US, Iraq "On The Brink" Of Long-Term Security Pact: Iraqi Foreign Minister

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - US, Iraq "On The Brink" Of Long-Term Security Pact: Iraqi Foreign Minister stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

ROBERT H. REID | August 10, 2008 02:27 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Iraqi army soldiers, accompanied by U.S. army soldiers from Fox Troop, Sabre Squadron, 3rd Armored Cavalry Regiment, walk down a field as plumes of smoke rise from a burned irrigation canal in a deserted area on the outskirts of Balad Ruz, in Diyala province, some 75 kilometers (46.6 miles) northeast of Baghdad, Iraq, Sunday, Aug. 10, 2008. Soldiers from Fox Troop burned thick growth inside irrigation canals as they were searching for weapons caches in the area. (AP Photo/Marko Drobnjakovic)

BAGHDAD — Iraq's foreign minister insisted Sunday that any security deal with the United States must contain a "very clear timeline" for the departure of U.S. troops. A suicide bomber struck north of Baghdad, killing at least five people including an American soldier.

Foreign Minister Hoshyar Zebari told reporters that American and Iraqi negotiators were "very close" to reaching a long-term security agreement that will set the rules for U.S. troops in Iraq after the U.N. mandate expires at the end of the year.

Zebari said the Iraqis were insisting that the agreement include a "very clear timeline" for the withdrawal of U.S.-led forces, but he refused to talk about specific dates.

"We have said that this is a condition-driven process," he added, suggesting that the departure schedule could be modified if the security situation changed.

But Zebari made clear that the Iraqis would not accept a deal that lacks a timeline for the end of the U.S. military presence.

"No, no definitely there has to be a very clear timeline," Zebari replied when asked if the Iraqis would accept an agreement that did not mention dates.

Differences over a withdrawal timetable have become one of the most contentious issues remaining in the talks, which began early this year. U.S. and Iraqi negotiators missed a July 31 target date for completing the deal, which must be approved by Iraq's parliament.

President Bush has steadfastly refused to accept any timetable for bringing U.S. troops home. Last month, however, Bush and Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki agreed to set a "general time horizon" for a U.S. departure.

Story continues below
advertisement

Last week, two senior Iraqi officials told The Associated Press that American negotiators had agreement to a formula which would remove U.S. forces from Iraqi cities by June 30, 2009, with all combat troops out of the country by October 2010.

The last American support troops would leave about three years later, the Iraqis said.

But U.S. officials insist there is no agreement on specific dates. Both the American and Iraqi officials spoke on condition of anonymity because the talks are ongoing. Iraq's Shiite-led government believes a withdrawal schedule is essential to win parliamentary approval.

American officials have been less optimistic because of major differences on key issues including who can authorize U.S. military operations and immunity for U.S. troops from prosecution under Iraqi law.

The White House said discussions continued on a bilateral agreement and said any timeframe discussed was due to major improvements in security over the past year.

"We are only now able to discuss conditions-based time horizons because security has improved so much. This would not have been possible 18 months ago," White House spokesman Gordon Johndroe said Sunday. "We all look forward to the day when Iraqi security forces take the lead on more combat missions, allowing U.S. troops to serve in an overwatch role, and more importantly return home."

Iraq's position in the U.S. talks hardened after a series of Iraqi military successes against Shiite and Sunni extremists in Basra, Baghdad, Mosul and other major cities.

Violence in Iraq has declined sharply over the past year following a U.S. troop buildup, a Sunni revolt against al-Qaida in Iraq and a Shiite militia cease-fire.

But attacks continue, raising concern that the militants are trying to regroup.

The suicide bomber struck Sunday afternoon as U.S. and Iraqi troops were responding to a roadside bombing that wounded an Iraqi in Tarmiyah, 30 miles (50 kilometers) north of Baghdad, the U.S. military said.

Four Iraqi civilians were killed along with the American soldier, military spokesman Lt. Col. Steve Stover said. Two American soldiers and an Iraqi interpreter were among 24 people wounded.

No group claimed responsibility for the blast but suicide bombings are the signature attack of al-Qaida in Iraq.

"This was a heinous attack by al-Qaida in Iraq against an Iraqi family, followed by a cowardly attack against innocent civilians, their security forces and U.S. soldiers," Stover said.

Elsewhere, a car bomb exploded outside the Kurdish security department in Khanaqin, 90 miles northeast of Baghdad. At least two people were killed and 25 wounded, including the commander of local Kurdish forces, Lt. Col. Majid Ahmed, police said.

First reports indicated it was a suicide attack. But the U.S. military later said the bomb was in a white truck filled with watermelons and that witnesses saw the occupants leave the vehicle just before the blast.

Ethnic tensions have been rising in northern Iraq amid disputes between Kurds, Turkomen and mostly Sunni Arabs over Kurdish demands to annex the oil-rich city of Kirkuk into their self-ruled region.

Sawarah Ghalib, 25, who was wounded in the blast, said he believed military operations under way south of the city in Diyala province had pushed insurgents into the Khanaqin area.

"I did not expect that a terrorist attack to take place in our secure town," Ghalib said from his bed in the Khanaqin hospital. "Al-Qaida is to blame for this attack. Operations in Diyala have pushed them here."

In Baghdad, six people were killed in a series of bombings on the first day of the Iraqi work week.

The deadliest blast occurred about 8:15 a.m. in a crowded area where people wait for buses in the capital's mainly Shiite southeastern district of Kamaliya. Four people were killed, including a woman and her brother, and 11 others wounded, according to police.

A car bomb later exploded as an Iraqi army patrol transporting money to a state-run bank passed by in Baghdad's central Khillani square, killing two people including an Iraqi soldier and wounding nine other people, a police officer said.

Another Iraqi soldier was killed and five were wounded by a car bomb in Salman Pak, about 15 miles south of Baghdad, police said.

___

Associated Press writers Hamza Hendawi, Kim Gamel and Sameer N. Yacoub in Baghdad and Yahya Barzanji in Sulaimaniyah contributed to this report.

BAGHDAD — Iraq's foreign minister insisted Sunday that any security deal with the United States must contain a "very clear timeline" for the departure of U.S. troops. A suicide bomber struck nor...
BAGHDAD — Iraq's foreign minister insisted Sunday that any security deal with the United States must contain a "very clear timeline" for the departure of U.S. troops. A suicide bomber struck nor...
Filed by Nick Graham  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
76
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 Next › Last » (3 pages total)
- TLV I'm a Fan of TLV 121 fans permalink

We know Republicans will not adhere to a time-line, so it will be a Democrat who will end this hell.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:50 AM on 08/11/2008
- jaschrod I'm a Fan of jaschrod 22 fans permalink

Hey, a sovereign nation cannot tell us what to do in their country. Who do they think they are. If they do not watch out, we will pick up our toys, and travel half way around the world in order to go home, and out of their country. We will show them.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:03 AM on 08/11/2008
- Roguewolf I'm a Fan of Roguewolf 36 fans permalink
photo

No, a Democrat will try to take credit for the success in Iraq

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:25 AM on 08/11/2008
- klmebane I'm a Fan of klmebane 19 fans permalink
photo

please, define success. is success only having a few bombings a week?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:23 AM on 08/13/2008
- Sundialsvc4 I'm a Fan of Sundialsvc4 142 fans permalink

It's grim, yet strangely funny, to watch Pinocchio trying to act like "a real boy."

The Iraqis have one simple "choice," and that is to sign-away all of Iraq's oil resources forever, just like a puppet government is supposed to do. And then, accede to allowing many dozens of permanent military bases to be built in your country as a jumping-off point to a complete military domination of the entire Middle East. Any American soldier or mercenary can do whatever he or she damn well pleases in your country, and your so-called government can do nothing more than wield a rubber stamp from time to time.

War is a business. It's the only business that the American government is really engaged-in, yet it's worth more than $2 trillion a year. We sell weapons to you, we sell weapons to your enemies, and we throw in a lighted match and wait for the invoices to arrive. Just as "Ike" Eisenhower predicted, it's far more important to us than anything else ... it trumps every other social priority. It's a business so massive that it can literally pay $1 million a DAY in bribes to every single member of the American Congress and have barely scratched the surface of its annual earnings.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:37 AM on 08/11/2008
- mamacat I'm a Fan of mamacat 150 fans permalink

On the Sunday talk shows, once again, I hear about McCain's "experience."
What friggin experience?
70% of Americans now realise that they were lied to and mislead, and as a result it was a big whopping mistake to go to war against Iraq. McSame refuses to admit that it was a huge mistake to invade Iraq, and refuses to acknowledge the demand for a timetable by the Iraqi government.
So, once again, everyone who gets old has experience, but that doesn't mean that Mac has the experience that we need in a President. Quite the opposite is true, judging by his actions and his words.
When are the MSM going to quit saying that Mac has experience?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:22 AM on 08/11/2008
photo

it is time to leave, bring the troops home and let the Iraq's have their country back, we have screwed it up enough a long with our own country which is now a total disaster area

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:38 AM on 08/11/2008
- MrGiggles I'm a Fan of MrGiggles 6 fans permalink

There's nothing more threatening to democracy than an occupied country that refuses to stick to the talking points.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:03 AM on 08/11/2008

You know what's sooo stupid. People keep saying the SURGE the SURGE the SURGE worked. OMG talk about disassociation!!!! Putting the SUNNIs on U.S. payroll was the REASON For decreased violence!!!!! COME ON!!!! you took one opposing faction and paid them to stop fighting. NOT the fregg'n surge.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:50 PM on 08/10/2008
- Gma11 I'm a Fan of Gma11 12 fans permalink

Okay, Bush, are they a sovereign nation or an occupied nation? You can't have it both ways. In fact, it is out of your hands now. The Iraqis are taking over whether you want them to or not!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:49 PM on 08/10/2008

What right or justification do we have to occupy a small... Now that we have set the bar the Russians just took a page out of our Iraq book for what is underway in Georgia..Regime Change...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:15 PM on 08/10/2008

Has Cheney ok'ed this yet? Cause if Cheney hasn't ok'ed it, it doesn't exist.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:51 PM on 08/10/2008
- trudem2 I'm a Fan of trudem2 12 fans permalink

Iraqis want their country back, and America wants its sons and daughters back.

Why don't the politicians and generals "get it"???

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:50 PM on 08/10/2008
- rajoro I'm a Fan of rajoro 8 fans permalink

M C Bullsh*t wants a "conditions on the ground" based withdrawal so they can order special ops to black op an attack on Sunnis by Shia and vice versa therefore requiring our continued presence. This is about oil which China will pay a premium for and that will cost the American Oilogopy a lot in military power and profits.

The opportunity here is for an 0bama administration to have policies that can jumpstart an alternative energy boom like Gore (he was responsible for the decision to keep the Internet public and not auction it to the telcos) was able to do in the 90's with the Internet. With our technology we create an export boom to China and the world while fighting hard for enviromental policies.

Save the oil for rebuilding the military which runs on it and will continue to for the forseeable future.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:49 PM on 08/10/2008

What a polite way to say "get your ass out!".

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:31 PM on 08/10/2008
- Maloysius I'm a Fan of Maloysius 20 fans permalink
photo

But I though McSurge said Iraq didn't mean it when they requested a time line? He wouldn't lie would he?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:18 PM on 08/10/2008
- JoeBlough I'm a Fan of JoeBlough 61 fans permalink
photo

It's quite simple. Iraq wants us out, so they can do business with China and Russia. Invading and occupying has put a big dent in their business. With us out, they can sell to the highest bidder. China and Russia has never declared war against Iraq, so it figures they would rather do business with them.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:04 PM on 08/10/2008
- bronceye I'm a Fan of bronceye 31 fans permalink

Get out!!!!! Now, that's clearly "conditions on the ground". Can't wait for the bush profile to return to the sidewalk.LOL. Minibush would still rather extend this occupation just to win the presidency. It worked for bush but can minibush re-tool his argument against the Obama/Maliki agreement? As Maliki waited for Obama's visit to announce his country's desire for us to leave, can it be called anything else?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:21 PM on 08/10/2008
Page: 1 2 3 Next › Last » (3 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect