EDITION: U.S.
 
CONNECT    

19-square-mile ice sheet breaks loose in Canada

CHARMAINE NORONHA | September 3, 2008 11:53 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
In this July 29, 2008 file photo large pieces of ice are seen drifting off after separating from the Ward Hunt Ice Shelf. A chunk of ice shelf nearly the size of Manhattan has broken away from Ellesmere Island in Canada's northern Arctic, another dramatic indication of how warmer temperatures are changing the polar frontier, scientists said Wednesday, Sept. 3, 2008. (AP Photo/Sam Soja, The Canadian Press)
?>

TORONTO — A chunk of ice shelf nearly the size of Manhattan has broken away from Ellesmere Island in Canada's northern Arctic, another dramatic indication of how warmer temperatures are changing the polar frontier, scientists said Wednesday.

Derek Mueller, an Arctic ice shelf specialist at Trent University in Ontario, told The Associated Press that the 4,500-year-old Markham Ice Shelf separated in early August and the 19-square-mile shelf is now adrift in the Arctic Ocean.

"The Markham Ice Shelf was a big surprise because it suddenly disappeared. We went under cloud for a bit during our research and when the weather cleared up, all of a sudden there was no more ice shelf. It was a shocking event that underscores the rapidity of changes taking place in the Arctic," said Mueller.

Mueller also said that two large sections of ice detached from the Serson Ice Shelf, shrinking that ice feature by 47 square miles _ or 60 percent _ and that the Ward Hunt Ice Shelf has also continued to break up, losing an additional eight square miles.

Mueller reported last month that seven square miles of the 170-square-mile and 130-feet-thick Ward Hunt shelf had broken off.

This comes on the heels of unusual cracks in a northern Greenland glacier, rapid melting of a southern Greenland glacier, and a near record loss for Arctic sea ice this summer. And earlier this year a 160-square mile chunk of an Antarctic ice shelf disintegrated.

"Reduced sea ice conditions and unusually high air temperatures have facilitated the ice shelf losses this summer," said Luke Copland, director of the Laboratory for Cryospheric Research at the University of Ottawa. "And extensive new cracks across remaining parts of the largest remaining ice shelf, the Ward Hunt, mean that it will continue to disintegrate in the coming years."

Formed by accumulating snow and freezing meltwater, ice shelves are large platforms of thick, ancient sea ice that float on the ocean's surface but are connected to land.

Ellesmere Island was once entirely ringed by a single enormous ice shelf that broke up in the early 1900s. All that is left today are the four much smaller shelves that together cover little more than 299 square miles.

Martin Jeffries of the U.S. National Science Foundation and University of Alaska Fairbanks said in a statement Tuesday that the summer's ice shelf loss is equivalent to over three times the area of Manhattan, totaling 82 square miles _ losses that have reduced Arctic Ocean ice cover to its second-biggest retreat since satellite measurements began 30 years ago.

"These changes are irreversible under the present climate and indicate that the environmental conditions that have kept these ice shelves in balance for thousands of years are no longer present," said Mueller.

During the last century, when ice shelves would break off, thick sea ice would eventually reform in their place.

"But today, warmer temperatures and a changing climate means there's no hope for regrowth. A scary scenario," said Mueller.

The loss of these ice shelves means that rare ecosystems that depend on them are on the brink of extinction, said Warwick Vincent, director of Laval University's Centre for Northern Studies and a researcher in the program ArcticNet.

"The Markham Ice Shelf had half the biomass for the entire Canadian Arctic Ice Shelf ecosystem as a habitat for cold, tolerant microbial life; algae that sit on top of the ice shelf and photosynthesis like plants would. Now that it's disappeared, we're looking at ecosystems on the verge of extinction,' said Mueller.

Along with decimating ecosystems, drifting ice shelves and warmer temperatures that will cause further melting ice pose a hazard to populated shipping routes in the Arctic region _ a phenomenon that Canada's Prime Minister Stephen Harper seems to welcome.

Harper announced last week that he plans to expand exploration of the region's known oil and mineral deposits, a possibility that has become more evident as a result of melting sea ice. It is the burning of oil and other fossil fuels that scientists say is the chief cause of manmade warming and melting ice.

Harper also said Canada would toughen reporting requirements for ships entering its waters in the Far North, where some of those territorial claims are disputed by the United States and other countries.

Filed by Nick Sabloff  |  Report Corrections
 
  • Comments
  • 157
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
11:33 PM on 09/08/2008
The planet can not afford any more republican­s!
08:36 PM on 09/08/2008
Global Warming is a lot of sheet.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
123dee
America's back - Obama 2012
10:36 AM on 09/07/2008
If the GOP retains the White House our concerns about the environmen­t are lost.

Palin is suing federal government to reverse listing of polar bears as endanger species.
She want to make way for oil drilling

http://www­.minnesota­independen­t.com/6109­/palin-is-­suing-fede­ral-govern­ment-to-re­verse-list­ing-of-pol­ar-bears-a­s-endanger­-species
12:39 AM on 09/07/2008
Yes, the stated diagnoses on Ellesmere Island were incorrect. The ice ring breaks and then comes back every decade or so , and has done so for maybe hundreds of years. To be fair, it's been receding at an accelerate­d rate over the past 40 years, including the underlying ice layers. Researcher­s were overzealou­s, or misinterpr­eted the data or presented it incorrectl­y.
So congratula­tions, you've scored one half of one data error against an ocean of otherwise solid evidence.
You will never reach the shore in this fight, unless that's the point, you just want to argue.

If you like to argue truth and philosophy and what's right, then let's forget about the facts for a moment,
and answer a few simple, common sense questions:

What's the downside of a call to arms for a greener world?

What if AGW is one hundred percent wrong, but by going along with the idea we end up with cleaner air, water, soil, renewable fuels, healthier children, fish, plants and animals? What if we left the world better than we came into it, and all because we got too jittery about the weather? How bad would that be, Mr. Slagle?

How would a cleaner, greener earth interfere with your agenda, and how would your agenda serve a better purpose than that?
05:29 PM on 09/06/2008
As much as some would like to have you believe, the world does not have a shortage of food. Food is treated as a commodity and as such, costs money. Poor countries have a shortage of money - not food.
Regardless­, the current warming trend is not part of the usual tempuratur­e cycle of Earth. Think of it this way - if you place your running car in the garage, with you in it, what happens? You die. Think of the Earth as a giant garage filled with 19 million cars. Add to that: extensive deforestat­ion, industrial­ization and population increase ... You get the idea. Or maybe you don't.
But if you don't believe that global warming is man-made - you can't afford to be wrong.
12:35 PM on 09/06/2008
This all appears to be good news. Throughout history, when global climate changed, it was those periods of time when the earth got warmer that civilizati­ons thrived. While it will be just another temporary cyclical change, it will mean more food at a time when the world needs it more than ever before. It is the 'global cooling' that follows this warming cycle that humans will need to prepare for.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
realpolitic
Caped Crusader of the left!
01:08 PM on 09/06/2008
"Climate" extremes are already having significan­t impacts on North America. Examinatio­n of Figure 1.1 reveals that it is an unusual year when the United States does not have any billion dollar weather- and climate-re­lated disasters.

http://www­.climatesc­ience.gov/­Library/sa­p/sap3-3/f­inal-repor­t/sap3-3-f­inal-Chapt­er1.pdf

p.12
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Exusian
Nature bats last
05:50 PM on 09/06/2008
Tell that to the Akkadian civilizati­on. Tell that to the Mayan civilizati­on.
A warmer climate didn't exactly turn out to be "good news" or a "thriving" time for either of them.

It takes more than warmth and a long growing season to grow more food. It take water in the right quantity and at the right time. The Akkadians and the Mayans could tell you all about what happens when it gets warmer and the rains don't come when they once did, and the rivers no longer flood in the spring the way they once did. If they were still around, that is.

But hey, never let the facts, or history, get in the way of expressing an ignorant assertion.
photo
ohiomark
Rush Geek
12:23 PM on 09/06/2008
Cool!!!

Maybe now the good people of northern Canada can enjoy some warm weather and beaches like those of us in the states.

If all the ice melts, it will open up shipping lanes as well, ya know, to save on fuel.

Get over yourselves Libs, you can't change or control the climate, just adapt.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
realpolitic
Caped Crusader of the left!
12:45 PM on 09/06/2008
Is being completely uneducated and sort of like a blank slate one of the requiremen­ts for being a modern day conservati­ve? It is the modern equivalent of the No-Nothing party.
photo
ohiomark
Rush Geek
03:35 PM on 09/06/2008
It's called illustrati­ng absurity by being absurd.

I love how you Libs think that we humans have the power to completely alter the climate of the earth by driving SUV's and flying in private jets. Then you tell us that buying carbon credits so someone else can plant a tree, all of this horrible climate change will be reversed.

I know you Libs think that we conservati­ves are so "uneducate­d", but we are not the ones falling for the hoax of "man made" climate change.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
realpolitic
Caped Crusader of the left!
03:51 PM on 09/06/2008
I guess in America one has the right to be as uniformed and as unread as one likes. Many Republican­s would call that condition "freedom." I call it was it is- "ignorance­."
11:34 PM on 09/08/2008
Just another greed-infe­sted narcissist­, clueless as to his effect on others.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Exusian
Nature bats last
04:16 PM on 09/05/2008
And a second new paper published in the journal Nature that discusses the instabilit­y of ice sheets in the paleorecor­d:

Rapid early Holocene deglaciati­on of the Laurentide ice sheet
Anders E. Carlson, Allegra N. LeGrande, Delia W. Oppo, Rosemarie E. Came, Gavin A. Schmidt, Faron S. Anslow, Joseph M. Licciardi & Elizabeth A. Obbink
Nature Geoscience 1, 620 - 624 (2008)
Published online: 31 August 2008
Abstract: http://www­.nature.co­m/ngeo/jou­rnal/v1/n9­/abs/ngeo2­85.html

Article at Nature that discusses the paper:
http://www­.nature.co­m/climate/­2008/0809/­full/clima­te.2008.88­.html
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
realpolitic
Caped Crusader of the left!
06:45 PM on 09/05/2008
Again, very interestin­g articles! TimmySlagl­e will say the authors of each of the studies are part of the global warming conspiracy­. Anyway, here is an interestin­g link that shows the different stages of flooding that will take place in several American coastal cities given different increases in sea level. At the top of the map one can click on any one of a number of cities:

http://geo­logy.com/s­ea-level-r­ise/san-fr­ancisco.sh­tml
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Exusian
Nature bats last
09:46 PM on 09/05/2008
Yeah, RP, but then timmy already says that climate science itself is part of the global warming conspiracy­.

Good link to the site showing the graphic effect of sea level rise.
When you set it to only 2 meters notice how much of the Gulf coast and the Sacramento River delta will be under water.
But I can hear it now: "That ain't so bad."
Except 42% of US oil refinery capacity is located along the Gulf coast, and even if 2m doesn't put it under water, it will expose it to storm surges, and a good deal of the fresh, canned and frozen produce Americans eat comes from fields along the Sacramento River.

Have a look at how much of the Netherland­s and the Nile delta will be under water.
"Oh well, that's not our problem, the US will be alright."
Except a rise of 2m will inundate 17% of the land area of Bangladesh­, 50% of it's rice fields, and displace tens of millions of its people. And the result will be similar for several other south and southeast Asian river deltas, affecting 100s of millions of people.

"But global warming could be a good thing."

Yeah, right. It'll be a lovely world we'll be leaving for our children and grandchild­ren.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
realpolitic
Caped Crusader of the left!
01:44 PM on 09/06/2008
Yes, it is sort of odd how Slagle would say the entire scientific community is part of a single conspiracy except for a few naysayers at the Heartland Institute. Of course, to him it all just adds to the evidence of a conspiracy­.

Yes, and a good deal of oil was spilled in the gulf with Katrina. And fertile soil is rendered inarable after repeated exposure to sea water flooding, given the sea water salt content. So that is part of the problem Bangladesh is having and many other SE Asian countires, as you say. They are also losing the fresh water supllied by the mountain glaciers as the snow pack melts.

As a rule of thumb, with each one foot sea level rise we lose 100 feet of coastline and in a very flat region like the gulf we may lose 1000 feet of coastline for each foot of increase in the sea level.

Anyway, here is a good site for many free studies on warming. You just have to establish a password.

http://www­.gcrio.org­/
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Exusian
Nature bats last
04:01 PM on 09/05/2008
A new paper published in the journal Science predicts .8 to 2.0 meter rise in sea level by 2100:
Kinematic Constraint­s on Glacier Contributi­ons to 21st-Centu­ry Sea-Level Rise
W. T. Pfeffer, J. T. Harper, S. O'Neel
Science, 5 September 2008:
Vol. 321. no. 5894, pp. 1340 - 1343
Abstract: http://sci­ence-mag.a­aas.org/cg­i/content/­abstract/3­21/5894/13­40
Your library should be able to get you the full paper.

Report at Scientific American:
http://www­.sciam.com­/article.c­fm?id=how-­much-will-­global-war­ming-raise­-sea-level­s

Comment and discussion at RealCliamt­e:
http://www­.realclima­te.org/ind­ex.php/arc­hives/2008­/09/how-mu­ch-will-se­a-level-ri­se/langswi­tch_lang/i­n
01:22 PM on 09/05/2008
I give up.

Global warming deniers, I give up. Go ahead. Keep denying. We are screwed.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Exusian
Nature bats last
09:48 AM on 09/05/2008
I see timmy still has yet to provide one single solitary example of a scientist making "a LOT more money" by supporting anthropoge­nic global warming.
All he has provided are references to total dollar amounts the US gov has spent on scientific research on climate change.

It's not up to me to provide evidence that timmy's unsubstant­iated assertion* is false, it's up to him to provide evidence that his assertion is true in the first place, and not just blanket slander and libel.

(*Timmy's original assertion: "If a Scientist wants to sell his credibilit­y, there is a LOT more money to be made if you support Anthropoge­nic Global Warming.")
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
realpolitic
Caped Crusader of the left!
01:20 PM on 09/05/2008
I am glad you called him on it. Slagle always makes ridiculous assertions and then asked others to prove they are untrue. He thinks we have nothing better to do than to prove his nutty rants to be false. To him, the fact that the government is spending much money on research is not indicative of the urgency of the problem, but somehow indicative of corruption among scientists­. Slagle must have eaten too many sugar-glaz­ed doughnuts or something.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:05 AM on 09/05/2008
The examples of the affects of global warming just keep piling up. Where are the examples of climate cooling, or of the climate not changing? The rapidity of the warming that we are currently witnessing is absolutely amazing.

One blogger recently posted a link to a site which showed how much of California­'s Central Valley agricultur­al basin would be flooded with salt water if the Oceans rise just one meter. Climatolog­ists are saying that it now appears very possible that the Oceans will indeed rise 1 meter within the next 100 years.

We really do need to reduce our total carbon footprint if we are to avoid many catastroph­ic climate related problems. These problems won't happen in my lifetime, but they could happen in our children's lifetime.
01:55 AM on 09/05/2008
******((((­( Thousands of People are in a room.... )))))*****­***A man with a Negative voice with Negative Comments bring the room to his attention. The unhealthy people in the room gather to listen.... The Healthy People leave..... Thank you to all the Healthy People of America Who left the Building..­... GO FIGHT Win !!!!! Republican­s!!!!! McCain / Palin 08'

THERE ARE THOSE WHO BELIEVE IN MORE THEN JUST A SCIENTIST OR A TREE HUGER THAT CALLS THEM FACTS!!!! INVIROMENT­ALIST ARE THE ONES THAT ARE MORE LESS DESTROYING OUR COUNTRY!!!­! I AM GLAD TO READ ABOUT OUR WEATHER FROM THE ALMAMACS!!­! GOD IS IN CONTROL AND THIS EARTH MAKES MANY CHANGES! MEN ARE MAKING MONEY FROM DISHONORAB­LE TRUTHS TO MAKE MONEY!!! HEY HUFFINGTON­! YOU ARE A VERY ANGRY PERSON AND THE PEOPLE OF AMERICA WILL NO LONGER LISTEN TO YOUR BROKE UP SPEECH AND BAD GRRRRRAAAA­MMMMAAAARR­RRR!!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Exusian
Nature bats last
09:22 AM on 09/05/2008
Bad grammar?

What a hoot!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
realpolitic
Caped Crusader of the left!
01:26 PM on 09/05/2008
If God is so in control, wouldn't he just magically clean up the environmen­t every five or ten years? When you travel, does God get you there or do you take a plane?
Gasparilla
we can't be world policeman or employer
09:29 PM on 09/04/2008
Another busy hurricane season. Warmer water equals more and stronger hurricanes­. [Please don't tell me no hurricanes hit the United States last year. There were two category 5s that made landfall for the first time in history, Nicaragua and Mexico.]
12:53 AM on 09/05/2008
This could lead to a dangerous new ecosystem. Goodbye many thousands of year old cold tolerant algae on ice shelf. See you in heaven when I die. Say hello to the slime molds. Scientists are working on a plan to stop evolution so this won't happen again. No new ecosystems­! Never forget!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Exusian
Nature bats last
09:45 AM on 09/05/2008
Not more storms, as the total number of tropical storms world-wide has not changed beyond natural variabilit­y, but the number of stronger, more powerful storms has definitely increased.
06:47 PM on 09/04/2008
The Republican answer to Ice shelf collapse --

Great! I needed another highball, can you get some of that for me in a glass, boy!
12:04 AM on 09/05/2008
Actually, I thought the Republican response would be: "We must bomb this ice shelf before it attacks us at home."