Government Plans Takeover Of Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Government Plans Takeover Of Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

ALAN ZIBEL | September 5, 2008 11:12 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
In this Aug. 13, 2008 file photo, a foreclosed home sits empty in Chandler, Ariz. A record 9 percent of American homeowners with a mortgage were either behind on their payments or in foreclosure at the end of June, as damage from the housing crisis continues to mount, the Mortgage Bankers Association said Friday, Sept. 5, 2008. (AP Photo/Matt York, file)

WASHINGTON — The government is expected to take over Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac as soon as this weekend in a monumental move designed to protect the mortgage market from the failure of the two companies, which together hold or guarantee half of the nation's mortgage debt, a person briefed on the matter said Friday night.

Some of the details of the intervention, which could cost taxpayers billions, were not yet available, but are expected to include the departure of Fannie Mae CEO Daniel Mudd and Freddie Mac CEO Richard Syron, according to the source, who asked not to be named because the plan was yet to be announced.

Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke, Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson and James Lockhart, the companies' chief regulator, met Friday afternoon with the top executives from the mortgage companies and informed them of the government's plan to put the troubled companies into a conservatorship.

The news, first reported on The Wall Street Journal's Web site, came after stock markets closed. In after-hours trading Fannie Mae's shares plunged $1.54, or 22 percent, to $5.50. Freddie Mac's shares fell $1.06, or almost 21 percent, to $4.04. Common stock in the companies will be worth little to nothing after the government's actions.

The news also followed a report Friday by the Mortgage Bankers Association that more than 4 million American homeowners with a mortgage, a record 9 percent, were either behind on their payments or in foreclosure at the end of June.

That confirmed what investors saw in Fannie and Freddie's recent financial results: trouble in the mortgage market has shifted to homeowners who had solid credit but took out exotic loans with little or no proof of their income and assets.

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac lost a combined $3.1 billion between April and June. Half of their credit losses came from these types of risky loans with ballooning monthly payments.

While both companies said they had enough resources to withstand the losses, many investors believe their financial cushions could wither away as defaults and foreclosures mount.

Story continues below

Many in Washington and on Wall Street hadn't expected Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson to intervene unless the companies had trouble issuing debt to fund their operations.

This summer, Congress passed a plan to provide unlimited government loans to Fannie and Freddie and to purchase stock in the two companies if needed.

Critics say the open-ended nature of the rescue package could expose taxpayers to billions of dollars of potential losses.

Supporters, however, argue the Bush administration had little choice but to support Fannie and Freddie, which together hold or guarantee $5 trillion in mortgages _ almost half the nation's total.

Representatives of Fannie and Freddie declined to comment on the government assistance plan.

Treasury spokeswoman Brookly McLaughlin said officials "have been in regular communications" with Fannie and Freddie, but refused to comment saying, "We are not going to comment on rumors."

Concern has been growing that a government rescue of Fannie and Freddie could not only wipe out common stockholders, but also be costly for scores of investment, banking and insurance companies that hold billions of dollars in their preferred shares.

Paulson has been in contact in recent weeks with foreign governments that hold billions of dollars of Fannie and Freddie debt to reassure them that the United States recognizes the importance of the two companies.

The two companies had nearly $36 billion in preferred shares outstanding as of June 30, according to filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Mudd, the son of TV anchor Roger Mudd, was elevated to Fannie Mae's top post in December 2004 when chief executive Franklin Raines and chief financial officer Timothy Howard were swept out of office in an accounting scandal. Syron was named Freddie Mac's CEO in 2003, replacing former chief Gregory Parseghian, who was ousted in after being implicated in accounting irregularities.

He formerly was executive chairman of Thermo Electron Corp., a Waltham, Mass.-based maker of scientific equipment, served head of the American Stock Exchange was president of the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston in the early 1990s.

Fannie Mae was created by the government in 1938, and was turned into a shareholder-owned company 30 years later. Freddie Mac was established in 1970 to provide competition for Fannie.

A government takeover could cost taxpayers up to $25 billion, according to the Congressional Budget Office.

But the epic decision highlights the size of the threats facing the housing market and the economy. On Friday, Nevada regulators shut down Silver State Bank, the 11th failure this year of a federally insured bank. And earlier this year, the government orchestrated the takeover of investment bank Bear Stearns by JP Morgan Chase.

___

AP Business Writers Martin Crutsinger and Jeannine Aversa contributed to this report.

WASHINGTON — The government is expected to take over Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac as soon as this weekend in a monumental move designed to protect the mortgage market from the failure of the two c...
WASHINGTON — The government is expected to take over Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac as soon as this weekend in a monumental move designed to protect the mortgage market from the failure of the two c...
Filed by Nick Sabloff  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
255
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 (8 pages total)
- 1rewd1 I'm a Fan of 1rewd1 3 fans permalink
photo

wow, this is big

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:26 PM on 09/05/2008

huge

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:54 PM on 09/05/2008
- drkazmd65 I'm a Fan of drkazmd65 56 fans permalink
photo

Yep - and not in a good sorta way.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:04 AM on 09/06/2008
- pbfishtaco I'm a Fan of pbfishtaco 12 fans permalink
photo

Privatize Profit.
Socialize Risk.

Repeat as Necessary to win elections.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:13 PM on 09/05/2008
- redsongia I'm a Fan of redsongia 100 fans permalink
photo

Yeah, real Reagan conservatives.

And to think, in 2006 the investigated the heck out of Fannie, because the bonus payments to the executives, paid to attract the best and brightest execs in the market, were considered "exhorbitant."

Chairman Mao would be proud of this.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:40 PM on 09/05/2008

Elegantly put. It's too bad that the "Sams Club" Republicans have no idea what that means, they might have a different opinion of the people who claim to represent them. They are the biggest losers as they will consider to hand their trust and money to the crooks who know how to manipulate markets for personal gain.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:46 AM on 09/06/2008
- Anciano I'm a Fan of Anciano 17 fans permalink
photo

Gee, wonder what Sara's informed opinion is about this?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:10 PM on 09/05/2008
- FatherWolf I'm a Fan of FatherWolf 21 fans permalink

If you can field-dress a moose, you don't worry about mortgages!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:18 PM on 09/05/2008
- Davwbaird I'm a Fan of Davwbaird 24 fans permalink
photo

“The potential for an economic implosion and subsequent world recession is huge and could surpass the biggest financial crash in history of that of the Great Depression”.

Billions were wiped off the world financial system in the 1920’s / 30’s. This period was known as ‘The Great Depression’ (also known in the U.K. as the Great Slump). This was the most dramatic of worldwide economic downturns in history.

It all started with the stock market crash on October 29, 1929, known as Black Tuesday. The depression had devastating effects in both the industrialised countries and those which exported raw materials.

With similar beginnings to the current crisis, the Great Depression was not a sudden total collapse but more of a slow burning fuse that sparked a sequence of major financial catastrophes across the US and subsequently around the globe.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:23 AM on 09/06/2008
- CarmanK I'm a Fan of CarmanK 41 fans permalink

I knew it. Paulson got the Congress to give him this takeover authority, while assuring them he did not think it would be necessary. I was doubtful that Congress should give any persoght in this administration "blanket" authority to do anything especially with T P dollars.
Pelosi and Reid failed again to curtail the Bush administration from their debt financed excesses.
This time, they should be ashamed.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:59 PM on 09/05/2008
- jennbeez I'm a Fan of jennbeez 12 fans permalink
photo

Better we should vote them out of office. They are nothing more than enablers, holding the taxpayers down while the Bushco rapes them .

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:45 PM on 09/05/2008

NO WAY, NO HOW, NO McCain-Palin .. People, wake up

http://tinyurl.com/68ru9x

If Jesus loves us all, why is that turquoise line staying stagnant? Because the thugs in office are making monkeys of us ...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:43 PM on 09/05/2008

oh boy! Not that it comes as a surprise though....

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:32 PM on 09/05/2008
- Binckeslaw I'm a Fan of Binckeslaw 5 fans permalink

Private and public pension funds alike hold large positions in both Freddie and Fannie because they are considered to be among the most safe places to park money while affording the funds a chance to diversify into more risky and rewarding investments. What happens to the portfolio value of these pension funds if the safest investment turns out to be worthless? What happens to our currency when foreign government funds lose money that they parked in the safest of American investments? Will sovereign wealth funds and foreign government funds abandon the dollar? The manner in which the Freddie and Fannie debacle is resolved could have consequences greater than any events that have occurred in America to date.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:28 PM on 09/05/2008
photo

Hey buddy, you nailed it with this comment. Our market of packaged crap, otherwise know as the "stock market" is heading for the outhouse. Yes, I have (had) a 401k and an IRA also. If I ever meet my broker in person, I'm gonna feed him that toilet paper sheet by sheet.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:10 PM on 09/05/2008
- NYBri I'm a Fan of NYBri 161 fans permalink

most of both FM's value has already been lost. They are as close to worthless now as they can get...so not much more for them to drop....

However, the effect on the market overall can't be exaggerated.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:35 PM on 09/05/2008
- iambusto I'm a Fan of iambusto 5 fans permalink

Only the common stock will be worthless (and maybe the preferred stock too, not sure about preferred).

The debt that companies and foreign govt. hold, will be taken over by the US govt. Well we all knew that had to happen. Those agencies had the "implicit" backing of the US govt. so its only fair that US govt. takes over these two GSE's debts.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:25 PM on 09/05/2008
- NicoleAnon I'm a Fan of NicoleAnon 9 fans permalink

They want to do it now before there is a new President and administration. And Paulson won't be treasury sectretary much longer - then he can go back to banking so our new administration can appoint another conman...sorry I mean someone from GS...for the job. That investment bank has more power over our economy than the Fed.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:27 PM on 09/05/2008
photo

This is what happens when government agencies are privatized.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:16 PM on 09/05/2008

I wonder what the golden parachutes of Fannie Mae CEO Daniel Mudd and Freddie Mac CEO Richard Syron look like?

This is yet another gigantic rip off of the taxpayer for the benefit of the upper 10%. It is the nail in the coffin of our economy that our capitalist masters are building. THEY WANT IT ALL! GREED KNOWS NO BOUNDS.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:56 PM on 09/05/2008
- darthdarcy I'm a Fan of darthdarcy 48 fans permalink
photo

Why not just peg the Sub Primes at 3% above the Fed Rate or even Prime Rate and forgive all penalties to date not to go below 6.25%, then not one dime of Tax Payer Money is needed to bail out either the lenders or the borrowers, and the vast majority of these folks can stay in their homes...?

Why to Republicans love creating debt and paying interest...so much...?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:47 PM on 09/05/2008
photo

What about the bond holders and the fact that most of the people going bankrupt now don't have jobs and couldn't even afford the house they bought in the first place. Most of these bad loans were made to people who took out a second to allow themselves to buy an over inflated home so even if you fixed the rate at 6.5% today the price of the house has to slide 15 or 20 percent for them to even think about ownership.
So add your 6.25% to the 15% they lost in equity and now you are in effect paying 21% interest on a house you have no equity in that is just stupid.

"Why do Republicans love creating debt and paying interest...so much...?"

We live in a world of fiat currency it must expand ever so much if it isn't expanding it is contracting or deflating. In order to expand the money supply and make room for a growing economy in a fiat capital system it means lending or borrowing money the interest paid is growth .

When deflation hits you cant pay your bills and money becomes scarcer and debt becomes impossible to service and credits dry up. Which leads to the house of Pain.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:11 PM on 09/05/2008
- tjfxh I'm a Fan of tjfxh 20 fans permalink
photo

That's rich: "interest paid is growth." Everyone who has taken Economic 101 knows that growth is the result of increased productivity alone -- never debt or interest on it. Interest is just transfer of existing wealth from one party to another.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:33 PM on 09/05/2008
- darthdarcy I'm a Fan of darthdarcy 48 fans permalink
photo

Most of these people bought homes not investments and the reason they can't afford is not that they can't pay 6.25-6.5% but the 11-14% or even more they are now being gouged for..

It's these unreasonable bloated interest rates causing the foreclosures..

This was all Phil Gramm's doing as a lobbyist for UBS and they are now under investigation...

The banks and lenders won't be losing money they just won't be making the huge greed ridden windfalls they planned on and again no Tax Money need be involved..

Instead Bush is going to now rob the American Tax Payer for his banking buddies after they robbed and cheated and misrepresented these mortgages to the borrowers..

1/2 these penalties are illegal even more than half..!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:38 AM on 09/06/2008
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 (8 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect