US, Iraq "On The Brink" Of Long-Term Security Pact: Iraqi Foreign Minister

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - US, Iraq "On The Brink" Of Long-Term Security Pact: Iraqi Foreign Minister stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

ROBERT H. REID | August 10, 2008 02:27 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Iraqi army soldiers, accompanied by U.S. army soldiers from Fox Troop, Sabre Squadron, 3rd Armored Cavalry Regiment, walk down a field as plumes of smoke rise from a burned irrigation canal in a deserted area on the outskirts of Balad Ruz, in Diyala province, some 75 kilometers (46.6 miles) northeast of Baghdad, Iraq, Sunday, Aug. 10, 2008. Soldiers from Fox Troop burned thick growth inside irrigation canals as they were searching for weapons caches in the area. (AP Photo/Marko Drobnjakovic)

BAGHDAD — Iraq's foreign minister insisted Sunday that any security deal with the United States must contain a "very clear timeline" for the departure of U.S. troops. A suicide bomber struck north of Baghdad, killing at least five people including an American soldier.

Foreign Minister Hoshyar Zebari told reporters that American and Iraqi negotiators were "very close" to reaching a long-term security agreement that will set the rules for U.S. troops in Iraq after the U.N. mandate expires at the end of the year.

Zebari said the Iraqis were insisting that the agreement include a "very clear timeline" for the withdrawal of U.S.-led forces, but he refused to talk about specific dates.

"We have said that this is a condition-driven process," he added, suggesting that the departure schedule could be modified if the security situation changed.

But Zebari made clear that the Iraqis would not accept a deal that lacks a timeline for the end of the U.S. military presence.

"No, no definitely there has to be a very clear timeline," Zebari replied when asked if the Iraqis would accept an agreement that did not mention dates.

Differences over a withdrawal timetable have become one of the most contentious issues remaining in the talks, which began early this year. U.S. and Iraqi negotiators missed a July 31 target date for completing the deal, which must be approved by Iraq's parliament.

President Bush has steadfastly refused to accept any timetable for bringing U.S. troops home. Last month, however, Bush and Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki agreed to set a "general time horizon" for a U.S. departure.

Story continues below

Last week, two senior Iraqi officials told The Associated Press that American negotiators had agreement to a formula which would remove U.S. forces from Iraqi cities by June 30, 2009, with all combat troops out of the country by October 2010.

The last American support troops would leave about three years later, the Iraqis said.

But U.S. officials insist there is no agreement on specific dates. Both the American and Iraqi officials spoke on condition of anonymity because the talks are ongoing. Iraq's Shiite-led government believes a withdrawal schedule is essential to win parliamentary approval.

American officials have been less optimistic because of major differences on key issues including who can authorize U.S. military operations and immunity for U.S. troops from prosecution under Iraqi law.

The White House said discussions continued on a bilateral agreement and said any timeframe discussed was due to major improvements in security over the past year.

"We are only now able to discuss conditions-based time horizons because security has improved so much. This would not have been possible 18 months ago," White House spokesman Gordon Johndroe said Sunday. "We all look forward to the day when Iraqi security forces take the lead on more combat missions, allowing U.S. troops to serve in an overwatch role, and more importantly return home."

Iraq's position in the U.S. talks hardened after a series of Iraqi military successes against Shiite and Sunni extremists in Basra, Baghdad, Mosul and other major cities.

Violence in Iraq has declined sharply over the past year following a U.S. troop buildup, a Sunni revolt against al-Qaida in Iraq and a Shiite militia cease-fire.

But attacks continue, raising concern that the militants are trying to regroup.

The suicide bomber struck Sunday afternoon as U.S. and Iraqi troops were responding to a roadside bombing that wounded an Iraqi in Tarmiyah, 30 miles (50 kilometers) north of Baghdad, the U.S. military said.

Four Iraqi civilians were killed along with the American soldier, military spokesman Lt. Col. Steve Stover said. Two American soldiers and an Iraqi interpreter were among 24 people wounded.

No group claimed responsibility for the blast but suicide bombings are the signature attack of al-Qaida in Iraq.

"This was a heinous attack by al-Qaida in Iraq against an Iraqi family, followed by a cowardly attack against innocent civilians, their security forces and U.S. soldiers," Stover said.

Elsewhere, a car bomb exploded outside the Kurdish security department in Khanaqin, 90 miles northeast of Baghdad. At least two people were killed and 25 wounded, including the commander of local Kurdish forces, Lt. Col. Majid Ahmed, police said.

First reports indicated it was a suicide attack. But the U.S. military later said the bomb was in a white truck filled with watermelons and that witnesses saw the occupants leave the vehicle just before the blast.

Ethnic tensions have been rising in northern Iraq amid disputes between Kurds, Turkomen and mostly Sunni Arabs over Kurdish demands to annex the oil-rich city of Kirkuk into their self-ruled region.

Sawarah Ghalib, 25, who was wounded in the blast, said he believed military operations under way south of the city in Diyala province had pushed insurgents into the Khanaqin area.

"I did not expect that a terrorist attack to take place in our secure town," Ghalib said from his bed in the Khanaqin hospital. "Al-Qaida is to blame for this attack. Operations in Diyala have pushed them here."

In Baghdad, six people were killed in a series of bombings on the first day of the Iraqi work week.

The deadliest blast occurred about 8:15 a.m. in a crowded area where people wait for buses in the capital's mainly Shiite southeastern district of Kamaliya. Four people were killed, including a woman and her brother, and 11 others wounded, according to police.

A car bomb later exploded as an Iraqi army patrol transporting money to a state-run bank passed by in Baghdad's central Khillani square, killing two people including an Iraqi soldier and wounding nine other people, a police officer said.

Another Iraqi soldier was killed and five were wounded by a car bomb in Salman Pak, about 15 miles south of Baghdad, police said.

___

Associated Press writers Hamza Hendawi, Kim Gamel and Sameer N. Yacoub in Baghdad and Yahya Barzanji in Sulaimaniyah contributed to this report.

BAGHDAD — Iraq's foreign minister insisted Sunday that any security deal with the United States must contain a "very clear timeline" for the departure of U.S. troops. A suicide bomber struck nor...
BAGHDAD — Iraq's foreign minister insisted Sunday that any security deal with the United States must contain a "very clear timeline" for the departure of U.S. troops. A suicide bomber struck nor...
Filed by Nick Graham  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
76
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 (3 pages total)
- JoeBlough I'm a Fan of JoeBlough 62 fans permalink
photo

This is democracy in its full expression. We elect a president, not to do want we the people want, but to do what he thinks is best for our country on our behalf. With this administration, we are getting what we asked for. We knew of his faults before we elected him, but did it anyway.

Likewise, the next President will do what he thinks is best. Not what we the people think is best. So stop whining about the crooks in the administration. They come with the man. We will get the government we deserve.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:52 PM on 08/10/2008
- bronceye I'm a Fan of bronceye 32 fans permalink

If they run us out, is that noble? I think so.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:45 PM on 08/10/2008

negotiators were nearing agreement on a proposal that calls for all American combat troops to leave Iraq by October 2010, with the remaining support personnel gone "around 2013."

"support personnel" such as troops to man the 58 U.S. Military Bases being built to protect & preserve the PROFITS of BIG OIL BARONS?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:19 PM on 08/10/2008
- StillAmused I'm a Fan of StillAmused 275 fans permalink

"... just as soon as we turn the corner. Well, okay -- the next few corners."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:25 AM on 08/10/2008

Victory (violence) is just around the corner.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:11 PM on 08/10/2008
- ChiGuy I'm a Fan of ChiGuy 355 fans permalink
photo

Digging us in even deeper.
A final FU to the I_raqi and American people from your friend G. W. Dumbf**k.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:20 AM on 08/10/2008
- Tulu I'm a Fan of Tulu permalink

It will be asad day if this "long-term" agreement is reached with this adminstration. Alqueda was seeking a this type of justification to cause a hickup for us everywhere in the world. Why are we continue such a foolish strategy? The neocons are driving this country not just in to ditch but in to a cliff that we cannot get out of.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:15 AM on 08/10/2008

and it sucks when you cant get out of a cliff...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:16 PM on 08/10/2008

I'm pretty tired of hearing this garbage about how the surge is working.Why are all these deals being negotiated by an administration that has done nothing for the cause of freedom other than lip service.We are less safe than we were 9/11 and a lot poorer too.Is our Congress going to be left out of the loop?Are they going to rubber stamp it?Why aren't we the people given any information about these negotiations?I'm not talking about sensitive security issues,just the meat and potatoes of who is going to profit from this fiasco and how many of our troops will have to die so these "contractors" can keep pillaging the U.S. treasury.I say no deals should be struck by the current administration which is suspect in almost everything they touch.Our Congress has also betrayed the people on a number of issues,impeachment for one,illegal wiretaps for another.The list of criminal offenses committed by this administration is mind numbing,coupled with the amount of people dead because of this onslaught on our constitution I see no reason to allow any deals other than a pullout timetable be allowed and only with a clause that any deal could be re-negotiated by the next administration.This is not a lame duck presidency,it's criminal and should be held to task for its crimes.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:14 AM on 08/10/2008

Don't mean a thing.

Bush proved that when he pulled us out of the International Criminal Court in the first six months of his administration. I wonder why he did that?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:11 AM on 08/10/2008
- Superbus I'm a Fan of Superbus 27 fans permalink
photo

This great news. We need U.S. bases permanently in Iraq, just like we needed them in Europe during the Cold War.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:07 AM on 08/10/2008
- helonias I'm a Fan of helonias 269 fans permalink
photo

You mean that we need the permanent bases built on top of the oil reserves

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:24 PM on 08/10/2008
- smitallica I'm a Fan of smitallica 17 fans permalink
photo

This great news? Me no think this great news. Me think you not read good. Me think you apologist for Bush regime. That what me think.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:37 PM on 08/10/2008

The only thing Iraq should be saying is "don't let the door hit you on the way out"

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:04 AM on 08/10/2008
- Crowhaul I'm a Fan of Crowhaul 13 fans permalink
photo

There is no "deal" that Iraq should accept if it comes from the hands of their invaders and occupiers.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:56 AM on 08/10/2008
photo

This agreement SHOULD NOT be permitted while this administration is in office.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:52 AM on 08/10/2008
- TrueIndy08 I'm a Fan of TrueIndy08 30 fans permalink

I completely agree.... wait until Barack takes office and then go ahead with the pull out agreement!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:34 AM on 08/10/2008
- yankee452 I'm a Fan of yankee452 39 fans permalink
photo

Well there you have it!

The arrogance and bloody-mindedness of neo-conservative "diplomacy". This is PRECISELY what Al Quaeda hope for as a rallying cry for more recruitment and attacks. Much in the same way it galvanized OBL after the House of Saud welcomed a similar agreement with the US in the early 1990's.

They DO NOT want us there. Iraq is by and large a Shia nation and will naturally gravitate to our supposed enemy Iran. We must come to terms with that fact. There can never be lasting peace in that region as long as the US govt insists on healing a multiple fracture with a band aid. The Iraqi people have made their choice as a sovereign nation - but now we must acknowledge that sovereignty. Insisting on a security pact not only diminishes Iraq's sovereignty in tending to their security, but it also perpetuates the poisonous sentiment that is directed exclusively at America.

This is however great news for Iran Russia and China.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:36 AM on 08/10/2008
- Nyland8 I'm a Fan of Nyland8 90 fans permalink
photo

From the article:

"A series of bombings, meanwhile, targeted Iraqi security forces and civilians nationwide, killing at least nine people and wounding dozens, including the commander of Kurdish forces in a town near the Iranian border."

It's fascinating to me how little play the utter failure of the "surge" gets, usually being relegated to small columns, the back pages, the Saturday editions and such. They give us the "news" at the same time they drown it out with the din of the inane. It's hidden in plain sight. But those of us who keep track understand that over 5 years of catastrophically failed Iraq occupation cannot be "un-failed" by anything we do there. Our presence will always be part of the problem - and the Iraqis know it. That is why they've asked us to leave in a dozen different ways on countless occasions. But the neo-conmen ideologues still hold sway in DC, and will continue to until the Democrats drive them out.

8

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:34 AM on 08/10/2008

"Our presence will always be part of the problem - and the Iraqis know it."

ain't that the truth!

WE are the catalyst for the carnage.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:29 PM on 08/10/2008
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 (3 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect