Justice Staffers Won't Be Prosecuted For Illegal Hiring Practices

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Justice Staffers Won't Be Prosecuted For Illegal Hiring Practices stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

MARK SHERMAN | August 12, 2008 04:13 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
U.S. Attorney General Michael Mukasey, left, faces reporters as Michael Sullivan, U.S. attorney general for Massachusetts, right, looks on during a news conference, in Boston, Tuesday, Aug. 5, 2008. The Department of Justice announced Tuesday that it had charged 11 people in connection with the hacking of nine major U.S. retailers and the theft and sale of more than 40 million credit and debit card numbers. The retailers included TJX, BJ's Wholesale Club, OfficeMax, and Boston Market among others. (AP Photo/Steven Senne)

NEW YORK — No criminal prosecutions are planned for former Justice Department officials accused of allowing politics to influence the hiring of prosecutors, immigration judges and other career government lawyers, Attorney General Michael Mukasey said Tuesday.

Mukasey used his sharpest words yet to criticize the senior leaders who took part in or failed to stop illegal hiring practices during the tenure of his predecessor, Alberto Gonzales.

But, he told delegates to the American Bar Association annual meeting, "Not every wrong, or even every violation of the law, is a crime. In this instance, the two joint reports found only violations of the civil service laws."

Other intrusions of Bush administration politics into department hirings and firings remain under investigation. Justice officials say the attorney general's remarks do not preclude criminal prosecutions if wrongdoing is found in the firing of nine U.S. attorneys in 2006 and the hiring practices in the department's civil rights division.

The political controversies prompted Gonzales' resignation last year.

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy said Mukasey "seems intent on insulating this administration from accountability."

The Vermont Democrat said Mukasey's remarks "appear premature based on the facts and evidence that congressional investigators and the inspector general have uncovered so far" in the hiring scandal. "We must continue to pursue the truth and facts, and hold any wrongdoers accountable," Leahy said.

An internal investigation concluded last month that for nearly two years, top advisers to Gonzales discriminated against applicants for career jobs who weren't Republican or conservative loyalists.

Story continues below
advertisement

The federal government makes a distinction between "career" and "political" appointees, and it's a violation of civil service laws and Justice Department policy to hire career employees on the basis of political affiliation or allegiance.

Yet Monica Goodling, who served as Gonzales' counselor and White House liaison, routinely asked career job applicants about politics, the report concluded.

Mukasey, who once was a federal judge in New York, said the Justice Department has taken steps under his leadership to prevent a recurrence of the hiring scandal.

"I have made repeatedly clear ... that it is neither permissible nor acceptable to consider political affiliations in the hiring of career department employees," Mukasey said.

If the problems were to recur, Mukasey said, he is confident department employees would speak up.

That did not happen during Gonzales' tenure, he said. Gonzales appeared unaware of the political hiring process outlined by Goodling and his then-chief of staff, Kyle Sampson, the report said.

"There was a failure of supervision by senior officials in the department. And there was a failure on the part of some employees to cry foul when they were aware, or should have been aware, of problems," Mukasey said.

Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., said more must be done to prevent political hiring at the agency. "Even if it is true they didn't commit a crime, it would be appropriate to make what they did a misdemeanor so that in the future, those who violate the civil service laws cannot escape unscathed," Schumer said in a statement.

Goodling's lawyer, John Dowd, declined comment when asked about Mukasey's speech.

The ABA has been at odds with the Bush administration on a range of issues, including treatment of prisoners suspected of terrorist ties and the need for a federal law to shield reporters from subpoenas.

Mukasey said that on the issue of politics in his department, there was no disagreement with the lawyers' group.

"Professionalism is alive and well at the Justice Department," he said.

Some candidates for career Justice Department jobs who were excluded because of politics could be invited to apply for new positions, Mukasey said.

He also ruled out firing or reassigning those who were hired under the now-discarded evaluation process.

"Two wrongs do not make a right," he said. "People who were hired in an improper way didn't themselves do anything wrong."

___

Associated Press reporter Natasha Metzler contributed from Washington.

NEW YORK — No criminal prosecutions are planned for former Justice Department officials accused of allowing politics to influence the hiring of prosecutors, immigration judges and other career g...
NEW YORK — No criminal prosecutions are planned for former Justice Department officials accused of allowing politics to influence the hiring of prosecutors, immigration judges and other career g...
Filed by Rachel Weiner  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
1870
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 (65 pages total)
- PuppaX I'm a Fan of PuppaX 7 fans permalink
photo

From the above:

But, he told delegates to the American Bar Association annual meeting, "not every wrong, or even every violation of the law, is a crime. In this instance, the two joint reports found only violations of the civil service laws."

What does that even mean? "Violations of the civil service law" is not a crime? Does that mean the attorney general would think it unworthy of attention if I practiced discriminatory hiring practices?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:57 AM on 08/12/2008
photo

Then why do the feds continue to harass medical marijuana clinics in California and other states?

I think violations of the law are only crimes when they don't involve Republican perpetrators.

Enough is enough! Vote them out and never, ever give them the White House again.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:09 PM on 08/12/2008
- doctorwang I'm a Fan of doctorwang 196 fans permalink
photo

It all comes down to political points. Being against the marijuana 'cartel' is a plus when it comes to impressing their conservative base. Having Repub operatives in the Justice Dept. is a plus because it enables them to cover their tracks. Law's are fine and dandy as long as those laws serve to advance their agenda(s)....when laws impede that agenda they are thrown by the wayside.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:49 PM on 08/12/2008
- JimboSlice I'm a Fan of JimboSlice 6 fans permalink

As long as you excluded minorities, women, and gays go right ahead.

But if you even think about not hiring a white male because of their religion (and by religion I mean the "true" religions, Jews or Christian) then the Justice Dept is coming after your ass.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:15 PM on 08/12/2008
- PuppaX I'm a Fan of PuppaX 7 fans permalink
photo

Actually, no AG would have a problem with excluding gay people. They're not a "protected" calls. (I hate that phrase...it makes the group in question sound like endangered animals.)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:07 PM on 08/12/2008
- andyboy I'm a Fan of andyboy 77 fans permalink

PuppaX,

It merely means that the perpetrators were political allies. Nothing else.

Our society is mired in a morass of lying and obfuscation.

The implied message here is this: It's fine to cheat and break the law as long as your a "conservative". And a conservative has to do "whatever it takes" to "win" over the evil forces of liberalism/socialism/communism/terrorism.

Since WW1 and before this nation has consistently allowed Republicans and even "conservative" Democrats to break any and all laws they deem necessary. Thousands were locked up during WW1 for daring to voice their opposition.

Mukasey is a political lackey a yes man for the neo-con war and fear machine. How could he possibly judge impartially people who are on his own team? His bretheren? There's no way.

Mukasey couldn't care less about justice. Everybody is a totally polarized earth scorching hell bent for leather partisan today.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:16 PM on 08/12/2008
- PuppaX I'm a Fan of PuppaX 7 fans permalink
photo

See the truth is, while I was being facetious above, I always have trouble with this issue (which I guess is just about to what extent the ends justify the means).

While I think the lengths they go to aren't justified by what they claim to be seeking to avoid, is there anything I shouldn't have done or any lie I shouldn't have told if it would have avoided Bush's presidency? If for no other reason than avoiding the hundreds of thousands of dead and million of displaced Iraqis?

If they believe that abortion is the equivalent to murder, isn't it their responsibility to do whatever is necessary to do away with it?

I'm not discussing whether they're morally right about abortion (or even whether criminalization is the best way to reduce its frequency), only about the "moral equivalency of lying versus "savings lives."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:17 PM on 08/12/2008

Would I have been giving the same pass,if I were to break any Law?

They ask us to obey the Laws,but they are above the Laws.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:56 AM on 08/12/2008
- jhNY I'm a Fan of jhNY 60 fans permalink

They don't ask. They tell.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:01 PM on 08/12/2008

"not every wrong, or even every violation of the law, is a crime. In this instance, the two joint reports found only violations of the civil service laws."

So who decides what is a crime and what isn't? If the law is bent for one person should the same standard not apply to others?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:54 AM on 08/12/2008
- Gidster I'm a Fan of Gidster 221 fans permalink
photo

They decide..."Remember you are either with us or against us"

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:34 PM on 08/12/2008

Crooks covering up for other crooks. I no longer have any respect for the justice system in any form in this country. What a big joke these pieces of garbage have made of this country. Exception made for the officer on the street of beat, they put their lives on the line so their superiors (garbage) can thump their chests.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:54 AM on 08/12/2008
- solid I'm a Fan of solid 24 fans permalink

And I respect very few of those jackboots. Most of 'em are just looking for an excuse to taser someone.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:39 PM on 08/12/2008

Not prosecuting them should keep the little fish (Goodling, etc..) from cutting a deal to real in the big fish (Bush, Rove, etc..). Good way to cover up once again for the Bush Administration, Mukasey.

Our government is corrupt and needs a changing - Repubs and Dems. All complicit and enabling, and covering up for one another.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:54 AM on 08/12/2008
- OverIt I'm a Fan of OverIt 78 fans permalink

This is news to whom exactly? Mukasey is a disgrace. The "Gang of 14" should be really proud right now.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:52 AM on 08/12/2008
- rinpochet I'm a Fan of rinpochet 45 fans permalink

"Not every violation of the law is a crime"!!!???? And this man is a laywer????

Violation of the law is the definition of a crime!

I guess it is, anything we can do to protect this administration.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:51 AM on 08/12/2008
Page: « First ‹ Previous 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 (65 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect