicidal and sociopathic behavior. Social worker Jean C. Duley won a protective order against Ivins on July 24 after telling a judge the scientist was a homicidal sociopath.

Duley, 45, also has a minor criminal record, according to court records. She pleaded guilty in April to driving under the influence and was fined $500 and placed on probation for nearly a year. In October 2006, she pleaded guilty to reckless driving and was fined $580. A 1992 charge of possessing drug paraphernalia was dismissed.

___

Associated Press writers Geoff Mulvihill in Mount Laurel, N.J., and David Dishneau in Hagerstown, Md., contributed to this report.

WASHINGTON — His decades-long obsession with a college sorority may link a former Army biowarfare scientist to four anthrax-laced letters dropped off at a New Jersey mailbox in 2001, authorities...
WASHINGTON — His decades-long obsession with a college sorority may link a former Army biowarfare scientist to four anthrax-laced letters dropped off at a New Jersey mailbox in 2001, authorities...
 
Comments
106
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 Next › Last » (4 pages total)
photo

The first order of protocol for a any Clinician is "Do no harm", and there are three instances when the client/therapist confidentiality clause is waived. 1. When a patient declares he/she is going to commit suicide; 2. When a patient discloses he/she is sexually abusing a child; and 3. When a patient says they are going to harm or kill another human being. Therefore, if this therapist was following protocol, she will have extensive records to back up her claims. Furthermore, it is my understanding that Mr. Ivins was in 'group therapy", so these other clients also have a right and an obligation to waive the confidentiality agreement they enter into as a member of group therapy, and disclose any information they believe would help in this case.

Nothing in this case makes sense to me, and I am very interested in the "evidence" the FBI based its case on.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:38 AM on 08/05/2008

I don't know if any of you have seen this. Pretty interesting read.

Yeah form the WSJ.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121789293570011775.html?mod=opinion_main_commentaries

OPINION

Bruce Ivins Wasn't the Anthrax Culprit
By RICHARD SPERTZEL
August 5, 2008

Over the past week the media was gripped by the news that the FBI was about to charge Bruce Ivins, a leading anthrax expert, as the man responsible for the anthrax letter attacks in September/October 2001.

But despite the seemingly powerful narrative that Ivins committed suicide because investigators were closing in, this is still far from a shut case. The FBI needs to explain why it zeroed in on Ivins, how he could have made the anthrax mailed to lawmakers and the media, and how he (or anyone else) could have pulled off the attacks, acting alone.

I believe this is another mistake in the investigation.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:12 AM on 08/05/2008

Yesterday the LA Times had a story filling in some of the details of the link to Ivins. I can't do it justice in 250 words, but here are two links, one to that story and one to the science publication of the genome analysis of the bioterror attack strains.

www.latimes.com/news/printedition/front/la-na-anthrax4-2008aug04,0,6131835.story
www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/296/5575/2028

The extremely short version appears to be this: The DNA sequencing indicated that a mixture of strains were used in the attacks (2002 paper, the data supporting this conclusion is in the paper but they don't look at that aspect of it). Ivins imported a number of anthracis strains from other biodefense labs, when USAMRIID typically sent out strains not received them. New genetic analysis of the old DNA samples and the strains Ivins received indicates that the mixture of strains he had possession of was used in the attacks, and that he had used a similar mixture in some of his legitimate work.

Before anyone jumps on me, I'm not endorsing any particular theory for this. It certainly makes him a link in the chain, but it doesn't actually prove that he did it, someone could have swiped a couple of microliters of one of his cultures and started their own (essentially).

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:34 AM on 08/05/2008

Chances are Ivins was in Princeton on his way into New York City to meet with the Bankers and Oil executives responsible for 9 /11 . I suspect THAT is why he was in Princeton

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:53 AM on 08/05/2008

You forgot that he was meeting w/ the Easter Bunny too!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:58 AM on 08/05/2008
- ymax I'm a Fan of ymax permalink

Not in October.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:53 PM on 08/05/2008

I don't believe it. This Duley person just won a protective order. What is the proof that he bothered her. The fact that she has a record tells me that she could easily be coerced into saying or doing anything to protect herself. Where and how could they be connected. Where is the proof that Irvins had psychopathic problems. He seems to have been easy prey.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:45 AM on 08/05/2008

This is beyond b.s.

Prove to me that Ivins was in Princeton that day & we can start to talk like adults.

KKG has almost no sizeable existance @ Princeton, they don't even have a house.

The main stream press is mocking America with this 'story'.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:44 AM on 08/05/2008

Of course, with Mr. Ivins can be 'guilty'. How does a dead man defend himself? This administration does not tolerate those who disagree and simply refuse to go away. He probably interfered considerably with the Government's attempts to make the story go away...now that a new administration may be at the helm, God knows they wouldn't want someone to get ahold of another of the Bush Administration fairy tales. God Speed Mr. Ivins. There are many who don't believe you did what you are now accused of doing.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:20 AM on 08/05/2008
photo

Just because this administration does not tolerate those who disagree, doesn't mean Ivins didn't do it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:23 AM on 08/05/2008

They do not show any obsession or connection to the sorority in Princeton. The girlfriend that caused the obsession was in Cincinnati. Why wouldn't he mail from there? Too far, OK. Then if the actual site of the rejection was not important, why not mail it from the Washington branch of the sorority. Much closer than driving 7 hours to Nj and back. If fixated on the sorority, why did he make the letters sound like they were from Arab terrorist. Was the girlfriend that rejected him and caused the obsession an Arab or a terrorist. or did she work for Dick Cheney? Lets see, he then addressed the letters to Leading liberal Democrats because he could not remember the names and addresses of any Republicans. His old girlfriend used to belong to Young Americans for freedom. I am getting confused. The FBI will have to call Dr. Phil and get some more convenient cheap psychology to explain those points.

PS When will Oliver Stone make this into a movie.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:02 AM on 08/05/2008
photo

"I am getting confused." ???

You ARE confused.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:24 AM on 08/05/2008

This is all just a little too "Wag the Dog" for me.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:48 AM on 08/05/2008
photo

Interesting that the FBI's star witness, Duley has a long record of numerous DUI's

Any good attorney would have no trouble discrediting this witness in an open murder trial.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:34 AM on 08/05/2008

I guess they're so accustomed to the American mainstream media accepting their lies and not challenging anything anymore, that they don't even have to try very hard. I honestly find it difficult to believe anything we're told these days. We're in such an awful state. I pray Obama wins.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:23 AM on 08/05/2008

I guess they're so accustomed to the American mainstream media accepting their lies and not challenging anything anymore, that they don't even have to try very hard. I honestly find it difficult to believe anything we're told these days. We're in such an awful state. I pray Obama wins.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:21 AM on 08/05/2008
- ymax I'm a Fan of ymax permalink

There is NO-way that Mr. Ivins is responsible for the Anthrax attack in oct. 2001.

In the lab that he was working at the time thay had surveiilance on evry person 24/7 365 day a year.

To top it all, to kill himself with Tylenol-3?...................I don't think so.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:56 AM on 08/05/2008

Studies show that 9 out of 10 bioweapons scientists recommend Tylenol over other leading pain relief medications.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:07 AM on 08/05/2008

As for the 24/7 suveilance, Monica Goodling was able to determine that all the other scientists that handled the anthrax strain passed the "Why do you want to server Bush?" test.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:12 AM on 08/05/2008

The news media is claiming (as if they know) that Ivins killed himself because the FBI was "closing in" on him. On the other hand, in much closer proximity to his actual death, his therapist just received a no-contact court order on him last week. Seems to me that it's much more plausible that he killed himself in response to that protective order. It would spell the end of his career as his security clearance would be revoked automatically and he would lose his job, not to mention the fact that it places in the public record the fact that he's a stalker with homicidal tendencies.

I wouldn't be surprised if the long FBI investigation wasn't really just very low key until that court case prompted them. But hey, the MSM does like a good drama. Forget about the facts if they interfere with the narrative.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:44 AM on 08/05/2008

One of the stories that first came out said that he was being forced to retire later this year (no idea on the link and I haven't seen it mentioned since in the AP stories so maybe that wasn't the case).

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:38 AM on 08/05/2008
photo

Hatfill didn't kill himself when the government accused him. He fought it and was awarded more than $5 million. So if Ivins was innocent, he could have done the same thing, but he chose suicide.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:28 AM on 08/05/2008
photo

I heard there were "coercive interrogation tactics" used... The more that comes out on this, the less believable its becoming.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:34 AM on 08/05/2008
photo

So how else was the FBI supposed to link the scientist to a mail box, if not his being "obsessed" with some college group from his youth... Makes sense,

Is it just me or is this whole thing seeming like an FBI desperate to find their scapegoat?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:42 AM on 08/05/2008

We don't have all the information yet. There are more questions than answers, such as if this guy had a history of homicidal thoughts and downright behavior, why did he still have a security clearance? And if his therapist just filed for a no-contact order last week, what led FBI to begin investigating him more than a year ago?

The Newsweek piece says they expect the files to be opened for the public if the government decides to close the case. It's too premature to jump to conspiracy theories just yet.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:31 AM on 08/05/2008

Just how 'obsessive' was this alleged obsession with the sorority? The anonymous officials are quick to point it out, but what is it based on. Doesn't look like arrests or threatening, illegal behavior led them to this conclusion. Emails and documents? So if he had lots of catalogs at home and frequent web purchases, he would be considered obsessed with Walmart?

The recent order of protection seems just a little too well-timed too. The whole case is very disturbing.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:26 AM on 08/05/2008
Page: 1 2 3 4 Next › Last » (4 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in  or  Connect