The Death Of Trends: Part I

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

JC Report   |  Erin Magner   |   August 5, 2008 11:50 AM



This piece was originally published on JCReport.com.

Back in February 1988, Vogue's "Point of View" column constantly alluded to the "right" style. Pants in this category were "narrow over the hip, softer and wider through the leg," while jackets were "longer, sharply tailored...often graphic in its design," hemlines were short, the proper color was green and the best accessory a scarf.

Twenty years on and the diktats of cool have become much less defined. Elle's March 2008 issue advises readers to stock up on cargo pants, mannish trousers, skinny jeans, denim cutoffs and flares, to pair with floral blouses, white tees, pajama tops or gypsy-inspired camisoles. And, while the apparel list seems rather extensive, every proper fashionista's list of must-have shoes also includes sculptural heels, wedges, gladiator sandals, ballet flats, open-toed booties and moccasins.

2008-08-05-end9.jpg
Image courtesy of Style Sight


When it comes to fashion in 2008 the only prevailing trend is that there are no prevailing trends. From excess to minimalism, free-spirited ingénue to tailored sophisticate--and everything in between--designers are mining just about every culture, decade and mood to create a distinctly "anything-goes" aesthetic.

"It's always been difficult to define an era's trends without generalizing, but nowadays, it's difficult to even define what a trend is," says Ben Whyman, writer and lecturer at London College of Fashion and arts editor of Issue One magazine. "It's safe to say the '80s were the age of the Yuppie and the New Romantic, while the '90s were about grunge on the streets and minimalism on the catwalks. But in these tight economic times, designers and shops are desperate for customers, so they're offering up lots of mini-trends within trends to appeal to as wide an audience as possible. It's hard to pin a season down to a single idea anymore," he adds.

2008-08-05-end8.jpg
Image courtesy of Style Sight


In this absence of a clear-cut sartorial zeitgeist, "Designers are focusing more on their own brand identities, despite what everyone else is doing," explains Stephanie Meyerson, Director of Youth Culture at trend resource agency Style Sight. "Balenciaga, Marc Jacobs, Gucci, Prada--all have an unwavering sense of brand vision and creativity, regardless of fleeting trends." It's an evolution that, though great for creativity, has made the editor's job of pinpointing "the new black" much more difficult.

Story continues below
advertisement

It's not just designers who are contributing to the end of boldface trends, however. Armed with broadband and blogrolls, consumers, too, are rejecting the commandments of the editorial elite, taking inspiration from peers around the world to craft their own personal interpretations of style. Rather than buy into one trend from head-to-toe, like the "preppy" or "punk" movements of decades past, consumers are appropriating eclectic influences and remixing them like a DJ does with music. It's now common to see stylistic mash-ups, like a demure Stella McCartney floral-print blouse coupled with Alexander Wang's grimy cutoffs and finished off with a pair of Balenciaga's erotically charged knee-high gladiator sandals.

2008-08-05-end7.jpg
Image courtesy of Style Sight


Sure, mixing different influences isn't particularly groundbreaking, but the current difference is the result of access. The boldness of the aforementioned outfit, for example, is no longer unique to the creative enclaves of London, New York and Paris. We're now seeing this kind of independent dressing everywhere from a flea market in Perth to a gig in St. Louis or a lounge in Prague.

"With the rise of 'fast-fashion' retailers, consumers have an overload of trends to choose from," explains Meyerson. "They ingest so much information from magazines, internet and TV that they're able to quickly digest the trends, buy what they want and style things in a unique, smart way. Not to mention the economy is making us think twice about each purchase, which brings a natural creative consciousness back to fashion." Adds Whyman: "The consumer is now so savvy that they choose only what's right for them and their lifestyle. I think this is the fundamental difference from 10 or 20 years ago, when people were more likely to loyally buy into one designer's ethos."

In the run-up to the spring/summer '09 collections, we'll be taking a closer look at how the trend is being re-defined, from the role of retailers in its shortening life cycle to the influence of alternative media in its proliferation. We may be just as baffled once show season rolls around, but hopefully there will be a little more context to the chaos.

This is the first in a three part series. The subsequent articles will appear on the next two Mondays, August 11 and August 18.

This piece was originally published on JCReport.com. Back in February 1988, Vogue's "Point of View" column constantly alluded to the "right" style. Pants in this category were "narrow over the hip, s...
This piece was originally published on JCReport.com. Back in February 1988, Vogue's "Point of View" column constantly alluded to the "right" style. Pants in this category were "narrow over the hip, s...
 
Comments
26
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)

"diktats of cool" DIKTATS?
How can anyone take fashion trends seriously, with this level of literacy?

Diktats...I suppose that makes people like Raoul Castro "diktaters..."

Makes you look forward to the next installment of this tripe, don't it?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:49 AM on 08/08/2008
photo

Try a dictionary before you go mouthing off and looking like the illiterate one. A "diktat" is a pronouncement made by someone in power without listening to the general public.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:18 PM on 08/08/2008

I know I'm dating myself, but I remember the year 1970 when the fashion industry turned dictatorial and punitive in their zeal to force women into a style they did not like. Women rebelled, retreating into pantsuits, which we've been wearing ever since. Many fashion houses went broke in 1970. I'm not interested in what skirt length happens to be "in style" at the moment. I want CHOICE.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:37 AM on 08/08/2008
photo

"Anything goes"? You have got to be living on Mars and surely not in the deep South. I once wore cargo pants on my head to play tennis at a country club in Mobile. You think I can ever do lunch in that town again? Get real.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:39 PM on 08/07/2008

LOL. The outfits in the pictures are atrocious. They look like vagabonds but I know their outfits cost more than a lot of my clothes combined. Whatever, I do what I want!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:39 AM on 08/07/2008
photo

Those hipster girls are HOT

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:24 PM on 08/07/2008
photo

All of the styles shown in this article are what I call "Bohemian homelessness." A bunch of piled up layers, too much cloth, screaming out "I'm an individual, yet I'm a victim of fashion." The hair style on the woman in blue should go with the HuffPost article on cutting your own hair, and what happens when things go terribly wrong. This is totally the Olsen Twins' fashion statement. It's like putting together a trendy outfit in a thrift store, only you paid a lot of money for it and they're brand new. Ugly Betty chic vs. Stevie Nicks glam.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:35 AM on 08/06/2008

I will never again give a flying sh(*#$ what "designers" and "fashionistas" have to say. I will dress to please myself and my body shape. The rest can got to hell.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:40 AM on 08/06/2008

Gonna make your own stuff?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:56 AM on 08/06/2008

I've been saying for decades now that fashion designers have the worst taste in clothes and looking at the gear on the women in the photos in this article, I confidently say that I continue to be correct.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:21 AM on 08/06/2008
photo

Hey Lauram, no one has ever forced you to wear any particular type of clothing. What you wear has been your own choice all along. It's cool if you don't want to wear what "designers" and "fashionistas" are promoting. But it's a waste of energy to condemn them to hell!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:37 AM on 08/06/2008
- TN I'm a Fan of TN permalink

Those outfits are awfull.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:06 AM on 08/06/2008
photo

Actually, there's been a very strong trend in recent years. It has to do with fabrics. When is the last time you saw any thick poly a la 1970s? And the silhouettes are definitely 21st century.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:29 PM on 08/05/2008
photo

"Handbags - it's the engine that's carrying the fashion world" according to Bill Cunningham, "On the Street" New York Time, July 2008.

Wear anything but choose a stylish handbag. I especially like total black with a glitzy silver bag.

Bill also notes from what he sees on New York's streets that the pencil thin skirt is back with slits and the vest is back. All apart from designer dictates. It's grass roots style.

Watch people like Victoria Beckham styled to the max she must have 10 Hermes Birkin handbags at $3K each.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:25 PM on 08/05/2008

you dress to suit yourself...men try to run every thing you do...please.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:24 PM on 08/05/2008
photo

who said it- "fashion is so repulsive it needs to be changed twice a year"

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:11 PM on 08/05/2008
photo

It's very simple:

If you're under 40, wear anything that Gwen Stefani wears
If you're between 40 & 65, wear anything that Michelle Obama wears
If you're over 65, wear whatever is comfortable

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:34 PM on 08/05/2008

Cargo pants are very functional. Me like.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:20 PM on 08/05/2008
photo

Me like too. Me carry things. Me carry lots of things far in Cargo pants.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:04 PM on 08/05/2008

And all along it was just to get folks (mostly women) to keep buying more stuff, that's all.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:06 PM on 08/05/2008
photo

that's a real challenge- getting women to buy more stuff...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:48 AM on 08/06/2008
- land I'm a Fan of land permalink

I'm glad to be reading about style democratization. It's about time broader culture matures past rigid tastes and guidelines. It's the right step on the way to eliminating the culture of obsolescence and waste, not to mention it makes for a much healthier emotional/psychological relationship between people and their clothes/image.
Recycle, reduce, reuse, mix, create and be yourself. It's the only way fashion can remain relevant going forward.
Project runway needs to do more of the recycle/thrift shop challenges. Who's with me?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:05 PM on 08/05/2008

If there were a "trend" today, I think it would be mix-and-max: people are mixing designer clothes and stuff from Target, thrift store clothes with stuff they made themselves, etc. Answering the question "Who are you wearing?" has gotten much more complicated.

I remember when wearing something from a discount or thrift store would put you in the out crowd, but now it's cool. I'm sure the economy has a bit to do with that, but also young people aren't into "fitting in" as much as they used to; they want to be original and unique.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:43 PM on 08/07/2008
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in  or  Connect