Verdict In Osama Bin Laden's Driver Trial Reached

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

MIKE MELIA | August 6, 2008 08:36 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »

In this Thursday, July 24, 2008 file photograph of a sketch by courtroom artist Janet Hamlin, reviewed by the U.S. Military, defendant Salim Ahmed Hamdan, left, watches as FBI agent Craig Donnachie testifies about his interrogations of Hamdan, while a picture of disguised U.S. agents is displayed on a screen, during Hamdan's trial inside the war crimes courthouse at Guantanamo Bay U.S. Naval Base, in Cuba. A jury of six military officers reached a split verdict on Wednesday, Aug. 6, 2008, in the war crimes trial of Salim Ahmed Hamdan, clearing him of some charges but convicting him of others that could send him to prison for life. The judge scheduled a sentencing hearing for later Wednesday.(AP Photo/Janet Hamlin, Pool)

GUANTANAMO BAY NAVAL BASE, Cuba — The conviction of Osama bin Laden's driver by a U.S. military court after a 10-day trial provides an indication of what to expect as dozens more Guantanamo prisoners go to court: shifting charges, secret testimony _ and quick verdicts.

Salim Hamdan held his head in his hands and wept Wednesday as the six-member military jury declared the Yemeni guilty of aiding terrorism, which could bring a maximum life sentence. But in a split decision, the jury in America's first war-crimes trial since the aftermath of World War II cleared Hamdan of two charges of conspiracy.

Deputy White House spokesman Tony Fratto applauded what he called "a fair trial" and said prosecutors will now proceed with other war crimes trials at the isolated U.S. military base in southeast Cuba. Prosecutors intend to try about 80 Guantanamo detainees for war crimes, including 19 already charged.

But defense lawyers said their client's rights were denied by an unfair process, hastily patched together after the Supreme Court rulings that previous tribunal systems violated U.S. and international law.

Under the military commission, Hamdan did not have all the rights normally accorded either by U.S. civilian or military courts. The judge allowed secret testimony and hearsay evidence. Hamdan was not judged by a jury of his peers and he received no Miranda warning about his rights.

Hamdan's attorneys said interrogations at the center of the government's case were tainted by coercive tactics, including sleep deprivation and solitary confinement.

All that is in contrast to the courts-martial used to prosecute American troops in Iraq and Vietnam, which accorded defendants more rights.

"This outcome was predetermined _ not by the court, but by the government _ well before the trial even began," said Sahr MuhammedAlly of Human Rights First, who has observed hearings in the hilltop courtroom.

Story continues below
advertisement

The five-man, one-woman jury convicted Hamdan on five counts of supporting terrorism, accepting the prosecution argument that Hamdan aided terrorism by becoming a member of al-Qaida in Afghanistan and serving as bin Laden's armed bodyguard and driver while knowing that the al-Qaida leader was plotting attacks against the U.S.

But he was found not guilty on three other counts alleging he knew that his work would be used for terrorism and that he provided surface-to-air missiles to al-Qaida.

He also was cleared of two charges of conspiracy alleging he was part of the al-Qaida effort to attack the United States _ the most serious charges, according to deputy chief defense counsel Michael Berrigan.

Berrigan noted the conspiracy charges were the only ones Hamdan originally faced when his case prompted the Supreme Court to halt the tribunals. Prosecutors added the new charges after the Bush administration rewrote the rules.

"The problem is the law was specifically written after the fact to target Mr. Hamdan," said Charles Swift, one of Hamdan's civilian lawyers.

The verdict will be appealed automatically to a special military appeals court in Washington. Hamdan can then appeal to U.S. civilian courts as well.

Ben Wizner, an American Civil Liberties Union attorney, said the appeals from Hamdan's case are unlikely to slow the pace of other Guantanamo trials.

The jury reconvened for a sentencing hearing in which psychologist Emily Keram testified that Hamdan was orphaned by the age of 10, has only a fourth-grade education and worked for bin Laden because he felt it was the only way to support his family.

She said Hamdan, who is about 37, wept when prosecutors showed video of airplanes crashing into the twin towers on Sept. 11, 2001.

"He told me it was hard on his soul," Keram testified at the hearing, which was to continue Thursday.

Hamdan's lawyers said he is likely testify himself Thursday or provide a written statement seeking leniency.

The military judge, Navy Capt. Keith Allred, gave Hamdan five years of credit toward his sentence for the time he has served at Guantanamo Bay since the Pentagon decided to charge him.

The Pentagon describes the Hamdan proceedings as the first "contested" U.S. military war crimes trial since World War II. In March 2007, Australian David Hicks reached a plea agreement that sent him home to serve a nine-month prison sentence in what the military considers the first trial.

The U.S. now holds about 265 prisoners at Guantanamo. The U.S. has been struggling to persuade other countries to take in the detainees it doesn't plan to prosecute, including many already cleared for release and dozens who officials consider too dangerous to let loose, even if they don't want to put them on trial.

Sen. John McCain, the Republican presidential candidate, said the split verdict proved the trial was fair.

"The fact that the jury did not find Hamdan guilty of all of the charges brought against him demonstrates that the jury weighed the evidence carefully," McCain said.

His Democratic rival, Barack Obama, also praised the military officers involved but said the process has "dangerous flaws" and that such trials belong in traditional military or civilian courts.

Hamdan was captured at a roadblock in southern Afghanistan in November 2001 and taken to Guantanamo Bay in May 2002.

The military accused him of transporting missiles for al-Qaida and helping bin Laden escape U.S. retribution following the Sept. 11 attacks by serving as his driver. Defense attorneys said he was merely a low-level bin Laden employee, a minor member of a motor pool who earned about $200 a month.

Army Lt. Col. Stephen Abraham, a former Guantanamo official who has since become critical of the legal process, mocked the choice of Hamdan for the tribunal's first trial.

"We can only trust that the next subjects ... will include cooks, tailors, and cobblers without whose support terrorist leaders would be left unfed, unclothed, and unshod, and therefore rendered incapable of planning or executing their attacks," Abraham said in an e-mail to The Associated Press.

GUANTANAMO BAY NAVAL BASE, Cuba — The conviction of Osama bin Laden's driver by a U.S. military court after a 10-day trial provides an indication of what to expect as dozens more Guantanamo pris...
GUANTANAMO BAY NAVAL BASE, Cuba — The conviction of Osama bin Laden's driver by a U.S. military court after a 10-day trial provides an indication of what to expect as dozens more Guantanamo pris...
 
Comments
482
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (8 pages total)
- Apov I'm a Fan of Apov permalink

FARCE

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:43 AM on 08/07/2008

Seven years later all they can convict him of is what he has always admitted to.

Funny, though, this trial was over in a few days. In the mean time, they have being trying A Canadian kid, for months (years?) and cannot get the trial to an end. They even replaced the judge when he was not performing as expected. I don't think they have much of a case and they are stalling.

Now, that they've, effectively, lost this one, watch out. there will be a hundred new witnesses and pices of evidence to convict this guy.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:03 PM on 08/07/2008

If it is not a war but a law enforcement issue and OBL had just robbed a bank, his driver would be and accomplice in a bank robbery. there for guilty of a crime.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:56 AM on 08/07/2008

Not to mention he was caught with to surface to air missiles, but I am sure he had a conceal and carry permit certified by the NRA.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:03 AM on 08/07/2008
photo

Sorry linky no worky. The article is in Time Magazine, called "Salim Hamdan: Enemy Number One" on Thursday, Jul. 24, 2008, by Jonathan Mahler.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:36 AM on 08/07/2008
photo

"According to his defense lawyers, Hamdan figured that he would be arrested if he tried to cross the border, so he instead dropped off his family and was planning to return the car, which he had borrowed, before finding a different way into Pakistan."
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1826281,00.html

If I ever borrow a car, I'll check the trunk for SAMs, just in case.

Hamdan may very well be guilty of the crimes for which he was convicted, but this trial doesn't effectively lay the questions to rest. It lacks credibility and undermines the American judicial system.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:36 AM on 08/07/2008

Does the Hamdan trial and its aftermath suggest chauffeurs can be held accountable for what their employers do? If so...we have a lot of chauffeurs out there, who work for a particularly despicable bunch in Washington!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:52 AM on 08/07/2008
- mh01 I'm a Fan of mh01 permalink

I guess if you are working for Osama, you might want to check the trunk, right before you start checking the employment section....

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:00 PM on 08/07/2008

Who's coming up next in the Court Agenda, bin Laden's cook?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:31 AM on 08/07/2008
photo

I really want to get his barber....that dude is always cutting his sideburns too close....once we get him and his green grocer...America will be a much safer place.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:46 AM on 08/07/2008
photo

anything can happen when you let the kangaroos run the courts.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:24 AM on 08/07/2008

Wow, Al Qaeda kills 1000s of US civilians in the US, we send 1000s of troops overseas and have the first war crimes trial since World War 2.

And we prosecute- OBL's driver. All I can say is Hitler's ex-driver must be pretty thankful that GWB wasn't president in 1945.

Who's next? OBL's dry cleaner? His pizza delivery guy?

Honestly can we please find someone who really did commit something atrocious and prosecute that person?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:11 PM on 08/06/2008
photo

"Honestly can we please find someone who really did commit something atrocious and prosecute that person?"

Short of a revolution, you can't. Bad cops don't turn themselves in...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:54 AM on 08/07/2008
- rwe I'm a Fan of rwe permalink

He had missiles in his trunk.People are sentenced to life for driveing getaway cars or being involved in situations where murders , crimes have been committed. Liberal prograssivei comments illustrate why Islamoterrorist s are licking their chops over the prospect of a Democrat surrendering all over the world in the guise of appeasement

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:07 PM on 08/06/2008
photo

I think you surrendered your ability to spell correctly...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:37 AM on 08/07/2008

rwe: The American Justice system should be replaced by this kangaroo court? Really, you want to defend: torturing false confessions, secret evidence, hearsay, inability to call witnesses, face you accusers? Really?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:25 PM on 08/07/2008

.....

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:18 PM on 08/07/2008

Still waiting for your reply, rwe. I'll take your silence as a vote for kangaroos courts in America.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:12 PM on 08/08/2008

I wish that everything in life were as predictable as the Huff Po comments on issues like this.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:49 PM on 08/06/2008

Shifting charges, secret testimony... My problem isn't with trying any of these detainees. My problem is in the WAY we're doing it! Why can't we have these "trials" as public matters and show the world what a real democracy is about? This isn't the way America used to do things and these last eight years have reached the limit of our patience with this administration and our own eroded rights. So much has been done in secret over these years and our government believes we can't handle the truth. What we can't handle is this administration and its lies!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:37 PM on 08/06/2008

Will we see the little deserter and Fony Blair's drivers on trial next?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:31 PM on 08/06/2008

Oh, come on. Do you really think that this guy was ONLY a driver with no clue as to anything else going on? Do you truly believe that he had no idea who Osama was and what type things he did and stood for? Really ?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:34 PM on 08/06/2008

It's not enough to say he probably knew more of what was going on, you have to prove it, and do so in a fair fashion that doesn't violate due process and in which a pre-determined outcome isn't guaranteed.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:52 PM on 08/06/2008

The fact that you have to prove a case is a given. My point was that it's not a stretch that information existed and was presented. For people to make several comments about this man being found guilty for simply driving a car, while not knowing the specific trial details, seems a bit myopic to me.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:18 PM on 08/06/2008
photo

This was not a jury of his peers. This was a military trail for a guy who was a car driver. How lame is that!
Ho9w weak, how embarrassing. I think they go this route because they know that 12 thinking American's could not convict on what they have!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:10 PM on 08/06/2008

You could try him 100 times in front of an American jury and they would convict him.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:38 PM on 08/06/2008
photo

That's what we should have done, then.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:35 AM on 08/07/2008
photo

The next president can pardon him.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:43 PM on 08/06/2008
photo

I think a new trial would be preferable. As with other Presidential Pardons and as with this tribunal, too many questions would be left unanswered. Get all the evidence out, even if it sets Hamdan free or sends him to the gallows.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:53 AM on 08/07/2008

Any chance maybe he's guilty?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:59 PM on 08/06/2008

So it's OK to convict people through kangaroo courts and deny them due process because they might really be guilty?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:53 PM on 08/06/2008
photo

One night you are stopped and picked up by the local police because you might be guilty - locked up for 2 or 3 years because you look sort of like Ali Khat - the Persian terrorist. You are subjected to sleep deprivation, waterboarding, and positional immobility. Fortunately these aren't considered to be torture cause there was no complete organ failure but you're a wimpy guy so after a few months of this you confess. They told you what you did - you know what they want to hear - you tell them - so the pain stops. Hey it's legal and you may be guilty.

Lucky you. Finally a trial you even get a lawyer - such nice guys - but the lawyer can't talk to you - can't see the evidence because it's "secret". Can't cross examine because hearsay evidence is acceptable - and the informants are "secret" .You are convicted and locked up forever.
Can't happen you say - it already has. But maybe he's guilty - so that makes it OK.

Recommended summer reading "A day in the life of Ivan Denesovich" by Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn
followed by "It Can't Happen Here" - Sinclair Lewis
History buffs might want to research "lettre de cachet"

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:17 PM on 08/06/2008
photo

Of taking a job that pays the bills but you're not proud of?...I think we are all guilty then

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:53 AM on 08/07/2008
- Enid I'm a Fan of Enid permalink

This also happens to be this mans THIRD trial by the US.
HE won the first two

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:22 PM on 08/06/2008

Message from G.W.B. Listen Americans; If you drive for money I( am going to convict you on terrorism and send you to jail for life. NO TRIAL, EXCEPT WHERE AND HOW I SAY, LIFE ON THE WATER BOARD WHEN, NOT IF, YOU ARE CONVICTED. sleep well. Or should I say SLEEP WITH ONE EYE OPEN , GRIPPING YOUR PILLOW TIGHT. My apology to Metalica.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:18 PM on 08/06/2008

I', sorry, was this person an Americak citizen fighting against Americans in Afghanistan?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:39 PM on 08/06/2008
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (8 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in  or  Connect