US, Poland Reach Agreement On Anti-Missile Defense Deal

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

VANESSA GERA and MONIKA SCISLOWSKA | August 14, 2008 07:30 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »

Chief U.S. negotiator John Rood, left, and Polish negotiator Andrzej Kremer exchange documents they just signed on an initial agreement on conditions for placing a U.S. missile defense base in Poland, in Warsaw, Poland, Thursday, Aug.14, 2008. (AP Photo/Alik Keplicz)

WARSAW, Poland — Poland and the United States struck a deal Thursday that will strengthen military ties and put an American missile interceptor base in Poland, a plan that has infuriated Moscow and sparked fears in Europe of a new arms race.

"We have crossed the Rubicon," Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk said, referring to U.S. consent to Poland's demands after more than 18 months of negotiations.

Washington says the planned system, which is not yet operational, is needed to protect the U.S. and Europe from possible attacks by missile-armed "rogue states" like Iran. The Kremlin, however, feels it is aimed at Russia's missile force and warns it will worsen tensions.

U.S. officials also said the timing of the deal was not meant to antagonize Russian leaders at a time when relations already are strained over the recent fighting between Russia and Georgia over the South Ossetia region.

In an interview on news channel TVN24, Tusk said the United States agreed to help augment Poland's defenses with Patriot missiles in exchange for placing 10 missile defense interceptors in the eastern European country.

He said the deal also includes a "mutual commitment" between the two nations to come to each other's assistance "in case of trouble."

That clause appeared to be a direct reference to Russia, which has threatened to aim its nuclear-armed missiles at Poland _ a former Soviet satellite _ if it hosts the U.S. site.

Poland has all along been guided by fears of a newly resurgent Russia, an anxiety that has intensified with Russia's offensive in Georgia, a former Soviet republic. The incursion, along with the bombing of military posts and airfields inside Georgia, has underlined a palpable fear in the region of Russia's renewed vigor and confidence.

Story continues below
advertisement

In past days, Polish leaders said the war justified Poland's demands that it get additional security guarantees from Washington in exchange for allowing the anti-missile base on its soil.

Talking about the "mutual commitment" part of the agreement, Tusk said that the North Atlantic Treaty Organization would be too slow in coming to Poland's defense if threatened and that the bloc would take "days, weeks to start that machinery."

"Poland and the Poles do not want to be in alliances in which assistance comes at some point later _ it is no good when assistance comes to dead people. Poland wants to be in alliances where assistance comes in the very first hours of _ knock on wood _ any possible conflict," Tusk said.

He said that armed with Patriot missiles, Poles "will be able to effectively protect our territory."

But after the deal was announced, both American and Polish officials sought to play down any connection to the Georgian war.

"This is not linked to the situation in Georgia," the chief U.S. negotiator, John Rood, told The Associated Press, after the pact was initialed. "We had made these arrangements for this round of negotiations before the conflict in Georgia, and so we just merely continued with the schedule we had."

In Washington, White House spokeswoman Dana Perino also said the timing was not meant to tweak Russia. "We believe that missile defense is a substantial contribution to NATO's collective security," she said.

In initial reaction from Russia, the parliamentary foreign affairs committee chairman, Konstantin Kosachev, was quoted by Interfax news agency as saying the agreement will spark "a real rise in tensions in Russian-American relations." He repeated the view that defense shield really targets Russia's arsenal.

The Pentagon has stressed that the 10 interceptors planned for Poland are not designed to counter Russia's huge missile arsenal, but rather to defend against emerging threats from countries such as Iran. Pentagon leaders have pushed to move as quickly as possible to implement the agreement, in light of the recent series of missile tests by Iran.

According to a senior defense official, the U.S. will base one Patriot missile battery in Poland along with about 100 U.S. military personnel to support it. The associated costs would be shared to some degree by both countries, said the official, who spoke on condition of anonymity because the agreement has not yet been formally signed. The Patriot will come from a battalion currently in Germany.

After Tusk announced the deal, it went through an initial signing ceremony late Thursday in Warsaw, but still needs approval from Poland's government and parliament and a final signing by Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice at a yet unspecified date.

At the signing, Polish Foreign Minister Radek Sikorski said the deal would strengthen the U.S., Poland and NATO.

Earlier this year, NATO endorsed the U.S. plan to expand its global missile defense shield with the planned site in Poland and a linked radar tracking base in the Czech Republic.

"Only evil people should be afraid of our agreement," Sikorski told reporters after Rood and his Polish counterpart, Andrzej Kremer, initialed the agreement at the Foreign Ministry.

The U.S. has also reached an agreement with the Czech Republic's government to place the radar component of the missile defense shield in that country. That deal still needs approval from Czech parliament.

___

Associated Press writers Foster Klug and Lolita C. Baldor in Washington contributed to this report.

WARSAW, Poland — Poland and the United States struck a deal Thursday that will strengthen military ties and put an American missile interceptor base in Poland, a plan that has infuriated Moscow ...
WARSAW, Poland — Poland and the United States struck a deal Thursday that will strengthen military ties and put an American missile interceptor base in Poland, a plan that has infuriated Moscow ...
 
Comments
152
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next › Last » (5 pages total)

What happens when this faulty antimissile system shoots down a Russian airliner?
http://www.strategypage.com/militaryforums/29-1858.aspx

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:14 PM on 08/16/2008

Poor Poland, you'd think that these people would have learned their lesson after all they have suffered; Washington has no intention of coming to their aid if attacked .
The U.S. will not sacrifize any of it's cities for Warsaw.
Poland will be the only European country with Cruise Missiles pointing at it.
They were sold a bill of goods.
Pobrecitos.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:59 PM on 08/15/2008

Putin isn't the nicest man alive, but I don't think he's that stupid. The only way Poland was "sold a bill of goods", is if Putin is that stupid.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:02 AM on 08/16/2008

Putin will be THAT stupid if Bush keeps making strategic blunders like he's been making since he took office. They too have a first strike doctrine.
Anyway, it'll be up to the next administration to follow thru with the missile installation in Poland; if the Dems win, it won't happen.
Make money, not war; live to enjoy , don't die rich.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:53 AM on 08/16/2008

Follow the money...FOLLOW THE DEFENSE CONTRACTORS.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:06 PM on 08/15/2008

So finally, Bush and Polska dropped the embarrassing pretense that this was about defending Europe from Iran. Iran will be is a threat, but Poland and Czech placement is all about Russia.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:08 PM on 08/15/2008

I can't imagine what Poland and the Czech Republic could possibly have against Russia.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:38 PM on 08/15/2008

I am talking about American and Polish lies about the placement of such stations.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:09 PM on 08/15/2008

i agree that the usa and poland should have a stonger alliance,but why kick the bear when we wouldnt back them ,if russia invades.republicans sure are tough,most having never served miltarily.WHY DO REPUBLICANS HATE OUR TROOPS.we have no viable military left.youre doing a heckuva job president 5 deferment cheney.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:42 PM on 08/15/2008

This so-called technology is one huge boondoggle and a fleecing of American taxpayers. If it actually works why isn't Isreal asking for it to protect from the percieved iranian threat.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:52 AM on 08/15/2008
photo

Thats because they know who is going to win the election and they're setting it up so Barack will have his hands full defusing the crap they have initiated.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:04 AM on 08/15/2008

I love how one of the dumbest Presidents ever ends up planning 9/11 and a laundry list of so called conspircaies . . .

How the times change.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:11 AM on 08/15/2008

I nominate Amanda BC for blog poster of the year.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:54 AM on 08/15/2008

Dumb move by the US administration. Now, the US can be accused of lying to major powers - this time, it's Russia.

What happened to America's claims that the missile defense shield is aimed at Iran? What a bunch of thugs

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:51 AM on 08/15/2008

Because Russia . . . never . . . has . . . lied . . . to . . . us?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:09 AM on 08/15/2008

Hey guys, why won't you post my comment on this article ?
I didn't write any obscenities or insults.
What gives ?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:46 AM on 08/15/2008
photo

The Price Is Right (Neocon puppet show participants)

Tell 'em what they have won!!!

They have won first priority to total obliteration by Russia in the event of a military conflict!!!!

Congrats Poland!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:40 AM on 08/15/2008

Poland, Russia, Georgia and all of us just got Punked!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:50 AM on 08/15/2008

The big winners are the M.I.C.
Thats right folks, these are U.S. missile bases added to the ever expanding black hole Penta gone FUN ding budget.
Eisenhower was an insider that blew the whistle and jumped off the train. Imagine a world without weapons, I think you can.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:55 AM on 08/15/2008

Any way to convince Russia that this is just another Maginot Line that can't be fired towards it?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:22 AM on 08/15/2008
photo

Too bad they won't be able to shoot down ground hugging cruise missiles.

A waste of money

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:56 AM on 08/15/2008

Remember Russian missiles in Cuba..that didn't make us very happy ...how do you think the Russians are feeling about now?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:12 AM on 08/15/2008
photo

"how do you think the Russians are feeling about now?"

Since when American "patriots" care about what foreigners feel? Now THAT's the crux of the matter...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:35 AM on 08/15/2008

Were the missles in Cuba setup for defense or for attacks?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:59 AM on 08/15/2008
photo

They were installed in retaliation for American missiles in Turkey and Italy. I.e. the US started it and the US ended it by COMPROMISING with the Soviets. That's not the story you were told...but then again anything that goes beyond a "goodies and baddies" story does require a certain amount of critical thinking...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:07 AM on 08/15/2008
    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:39 AM on 08/15/2008
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next › Last » (5 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in  or  Connect