Justice Staffers Won't Be Prosecuted For Illegal Hiring Practices

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Justice Staffers Won't Be Prosecuted For Illegal Hiring Practices stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

MARK SHERMAN | August 12, 2008 04:13 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
U.S. Attorney General Michael Mukasey, left, faces reporters as Michael Sullivan, U.S. attorney general for Massachusetts, right, looks on during a news conference, in Boston, Tuesday, Aug. 5, 2008. The Department of Justice announced Tuesday that it had charged 11 people in connection with the hacking of nine major U.S. retailers and the theft and sale of more than 40 million credit and debit card numbers. The retailers included TJX, BJ's Wholesale Club, OfficeMax, and Boston Market among others. (AP Photo/Steven Senne)

NEW YORK — No criminal prosecutions are planned for former Justice Department officials accused of allowing politics to influence the hiring of prosecutors, immigration judges and other career government lawyers, Attorney General Michael Mukasey said Tuesday.

Mukasey used his sharpest words yet to criticize the senior leaders who took part in or failed to stop illegal hiring practices during the tenure of his predecessor, Alberto Gonzales.

But, he told delegates to the American Bar Association annual meeting, "Not every wrong, or even every violation of the law, is a crime. In this instance, the two joint reports found only violations of the civil service laws."

Other intrusions of Bush administration politics into department hirings and firings remain under investigation. Justice officials say the attorney general's remarks do not preclude criminal prosecutions if wrongdoing is found in the firing of nine U.S. attorneys in 2006 and the hiring practices in the department's civil rights division.

The political controversies prompted Gonzales' resignation last year.

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy said Mukasey "seems intent on insulating this administration from accountability."

The Vermont Democrat said Mukasey's remarks "appear premature based on the facts and evidence that congressional investigators and the inspector general have uncovered so far" in the hiring scandal. "We must continue to pursue the truth and facts, and hold any wrongdoers accountable," Leahy said.

An internal investigation concluded last month that for nearly two years, top advisers to Gonzales discriminated against applicants for career jobs who weren't Republican or conservative loyalists.

Story continues below
advertisement

The federal government makes a distinction between "career" and "political" appointees, and it's a violation of civil service laws and Justice Department policy to hire career employees on the basis of political affiliation or allegiance.

Yet Monica Goodling, who served as Gonzales' counselor and White House liaison, routinely asked career job applicants about politics, the report concluded.

Mukasey, who once was a federal judge in New York, said the Justice Department has taken steps under his leadership to prevent a recurrence of the hiring scandal.

"I have made repeatedly clear ... that it is neither permissible nor acceptable to consider political affiliations in the hiring of career department employees," Mukasey said.

If the problems were to recur, Mukasey said, he is confident department employees would speak up.

That did not happen during Gonzales' tenure, he said. Gonzales appeared unaware of the political hiring process outlined by Goodling and his then-chief of staff, Kyle Sampson, the report said.

"There was a failure of supervision by senior officials in the department. And there was a failure on the part of some employees to cry foul when they were aware, or should have been aware, of problems," Mukasey said.

Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., said more must be done to prevent political hiring at the agency. "Even if it is true they didn't commit a crime, it would be appropriate to make what they did a misdemeanor so that in the future, those who violate the civil service laws cannot escape unscathed," Schumer said in a statement.

Goodling's lawyer, John Dowd, declined comment when asked about Mukasey's speech.

The ABA has been at odds with the Bush administration on a range of issues, including treatment of prisoners suspected of terrorist ties and the need for a federal law to shield reporters from subpoenas.

Mukasey said that on the issue of politics in his department, there was no disagreement with the lawyers' group.

"Professionalism is alive and well at the Justice Department," he said.

Some candidates for career Justice Department jobs who were excluded because of politics could be invited to apply for new positions, Mukasey said.

He also ruled out firing or reassigning those who were hired under the now-discarded evaluation process.

"Two wrongs do not make a right," he said. "People who were hired in an improper way didn't themselves do anything wrong."

___

Associated Press reporter Natasha Metzler contributed from Washington.

NEW YORK — No criminal prosecutions are planned for former Justice Department officials accused of allowing politics to influence the hiring of prosecutors, immigration judges and other career g...
NEW YORK — No criminal prosecutions are planned for former Justice Department officials accused of allowing politics to influence the hiring of prosecutors, immigration judges and other career g...
Filed by Rachel Weiner  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
1870
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next › Last » (65 pages total)

Why should anyone be surprised at Mukasy, especially after Bush's longtime buddy Gonzales as AT? Hasn't ANY Senator learned ANYTHING about the kind of people Bush selects to oversee the Departments in his administration? They're all "loyal Bushies", idealogues like Bush, incompetents who supported his campaigns, or selected for their skill and loyalty in hiding administration secrets and protecting Bush from accountability! After the Gonzales catastrophie--who got away scot free--our distinguished SENATORS (listen up, Feinstein, Schumer and the rest!) CAVED in again and proved once again: "Fool me once, shame on me; fool me twice,---dammit, we're IDIOTS!"

I simply fail to understand how our elected "representatives" in Congress can take an oath to protect our Constitution, say the Pledge of Allegiance each a.m., pontificate without end on how much they LOVE America, then lay down and let Bush/Cheney and their cabal of criminals walk all over them and our country! Our Justice system has been essentially DESTROYED by this bunch!

Have none of you Congressmen ANY DECENCY, Sirs?----Oh, sorry to bother you; you're all on vacation!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:04 PM on 08/12/2008

Good post.....I am at a loss to respond. I mean, what else can one say about the utter incompetence of the House and Senate? I don't even bother to wrote my senators anymore as all I get back are form letters.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:18 PM on 08/12/2008
photo

'Incompetence' is far more benign than is the cowardice and opportunism driving their willful dereliction of duties and violation of their oaths of office.

I have become disgusted by the craven attitudes of Pelosi and Reid, and all they lead.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:33 PM on 08/12/2008
- Vinca I'm a Fan of Vinca 6 fans permalink

druidlady42:Thanks for your commentary

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:20 AM on 08/13/2008
- Cynth I'm a Fan of Cynth 13 fans permalink

Oh, but they didn't *mean* to break the law... [sniff]

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:03 PM on 08/12/2008
- TheBrizz I'm a Fan of TheBrizz 6 fans permalink

The idea that not every violation of the law is a crime is pretty much a synopsis of the last 7 1/2 years the Bush administration has been in power. They've done nothing but lie, cheat and steal since January 20, 2001. But at least we got Scooter Libby.

Oh, wait a minute...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:58 PM on 08/12/2008
- billrott I'm a Fan of billrott 9 fans permalink

Since it is clear the attorney general will not enforce the laws that the people of the united states entrusted him to can we impeach him now? Seriously, what exactly does it take for this guy meaning mukasey to be impeached?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:54 PM on 08/12/2008
- billrott I'm a Fan of billrott 9 fans permalink

I know people that have been put away for crimes they did not commit simple because a DOJ employee was able to railroad a conviction through before a lack luster jury. To listen to mukasey say he won't prosecute these people for breaking the law is absurd. First off, mukasey should have recused himself from such a decision. Second, these people should not be treated differently because they supported the president.

This decision is bull.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:53 PM on 08/12/2008
- krm1255 I'm a Fan of krm1255 3 fans permalink

I'm not surprised.

What I expect to happen next is that the Democrats will win the White House, we'll get the speech about how we have to look forward instead of back and NO ONE will be held accountable for anything that happened the last 8 years.

Accountability doesn't exist in government anymore.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:51 PM on 08/12/2008

Of course not, the Dems are in on the corruption.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:19 PM on 08/12/2008

Now we know what Mukasey's qualification was - qualified justice.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:49 PM on 08/12/2008
photo


The Federal government lies all the time, when they want to railroad somebody, especially.

Thousands and thousands of lives have been ruined, families destroyed because they live to put people away.

Mukasey has just given a typical insight to the integrity of justice in this country. Especially Justice under Bush.... "If we say, white is black, it's black. If we say it's sunny on a rainy day, you better damn well know it's sunny. If we piss down your back and say it's raining, you better get an umbrella."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:47 PM on 08/12/2008
- Vinca I'm a Fan of Vinca 6 fans permalink

castlerider:You are very insightful, you hit the nail

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:20 AM on 08/13/2008
- research I'm a Fan of research 250 fans permalink

Thanks ALL of you folks who realized just how important this story is!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:45 PM on 08/12/2008

Why have any law on the books that is "selectively" enforced? As an african american past age 50 all I can say to the other "outraged" bloggers is "welcome to my world" for african americans this is the "norm" as it relates to the justice system. Richard Pryor said it best in a routine, he said " I went downtown looking for justice and all I found was "just us".

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:36 PM on 08/12/2008
- darker I'm a Fan of darker 40 fans permalink

It's "just us" footing the bill for REPUBLICAN CORRUPTION.

That nobody will be punished or HELD ACCOUNTABLE for REPUBLICAN CORRUPTION
is a huge SCANDAL. It means the Republicans will KILL to CONTINUE THEIR "GOLD RUSH"
of the US Treasury and your tax dollars.

Justice Department is A REPUBLICAN SCANDAL. It's a FREE FOR ALL for all CROOKS, now!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:41 PM on 08/12/2008

They've gotten away with everything so far.
Ain't gonna change now.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:47 PM on 08/12/2008

Its the DEMS TOO!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:20 PM on 08/12/2008
photo

The Injustice Department continuing a stellar lists of achievements especially rendering the 4th Amendment moot. Ah, the legacy we will all have to live with for many years.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:36 PM on 08/12/2008
- arbroath I'm a Fan of arbroath 3 fans permalink
photo

"Not every wrong, or even every violation of the law, is a crime."
Excuse me, but in this country of justice, in this country of laws, yes, a violation of the law is a crime. Talk about creating the most immensely hazardous slippery slope in the history of law - this has got to be the one.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:35 PM on 08/12/2008
photo

As much as I hate to say this, Mukasey is right: not every violation of law is a crime, even if every crime is a violation of law. Put another way, crimes are a subset of all law violations.

To be a crime, the law in question has to be part of a criminal code or it must: 1) make specifically state that its violation shall be considered a crime and specify the degree (typically a misdemeanor or felony); and 2) specify that there is a criminal (as opposed to civil or administrative) penalty for its violation.

Most federal crimes are codified in Title 18 of the U.S. Code. So, if the federal statute in question isn't in 18 USC or it doesn't identify its violation as a crime and specify punishment, then acting contrary to the federal law in question would be a civil violation and not a criminal violation.

EXAMPLE: a statue in 42 USC requires that Agency give notice to interested parties and specifies that the notice must contain A, B, and C but is silent as to the consequences for Agency's failing to include those required elements. Agency then sends out notice that includes A, D, and E, failing to include B and C. While that clearly would be a violation of law, such violation is civil only (it's not criminal since no criminal penalty is specified for its violation).

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:29 PM on 08/12/2008
- RRonin I'm a Fan of RRonin 19 fans permalink
photo

"Laws are like cobwebs, which may catch small flies, but let wasps and hornets break through." - Jonathan Swift

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:27 PM on 08/12/2008
- bamboozled I'm a Fan of bamboozled 11 fans permalink

By the way, I'm likely to agree with that statement more in cases where there's no victim. For example, Bill Clinton lying about an affair with his intern. What precisely was the crime there? Who was harmed, besides the American taxpayer, whose money was wasted?

In this case, there were actually people who unjustifiably lost their jobs. I'd say that's a crime. If someone fired me for doing my job correctly, I'd certainly pursue legal action.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:26 PM on 08/12/2008

Mukasey is a sorry republican SOB. The law does not apply to them - just to everyone else.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:25 PM on 08/12/2008
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next › Last » (65 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect