Arctic sea ice drops to 2nd lowest level on record

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Arctic sea ice drops to 2nd lowest level on record stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

SETH BORENSTEIN and DAN JOLING | August 27, 2008 07:23 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Aviation Maintenance Tech 2 John Ferrari looks out of the back of a Coast Guard C-130 as he surveys the ice off of the coast of Barrow, Alaska, during a surveillance flight to the Arctic on Thursday Aug. 7, 2008. (AP Photo/Al Grillo)

WASHINGTON — More ominous signs Wednesday have scientists saying that a global warming "tipping point" in the Arctic seems to be happening before their eyes: Sea ice in the Arctic Ocean is at its second lowest level in about 30 years.

The National Snow and Ice Data Center reported that sea ice in the Arctic now covers about 2.03 million square miles. The lowest point since satellite measurements began in 1979 was 1.65 million square miles set last September.

With about three weeks left in the Arctic summer, this year could wind up breaking that previous record, scientists said.

Arctic ice always melts in summer and refreezes in winter. But over the years, more of the ice is lost to the sea with less of it recovered in winter. While ice reflects the sun's heat, the open ocean absorbs more heat and the melting accelerates warming in other parts of the world.

Sea ice also serves as primary habitat for threatened polar bears.

"We could very well be in that quick slide downward in terms of passing a tipping point," said senior scientist Mark Serreze at the data center in Boulder, Colo. "It's tipping now. We're seeing it happen now."

Within "five to less than 10 years," the Arctic could be free of sea ice in the summer, said NASA ice scientist Jay Zwally.

"It also means that climate warming is also coming larger and faster than the models are predicting and nobody's really taken into account that change yet," he said.

Story continues below
advertisement

Five climate scientists, four of them specialists on the Arctic, told The Associated Press that it is fair to call what is happening in the Arctic a "tipping point." NASA scientist James Hansen, who sounded the alarm about global warming 20 years ago before Congress, said the sea ice melt "is the best current example" of that.

Last year was an unusual year when wind currents and other weather conditions coincided with global warming to worsen sea ice melt, Serreze said. Scientists wondered if last year was an unusual event or the start of a new and disturbing trend.

This year's results suggest the latter because the ice had recovered a bit more than usual thanks to a somewhat cooler winter, Serreze said. Then this month, when the melting rate usually slows, it sped up instead, he said.

The most recent ice retreat primarily reflects melt in the Chukchi Sea off Alaska's northwest coast and the East Siberian Sea off the coast of eastern Russia, according to the center.

The Chukchi Sea is home to one of two populations of Alaska polar bears.

Federal observers flying for a whale survey on Aug. 16 spotted nine polar bears swimming in open ocean in the Chukchi. The bears were 15 to 65 miles off the Alaska shore. Some were swimming north, apparently trying to reach the polar ice edge, which on that day was 400 miles away.

Polar bears are powerful swimmers and have been recorded on swims of 100 miles but the ordeal can leave them exhausted and susceptible to drowning.

And the melt in sea ice has kicked in another effect, long predicted, called "Arctic amplification," Serreze said.

That's when the warming up north is increased in a feedback mechanism and the effects spill southward starting in autumn, he said. Over the last few years, the bigger melt has meant more warm water that releases more heat into the air during fall cooling, making the atmosphere warmer than normal.

On top of that, researchers were investigating "alarming" reports in the last few days of the release of methane from long frozen Arctic waters, possibly from the warming of the sea, said Greenpeace climate scientist Bill Hare, who was attending a climate conference in Ghana. Giant burps of methane, which is a potent greenhouse gas, is a long feared effect of warming in the Arctic that would accelerate warming even more, according to scientists.

Overall, the picture of what's happening in the Arctic is getting worse, said Bob Corell, who headed a multinational scientific assessment of Arctic conditions a few years ago: "We're moving beyond a point of no return."

___

Science Writer Seth Borenstein reported from Washington and Dan Joling reported from Anchorage, Alaska. AP writer Arthur Max contributed from Accra, Ghana.

___

On the Net:

National Snow and Ice Data Center image:

. http://nsidc.org/data/seaice_index/images/daily_images/N_daily_extent_hires

png

WASHINGTON — More ominous signs Wednesday have scientists saying that a global warming "tipping point" in the Arctic seems to be happening before their eyes: Sea ice in the Arctic Ocean is at it...
WASHINGTON — More ominous signs Wednesday have scientists saying that a global warming "tipping point" in the Arctic seems to be happening before their eyes: Sea ice in the Arctic Ocean is at it...
Filed by Nick Sabloff  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
82
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 (2 pages total)

Since Amundsen was able to travel through the northwest passage only a hundred years or so ago while the earth's climate was still in the grip of the little Ice Age's tail end, it doesn't seem as if it's that unreasonable for it to take one hundred years or more for the warming climate to free the arctic from its burden of sea ice. I think that considering the properties of the cold sea water of the Arctic, we'll see a huge proliferation of life as the photosynthetic plankton bloom and set-off a feast for all the other animals of the arctic. Certain species that are more dependent on annual ice might see their populations reduced as their prime habitat retreats to those areas that would act as refugias for their species, ready to return when the complex relationships that impact our planetary climate are favorable for cooling again. It could be soon too since our planets current arrangement of continents does allow for ice ages to occur as we know they hav in the recent past and presume they will again, maybe in the not too distant future.
Global warming might free us from the need of so much fuel oil for heating in the northern hemisphere­...which could cut the profits from the oil barrons, oily oligarchs, and corrupt theocracies around the world..

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:39 AM on 08/28/2008

Wow, must be nice to live in your world.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:00 AM on 08/28/2008
- rfshunt I'm a Fan of rfshunt 47 fans permalink

WilliePilgrim's post is a carnival of delusion and disinformation.

Amundsen's voyage was closer to a death march than a sailing trip.

"After a third winter trapped in the ice, Amundsen was able to navigate a passage into the Beaufort Sea after which he cleared into the Bering Strait, thus having successfully navigated the Northwest Passage.[1­] Continuing to the south of Victoria Island, the ship cleared the Canadian Arctic Archipelago on August 17, 1905, but had to stop for the winter before going on to Nome on the Alaska Territory's Pacific coast. Five hundred miles (800 km) away, Eagle City, Alaska, had a telegraph station; Amundsen travelled there (and back) overland to wire a success message (collect) on December 5, 1905. Nome was reached in 1906. Due to water as shallow as 3 feet (0.91 m), a larger ship could never have used the route."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roald_Amundsen

As for the rest of your speculations - it's more than a little telling that you provide no citations or links to any scientific research.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:43 PM on 08/28/2008

Having your ship frozen solid into the ice for three years is not most peoples idea of a cruise through the Northwest Passage.

We are talking about being able to sail right through the same path without hitting any ice at all. You are talking BS.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:18 PM on 08/28/2008
- realpolitic I'm a Fan of realpolitic 150 fans permalink

Yes, he makes it sound like Amundsen was riding aboard a luxury cruiser worrying about his cable tv reception!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:58 AM on 08/29/2008
- danoj I'm a Fan of danoj 17 fans permalink

Never fear the sea ice will be back the wind blows sea ice around some. I'll do some digging and see if I can find the article on it. Last time they reported something like this other scientists had descovered the ice they could not account for had been moved by ocean current and wind. Only explanation these guys give though is well it must have melted now give me more grant money so I can study the issue.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:39 AM on 08/28/2008

Yeah, you keep digging. Thanks for your help, @ss-hole.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:22 AM on 08/28/2008

Remember that article I found that one time, that said in one of the sentences, that one possible reason ... is .... the wind, thats all, just a really strong breeze.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:02 AM on 08/28/2008

Thanks for the rigorous research and contemplation - it must be the wind. Yes, the wind just blew away a million square miles of ice (Auntie Em, Auntie Em - it's a twister!). That's quite a relief, whew.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:24 AM on 08/28/2008
- AmandaBC I'm a Fan of AmandaBC 584 fans permalink
photo

When it comes to believing the world's leading environmental scientists or an anonymous freeper who can't back any of his lies with any credible evidence, the choice is pretty easy, at least for anyone with an IQ over 80...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:32 AM on 08/28/2008
- realpolitic I'm a Fan of realpolitic 150 fans permalink

Who should I believe the world's leading scientists or danoj? It is a very tough one!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:00 AM on 08/29/2008
- realpolitic I'm a Fan of realpolitic 150 fans permalink

Where is the missing ice? Perhaps it is wih the missing weapons in Iraq!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:11 AM on 08/29/2008
- dgscol I'm a Fan of dgscol 4 fans permalink
photo

The calculations by Vinnikov et al. (1999) and Manabe et al. (1992) indeed show the largest sea ice signal in winter. An explanation of this summer/winter discrepancy has not been offered so far. The absence and presence of sea ice, and its thickness, depend on very small differences between large fluxes of energy. Minor changes of the assumptions about surface albedo, snow cover, cloudiness and cloud radiative properties, ocean heat flux, and other factors, may have large effects on the computed ice cover and require a model precision that remains to be attained.

Zwally is off his rocker. Ice builds up in the Arctic in winter and reduces in summer, the opposite of what global warming would do : melting in winter. This summer, the ice was actually building up rather than melting. Zwally is out of touch with the observations, and apparently is not using other observations he has, to make inferences. He is a picture show guy.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:24 AM on 08/28/2008

"Zwally is off his rocker. Ice builds up in the Arctic in winter and reduces in summer, the opposite of what global warming would do : melting in winter. This summer, the ice was actually building up rather than melting."

What planet are you living on? Here on Earth, we have seasons and things are relatively colder in winter when compared to summer. Polar sea ice melting in winter would be a sure sign that global warming has passed the tipping point. You claim Zwaly is picking and choosing his facts but your reference to ice buildup this summer is in the article, i.e., you are the one who is "off his rocker."

Nice try, expletive.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:26 AM on 08/28/2008

dgscol; Satellite photos don't lie. The ice is gone and not moved to another location.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:29 AM on 08/28/2008
- realpolitic I'm a Fan of realpolitic 150 fans permalink

It is very hard to "fix" the data when it measured by satellite using microwave data.

The brightness temperature of seawater (ice-free ocean) is much lower than that of ice/snow or melting ice/snow. By calculating daily brightness temperatures (from the daily pass of the satellite over the Arctic), scientists can determine the extent of sea ice in the Arctic and the extent of melt on the Greenland Ice Sheet. Because the microwave instrument can “see through” clouds and darkness, ice extent can be monitored year-round, even during storms and winter darkness.

To validate, or confirm, their calculations of ice extent, the sea ice team used images from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS). The Greenland team validated its findings with climatological data from 20 automatic weather stations distributed over the entire ice sheet. The passive microwave data and the MODIS images are archived at the National Snow and Ice Data Center, one of NASA’s Distributed Active Archive Centers.

http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Study/vanishing/

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:11 AM on 08/29/2008
- poco767c I'm a Fan of poco767c 363 fans permalink
photo

I will save some of you some time.
Goracle, Global warming myth, Medieval warming, Scam, Pseudo science...­..(insert discredited scientist name and arbitrary figures here), Cyclical event, Warming?? No consensus Etc Etc....
Is that the greatest hits covered?

Please do not bother posting any of the ridiculous statements above as I have covered them all.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:07 AM on 08/28/2008

Unfortunately for us, your efforts to peremptorily challenge the moronic blather have not been availing. See later posts. :(

Thanks anyway.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:29 AM on 08/28/2008
- mlaiuppa I'm a Fan of mlaiuppa 38 fans permalink
photo

Does the term "exponential" mean anything to anyone?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:08 AM on 08/28/2008
- saltysea I'm a Fan of saltysea 4 fans permalink

thanks for reminding us. probably will become one of the most feared words of this century. hope not, tho.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:30 AM on 08/28/2008

Goes nicely with the word "hyperbole".

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:40 AM on 08/28/2008
- dadw5boys I'm a Fan of dadw5boys 280 fans permalink
photo

Yes it means things are excelerating at an ewver increasing rate.

Take 2 x 2 = 4 then 4 x 4 =8 then 8 x 8 = 64 --- Exponential !!!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:31 AM on 08/28/2008
- RTIII I'm a Fan of RTIII 87 fans permalink

Yes... I saw a great video on it the other day:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F-QA2rkpBSY
.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:39 PM on 08/28/2008
- saltysea I'm a Fan of saltysea 4 fans permalink

This should be major news. this is awful. i do. not. want. responsibility for polar bears drowning, starving, floating away on ice floes with their cubs. it makes me sob, wrenching sobs. i'm sorry. i know animals everywhere are suffering horrible deaths all the time. i know that when we lose a keystone predator, we lose a lot of the whole web.

But this is my own, personal tipping point. I hope against hope that Obama stops this. just. stops. these agonizing drownings of polar bears.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:39 AM on 08/28/2008
- Guynemer I'm a Fan of Guynemer 6 fans permalink
photo

Don't think about it as killing bears. Think about it as saving seals.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:47 AM on 08/28/2008
- saltysea I'm a Fan of saltysea 4 fans permalink

Except without the ice, the seals die, too, ya know. the krill dies. the warm water attracts more orcas, that kill droves of otters and lots of seals.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:03 AM on 08/28/2008
- saltysea I'm a Fan of saltysea 4 fans permalink

you may have been trying to lighten the mood. sorry to be a buzzkill & thanks for the effort.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:04 AM on 08/28/2008
- saltysea I'm a Fan of saltysea 4 fans permalink

because this was my answer that didn't post. You probably know that no ice means the seals are dying, too. The krill are dying. The warmer water brings more orcas, that kill whole herds or whatever you call them of otters, and of course more seals. The whole thing is truly terrible, almost beyond words except we have to speak.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:07 AM on 08/28/2008
- dadw5boys I'm a Fan of dadw5boys 280 fans permalink
photo

YAOU WON;T HAVE TO WOORY ABOUT IT.

Food and water will be your worry soon.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:32 AM on 08/28/2008

Ya. There the mention of the methane release which is quite scary. I am hoping that the data do not back that up. We, including the moronic deniers, are all in this together. The blue marble is getting smaller.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:31 AM on 08/28/2008
- realpolitic I'm a Fan of realpolitic 150 fans permalink

Overall, the picture of what's happening in the Arctic is getting worse, said Bob Corell, who headed a multinational scientific assessment of Arctic conditions a few years ago: "We're moving beyond a point of no return."

Truer words have not been spoken!!

I wonder what kind of denying claptrap the deniers will come up with now? It is a religion of then and has little to do with the science of global warming.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:27 AM on 08/28/2008
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 (2 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect