Government Plans Takeover Of Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Government Plans Takeover Of Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

ALAN ZIBEL | September 5, 2008 11:12 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
In this Aug. 13, 2008 file photo, a foreclosed home sits empty in Chandler, Ariz. A record 9 percent of American homeowners with a mortgage were either behind on their payments or in foreclosure at the end of June, as damage from the housing crisis continues to mount, the Mortgage Bankers Association said Friday, Sept. 5, 2008. (AP Photo/Matt York, file)

WASHINGTON — The government is expected to take over Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac as soon as this weekend in a monumental move designed to protect the mortgage market from the failure of the two companies, which together hold or guarantee half of the nation's mortgage debt, a person briefed on the matter said Friday night.

Some of the details of the intervention, which could cost taxpayers billions, were not yet available, but are expected to include the departure of Fannie Mae CEO Daniel Mudd and Freddie Mac CEO Richard Syron, according to the source, who asked not to be named because the plan was yet to be announced.

Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke, Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson and James Lockhart, the companies' chief regulator, met Friday afternoon with the top executives from the mortgage companies and informed them of the government's plan to put the troubled companies into a conservatorship.

The news, first reported on The Wall Street Journal's Web site, came after stock markets closed. In after-hours trading Fannie Mae's shares plunged $1.54, or 22 percent, to $5.50. Freddie Mac's shares fell $1.06, or almost 21 percent, to $4.04. Common stock in the companies will be worth little to nothing after the government's actions.

The news also followed a report Friday by the Mortgage Bankers Association that more than 4 million American homeowners with a mortgage, a record 9 percent, were either behind on their payments or in foreclosure at the end of June.

That confirmed what investors saw in Fannie and Freddie's recent financial results: trouble in the mortgage market has shifted to homeowners who had solid credit but took out exotic loans with little or no proof of their income and assets.

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac lost a combined $3.1 billion between April and June. Half of their credit losses came from these types of risky loans with ballooning monthly payments.

While both companies said they had enough resources to withstand the losses, many investors believe their financial cushions could wither away as defaults and foreclosures mount.

Story continues below
advertisement

Many in Washington and on Wall Street hadn't expected Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson to intervene unless the companies had trouble issuing debt to fund their operations.

This summer, Congress passed a plan to provide unlimited government loans to Fannie and Freddie and to purchase stock in the two companies if needed.

Critics say the open-ended nature of the rescue package could expose taxpayers to billions of dollars of potential losses.

Supporters, however, argue the Bush administration had little choice but to support Fannie and Freddie, which together hold or guarantee $5 trillion in mortgages _ almost half the nation's total.

Representatives of Fannie and Freddie declined to comment on the government assistance plan.

Treasury spokeswoman Brookly McLaughlin said officials "have been in regular communications" with Fannie and Freddie, but refused to comment saying, "We are not going to comment on rumors."

Concern has been growing that a government rescue of Fannie and Freddie could not only wipe out common stockholders, but also be costly for scores of investment, banking and insurance companies that hold billions of dollars in their preferred shares.

Paulson has been in contact in recent weeks with foreign governments that hold billions of dollars of Fannie and Freddie debt to reassure them that the United States recognizes the importance of the two companies.

The two companies had nearly $36 billion in preferred shares outstanding as of June 30, according to filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Mudd, the son of TV anchor Roger Mudd, was elevated to Fannie Mae's top post in December 2004 when chief executive Franklin Raines and chief financial officer Timothy Howard were swept out of office in an accounting scandal. Syron was named Freddie Mac's CEO in 2003, replacing former chief Gregory Parseghian, who was ousted in after being implicated in accounting irregularities.

He formerly was executive chairman of Thermo Electron Corp., a Waltham, Mass.-based maker of scientific equipment, served head of the American Stock Exchange was president of the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston in the early 1990s.

Fannie Mae was created by the government in 1938, and was turned into a shareholder-owned company 30 years later. Freddie Mac was established in 1970 to provide competition for Fannie.

A government takeover could cost taxpayers up to $25 billion, according to the Congressional Budget Office.

But the epic decision highlights the size of the threats facing the housing market and the economy. On Friday, Nevada regulators shut down Silver State Bank, the 11th failure this year of a federally insured bank. And earlier this year, the government orchestrated the takeover of investment bank Bear Stearns by JP Morgan Chase.

___

AP Business Writers Martin Crutsinger and Jeannine Aversa contributed to this report.

WASHINGTON — The government is expected to take over Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac as soon as this weekend in a monumental move designed to protect the mortgage market from the failure of the two c...
WASHINGTON — The government is expected to take over Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac as soon as this weekend in a monumental move designed to protect the mortgage market from the failure of the two c...
Filed by Nick Sabloff  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
255
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (8 pages total)

I am really scared that the recent takeovers of now AIG, IndyMac, Freddie, and Fannie are signs of a movement towards socialism. I have posted a blog with other information about this takeover. Someone please tell me it is not as bad as it sounds!

http://averagepolitics.wordpress.com/2008/09/17/government-takeover-of-banks-is-this-socialism/

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:58 AM on 09/17/2008

Where WAS the government when this crisis was building? They must have seen it coming??

Baby boomer views: http://www.Vaboomer.com

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:01 PM on 09/08/2008

Moving closer and closer to socialism.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:19 AM on 09/08/2008
- FredOCal I'm a Fan of FredOCal 3 fans permalink

Substitute fascism for socialism, and you're absolutely correct.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:27 AM on 09/08/2008
- jwws007 I'm a Fan of jwws007 7 fans permalink

can we bail out all of the people who's jobs were outsourced to china

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:53 PM on 09/07/2008
- pmag88 I'm a Fan of pmag88 12 fans permalink

The republican revolution has turned out bunk.

None of the nations in Europe or elsewhere were going to adopt their peculiar brand of free market/ free trade/ deregulation governance if it didn't work here first and thats why they all prefer Obama.

The best thing we can do as Americans is to become as independent as possible. Pay down our debt and invest in things that we believe in. Like getting Obama and other dems elected.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:50 PM on 09/07/2008
photo

Why the tax payers have to continually bail out Bank and Corporations? They don’t want to be regulated, but as soon as things go bad they want help from the government, us the tax payer. I say let them go belly up, they don’t want to help the homeowners and many of they were taken advantage of.
Indy Mac, Bear , now Freddy Mac and Fanny Mae. I heard on CNN that Ford is going to Washington next week to request help. Where will it stop? They are taxing my grand, and great grand kid future

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:25 PM on 09/07/2008

Let the so called PUMAs and the other women who are so impressed with Palin take note. But that's asking too much because most of them let the men in their life tell them what to think. I'm speaking from knowledge that I have obtained from professional co-workers. Most of them have told me they don't listen to the news and have quoted their husbands opinion. Sad, but true. Considering that based on statistics, many will be divorced and left to rasie their kids alone you would think they would wake up. But, most are so narcassistic that they don't get involve until an issue directly affect them.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:08 PM on 09/07/2008

Trickle Down Economics at work. Brought to you by the GOP.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:56 AM on 09/07/2008
- Bobrobert I'm a Fan of Bobrobert 9 fans permalink

DEPRESSION

One in ten homeowners are losing their homes folks - it wasn't that bad during the depression of the 30's.

The government is going to allow the FDIC unlimited funds from the Treasury - oops - that means the government has gone broke.

What a mess these folks have made of our lives.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:05 PM on 09/06/2008
- AllenD I'm a Fan of AllenD 36 fans permalink
photo

Bush/McCain Economics:
Privatize profit
Socialize losses

Wall Street and bankers, we got your back. Main Street and your average middle class American, you are on your own!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:30 PM on 09/06/2008

Take note - this is the largest project of nationalization since before WWII. This Republican government has created socialism on a scale not seen in 70 years.

Common shareholders will lose their investment, stolen by the state.

Well done, Bushie. I am sure the 'Base' is pleased!

Whatever your politics, this is a travesty. The Republicans have had there day. End of story.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:51 PM on 09/06/2008

Please stop calling it socialism. Its fascism. If it were socialism we would have health care.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:56 AM on 09/07/2008
- FredOCal I'm a Fan of FredOCal 3 fans permalink

Absolutely. This is fascism, pure and simple. And anyone who thinks that both parties aren't equally complicit, is blinded by political BS. There hasn't been one president since Carter who hasn't blown this credit bubble bigger with a complete understanding of what it means.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:18 AM on 09/08/2008

What is wrong with THAT one?? Every word is 100% TRUE AND ACCURATE!!! Why don't you moderators learn a little more about the truth in America GD IT!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:44 PM on 09/06/2008
- Oldbuck I'm a Fan of Oldbuck 8 fans permalink
photo

Vote for another Republican and assure a total collapse of our financial system and I am not to dam sure it has not gone to far to be saved but I can assure McCain and his party can not save it. They put it in this shape. If you will get you a Jr High History book and read about McKinley through Hoover and what the Republican party did to the Country then history does repeat it self.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:05 PM on 09/06/2008
- FredOCal I'm a Fan of FredOCal 3 fans permalink

Bill Clinton did as much, if not more damage than anyone this side of Milton Reagan.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:19 AM on 09/08/2008

The government has had to take over Bear Stearns, Fannie Mae, and Freddie Mac. And this is just the tip of the iceberg. Do you realize how bad our financial system must be, for our bail out resistant "trust the market" Republican administration to have to agree to do that? Use your imagination. Sec. of the Treasury Paulson (a Republican) has obviously told Bush that the US is facing economic ruin, and looking at the abyss.

It's going to take total global coordination with all the G8 powers to keep the US from financially collapsing, and bringing down the interconnected global financial and credit system. If we fail to be able to pay our debts, they fail, since they own most of it. It's as simple as that. So I'm sure no stone will go unturned to make sure that doesn't happen.

I'm perplexed as to why the Democrats and Obama don't use this and the S&L crisis in the '80s to point out the absolute absurdity of the Republican total deregulation policies to the electorate. Total deregulation and minimal oversight of, lending, financial matters, and institutions would work---if this were heaven. But this is Earth. When will we Americans learn?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:39 PM on 09/06/2008
- Oldbuck I'm a Fan of Oldbuck 8 fans permalink
photo

You tell them brother what you said was right on the money. I was in the S&L business and watch them destroyed by deregulation.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:54 PM on 09/06/2008
- Jetling I'm a Fan of Jetling 5 fans permalink

Because all people that vote Republican hear is that Democrats will raise their taxes and kill babies.

They also believe they should trust the market. On the underside, government deregulation (thank you, Phil Gramm) allows the system to be gamed to the point where someone has to bail them out.

For anyone who thinnks nationalizing Freddie and Fannie will shift the risk to the individuals, I have to tell you something: It already happened. To millions of people. Will some millionaires see their homes depreciate in value? Undoubtedly. But that millionaire has a safety net. After all...they have a net worth of over one million dollars.

That the people who "should have known better" or "should have managed their money better" are the ones to blame totally ignores changes made to the financial systems that the mortgage system operates within. And the executives that game the system, overstate their findings and walk away? You can take my credit rating to -24, because I just walked away with $18 million. You don't need to worry about a credit rating with that much coin.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:57 AM on 09/07/2008

Why would the government continue to provide billions in bailouts to yet more companies because of bad investment decisions they made with regard to the type of loans they are giving out? If we are all to pay this many taxpeyer dollars so that the market doesn't collapse, shouldn't we just be helping out the people that are about to lose their homes? Sure for many of them it may be their fault they got in over their heads and tehreby not really deserving of such help, but the companies knew the risks involved just as well, so why only aid them when we near a chrisis instead of paying off the debts on mortgage that are about to default. This way the companies still get the cash they need therby avoinding the huge economic meltdow , but the actuall people, many of who legitimately fell behind because of other ecomnmic troubles that have come up over the past 8 years, also get to keep their homes, and this way without forclusers, the overall housing market would be able to sustain higher prices thereby increasing everyon'es equity. Like I said I am no economic expert, but it seems that since we reached such a critical stage that a government bailout is neccessary for the sake of everyone, why shoudl we just help the companies and not the people first which then helps the companies and therby save all of us from undergoing a depression. Call it trickle up economics...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:23 PM on 09/06/2008
- FredOCal I'm a Fan of FredOCal 3 fans permalink

Because we've become a fascist state. Fascism as defined by Mussolini: "Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:40 AM on 09/08/2008
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (8 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect