Government Plans Takeover Of Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Government Plans Takeover Of Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

ALAN ZIBEL | September 5, 2008 11:12 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
In this Aug. 13, 2008 file photo, a foreclosed home sits empty in Chandler, Ariz. A record 9 percent of American homeowners with a mortgage were either behind on their payments or in foreclosure at the end of June, as damage from the housing crisis continues to mount, the Mortgage Bankers Association said Friday, Sept. 5, 2008. (AP Photo/Matt York, file)

WASHINGTON — The government is expected to take over Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac as soon as this weekend in a monumental move designed to protect the mortgage market from the failure of the two companies, which together hold or guarantee half of the nation's mortgage debt, a person briefed on the matter said Friday night.

Some of the details of the intervention, which could cost taxpayers billions, were not yet available, but are expected to include the departure of Fannie Mae CEO Daniel Mudd and Freddie Mac CEO Richard Syron, according to the source, who asked not to be named because the plan was yet to be announced.

Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke, Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson and James Lockhart, the companies' chief regulator, met Friday afternoon with the top executives from the mortgage companies and informed them of the government's plan to put the troubled companies into a conservatorship.

The news, first reported on The Wall Street Journal's Web site, came after stock markets closed. In after-hours trading Fannie Mae's shares plunged $1.54, or 22 percent, to $5.50. Freddie Mac's shares fell $1.06, or almost 21 percent, to $4.04. Common stock in the companies will be worth little to nothing after the government's actions.

The news also followed a report Friday by the Mortgage Bankers Association that more than 4 million American homeowners with a mortgage, a record 9 percent, were either behind on their payments or in foreclosure at the end of June.

That confirmed what investors saw in Fannie and Freddie's recent financial results: trouble in the mortgage market has shifted to homeowners who had solid credit but took out exotic loans with little or no proof of their income and assets.

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac lost a combined $3.1 billion between April and June. Half of their credit losses came from these types of risky loans with ballooning monthly payments.

While both companies said they had enough resources to withstand the losses, many investors believe their financial cushions could wither away as defaults and foreclosures mount.

Story continues below

Many in Washington and on Wall Street hadn't expected Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson to intervene unless the companies had trouble issuing debt to fund their operations.

This summer, Congress passed a plan to provide unlimited government loans to Fannie and Freddie and to purchase stock in the two companies if needed.

Critics say the open-ended nature of the rescue package could expose taxpayers to billions of dollars of potential losses.

Supporters, however, argue the Bush administration had little choice but to support Fannie and Freddie, which together hold or guarantee $5 trillion in mortgages _ almost half the nation's total.

Representatives of Fannie and Freddie declined to comment on the government assistance plan.

Treasury spokeswoman Brookly McLaughlin said officials "have been in regular communications" with Fannie and Freddie, but refused to comment saying, "We are not going to comment on rumors."

Concern has been growing that a government rescue of Fannie and Freddie could not only wipe out common stockholders, but also be costly for scores of investment, banking and insurance companies that hold billions of dollars in their preferred shares.

Paulson has been in contact in recent weeks with foreign governments that hold billions of dollars of Fannie and Freddie debt to reassure them that the United States recognizes the importance of the two companies.

The two companies had nearly $36 billion in preferred shares outstanding as of June 30, according to filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Mudd, the son of TV anchor Roger Mudd, was elevated to Fannie Mae's top post in December 2004 when chief executive Franklin Raines and chief financial officer Timothy Howard were swept out of office in an accounting scandal. Syron was named Freddie Mac's CEO in 2003, replacing former chief Gregory Parseghian, who was ousted in after being implicated in accounting irregularities.

He formerly was executive chairman of Thermo Electron Corp., a Waltham, Mass.-based maker of scientific equipment, served head of the American Stock Exchange was president of the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston in the early 1990s.

Fannie Mae was created by the government in 1938, and was turned into a shareholder-owned company 30 years later. Freddie Mac was established in 1970 to provide competition for Fannie.

A government takeover could cost taxpayers up to $25 billion, according to the Congressional Budget Office.

But the epic decision highlights the size of the threats facing the housing market and the economy. On Friday, Nevada regulators shut down Silver State Bank, the 11th failure this year of a federally insured bank. And earlier this year, the government orchestrated the takeover of investment bank Bear Stearns by JP Morgan Chase.

___

AP Business Writers Martin Crutsinger and Jeannine Aversa contributed to this report.

WASHINGTON — The government is expected to take over Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac as soon as this weekend in a monumental move designed to protect the mortgage market from the failure of the two c...
WASHINGTON — The government is expected to take over Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac as soon as this weekend in a monumental move designed to protect the mortgage market from the failure of the two c...
Filed by Nick Sabloff  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
255
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (8 pages total)

Couldn't this be the nail in the coffin for McCain's campaign? It was the Republicans who have been running things for two terms now and have always advocated deregulating business, which they did with the lending industry. They will however lie and try to pin it on the Dems who have not been in control the past 7 years.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:04 AM on 09/06/2008
- Dynamohum I'm a Fan of Dynamohum 62 fans permalink

Wait a minute! Did not John McCain, just yesterday say he was going to shrink big government? Unbelievable!! No more government handouts? This so reminds me of failed S&L scandal that McCain was involved in. I lived through it. These people are incredulous. Yet time and time again the American working class lets them ride roughshod right over our interests. Wash Rinse Repeat.

WAKE UP AMERICA

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:03 AM on 09/06/2008
- DAE I'm a Fan of DAE 19 fans permalink
photo

So let me get this straight. The largest mortgage holders in the world with trillions of dollars of debt have gone belly up. The Highway Trust fund which McCain wants to deplete is nearly bankrupt. Unemployment and inflation are skyrocketing and Sarah Palin was nominated for VP. Well, even though I'm an atheist, God help us

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:47 AM on 09/06/2008
- plooger I'm a Fan of plooger 15 fans permalink

Bailouts like this should be the number one rationalization for a return to a more aggressive progressive income tax scheme.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:45 AM on 09/06/2008
- plooger I'm a Fan of plooger 15 fans permalink

Privatize the profits.... socialize the risk.

Got Free Market?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:43 AM on 09/06/2008

This time next year, Bush will be proud of the new monument to him in Central Park, Hooverville 2.0.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:56 AM on 09/06/2008
- Luca I'm a Fan of Luca 7 fans permalink

Well, no wonder taxes are going to have to rise next term. The Republicans seem intent on bankrupting the nation. Bush's policy has been spend spend spend and NO taxes. Tax and spend makes more sense. Right? I hope someone talks about Bush and his fiscal policies creating yet another disaster. But I guess the fall-out will be with the next administration who will have to deal with this decision.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:54 AM on 09/06/2008

Corporate socialism is a wonderful thing...emphasis (to the anal retentive R'pigs) on SOCIALISM. When corporations are not allowed to fail on their own merits, that's socialism....corporate socialism, where society bears the burden of corporate incompetence and malfeasance, and the incompetent criminals escape and financial consequences under self-made golden parachutes. This is the marvel of modern Republicanism, the ability to say the same thing with minimal spin, and have two entirely different results, i.e. socialism BAD....corporate socialism GOOD. The operative word there being SOCIALISM.

This is about the Republicans, not me. I think the world would be a better place with socialism...but NOT corporate socialism. They want the public to take all the risks with no possible return, while they take no risks and reap all the rewards. And because they're in power, they're gonna take these two private financial institutions and turn them into government financed cash cows...but not one penny to the taxpayers. Billions from the taxpayers, but NOT ONE CENT IN RETURN.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:57 AM on 09/06/2008

kinda reminds me of the Keating five... McCain's buddies back in the day when the savings and loans went belly up and we the tax payers got stuck... oh boy!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:54 AM on 09/06/2008

And John McCain "reimbursed" Keating for travel expenses, and other sundries, to the tune of over 13,000 dollars...AFTER he was revealed to have accepted those "gifts" from Charles Keating.

Hmmm...so, if one were to say, rob a bank, and then get caught, all would be forgiven if that person were to give the money back? Sounds like internal Republican logic to me...if they rob the bank, are caught, and return the loot, no crime...however, if ANYONE ELSE were to do that, I'm thinking they'd be looking at 10 to 20 in a federal penitentiary!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:42 PM on 09/06/2008
- Viper I'm a Fan of Viper 330 fans permalink

I'm not for socailism. Its a reaction, as was communism to Laisez -faire captalism which does not work time and time again. Its no better than communism or socialism.

Captalism needs to be regulated for the same reasons that we need speed limits... human nature.

Also we talk about completely free markets and free trade, when no one else in the world is foolish enough to practice either one. Accordingly a Communist country is now our banker and makes everything we use...

Accordingly Repugs only tool is their false belief in an unregulated free market that solves everything even after the massive failures time and time again.. a simple concept with no grays! Simple people like the way it sounds. Therefore they are incapable in a complex world to solve any problem we now face such as healthcare, outsourcing and a gutted MFG base..

The known solutions run counter to their idealogy. And ironically some of the solutionwere employed by Alexander Hamilton more than 200 years ago in this country.

Regards



Regards

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:16 AM on 09/06/2008

Two appropriate words: duplicity and cronyism. Although not defined as such, this entire situation is a crime. Not defined as such because look at who wrote the laws.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:31 AM on 09/06/2008
- Marichu I'm a Fan of Marichu 16 fans permalink
photo

I knew this was inevitable, but I was hoping for later rather than sooner. Unrealistically hoping that Fannie and Freddie would somehow survive without the government bailing them out. Digging out of this lousy economic hole will be long and arduous.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:54 AM on 09/06/2008

lets not forget these companies are a creation of our federal government. so if we are told it will take 26 billion tax dollars to bail out, we know to expect 50 billion. greed coruption stick it in break it off. can someone please show money trail of who benefits. you know somebody does. but it must be better bush says so.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:26 AM on 09/06/2008

$50B won't even pay the lawyers fees

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:14 AM on 09/06/2008

That's what they want you to think, and to continue to invest your hard earned money in equity securities. Simply look at the the credit default swap numbers, the cdo's or toxic paper as they are affectionately referred to. The numbers are simply staggering, absolutely staggering, beyond comprehension really. Try to reconcile them, or in lay people terms, balance the check book. It simply cannot be done.This is beyond bankruptcy. Consider this rather weak analogy: family makes $50K a year and has $5M in debt accruing interest and still has to put food on the table, pay utilities and gasoline and property taxes. Try to calculate when they will pay it off. Also, ask yourself how long will it take before Capital One, Citi and Chase want payment in full as opposed to the simple monthly minimum?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:48 AM on 09/06/2008
- Marichu I'm a Fan of Marichu 16 fans permalink
photo

Are you saying that we are looking at a total collapse of our economy? Something along the lines of what happened to Germany in the 1920's? And if the US economy goes under, this has to have a cascading effect on the world's economies- a global hyperinflation?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:11 AM on 09/06/2008
- Jon Raymond - Huffpost Blogger I'm a Fan of Jon Raymond 6 fans permalink

Not to worry. Bush says the economy is getting better.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:40 AM on 09/06/2008

It used to be that the defenders of capitalism said "the entrepreneur is paid for the risk involved." I guess these days investors have no risks. So what are they getting paid for?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:40 AM on 09/06/2008

Ron Paul warned of this but people never listened and they voted a CFR candidate like Obama and Mcsame. There will be no money for health care, Environment or any other social programs soon. But ya just had to have a corrupt Dem...check this video out.

This video will show how the Dem and Repub presidents are all the SAME!

http://ca.youtube.com/watch?v=teXgZoZrnwQ

and listen to this, it was 1983 but it applies EXACTLY to this..he even predicts the market failure of 1978.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:34 AM on 09/06/2008

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6epCVUppjJM

Here is the second video...sorry.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:35 AM on 09/06/2008
- Dynamohum I'm a Fan of Dynamohum 62 fans permalink

Please, we do not need any conspiracy theory mumbo jumbo. When I was very young back in the 60's there were elements of both parties that preached this horsesh *t.

More drivvle from the fruit cake fringe. Instead of paranoia why don't you get involved if not in this campaign, then in your community. Change happens from the ground up. Always has and always will.

And why should there not be a common roadmap for where the world should be. There are 7 billion of us. Would you rather have anarchy?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:15 AM on 09/06/2008

Placing our already extended government to guarantee over 5 trillion dollars of suspect bonds sold and profited by miscreant bankers is the height of irresponsibility and incompetence bordering on treason.
Why? Because trillions of those dollars over a period of time may and probably will default, and President Bush, Treasury Secreatary Henry Paulson and Bernacke know or are in self-denial.
Such a guarantee of shaky debt instruments will bankrupt our currency and our country while continuing to encourage financial interests to make outrageous loans and speculative arrangements knowing that Uncle Sam will bail them out.
I know that many of these bonds were sold to China and other American government creditors. If our nation tries to guarantee bonds that two incompetent companies guaranteed until the laws of economics intervened, then our poor country will be subject to those same laws as we default on our own debt. Such a situation would be no less than catasthrophic.
Presidential candidates McCain and Obama should both forcefully decry the bailout of bad loans too enormous to even consider, even if the immorality is ignored. The Bush Administration is attempting to ram through an unapproved policy for short term political advantage and gain at the expense of our nation's future. All responsible citizens must resist or suffer terrible consequences.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:33 AM on 09/06/2008

A 5 trillion dollar bailout, this is as much inflation as Bush admin created over the past 7 years in ONE SHOT! The dollar is finished, do not believe the propaganda.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:29 AM on 09/06/2008
- Chillinout I'm a Fan of Chillinout 125 fans permalink
photo

Here we go. Bailing out the Republicans again. it is time to start making these people pay. Take everything they own, sell it and pay back as much of what they lost as you can. If people had to take personal responsibility for these things, they would be a lot more careful with how they treated other people's money.

This ridiculous and McCain wants us to give him four more years of this. Anyone think this country would survive four more years of this?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:15 AM on 09/06/2008

Absolute power corrupts absolutely. Wall street requires our corporations to make unrealistic commitments (top line, bottom line, organic growth, etc.) to prevent the short sell death spiral. CEOs knowing their shelf life is short must compromise their ethics to meet these demands or resign. This leads to survival of the unfittest as those with better judgement are passed over by a board who maintains an arms length away from the cooked books. Add unregulated hedgefund to the mix and things really go crazy.

Our financial markets are a house of cards waiting to collapse.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:00 AM on 09/06/2008
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (8 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect