More

Google Phone Software "Android" Strong, But Not Slick At Outset


First Posted: 08-15-08 07:58 AM   |   Updated: 09-15-08 05:12 AM

I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Google Phone

Silicon Alley Insider:

So now we know that the first GPhone is indeed coming this fall.

Will it be a hit? It's hard to tell much from the supposed spy photos we've seen floating around on the Web, like the one to the right.

But someone who's actually seen the gadget -- similar, if not identical to the one in the photo -- tells us that both the hardware (from handset-maker HTC) and Google's Android software suffer from a similar problem: They're technically powerful but not as elegant as Apple's iPhone and OS X.

Read the whole story: Silicon Alley Insider

So now we know that the first GPhone is indeed coming this fall. Will it be a hit? It's hard to tell much from the supposed spy photos we've seen floating around on the Web, like the one to the righ...
So now we know that the first GPhone is indeed coming this fall. Will it be a hit? It's hard to tell much from the supposed spy photos we've seen floating around on the Web, like the one to the righ...
Filed by Dave Burdick  |  Report Corrections
 
 
  • Comments
  • 9
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
12:39 PM on 08/15/2008
If the API is open (unlike the iPhone API), I am going to get one.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
situationcritical
SuperMegaUltraUberLiberal
11:10 AM on 08/15/2008
At least they run Linux, not Windoze.
12:26 PM on 08/15/2008
openSUSE does it for me.
12:27 PM on 08/15/2008
The fact it runs on Linux will makes it more customizable, and will give the user more control. Those using Linux know what am talking about.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:19 AM on 08/15/2008
I expect that all of these phones will, in fact, be successful ... and even, in their own way, "slick."

These are not telephones: they are computers. Hand-held computers that are every bit as powerful as a laptop.

Significantly, they run "Unix or Linux." They don't run Windows.

This represents a broad-brush, fundamental shift in the role of a computer ... it ceases to be something that you walk up to, sit down and use ... it becomes something that you carry in the palm of your hand. Furthermore, its fundamental role has changed: it is a portal, not a destination. There's a glut of computer power out there on the Internet, and all of it is at your hand.

Apple can't "own that," and they understand this. They were simply "first," and their product is very, very good. A robust marketplace will arise that will define the next five years of computing.
photo
stepintothelight
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
01:45 PM on 08/15/2008
One of the reasons I appreciate Apple over Microsoft. Apple can see profit in innovation where Microsoft only can see innovation in profit making!!!

Go ahead and argue with me ... I have one word to prove it!!!

Vista!!!

Apple would have never "charged" me to downgrade to a more stable system but then again they would have never released Vista!!!
08:47 AM on 08/16/2008
No but Apple does release a minor upgrade to it's OS every year, hype it as earth shattering, and charge full price for it.