EDITION: U.S.
 
CONNECT    

US, Poland Reach Agreement On Anti-Missile Defense Deal

VANESSA GERA and MONIKA SCISLOWSKA | August 14, 2008 07:30 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Chief U.S. negotiator John Rood, left, and Polish negotiator Andrzej Kremer exchange documents they just signed on an initial agreement on conditions for placing a U.S. missile defense base in Poland, in Warsaw, Poland, Thursday, Aug.14, 2008. (AP Photo/Alik Keplicz)
?>

WARSAW, Poland — Poland and the United States struck a deal Thursday that will strengthen military ties and put an American missile interceptor base in Poland, a plan that has infuriated Moscow and sparked fears in Europe of a new arms race.

"We have crossed the Rubicon," Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk said, referring to U.S. consent to Poland's demands after more than 18 months of negotiations.

Washington says the planned system, which is not yet operational, is needed to protect the U.S. and Europe from possible attacks by missile-armed "rogue states" like Iran. The Kremlin, however, feels it is aimed at Russia's missile force and warns it will worsen tensions.

U.S. officials also said the timing of the deal was not meant to antagonize Russian leaders at a time when relations already are strained over the recent fighting between Russia and Georgia over the South Ossetia region.

In an interview on news channel TVN24, Tusk said the United States agreed to help augment Poland's defenses with Patriot missiles in exchange for placing 10 missile defense interceptors in the eastern European country.

He said the deal also includes a "mutual commitment" between the two nations to come to each other's assistance "in case of trouble."

That clause appeared to be a direct reference to Russia, which has threatened to aim its nuclear-armed missiles at Poland _ a former Soviet satellite _ if it hosts the U.S. site.

Poland has all along been guided by fears of a newly resurgent Russia, an anxiety that has intensified with Russia's offensive in Georgia, a former Soviet republic. The incursion, along with the bombing of military posts and airfields inside Georgia, has underlined a palpable fear in the region of Russia's renewed vigor and confidence.

In past days, Polish leaders said the war justified Poland's demands that it get additional security guarantees from Washington in exchange for allowing the anti-missile base on its soil.

Talking about the "mutual commitment" part of the agreement, Tusk said that the North Atlantic Treaty Organization would be too slow in coming to Poland's defense if threatened and that the bloc would take "days, weeks to start that machinery."

"Poland and the Poles do not want to be in alliances in which assistance comes at some point later _ it is no good when assistance comes to dead people. Poland wants to be in alliances where assistance comes in the very first hours of _ knock on wood _ any possible conflict," Tusk said.

He said that armed with Patriot missiles, Poles "will be able to effectively protect our territory."

But after the deal was announced, both American and Polish officials sought to play down any connection to the Georgian war.

"This is not linked to the situation in Georgia," the chief U.S. negotiator, John Rood, told The Associated Press, after the pact was initialed. "We had made these arrangements for this round of negotiations before the conflict in Georgia, and so we just merely continued with the schedule we had."

In Washington, White House spokeswoman Dana Perino also said the timing was not meant to tweak Russia. "We believe that missile defense is a substantial contribution to NATO's collective security," she said.

In initial reaction from Russia, the parliamentary foreign affairs committee chairman, Konstantin Kosachev, was quoted by Interfax news agency as saying the agreement will spark "a real rise in tensions in Russian-American relations." He repeated the view that defense shield really targets Russia's arsenal.

The Pentagon has stressed that the 10 interceptors planned for Poland are not designed to counter Russia's huge missile arsenal, but rather to defend against emerging threats from countries such as Iran. Pentagon leaders have pushed to move as quickly as possible to implement the agreement, in light of the recent series of missile tests by Iran.

According to a senior defense official, the U.S. will base one Patriot missile battery in Poland along with about 100 U.S. military personnel to support it. The associated costs would be shared to some degree by both countries, said the official, who spoke on condition of anonymity because the agreement has not yet been formally signed. The Patriot will come from a battalion currently in Germany.

After Tusk announced the deal, it went through an initial signing ceremony late Thursday in Warsaw, but still needs approval from Poland's government and parliament and a final signing by Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice at a yet unspecified date.

At the signing, Polish Foreign Minister Radek Sikorski said the deal would strengthen the U.S., Poland and NATO.

Earlier this year, NATO endorsed the U.S. plan to expand its global missile defense shield with the planned site in Poland and a linked radar tracking base in the Czech Republic.

"Only evil people should be afraid of our agreement," Sikorski told reporters after Rood and his Polish counterpart, Andrzej Kremer, initialed the agreement at the Foreign Ministry.

The U.S. has also reached an agreement with the Czech Republic's government to place the radar component of the missile defense shield in that country. That deal still needs approval from Czech parliament.

___

Associated Press writers Foster Klug and Lolita C. Baldor in Washington contributed to this report.

WARSAW, Poland — Poland and the United States struck a deal Thursday that will strengthen military ties and put an American missile interceptor base in Poland, a plan that has infuriated Moscow ...
WARSAW, Poland — Poland and the United States struck a deal Thursday that will strengthen military ties and put an American missile interceptor base in Poland, a plan that has infuriated Moscow ...
Filed by Nick Graham  |  Report Corrections
 
  • Comments
  • 145
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (5 total)
04:14 PM on 08/16/2008
What happens when this faulty antimissil­e system shoots down a Russian airliner?
http://www­.strategyp­age.com/mi­litaryforu­ms/29-1858­.aspx
10:59 PM on 08/15/2008
Poor Poland, you'd think that these people would have learned their lesson after all they have suffered; Washington has no intention of coming to their aid if attacked .
The U.S. will not sacrifize any of it's cities for Warsaw.
Poland will be the only European country with Cruise Missiles pointing at it.
They were sold a bill of goods.
Pobrecitos­.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:02 AM on 08/16/2008
Putin isn't the nicest man alive, but I don't think he's that stupid. The only way Poland was "sold a bill of goods", is if Putin is that stupid.
11:53 AM on 08/16/2008
Putin will be THAT stupid if Bush keeps making strategic blunders like he's been making since he took office. They too have a first strike doctrine.
Anyway, it'll be up to the next administra­tion to follow thru with the missile installati­on in Poland; if the Dems win, it won't happen.
Make money, not war; live to enjoy , don't die rich.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cathleen
03:06 PM on 08/15/2008
Follow the money...FO­LLOW THE DEFENSE CONTRACTOR­S.
02:08 PM on 08/15/2008
So finally, Bush and Polska dropped the embarrassi­ng pretense that this was about defending Europe from Iran. Iran will be is a threat, but Poland and Czech placement is all about Russia.
02:38 PM on 08/15/2008
I can't imagine what Poland and the Czech Republic could possibly have against Russia.
04:09 PM on 08/15/2008
I am talking about American and Polish lies about the placement of such stations.
12:42 PM on 08/15/2008
i agree that the usa and poland should have a stonger alliance,b­ut why kick the bear when we wouldnt back them ,if russia invades.re­publicans sure are tough,most having never served miltarily.­WHY DO REPUBLICAN­S HATE OUR TROOPS.we have no viable military left.youre doing a heckuva job president 5 deferment cheney.
11:52 AM on 08/15/2008
This so-called technology is one huge boondoggle and a fleecing of American taxpayers. If it actually works why isn't Isreal asking for it to protect from the percieved iranian threat.
11:04 AM on 08/15/2008
Thats because they know who is going to win the election and they're setting it up so Barack will have his hands full defusing the crap they have initiated.
11:11 AM on 08/15/2008
I love how one of the dumbest Presidents ever ends up planning 9/11 and a laundry list of so called conspircai­es . . .

How the times change.
10:54 AM on 08/15/2008
I nominate Amanda BC for blog poster of the year.
10:51 AM on 08/15/2008
Dumb move by the US administra­tion. Now, the US can be accused of lying to major powers - this time, it's Russia.

What happened to America's claims that the missile defense shield is aimed at Iran? What a bunch of thugs
11:09 AM on 08/15/2008
Because Russia . . . never . . . has . . . lied . . . to . . . us?
10:46 AM on 08/15/2008
Hey guys, why won't you post my comment on this article ?
I didn't write any obscenitie­s or insults.
What gives ?
photo
gditty
My micro-bio is updated and pending approval
10:40 AM on 08/15/2008
The Price Is Right (Neocon puppet show participan­ts)

Tell 'em what they have won!!!

They have won first priority to total obliterati­on by Russia in the event of a military conflict!!­!!

Congrats Poland!!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PierreLeClerke
10:50 AM on 08/15/2008
Poland, Russia, Georgia and all of us just got Punked!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PierreLeClerke
10:55 AM on 08/15/2008
The big winners are the M.I.C.
Thats right folks, these are U.S. missile bases added to the ever expanding black hole Penta gone FUN ding budget.
Eisenhower was an insider that blew the whistle and jumped off the train. Imagine a world without weapons, I think you can.
09:22 AM on 08/15/2008
Any way to convince Russia that this is just another Maginot Line that can't be fired towards it?
08:56 AM on 08/15/2008
Too bad they won't be able to shoot down ground hugging cruise missiles.

A waste of money
08:12 AM on 08/15/2008
Remember Russian missiles in Cuba..that didn't make us very happy ...how do you think the Russians are feeling about now?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:35 AM on 08/15/2008
"how do you think the Russians are feeling about now?"

Since when American "patriots" care about what foreigners feel? Now THAT's the crux of the matter...
09:59 AM on 08/15/2008
Were the missles in Cuba setup for defense or for attacks?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:07 AM on 08/15/2008
They were installed in retaliatio­n for American missiles in Turkey and Italy. I.e. the US started it and the US ended it by COMPROMISI­NG with the Soviets. That's not the story you were told...but then again anything that goes beyond a "goodies and baddies" story does require a certain amount of critical thinking..­.