Gabe Sherman's Eye-Opening Backstory On The Enquirer/Edwards Story

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Gabe Sherman's Eye-Opening Backstory On The Enquirer/Edwards Story stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

Huffington Post   |  Rachel Sklar
First Posted: 08-22-08 09:16 AM   |   Updated: 09-22-08 05:12 AM

I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Edwards

Wow. If you ever needed evidence that the cover-up is worse than the crime, look no further than Gabe Sherman's fantastic piece, posted on the New Republic website last night. It details the National Enquirer's quiet, patient, thorough pursuit of the John Edwards story — also known as the story of his affair and lovechild with former campaign videographer Rielle Hunter.

The resources that were dedicated to getting this story is really something. As Sherman reports, the tip came in to the Enquirer's Rick Egusquiza, in September 2007, and the Enquirer's executive editor, Barry Levine, "directed the coverage that grew to include nearly a dozen reporters." And he put them to work:

In late November 2007, Perel and Levine dispatched to North Carolina a "ghost team," reporters whose job it is to watch but not to be seen. The reporters discovered that Hunter was living in a gated community and having dinner with Andrew Young, the campaign aide who later said he was the father of Hunter's child, and his wife. They wanted a photo, and they wanted comments from both Hunter and Young. "You know, you have sources telling you she's six months pregnant, but let's see it!" Perel says. "We decided to shift into 'go-mode.' "

For two weeks, a team of four reporters-including Alan Smith, who broke the Donna Rice scandal-staked out Hunter's OB/GYN office until she was spotted and snapped outside a nearby grocery store on December 12. "The picture you see where she looks like Camilla Parker Bowles took fifteen days," reporter Alan Butterfield, who was at the scene, remembers. "We sat in our car."

"Ghost Team" — that term should scare any high-profile person doing something naughty. Here's the part that makes you almost feel bad for Edwards — hell, forget "almost":

Four days before encountering Edwards at the Beverly Hilton on July 22, they learned he would be meeting Hunter at the hotel, and, on July 21, a team of seven Enquirer reporters reserved several rooms and set up camp.... Around 9:40 p.m. on July 21, [senior reporter Alexander] Hitchen saw Hunter's friend Bob McGovern pull up to the hotel in a navy blue BMW 740 sedan and take the elevator up to Hunter's room. Hitchen and Butterfield knew Edwards would likely use a less visible entrance and stationed themselves in the lobby for the five-hour stakeout. Shortly after 2 a.m, Hitchen saw McGovern return to the lobby. Expecting Edwards to take the elevator to the basement where he could escape through a rear stairwell, the reporter positioned himself at the bottom of the stairs. Edwards popped out of the elevator and started up the stairs.

Then Hitchen pounced. "Mr. Edwards, Alexander Hitchen, from the National Enquirer. Would you like to say why you were at the hotel this evening to see your mistress Rielle Hunter and your love child?" he asked. Edwards froze and "turned pale," Hitchen remembers. Edwards made a move for the top of the stairs but Butterfield, standing with a photographer, was blocking the exit. "He ducked, tucked, and ran," Butterfield says. The Enquirer reporters ran after him, Hitchen asking questions all the while. "Do you think for the sake of your child, you should admit paternity?" he said.

Edwards said nothing.

Edwards darted into a bathroom and pulled the door shut. Hitchen and Butterfield stood in the corridor, trying to pry it back open. Edwards "was trying to pull the door, and occasionally I'd see his face, and you'd see the stress on his face and his hair tussling around," Butterfield told me. A group of security guards came over. Hitchen explained the situation and handed his card to a guard who went into the bathroom. Soon, the guards shielded Edwards's head with a jacket and escorted him up the stairs and out of the hotel.

Oy.

One last thing: I appreciated that Sherman took the time to publish Enquirer editor David Perel's scoffing dismissal of Sharon Waxman's blog post weakly defending the MSM's hands-off silence on the story. Waxman sniffed that the only reason the Enquirer got the info was that it paid its sources — certainly true in many cases, but to equate source-payment to success in investigative journalism strikes me as not only a cop-out, but flat-out wrong. I'm pretty sure the NYT could have sent out a ghost team...if they'd wanted to. Waxman's speculation that Hunter was blackmailing Edwards was also sort of ridiculous to anyone who'd been following the story and knew anything about Hunter — because, my God, what awful karma.

Anyhow: Great read. Sort of interesting how the Enquirer is emerging as some sort of journalistic hero in all this. But that's another story. This one is about how they did the work, lay in wait, and got it right.

Open Tab: The Dark Art of the National Enquirer [TNR]
All the Scandalous News That's Fit to Print [HuffPo]

Related:
The Edwards Affair: The Law of the Tabloids [Waxword]

Wow. If you ever needed evidence that the cover-up is worse than the crime, look no further than Gabe Sherman's fantastic piece, posted on the New Republic website last night. It details the National ...
Wow. If you ever needed evidence that the cover-up is worse than the crime, look no further than Gabe Sherman's fantastic piece, posted on the New Republic website last night. It details the National ...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
6
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:

He's history - let's move on to something more interesting - and America, stop being so nosy and so PRUDISH.
It's not our business - it belongs with the Edwards family.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:03 PM on 08/23/2008

Picture of the man in the room holding the baby looks like John Edwards, but if you compare a right profile picture of John E. the pictures don't match up exactly. His bridge is not that high and his eyes are not as deep. His hairline is off and the double widow's peak don't match up. Definitely looks doctored. However the recent picture of the baby does resemble him, but then again, babies look like anyone at this point. We'll just have to wait and see - when this woman finds out that John will not leave his wife who could live anywhere from 6 months to 8-10 years. The reason Mainstream is not picking up on this story is they do not want to be held responsible for expediting Elizabeth's disease and face her demise sooner than expected. I am sure that's what fortune "Hunter" wants to happen tho, but I think she wasn't expecting the deep and abiding love between a man and woman who have been together for 34 years. This bimbo will soon come out screaming for attention if she continues being neglected by John, then we'll all know the story. By then hopefully he will be the victim and America loves the underdog.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:36 PM on 08/22/2008
photo

Why is Edwards' sex life anyone's business?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:56 PM on 08/22/2008

John Edwards made it the world's business when he chose to go on Nightline and spin an incredulous tale. And since he made his family a big part of his campaign, the newest member is very newsworthy.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:53 PM on 08/22/2008
- impatient I'm a Fan of impatient 10 fans permalink

No, it's because John Edwards SAID it was our business.

Don't you remember that infamous clip where he actually says in an interview, "We candidates, all of us have private lives. And we should expect to have them scrutinized. The American public has a right to know." He said this WHILE his affair with Rielle Hunter was ongoing and with his wife right next to him.

That being the case, this guy goes way past Chutzpah. He had a death wish.

And that is why it's a story.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:01 PM on 08/22/2008

Yet no one has explained yet how they got the picture of Edwards INSIDE the hotel room... Did they knock on the door saying Room Service! and snapped the picture.. Did they had someone hiding inside the room's closet.. ? Did SHE take it?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:43 PM on 08/22/2008
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect