Iraq Contracts Have Cost Taxpayers At Least $85 Billion Since Invasion

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Iraq Contracts Have Cost Taxpayers At Least $85 Billion Since Invasion stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

KIMBERLY HEFLING | 08/12/08 11:59 PM | AP

I Like ItI Don’t Like It
In this Sept. 23, 2007 file photo, an armored sport-utility vehicle manned by private security contractors passes through central Baghdad, Iraq. In the last year, U.S. contractors in Iraq have been investigated in connection to the shooting deaths of Iraqis and in the electrocutions of U.S. troops who died while doing mundane tasks such as showering in barracks they were charged with maintaining. (AP Photo/Hadi Mizban, File)

WASHINGTON — Military contracts in the Iraq theater have cost taxpayers at least $85 billion, and when it comes to providing security, they might not be any cheaper than using military personnel, according to a report released Tuesday.

The Congressional Budget Office report comes on the heels of increased scrutiny of contractors in the last year, some of whom have been investigated in connection with shooting deaths of Iraqis and the accidental electrocutions of U.S. troops.

The United States has relied more heavily on contractors in Iraq than in any other war to provide services ranging from food service to guarding diplomats. About 20 percent of funding for operations in Iraq has gone to contractors, the report said.

Currently, there are at least 190,000 contractors in Iraq and neighboring countries, a ratio of about one contractor per U.S. service member, the report says.

The study does not include monetary figures for 2008, so the total paid to contractors for work in the Iraq theater since the invasion of Iraq in 2003 is probably much higher. If spending for contractors continues at about the same rate, by the end of the year, an estimated $100 billion will have been paid to military contractors for operations in Iraq.

Sen. Kent Conrad, D-N.D., chairman of the Budget Committee, which requested the CBO review, said the Bush administration's reliance on military contractors has set a dangerous precedent.

The use of contractors "restricts accountability and oversight; opens the door to corruption and abuse; and, in some instances, may significantly increase the cost to American taxpayers," Conrad said in a statement.

The death of a Green Beret from Pittsburgh, Sgt. Ryan Maseth, who was electrocuted in January while showering in Iraq, prompted a House committee oversight hearing last month into whether contractor KBR Inc. has properly handled the electrical work at bases it is tasked with maintaining. The military has also said that five other deaths were due to improperly installed or maintained electrical devices, according to a congressional report.

Story continues below
advertisement

Senators have also been looking into the electrical work done by contractors.

In a separate matter, a federal grand jury is investigating whether Blackwater Worldwide guards acted illegally when they opened fire in a busy Baghdad intersection last September. Seventeen Iraqis died and the shooting strained US-Iraqi relations.

The Justice Department is expected to decide soon whether to bring charges. The company itself is not expected to be prosecuted. Executives from Blackwater, based in Moyock, N.C., said recently that they planned to scale back their security contracting business and focus on other areas, in large part because of the negative attention after the shooting.

The CBO estimated Tuesday that $6 billion to $10 billion has been spent on security work, and that the prices paid are comparable to a U.S. military unit doing that work. It estimated that about 25,000-30,000 employees of security firms were in Iraq as of early 2008.

The report said the legal status of contractor personnel is uncertain, particularly for those who are armed. It also noted that military commanders have less direct authority over the actions of contractors than they would a subordinate because the contract is managed by a government contracting officer and not a military commander.

That's because that's how the government designed the relationship, said Alan Chvotkin, executive vice president and counsel for the Professional Services Council, which represents government contractors.

"There is accountability through the contract and to the contracting officer," Chvotkin said.

The use of military contractors dates to the American Revolution. During the Vietnam War, U.S. contractors were targeted by protesters who accused the companies of profiting from the war.

Since the end of the Cold War, the military has relied more heavily on contractors as it reduced the size of its force. Also, the government in general has sought to outsource more activities that are not inherently governmental.

In Iraq and surrounding countries, contractors have performed duties that otherwise would have required the deployment of more troops. About 20 percent are U.S. citizens; 40 percent are citizens of the country where they are working; and the rest are from other countries.

The personal cost to many of the employees has been great.

They've faced kidnappings and at least 1,200 have died _ including four Blackwater employees who were ambushed in 2004 by insurgents in Fallujah who strung their remains from a bridge. Some female employees of contractors have alleged they were raped by co-workers in Iraq. Investigators have said a contractor was electrocuted when the air conditioner in his living room shorted, and the death is among the electrocutions under investigation.

Since the 2003 invasion of Iraq, much criticism has been directed at Halliburton, an oil services company once run by Vice President Dick Cheney.

Last year, KBR _ formerly known as Kellogg, Brown & Root _ separated from Halliburton and is now the Army's largest contractor, according to its Web site. It holds a multibillion-dollar contract to provide basic services including food and shelter for U.S. soldiers.

It agreed in 2006 to pay $8 million to settle six-year-old claims that it overcharged the Army for construction and other support services in the Balkans.

A KBR spokeswoman declined to comment on Tuesday.

In May, an internal audit from the Defense Department's inspector general of about $8 billion paid to U.S. and Iraqi contractors found that nearly every transaction failed to comply with federal laws or regulations aimed at preventing fraud.

___

A copy of the report can be found at: http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/96xx/doc9688/08-12-IraqContractors.pdf

WASHINGTON — Military contracts in the Iraq theater have cost taxpayers at least $85 billion, and when it comes to providing security, they might not be any cheaper than using military personnel...
WASHINGTON — Military contracts in the Iraq theater have cost taxpayers at least $85 billion, and when it comes to providing security, they might not be any cheaper than using military personnel...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
596
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (15 pages total)

Big bucks, big mess, big blunder - these wars are an oozing sore which is ripping the heart out of a lot of families. It is achieving nothing and while the identifiable costs are astronomical the hidden costs are even higher while on top of that the peripheral costs will bleed nations and despairing families for a generation or more.
As in Vietnam, the cost in human life, in environmental damage, in fiscal terms, in ongoing trauma and misery, etc will all become intolerable - solutions will clearly not be found out of the barrel of a gun.
The might of leading and powerful nations is nothing when the populations on both sides of "the divide" decide to act.
We are stripping the whole heart out of a World community and it is time for new strategies.
Paying huge amounts to private armies to perpetuate the situation will offer no solutions even though it allows many of the real and direct costs to be hidden.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:57 AM on 08/22/2008
- tbone99 I'm a Fan of tbone99 93 fans permalink

Thats $85 Billion to Bush's friends and syncophants.
they couldn't assure Repug votes and organizing if they'd just channeled it to the military.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:45 PM on 08/13/2008
- Tabasco I'm a Fan of Tabasco 18 fans permalink

"WASHINGTON — Military contracts in the Iraq theater have cost taxpayers at least $85 billion...­"

A drop in the bucket compared to the runaway deficit spending the GOP were getting away with in their glory days of late 2002 to late 2006. And, of course, they are STILL blaming the 'Democrat Party' for all that.

I'm at a loss to figure out how these finger-pointing, pontificating opportunists can sleep at night.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:10 PM on 08/13/2008
- kappa08 I'm a Fan of kappa08 77 fans permalink
photo

easy...the­y have the blessing of Redneck America that "thinks" their in "that" crowd.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:57 PM on 08/13/2008
- 2bad I'm a Fan of 2bad 16 fans permalink

President Eisenhower tried to warn the American public to be weary of the "Military Industrial Complex" as he was leaving office. Those who ignore history are condemned to repeat it!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:29 AM on 08/13/2008
photo

Just an observation:

I so glad to see the title used the correct term: "Iraq Contracts Have Cost Taxpayers At Least $85 Billion Since Invasion".
Invasion is the precise term. I may be splitting hairs, but I see red whenever I hear this unnecessary and avoidable atrocity referred to as a "war".

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:16 AM on 08/13/2008
- tbone99 I'm a Fan of tbone99 93 fans permalink

Invasion followed by occupation­.....

Bribery, corruption, shakedowns and breakup of public owned resources

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:48 PM on 08/13/2008
- OgreDaddy I'm a Fan of OgreDaddy 33 fans permalink
photo

The CIA funnels WAY more than this amount to DOD "black projects" every year using well proven money laundering techniques.

If there were an actual accurate and open audit, the American people would discover that we're being
fleeced to the tune of trillions not billions.

As taxpayers, we have the right to know where every last penny is spent, but the government within
the government has seen to it that the amounts they really spend are all "classified" for reasons
of "national security".

It's rather disturbing that We The People have to account for every penny we earn, but the powers that be are not accountable in any meaningful way.

It's even more disturbing that so many So-Called Conservatives are not DEMANDING accurate and open accountability of government spending.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:38 AM on 08/13/2008
- lobear00 I'm a Fan of lobear00 25 fans permalink

That is the one and only thing the "Republican Party does so very well "MONEY LAUNDERING TECHNIQUES. "
The second thing their "Pros at is "Lying,Cheating, Stealing from the American People and Stealing the Resources of this Nation.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:36 AM on 08/13/2008
- ilpostino I'm a Fan of ilpostino 3 fans permalink
photo

Totally agree with ogredaddy.

And what is this statement about private contractors??:" ...they might not be any cheaper than using military personnel, according to a report released Tuesday."

This is SOOO wrong. Of course it would be cheaper to use military personnel. The reason?
1. To use military personnel to do the jobs that most private contractors now do, we would need to recruit more soldiers.
2. Congress would need to vote on a DRAFT to circumscript personnel.
3. The DRAFT bill would have been defeated soundly.
4. No invasion would have occurred since we would not have the military personnel to both attack and support troops after the invasion.
5. hence, it would have cost us less.
6. MUCH LESS.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:16 PM on 08/13/2008
photo

I want to point out that there are many Conservatives that think this and many other of the Bush administration's actions do not represent them well. They also believe McCain will only continue the same policies.

This is a sort of disclaimer for my earlier remarks. I don't mean to lump all conservatives or republicans together as I have personal friends who will vote Obama, and are conservatives. (Also, see http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/08/12/gopers-for-obama-rip-mcca_n_118414.html )

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:29 AM on 08/13/2008

No one ever answers this question: What exactly is a conservative?

A conservative person can also be a liberal person, just depends on what the issue is.

I have seen these self-proclaimed "conservatives" AKA republicans CONSERVE NOTHING, and steal everything, including this country's soul......­......WE, THE PEOPLE, insist that our country and the constitution be restored.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:14 AM on 08/13/2008
- Tabasco I'm a Fan of Tabasco 18 fans permalink

Read Kirk's "The Conservative Mind". It has been the definitive work for decades on what a Conservative really is.

But even HE warned in the book that too much deregulation and disproportionate tax relief is far worse than the opposite. And he had statistics to back it up.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:17 PM on 08/13/2008
- tbone99 I'm a Fan of tbone99 93 fans permalink

If they voted him in twice they are GUILTY

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:46 PM on 08/13/2008
- bija I'm a Fan of bija 5 fans permalink

I am really enraged that any of my tax dollars are going to any military-for-hire corporation or other private corporations who seem to be just looting our country's treasury.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:27 AM on 08/13/2008

For Sale - Oil well in undisclosed location. Lots of wear with loads of life left to it. High income potential for right person. Around back, knock on basement door, ask for Dee Cee.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:48 AM on 08/13/2008
- anghiari I'm a Fan of anghiari 22 fans permalink

(Note: This is an excerpt from a longer article talking about socialite Ms. Mosbacher’s summer travels. It was her venturing into Afghanistan as the guest of the Supreme Allied Commander that caught my attention. This was found on the NYSD.com website 8/13/08.)

“.Our New Age Auntie Mame, Georgette Mosbacher, the tycoon lady of Borghese (the cosmetics), the hostess who gives the mostest, has been away far, far from her glamorous Fifth Avenue aerie, far from her beloved dawgs.

The lady boarded a US military C14 guest of the Supreme Allied Commander Europe, U.S. General Bantz John Craddock, and off they flew to Kabul, Afghanistan to the INTERNATIONAL SECURITY ASSISTANCE FORCE Headquarters, where they toured the ‘Green Zone’ and had an opportunity to speak with the generals of the other Allied Forces fighting in Afghanistan. The following day in Kabul, Georgette and company put on their combat vests that weighed a ton (actually 30 pounds), and helmets, and boarded a Chinook Helicopter to fly to our communications depot at the Khyber Pass. The day after that, off they flew to Kandahar, where they boarded another helicopter, escorted by two Blackhawk helicopters, and flew to one of our forward camps.
next weekend it’s off to Aspen for a McCain senior leadership meeting. Then September 1-4th, she’ll be representing New York as an alternate delegate to the Republican Convention in Minnesota, before heading the following week down to Guantanamo to visit our detention center.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:31 AM on 08/13/2008
- tbone99 I'm a Fan of tbone99 93 fans permalink

But if Obama stopped in ,it was politickin­g...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:49 PM on 08/13/2008
- Danny I'm a Fan of Danny 5 fans permalink

"The use of military contractors dates to the American Revolution. During the Vietnam War, U.S. contractors were targeted by protesters who accused the companies of profiting from the war.

Since the end of the Cold War, the military has relied more heavily on contractors as it reduced the size of its force. Also, the government in general has sought to outsource more activities that are not inherently governmental".

This innocuous passage reeks of rewriting of history, of which we will see plenty if we don't pay attention. So who is "Kimberly Hefling", and in whose employ is she? "Warwire"? What is "Warwire", a Rove operation?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:36 AM on 08/13/2008

When a crime like the Iraq war is committed all you got to do to figure it out is follow the money.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:34 AM on 08/13/2008

And with the coming elections or whatever they will be, Americans are anxious to know who will be the next business manipulator to let his corporate friends gut the nation.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:30 AM on 08/13/2008

I want to thank Ms. Heflin for posting the report and allowing me to read it. I then got to compare what I see it says and what she reported it says. Maybe I am not a journalistic award winner but she seems to be a bit biased in her reporting. Not that I am against a little bias ever once in awhile but please do not make me out to be stupid.
I truly do not want to be electrocuted in my shower and someone needs to be held responsible but unless we are prepared as a country to increase our armed forces by 100-200% we are going to be stuck with contractors, no matter who controls the White House next year.
Read the report and then respond in the comments section.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:26 AM on 08/13/2008
photo

I knew someone would come up with this sort of argument, and you are simply not thinking this through. There will always be contractors, true. However, do you know what "Blackwater" does? They are paid mercenaries. Almost all are known killers from other countries who get paid INSANE money to stand in for our soldiers because WE DON'T HAVE ENOUGH OF THEM. Why don't we have enough? Because we're running both these wars with our "Reserves". In order to provide "overwhelming force" which our own military elite told the shrub we need, we would need a DRAFT. But the shrub couldn't institute a DRAFT because there wasn't enough support for the war, and he figured we would be "greeted as liberators". In other words, he thought we would be welcomed after we kicked Sadam out. He had no strategy at all beyond removing Sadam. So we have spent years fighting a war that should have taken months, spent Billions of dollars on a war that would have cost a fraction of that, all because the shrub didn't go in with overwhelming force (ie. greater than 400,000 troops) which leaves us fighting for YEARS with HIRED KILLERS. "Contractors" used to mean hiring companies to provide goods for the war. This time, it's that, and a word they use to avoid the ugly reality.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:54 AM on 08/13/2008
- tbone99 I'm a Fan of tbone99 93 fans permalink

Maybe if grunts on the ground made 100K like Haliburton paid truckdrivers it wouldn't be so hard to recruit them. Instead they make about $11 /hr and the repugs are fighting healthcare and tuition as a
benefit to offset the low wages.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:52 PM on 08/13/2008

Conservatives love to point to WW2 when discussing the importance of the Iraq conflict; frankly I do not see any comparison except people die and things get destroyed like all wars. What I will say if the 2nd World War had been fought with the same sort of incompetence and profiteering from private contractors the US could have lost the war. There was much anger by powerful corporate interest toward the Roosevelt Administration, due to lack of profit taking allowed. Small auto companies like Bantam, which built the original prototype for the Jeep, a vehicle, which could be argued, was instrumental in winning the war, was not given the production contracts since Bantam did not have the production capacity to supply the military with vast numbers of Jeeps needed. Bantam lost out big time on their design, which they had to hand over, to Ford and Kaiser for mass production. These were difficult decisions, which were made to prevail in a 2 front war, tough decisions which were never made in the current Iraq conflict with private contractors. Ironically conservatives of the 1930s and 40’s during the largest shooting war this country has ever been in engaged in did not want private interest to sacrifice to do what needed to be done than, either. The Bush Administration has done nothing to encourage sacrifice in what it deemed as a “war between cutlers”.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:23 AM on 08/13/2008
photo

The Truman Commission stopped a lot of profiteering as the country mobilized for WWII. He was never forgiven by the Republicans. Amazing what one Senator can do.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:25 AM on 08/13/2008
photo

This article is probably pretty freeing for the conservati­ves...

Now they can just run through the streets screaming, "I'M A CROOK!! I'M A CROOK!!"

No reason to hide it anymore. Oh, and, "Vote MCCAIN!! I WANT MORE!!"

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:51 AM on 08/13/2008
photo

Amen! Let's continue the wanton destruction of America! Vote McCain!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:13 AM on 08/13/2008
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (15 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect