Bruce Ivins Only One Responsible For Anthrax Deaths, Says Justice Department

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Bruce Ivins Only One Responsible For Anthrax Deaths, Says Justice Department stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

LARA JAKES JORDAN and MATT APUZZO | August 6, 2008 10:57 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
This document released by the Department of Justice on Aug. 6, 2008, shows a copy of the search warrant that was issued on Oct. 31, 2007, for a search of army scientist Bruce Ivins home. The warrant was executed on Nov. 1, 2007. Ivins "was the only person responsible" for anthrax attacks in 2001 that killed five and rattled the nation, the Justice Department said, backing up the claim with dozens of documents all pointing to his guilt. (AP Photo/Department of Justice)

WASHINGTON — Army scientist Bruce Ivins had in his lab highly purified anthrax spores that were linked to the 2001 attacks that killed five and access to the distinctive envelopes used to mail them, the government declared Wednesday, releasing a stack of documents to support a damning though circumstantial case.

Ivins, a brilliant but deeply troubled man who committed suicide last week, was the anthrax killer whose mailings rattled the nation in the worst bioterror case in U.S. history, just a month after the Sept. 11 terror attacks, federal prosecutors asserted. They were backed by court documents that were a combination of hard DNA evidence, suspicious behavior and, sometimes, outright speculation.

Ivins' attorney said the government was "taking a weird guy and convicting him of mass murder" without real evidence. Republican Sen. Charles Grassley of Iowa called for a congressional investigation.

Ivins had submitted false anthrax samples to the FBI to throw investigators off his trail and was unable to provide "an adequate explanation for his late laboratory work hours" around the time of the attacks, according to documents that officials made public to support their conclusions.

Investigators also said he sought to frame unnamed co-workers and had immunized himself against anthrax and yellow fever in early September 2001, several weeks before the first anthrax-laced envelope was received in the mail.

Ivins killed himself last week as investigators closed in, and U.S. Attorney Jeffrey Taylor said at a Justice Department news conference, "We regret that we will not have the opportunity to present evidence to the jury."

The scientist's attorney, Paul F. Kemp, heatedly dismissed that comment.

"They didn't talk about one thing that they got as result of all those searches," he said. "I just don't think he did it, and I don't think the evidence exists."

Story continues below
advertisement

Taylor conceded the evidence was largely if not wholly circumstantial but insisted it would have been enough to convict.

The prosecutor's news conference capped a fast-paced series of events in which the government partially lifted its veil of secrecy in the investigation of the poisonings that followed closely after the airliner terror attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.

The newly released records depict Ivins as deeply troubled, increasingly so as he confronted the possibility of being charged.

"He said he was not going to face the death penalty, but instead had a plan to kill co-workers and other individuals who had wronged him," according to one affidavit. In e-mails to colleagues, Ivins described a feeling of dual personalities, the material said.

Officials disclosed Wednesday they had restricted his access to the biological agents last September.

Ivins was described in the documents as the sole custodian of highly purified anthrax spores with "certain genetic mutations identical" to the poison used in the attacks. When pressed, Taylor acknowledged "a large number of individuals, over 100," had access to the substance.

Investigators said they had traced back to his lab the type of envelopes used to send the deadly powder through the mails.

The FBI's investigation had dragged on for years, tarnishing the reputation of the agency in the process. Investigators had long focused on Steven J. Hatfill, whose career as a bioscientist was ruined after then-Attorney General John Ashcroft named him a "person of interest" in 2002. The government recently paid $6 million to settle a lawsuit by Hatfill, who worked in the same lab as Ivins.

Taylor said Wednesday that investigators concluded in 2005 that Hatfill couldn't have had access to a crucial flask of anthrax spores.

Authorities say that language Ivins used in an e-mail days before a second round of anthrax attacks was similar to the messages in anthrax-laced letters received soon after by Democratic Sens. Tom Daschle and Patrick Leahy.

In the e-mail, Ivins wrote that "Bin Laden terrorists for sure have anthrax and sarin gas" and have "just decreed death to all Jews and all Americans." The letters to Daschle and Leahy said: "WE HAVE THIS ANTHRAX . . . DEATH TO AMERICA . . . DEATH TO ISRAEL."

The documents were released Wednesday as FBI Director Robert Mueller met privately with survivors and families of the victims of the attacks to lay out the evidence the agency had compiled to close the case.

Patrick O'Donnell, a postal sorter who was sickened after handling one of the contaminated letters, said after attending Tuesday's briefing that he believes Ivins is the man who poisoned him. At the same time, the government didn't provide all the answers.

"I don't know what to think, man," O'Donnell said. "It's closing a lot of things, but it's also opening up a lot of doors."

As for motive, investigators seemed to offer two possible reasons for the attacks: that the brilliant scientist wanted to bolster support for a vaccine he helped create and that the anti-abortion Catholic targeted two pro-choice Catholic lawmakers.

"We are confident that Dr. Ivins was the only person responsible for these attacks," Taylor told a news conference at the Justice Department.

Noting that Ivins would have been entitled to a presumption of innocence, Taylor nevertheless said prosecutors were confident "we could prove his guilt to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt."

The events in Washington unfolded as a memorial service was held for Ivins at Fort Detrick, the secret government installation in Frederick, Md., where he worked. Reporters were barred.

More than 200 pages of documents were made public by the FBI, virtually all of them describing the government's attempts to link Ivins to the crimes.

That's not enough, said Grassley, the Iowa senator. He said there should be hearings rather than "the selective release of a few documents."

"This has been one of the largest domestic terrorism investigations in the FBI's 100-year history, and the investigative team made mistakes, missteps and false accusations," he said.

The government material describes at length painstaking scientific efforts to trace the source of the anthrax that was used in the attacks.

It says that in his lab, Ivins had custody of a flask of anthrax termed "the genetic parent" to the powder involved _ a source that investigators say was used to grow spores for the attacks on "at least two separate occasions."

Anthrax culled from the letters was quickly discovered to be the so-called Ames strain of bacteria, but with genetic mutations that made it distinct. Scientists developed more sophisticated tests for four of those mutations, and concluded that all the samples that matched came from a single batch, code-named RMR-1029, stored at Fort Detrick.

Ivins "has been the sole custodian of RMR-1029 since it was first grown in 1997," said one affidavit.

Powder from anthrax-laden letters sent to the New York Post and Tom Brokaw of NBC contained a bacterial contaminant not found in the anthrax-containing envelopes mailed to Leahy or Daschle, the affidavit said.

Investigators concluded that "the contaminant must have been introduced during the production of the Post and Brokaw spores," the affidavit said.

The documents disclosed that authorities searched Ivins' home on Nov. 2, 2007, taking 22 swabs of vacuum filters and radiators and seizing dozens of items. Among them were video cassettes, family photos, information about guns and a copy of "The Plague" by Albert Camus.

Ivins' cars and his safe deposit box also were searched as investigators closed in on the respected government scientist who had been troubled by mental health problems for years.

According to an affidavit filed by Charles B. Wickersham, a postal inspector, the scientist told an unnamed co-worker "that he had `incredible paranoid, delusional thoughts at times' and 'feared that he might not be able to control his behavior.'"

A mental health worker who was involved in treating Ivins disclosed last week that she was so concerned about his behavior that she recently sought a court order to keep him away from her.

One FBI document said Ivins "repeatedly named other researchers as possible mailers and claimed that the anthrax used in the attacks resembled that of another researcher" at the same facility.

The name of the other researcher was not disclosed.

The documents painted a picture of Ivins seeking to mislead investigators beginning in 2002, when he allegedly submitted the wrong samples to FBI investigators.

It wasn't until more than two years later, in March 2005, that he was confronted with the alleged switch, according to U.S. Postal Inspector Thomas Dellafera, who added that Ivins insisted he had not sought to deceive.

The victims of the attacks had little in common.

Robert Stevens, 63, a photo editor at the Sun, a supermarket tabloid published in Boca Raton, Fla., was the first to die. Thomas Morris Jr. 55, and Joseph Curseen, 47, worked at a Washington-area postal facility that was a hub for sorting the capital's mail. Kathy Nguyen, 61, who had emigrated from Vietnam and lived in the Bronx, worked in a stock room at Manhattan Eye Ear & Throat Hospital. Ottilie Lundgren, 94, who lived in Oxford, Conn., was the last to die.

WASHINGTON — Army scientist Bruce Ivins had in his lab highly purified anthrax spores that were linked to the 2001 attacks that killed five and access to the distinctive envelopes used to mail t...
WASHINGTON — Army scientist Bruce Ivins had in his lab highly purified anthrax spores that were linked to the 2001 attacks that killed five and access to the distinctive envelopes used to mail t...
Filed by Katharine Zaleski  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
378
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (11 pages total)
- geobushono I'm a Fan of geobushono 15 fans permalink

This morning on CSPAN Washington Journal call in, I think ONE (out of 20 or so) caller believed this concoction. It seems NOBODY, left or right, trusts the fbi.
Regular viewers know WJ callers seems to represent an accurate cross section of voters.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:37 PM on 08/07/2008
photo

Once AGAIN, the FUBAR exhibits its incompetent, corrupt nature !!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:45 PM on 08/07/2008

And the recession is all in our minds.....­..

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:20 PM on 08/07/2008
- skibum49 I'm a Fan of skibum49 3 fans permalink

Ok really simple question? The company I work for does computer support work at this same installation. Positions require a TS SCI clearance with a lifestyle polygraph. Keep in mind this is the requirement for computer geeks who have no access to any laboratory where biological research is being conducted (just computers). When was the last time that Bruce Ivins had a Periodic Reinvestigation of his security clearance and what was his answer to the question on this reinvestigation or any previous investigation concerning whether he was under treatment by a therapist for any mental health issues?
Just curious?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:34 PM on 08/07/2008

Careful skibum, you're asking too many "key" questions. Just forget it ever happened.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:21 PM on 08/07/2008
- mabinog I'm a Fan of mabinog 38 fans permalink
photo

I had a neighbor who had a clearance and a fed agent showed up knocking on my door one day asking me about his personal habits; late nights, noisy, parties, people coming and going, alcohol, etc.

Now I suppose it is possible that my neighbor did this kind of work but I kinda of doubt it. So if my neighbor has these checks, why would someone who is messing with really nasty stuff like anthrax not be outed as security risk - seeing as he is such nutjob and all and has been since, arguably, before 9/11?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:32 PM on 08/07/2008

What was this guy doing working for the Army, responsible for research with deadly biological agents, if he was such a nutcase? A granny gets kicked off a plane if her knitting needles are too sharp and a nursing mother can't bring a bottle of breast milk on an airplane, but this so called "homicidal" maniac had top govt. clearance. If this is a cover-up (very likely) shame on us for falling for this story. Or if this is the truth, shame on Bush's impotent , incompetent agencies for allowing this man to be in the position he was in.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:43 PM on 08/07/2008
- FogBelter I'm a Fan of FogBelter 267 fans permalink
photo

Lone Nut Theory? Where have we seen that before?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:06 PM on 08/07/2008

So convenient that he killed himself. They wouldn't want another lawsuit against them. I don't believe anything this administration puts out from any agency, everything is suspect.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:29 PM on 08/07/2008
photo

Coming in here and declaring you have misgivings with the party line response to this report is like being thrown to the wolves with an asbestos weiner. But I'll say it again, like I did all day yesterday: he did it. And today, the WaPo feature did even more damage to the so-called cred of every bumpersticker philosopher in here who didn't bother to read a page of the evidence. This time, I'm not with you guys. He did it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:51 AM on 08/07/2008
- DCX2 I'm a Fan of DCX2 5 fans permalink

Believe if you will that he did it. The whole "Bin Laden has..." quote conveniently removed a great deal of context, if you were to read the "evidence". He had heard that Bin Laden had that stuff...co­incidental­ly, there was a news report on the same day saying the same thing...

Or the fact that he only knew how to work with "wet anthrax", as opposed to this "dry anthrax", some of which also had silica attached (Ivins didn't know how to do that).

Oh yeah, Ivins was vaccinated 33 times against Anthrax...­and an adjuvant to the anthrax vaccine (squalene) allegedly causes Gulf War Syndrome..­.might that explain why he was acting crazy?

FBI agents confronting him in the mall, in front of his wife, telling her that he killed people. Showing his daughter pictures of anthrax victims, saying he did it. Offering his son millions and a sports car if they rat on him. How would you feel if the FBI turned your family against you?

Even if you believe after all of this that Bruce Ivins is the anthrax killer...h­ow do you know he did it alone?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:38 PM on 08/07/2008

And if he did it, what does this say about so-called Homeland Security?????

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:42 PM on 08/07/2008

Why is it so difficult to understand that others here may have read all the same evidence that's been presented but still disagree with the investigation's conclusions? And why the dogged determination to discredit and disparage those with lingering unanswered questions that might indicate that there's more to the story than what's being reported? Do you have the answers to all the questions posed here?

The man who may have had a lot of the answers, and more than likely, a few questions of his own is dead. At least there are some who care enough to question that.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:35 PM on 08/07/2008
- krocklin I'm a Fan of krocklin 30 fans permalink

Many media stories about this have prominently featured the comments of Ivins' "theripist" (sic) as she calls herself, though she really was a social worker in some kind of group that he belonged to.
Her charges have been used to substantiate Ivins' guilt, dubiously, simply on the basis of her beliefs that he was serial murderer of some kind.
The story above casually sites her remarks without noting how dubious they are.
She gives no evidence to back up her beliefs in the way of hard evidence, and she herself has a dubious resume, including recent drunk driving arrests and a bankruptcy among other things.
Also, there is the matter of the Washington Post story that was changed in regard to Ivins' access to powdered Anthrax. In one story they stated he could not have had access to it since only liquid Anthrax at the lab he worked at. In the story that replaced it, this was dropped.
These mysteries, along with the original ABC story years ago stating the network had 4 "well-placed" sources that the Anthrax powder had Iraqi origins, just have not been addressed thoroughly in the media, making the government statements that Ivins was sole responsible more questionable.
If these sources could be identified - and it may take a Congressional inquiry to make ABC cite them - they might lead us on a trail to the real conspirators, most likely in the Bush Administration.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:30 AM on 08/07/2008
photo

Convenient. . . just like the D.C. Madam's "suicide."

What did became of her list of 30,000 names anyway?

Secreted away somewhere in the foul dark cesspool that passes for government, I guess, ready to be used for blackmail purposes by the Teflon Frick and Frack squatting in our White House.

How I long for those halcyon bygone days of "hard-hitting, fact-finding" journalists who risked life and limb to bring us the truth. (Did they ever really exist or was I just naive and thought they did?)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:25 AM on 08/07/2008

Here's one that seems to have slipped through the radar: At some point in the not-to-distant aftermath of the anthrax attacks, in order to calm the public's fear of handling their mail, it was reported on the evening news that authorities believed they had all the letters. How could anyone but the perpetrator have known that?

By the way, who did the autopsy on Ivins? Who counted the pills in the Tylenol bottle, or analyzed them for content and potency?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:13 AM on 08/07/2008
- MzTexas I'm a Fan of MzTexas 30 fans permalink

I find this very convenient given that Hatfill received his settlement around June 27, 2008. Then, Perino was asked just about a month ago what had happened to the anthrax investigation and she stumble-bummed around the question. From July 14, 2008, press briefing:

"Q Is the President satisfied with the progress of the investigation into the anthrax attacks?

MS. PERINO: I don't know if he's had an update on it, but obviously this is something that the FBI is doing. We don't do the investigation from the White House.

Q Well, is he following the progress?

MS. PERINO: You know, I'm sure he -- he gets updated by Director Mueller once a week on a variety of issues, and if that comes up, I'm sure he gets an update.

Q You don't know if he's satisfied with the progress?

MS. PERINO: I don't.

Q Thank you. "

Boom, we've got a dead scientist who the government now tells us is definitely solely responsible, even though the experts are saying it was impossible for him to be solely responsible. Case closed.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:45 AM on 08/07/2008
photo

Brad Friedman (blogger on HuffPo) is reporting (per the Frederick County, MD Board of Elections) on his blog that Ivins was a registered Democrat. Ivins was probably much more disturbed than some around him realized. You can't believe anything our government says, but it does appear Ivins motivation will never be completely understood.

http://www.bradblog.com/?p=6245

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:02 AM on 08/07/2008
- Jared137 I'm a Fan of Jared137 3 fans permalink

It's all smoke and mirrors with this government. There is no way that Ivins did this if you look at the facts.

On the other hand, I'm wondering if they will suddenly "find Bin Ladin" since they have detained his driver. Wouldn't that just take the cake if the driver "drives them" straight to OBL so that Bush can have his defining glory. Maybe that presidential library in Crawford will be built after all!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:32 AM on 08/07/2008
- jubo I'm a Fan of jubo 6 fans permalink
photo

How convenient and amateurish. Laughable.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:32 AM on 08/07/2008
- frappe I'm a Fan of frappe 206 fans permalink
photo

Oh, according to the FBI, Ivins is the only one responsible? And how did they come to that conclusion? ...As if they really knew definitively what actually happened.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:26 AM on 08/07/2008
photo

Of course THEY "knew definitively what actually happened" and they know Ivins is the patsy.

Do you actually think the FBI is on the side of truth and justice?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:35 AM on 08/07/2008
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (11 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect