Jason Linkins
RSS

TV SoundOff: Sunday Talking Heads

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

September 7, 2008 08:55 AM



Good morning and welcome to the most beautiful Sunday of the calendar year. No: not the first post-convention welcome to the campaign Sunday. And, no: not the everyone on the ticket is on the air Sunday (one person I'm told is somewhat consequential is sitting this Sunday out, I'm told (though she'll probably tell everyone she participated, because that's what she does, apparently)). No, today is the first Sunday of the National Football League! I'm not even going to pretend that many of you won't try to lose your cares and concerns in the fall pastime. Please, do. I back the Washington Redskins myself, so I enjoy this Sunday morning political horrorshow because compared to my home team simply because it's not as big a trainwreck.

Speaking of, here comes...

FOX NEWS SUNDAY

We begin Sunday with dueling consultants, starting with David Axelrod. How will Obama counter Sarah Palin? Axelrod says, "Uhm...we'll actually go ahead and counter John McCain." And then on comes the elevator speech about how awful the economy is. But does Obama REALLY BELIEVE he has precious executive experience. Axelrod is all, "Nobody knows about the enduring mystery that is Sarah Palin! Who knows what experience she has?" Okay. Interesting tack. Why can't the answer simply be, "Yes. Obama has more leadership experience." That's Axelrod's second answer. I don't get the game. They ask you if you have enough experience, the answer is yes.

But isn't John McCain the real agent of change, because he was tortured?

WOO! Obama worked on putting caps on Katrina rebuilding! Hooray?

Wallace basically says, "Yes. But there are other issues that Obama didn't fight his party on!" What's the point of even answering these questions?

Axelrod points out that McCain's campaign is being run by lobbyists, like Rick Davis. And Axelrod gets deep, stupidly deep in the weeds on the "Surge." Along with Obama. As has been documented, the decrease in sectarian violence is attributable to the sectarian cleansing that went on contemporaneously. Axelrod is right that there's a "much larger discussion," but he needs to have it in a more simple way. I'd focus on the the fact that the "surge" has led to higher casualities in Afghanistan, it's led to al Qaeda's resurgence, it hasn't impacted Iran's increasing role in Iraq, and Iraq is clamoring for Obama's withdrawal plan anyway.

Story continues below
advertisement

Axelrod, not good today. Got to reinvent some of these old sales pitches. "More of the same" is already feeling hoary. His counterparts on the right respond and react to everything, even the stupid things - even stupidly! But at the end of the week they've got a sense of what works and what doesn't, and filter new rhetoric through old message.

Anyway, here's Rick Davis. What about all the lobbyists that make up the campaign? David says it's hilarious. Hilarious enough to not answer the question.

Anyway, Palin reinforces the maverick brand somehow, even though she's a devourer of government pork and a supporter of bridges to nowhere and Ted Stevens. Davis says that the pork was in place before she became mayor. That's actually a big fat lie! Public records show that Palin INTRODUCED earmarks to Wasilla.

When will Palin agree to an interview? Rick Davis says, not yet! But in the meantime, watch Fox News glowing hagiography. Then he says that this past week wasn't a good week for the news media. Really? What did the media do? Besides uncritically report on the RNC? Wallace is all, "You're right, we were awful!" He says that what the media has said about Palin is not "objective journalism" because it doesn't fulfill the "objective" of getting McCain elected.

So, Wallace asks about the whole statement that Davis made about how this election is not about issues, but about a "composite view" of the candidates. I guess that's scandalous, somehow. But it's also correct! The election will be won by who presents the clearest composite view and whichever composite view reflects people's values the strongest will win the election. I mean, issues are great, but I can easily see us getting to 2012, and the Democrats just updating their "For eight years things have sucked!" message as "For twelve years things have sucked!" And they'd probably be well served to plan the "For sixteen years things have sucked!" message in advance.

Boy, Davis pretty much worked over Axelrod this morning. As fatuous as "Country first" versus "Me First" is, you can actually say it in one breath. That's the difference! Composite view.

Anyway, panel time with Hume, Liasson, Kristol, and Williams. These four...it's just so hard to spend Sunday morning with these four. They are just like cancer of the eye.

We take time out to give Kristol props for correctly picking Palin. It's the first thing he's been right about in maybe 47 years, so, stand and give some clapter. He'll return to producing mistake-ridden columns and backing policies that will get you and me killed later this afternoon.

Liasson says that Palin's not going to fade, even if she's not ready to be Veep. She'll either implode or explode. I more or less agree. On Jezebel this week, I summed up Palin as someone who'd lack of accomplishment is more than offset by a clear abundance of talent. The GOP has anointed a national figure, and incited a cult/celebrity phenomenon of their own. I have to imagine that gets the party, finally, invested in McCain, because even if McCain loses this particular battle, he's positioned the party for the future. And, strangely enough, going into the convention, I don't think the GOP was well-positioned for the future.

Of course, that future holds some of the shallowest identity politics you can imagine.

Anyway, I agree with Brit Hume that there's just no reason for the Democrats to even talk about Sarah Palin. He's right. She's the vice-presidential candidate, for crying out loud. And not a Veep in the Cheney mold. And she'll be outranked in a McCain White House by Lindsay Graham, Joe Lieberman, Mark Salter and that crew, and a host of party operatives. Unless the Obama camp gets proof that Palin's going to screw up the country at one of the many ribbon-cutting ceremonies she'll be attending, it's best to concentrate on the distinctions that can be made of the two candidates values and style of governance.

So, what to expect in the last fifty eight days? Williams says it's going to be THIRD BUSH TERM vs. MAVERICK. Hume says that it's close, Obama's the favorite, and the McCain campaign needs to get serious on the economy. I'm not sure he's right that the Democrats are poorly positioned on energy, because that Pelosi energy plan really pins McCain in. Liasson thinks that its amazing that McCain's made it this far without a clear economic message and that the Obama ground game is better.

OH, BRIT HUME. He thinks that there's been great job growth. A "huge number." Uhm...no.

Anyway, Brit Hume thinks the public doesn't "give a fig" abotu Sarah Palin answering questions. It's sad if he's right!

THIS WEEK WITH GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS

Where is Obama doing this interview from? A farm?

He thinks the new Republican team came roaring out of Saint Paul? So did the rest of everyone! My twitter is filled with people relieved to be done with the tear gas capital of the North.

Anyway, Obama on his taxcutting farm. Ol' McCain done been spinnin' yarns about taxocratz like Obama, but he says that he's cutting taxes for some 80% of the country. McCain's wars will blow a hole through the budget, Obama says. GS says: "So, even if we're in a recession, you are going to do your tax increases." Obama says, uhm...I said tax cuts!

Obama isn't keen on answering questions about Palin, other than she's a skilled performer, with the best two drink minimum shows since the Yiddish policeman's union came to Sitka. But what about issues, and stuff? GS, is all: Sarah Palin bravely commands the Alaskan National Guard, to bravely defeat caribou. She's definitely fought the caribou to a draw in Alaska. "This whole resume contest...is not what the American people are looking for."

GS asks what Obama thought of the "boos and laughter." I'm glad that Obama does not answer such a touch-and-feel fest. Anyway, Obama was a community organizer, but made the mistake of organizing black people, instead of caribou, and earmarks.

Obama is asked about whether he ever considered to join the military. He signed up with Selective Service, and thinks the military was great, and he'll take care of the troops.

Three changes that would be unpopular with the Democrats? He'd promote accountability in education and pay for performance. He'd increase the size of the military. He'd reduce litigation costs in health care. Plus, he'll to an audit on government spending - he cites Medicare funding as something that needs to be reviewed. Yeah. A lot of that stuff won't be popular with the Democrats. I'd love to hear that question put to McCain, though? He'd probably answer it: "I lived in a box and was tortured and stuff."

Surge much? Our troops have reduced violence, Obama says! But why does McCain "snatch defeat from the jaws of victory" by not supporting the timetable for withdrawal. "It's amazing to me that people are so focused on the right year and a half and not the previous five." That's a good answer. A better answer would be some Attackermanese: "JOHN MCCAIN WANTS YOU TO BELIEVE THAT THE SURGE ZEROED THE BALANCE IN IRAQ. IT DID NOT." But I'll say this: Obama's come closest to the argument formulation in my own mind today.

Was the "above my pay grade" answer too "flip?" Obama says "probably." How about definitely?

Why are there no animals on this farm? Has Sarah Palin aerially hunted them all and sold them on eBay?

Now, Obama's trying to answer about who said what about who's pregnant daughter and Muslim heritage. Why not simply say that the conservative blogosphere has been promoting these attacks, and that they are for all intents and purposes, part of the McCain campaign? The McCain campaign is essentially saying the same thing about the Bristol Palin stuff.

Finally, Obama will be willing to play Palin in basketball, so long as she doesn't bring her gun. No problem! I hear her guns are mostly pointed at Levi Johnston these days, anyway.

Man. It's so hard to find anything funny to say about this stuff after using all my best material on Twitter for the past two weeks. I actually cannot believe that anyone going to a political convention for the first time would take in the breadth of that experience and say, "Yes! I will do this again in four years!" What is it? Do people like the taste of mace or something? Going to utterly crappy parties with the same utterly crappy people in different cities?

It must be watching television in tents.

Anyway, they're talking about Sarah Palin. She's energized the party! I can't wait until she goes to conservative hotbed San Francisco for a fundraiser with noted po' folk Stacy and Tom Siebel! Mayhill Fowler will be there, taping Palin when she says that liberal women "cling to their uteruses and silly sense of autonomy."

The panel discussion is continuing on the show. I haven't been paying attention to a word of it? George Will just said something about "moxie." Palin has it. She has a old, carbonated beverage that tastes like malted transmission fluid.

GS says that Palin will inspire two different gut reactions: which I take to mean 1) explosive reverse peristalsis and 2) pancreatic ulcers.

Commenter aznurse asks: "Why do I feel like this whole election is some sort of science project??" Because those projects end up in science fairs, where adults wander around and hand out ribbons and pretend to be impressed, but in the end, you've just rewarded a bunch of children who really don't know what the frack they're talking about, only we're actually putting them in charge, which is why all of our domestic policy is about as serious as adding baking soda to vinegar. WOO VOLCANO! YAY PRETTY!

FACE THE NATION

After the nation got maced, the nation gets faced, unless of course, they want to aerially hunt McCain's Veep pick, in which case, they are on a bridge to nowhere, which she supported. My hope is that the first question they ask Palin is, "Are you planning on voting for Ted Stevens? Yes, or get the eff out of here?"

Anyway, here's loveable Bob Schieffer, coming to us live from a crypt in Colorado Springs. John McCain has been on the show a lot, because he's a member of the DC cocktail circuit clique who go on these shows rather than do things. McCain surpasses Viagra spokesman Bob Dole for number of appearances, McCain says it's an honor to follow in his footsteps, and I'd bet that many of you out there in commentland hope he keeps right on that path.

Anyway, McCain tells Sheef that he's close to death, too, so shut up.

BS thinks that McCain did an extraordinary thing standing up to his own party, and then something about goats. McCain says he's stood up to goats and has reached across the aisle to other goats, and supports a goat-like surge. McCain is eager to deflect attention onto his running mate. Of course, then he talks about running a "unity" government. "You have to." How will he do that with a running mate who's only made splashes by reinforcing the partisan division?

McCain says that he's going to have the smartest people in America in his cabinet. Shouldn't the smartest people in America be teaching America, with competitive wages?

So, Charles Krauthammer says that Palin is an empty vessel and not ready to be Veep, and McCain's riposte is that, "She's so popular!" So, celebrity is a good thing, now?

"She's not just exciting our base, she's excited all Americans." McCain's right. She's personally been responsible for a 10:1 donation ratio in Obama's favor over the last two days of the convention. Also, she was a point guard! She's ready to lead the box-and-one on day one! She'll have many double-doubles, and she'll defeat neighboring Russia in FIBA. She will field dress the New York Knickerbockers, and their elitism.

Okay. I love how McCain is complaining about lobbyists, cronies, "quasi-governmental organizations," and the fact that people at Freddie and Fannie made mad bank as CEOs. He's going to fight that? He's going to catapult into that culture and change it? NEVER GONNA HAPPEN. You know, Franklin Raines got drummed out of Fannie Mae amid just the sort of scandal that a guy like McCain, if he was a real reformer, would decry till he was blue in the face. Guys like Raines should be made to feel some real heat, some real shame. But it's never going to occur because ultimately, people like Raines will crony up with people from the McCain campaign, and everyone will get rich on their empty headed board of directors slots, and nothing will ever change because the first rule of business is PROTECT THE WEALTH OF THE WEALTHY.

Don't believe me? Well, where is Frankin Raines now? He's on the board of directors of Steve Case's Revolution Health. Would you like to know one of his colleagues at Revolution? I should EVER SO GLAD TO TELL YOU: Carly Effing Fiorina, folks! That's right. Now, if Fiorina and Raines can happily coexist on the board of Rev Health, how serious do take McCain when he says he's going to change this political culture?

If you answered, "I take it very seriously!" you may as well kick yourself in the fracking face right now, to get used to the disappointment. And people, Fiorina and Raines just sort of leap to mind. I'm guessing we could run a similar game with the Obama campaign, as well. And people think the candidates' pastors give us insight into their thinking! It's never about Jesus, people. It's about the moneylenders.

"When the housing market starts back up, the taxpayers are going to be reimbursed." GOOD GOD MAN! When the housing market starts back up there will be trillions of dollars of mortgages that will have reset! Even the people that don't get foreclosed on are going to have to scrape by and survive. There are many Americans who won't ever be moving from their homes! There are many Americans who won't be buying a new car, won't be taking a vacation, won't be buying the new HDTV, won't be buying that MacBook Air, won't be sending their kids to college. But yeah, when the housing market "starts back up again," Hanry Paulson says everything will be fine, and everyone will get a few hundred dollars back.

Sheef asks McCain about the whole community organizer slurs, with "important responsibilities." McCain says that he loves community organizers, especially when they are wealthy and do not have presidential aspirations. McCain's stance is that Obama "denigrated small town mayors" first. HE STARTED IT! He should have done those town halls with me! PLEASE GIVE ME ALL YOUR NUCLEAR FOOTBALLS.

McCain still will not acknowledge that going into Iraq, as opposed to avenging the deaths of our countrymen by fighting terrorists, was wrong.

"I'll have to convince [minorities] that I'll be the president of everybody." Good luck with Palin on your ticket, Mac.

How will you do that? He will say the word "education." He will say the word "economy."

Ezra Klein and Alex Pareene were getting at something here in their discussion on Daily Intelligencer:

A.P.: It just seemed odd last night to have Obama speaking on Iran and Pakistan and McCain basically doing the old John Edwards "I met a struggling family working 100 jobs" routine. When McCain does that routine, there's an odd break where you wait for him to explain what they wanted John McCain to do about it.

E.K.: Yeah, with him it's empathy for empathy's sake. "My friends, I too have known hardship..." It's interesting, the theory of why people vote on character issues is that we don't have time to get deeper and we use people's personality traits to assume their policies and agendas and priorities. But McCain has a tendency to not even try and signal that. He signals some empathy, but no interest in even gesturing toward his compassionate or attentive response. It's sort of rare for a politician.

That's the thing with McCain: he does talk a lot about people's hardship! I believe him, at least at some level, when he says he's saddened by it! But McCain basically believes the solution is: Send A Guy Who Was Tortured For Five Years and Now Owns Seven Homes. He believes the inspirational figure he might cut is sufficient. Basically, McCain promises America that he will draw a cross in the dirt for them, and after that, you're on your own. Meanwhile, yes: our enemies will continue to bask in their continued appeasement from America, but as soon as McCain joins bin Laden on some other metaphysical plane of existence, he will give him a stern talking to!

Anyway, my Face The Nation recording ends here, so, Meet The Press, I guess.

MEET THE PRESS, I GUESS

People are saying, by the way, that Robert Gibbs was better on teevee today than David Axelrod. Know why? Gibbs is better suited to presenting the "overall composite" of his candidate. Gibbs is a guy who's got values appeal. He's looser, less wonky and mopey, and exudes charm.

Anyway, Tom Brokaw, Joe Biden. In Delaware. Biden, dropping his foreign affairs cred in an offhanded way.

Biden calls Palin "smart, tough, formidable," which is all about playing the expectations game. Then Brokaw wants to know about the tick-tock: "Who'd you call after you saw Palin's amazing speechifying?" My proctologist, I guess? Anyway, Biden is used to debating "tough, smart women." But he doesn't know what her policies are, and assumes they are the same as John.

What about the fact that women seem to be flocking to Palin. Biden basically says:

What about Hillary? Is she going into the campaign? Biden says that she's "big player" and he hopes that he can go with. I think it's probably pretty smart to not send Clinton specifically as a "Palin-buster."

Lots of people tuned in to the convention! But how many will watch Lou Dobbs "independent convention" next week, for zenophobes with gigantic estates that can be seen from space? That's the real question.

Biden explains why no joint town halls: it significantly constrains your ability to campaign where you want.

So, what about the Surge? Biden says, look, the Surge wasn't half as effective as the Anbar Awakening, and anyway, it's all irrelevant, because TIMETABLZ 4 WITHDRAWALZ: YOU CAN HAZ THEM. And only John McCain is saying: "DO NOT WANT."

Biden is actually smart to future-focus this issue. Instead of this wack-ass chase for credit, who's going to set up the next stage.

OH NOES! Joe Biden just mistook Shia for Sunnis! And Tom Brokaw called them, "Sheee-eyes." These foreign people confuse us, with their funny hats.

Biden is killing it, actually. Speaking plain truth about the fact that the Iraq we've built is crazy in love with Iran and Ahmadinejad. Look, it should be said: the Biden experience is every bit, every inch of the complement that Obama needs. He's got a breadth of knowledge and an encyclopaedic command. And when Biden's talking policy - especially foreign policy - he's NOT saying crazy things about how Delaware would have been a slave state.

I wish that Obama and Biden would make fun of McCain for saying that there would be a "lifetime ban" on members of his staff from lobbying. Because that was the McCain stance on lobbying that made me just laugh, and later cry, and then turn to drink, and by drink I mean Clorox, because BISH PLS! No one, no way, no how is some sort of "lifetime ban" on lobbying going to be enforces on anyone! Damn, son! When John McCain is pushing up the daisies, how the eff do you presume Rick Davis is gonna get PAID? You think he's gonna open a chicken shack or something? Hell, no! The man is gonna lobby, crony, itching-palmy his ass off! That's what you do when campaigns end and candidacies fade and your bood leaves office.

Anyway, Biden is neck deep in lobbydom himself, and his son is too. So: PLEASE TO EXPLAIN? Actually, let's give Brokaw twenty minutes to get through his question. Anyway, Biden says that his son could have had a better job, which doesn't seem relevant, and that his son's bank's total contributions are 2% (which only makes me wonder who's contributed the other 98%), and that he blocked the bank's bill three times prior. Yeah. Well, in the end, that was a pretty bad bankruptcy bill, and if it's totally going to work once we have national health care, let's have the health care first.

Biden says that lobbyists would continue to "have a voice" but would no longer be allowed to write legislation. The bad news is: that means all the idiots in Congress are going to have to START writing it, and I don't think most of the people America elects can even READ.

Well, okay. Biden can obviously read, since he's dropping the Summa Theologica by Thomas Aquinas as a part of his abortion rights answer.

Should Lieberman be welcomed back in the caucus? Biden says that Catholics believe in redemption. That may be true, but the church doesn't sell indulgences anymore, either.

Then, a half-hour of Thomas Friedman follows, which I believe is a milli-Friedman unit. Anyway, he has a book and a mustache.

So, four shows, three candidates, and a noteworthy absence. That's Sunday. Conventions are over. I'm burnt but recharging. Time for a break. Watch some football today, people! Be glad the Redskins aren't on today! We'll see you next week!


Good morning and welcome to the most beautiful Sunday of the calendar year. No: not the first post-convention welcome to the campaign Sunday. And, no: not the everyone on the ticket is on the air Su...
Good morning and welcome to the most beautiful Sunday of the calendar year. No: not the first post-convention welcome to the campaign Sunday. And, no: not the everyone on the ticket is on the air Su...
 
Comments
623
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (13 pages total)

He forgot the part where Tom Brokaw slips in one of the Republican talking points and bashes Oprah at the same time all in the guise of asking a question. Does Oprah not having Sarah Palin on her show seem elitist?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:09 PM on 09/08/2008

I didn't watch, but I'm not surprised at Brokaw. He's an undercover rightwinger. So are Brian Williams & Charles Gibson. And, why the swipe at Oprah? Oprah doesn't tell Brokaw who to have on Press, so why does he think he has anything to say about who Oprah has on her show? Just because Palin looks like a woman, & Oprah is a woman, Oprah HAS to have her on her show? Brokaw, or anybody else, hasn't ever been concerned about uninvited guest of the Oprah show. So, why now? Because it's another way to coming to Palin's defense, & trying to turn female Oprah fans against Oprah ---- who supports Barack.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:35 PM on 09/08/2008

I caught that. It was so blantantly irrelevant, I wished Biden had responded with "I think your show is a more appropriate forum. Has she agreed to come on MTP? Oh, really why?"

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:04 PM on 09/08/2008

It seems beyond ridiculous to bash Oprah for not having someone on her show, when that very person is refusing interviews ANYWAY! That is moronic!

Oprah is only trying to be fair! If Palin did happen to agree to appear (which she wouldn't anyway!), Oprah would then probably be slammed for asking her supposedly "bias" questions. Oprah knows that would be seen as a conflict of interest, since she's already declared herself for Obama! Oprah is a smart and fair woman! I'm sure Oprah's IQ would far surpass Sarah Palin's ANY day!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:02 PM on 09/08/2008

When Wallace asks Axelrod, yeah but there are other issues he didn't oppose his party on, Why can't Axelrod just answer: Uh, Chris, that's because he agrees with his party on those issues. He's a Democrat, and therefore Chris, uh, he believes in Democratic policy. And I hate to tell you this Chris, but if Sen. Obama opposed his party on every issue, he'd be a Republican.
Jeez, how dumb are Republicans to think that Obama has to go against every bill or issue that Dems put out there? Axelrod falls into their trap.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:22 AM on 09/08/2008

That is an excellent point, and for some reason it catches more Democrats off balance than not.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:07 PM on 09/12/2008

I thought the right were against the fairness doctrine??? why are the trying to make a big deal about oprah??

Its her show and she can book who she wants when she wants.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:59 PM on 09/07/2008
photo

Tom Brokaw is one of them. A Bush conservative. That explains it all.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:22 AM on 09/08/2008

oprah can do as she pleases, sarah palin can go on martha stewart, let her cook some moose burgers!!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:29 PM on 09/08/2008

I think they're trying to embarrass Oprah into inviting her to give her access to female voters. Funny how Brokaw is more concerned about her going on Oprah and coming on his own show. The press is disgusting.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:20 PM on 09/08/2008

The ruralfication of america---

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:35 PM on 09/07/2008

People, stop your wishful thinking that Palin is a drooling fool. She is a skilled politician and can memorize and deliver talking points handed to her by the Repub operatives with great ease. She can lie with the best of them. You are setting yourself up for a big surprise when she comes out swinging and answer softball questions from friendly MSM with ease and familiarity of the subject. What with advance questions from McCain campaign given to the MSM and are allowed to ask.

Ignore the pitt bull and focus on McCain and the last horrible 8 years.

Also, Obama should cut the BS already and challenge that small town values that Mccain/Pittbull are spouting with statement like this

"I know people from small town; I worked with them and they are good people that DON'T lie blatantly about other people's accomplishment to score points politically. Pittbull lying is not a small town values. Small town values does not include lying. Sara might come from small town but her values does not reflect small town values. " Keep repeating the small town values and lie and tie in sarah and Mcain wiht bush about lying. Just repeat it over and over like Repubs do.

Anybody from Obama's campaign reading this blog, PLEASE fight back and fight hard.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:28 PM on 09/07/2008

The fellow who wrote the article blew it in at least two places:

1. Palin is not a future star. This is her chance. If she can't hide McCain behind her skirts and carry him across the finish line in first place Nov 4, this is it for her. She exists as a temper tantrum waiting to happen, and her judgment is seriously flawed. She has about as much future as a Republican leader as Harold Stassen had after his first run big noise.

2. The human condition is to fear change, otherwise described as to be moderately conservative. The future of the Republican party was never in doubt. The Republican mindset will outlive roaches. IN every nation in every style of government there has always been a party representing Republican fears, and there always will be.

Otherwise the writer above got it right. I'd have given Wallace a bit more of a boost for briefly raising the honesty and integrity quotient at Fox grilling some Republican weirdo about Palin's absence from the chatterbox circuit.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:43 PM on 09/07/2008
photo

I agree with your first point but disagree with your second point. I remember seeing a two year old child back in 1986, put her favorite CD into the computer, start a program, and run it. ///this was before Windows 3.0! People do not start out fearing change; they are socialized into it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:52 PM on 09/07/2008

Two things:

In #1 above the word "necessarily" should have been between "not" and "a future star". If she carries Simp across the finish line in first place, she might be a durable star. Depends on whether her temper can be trained out of her. Simp gets away with it due to his POW protective halo. She ain't a gonna get that bye although she's done a good job of hiding behind her own skirt and her daughter's skirt.

In re your response, SD, you are certainly correct that fear is learned. It is my belief that most people, probably something above 80% of all populations will always learn to fear change due to personal incompetencies and local balance of power issues. That could be wrong, but it is my belief. However, consider it acknowledged that your position, fear is learned, is absolutely correct while my belief is not.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:48 PM on 09/07/2008

Obama wants to create an organization which will compete with the US military. He's trying to tear down the military, why would he join? Let's quit pretending he's mainstream.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:39 PM on 09/07/2008
photo

What's it called? Blackwater? Too late!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:59 PM on 09/07/2008
- Deni I'm a Fan of Deni permalink

Sourcing on this?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:15 PM on 09/07/2008

"my Muslim faith." - Barack Obama today; the mother of all freudian slips.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:37 PM on 09/07/2008

good read, I'll be back. I read somewhere today of a GOP wag describing something as something like "quicker than a lobbyist grabs a free drink" which clearly indicates the GOP wag doesn't understand the dynamics of all this -- the lobbyists BRING the free drinks!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:26 PM on 09/07/2008

Great Article. I agree with the ideas and insights with the exception of one item...
this statement...
"...because the first rule of business is PROTECT THE WEALTH OF THE WEALTHY."
Is not accurate.

In reality the 1st rule of business is currently and in recent past and future,
"Commit crime and fraud in every possible way, bribe those in charge to let you, and scam, steal, & give away as much money for the rich from everyone else as possible and continue to do it until you cannot"

Simply protecting wealth would not be indicative of the legislation and lack of oversight, and obvious backpocket deposits made in order to easily get away with what has occurred in this country and out of it from corporate america in the last few decades. Illegal, immoral constant Mini-empire building of wealth is what has gone on to the point of the rich are investing in themselves to make money and since no company can successfully sell enough product to make the profit they demand, they have to rig the system, rig the accounting, and pay millions to make billions for delivery to the shareholders/ownership.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:22 PM on 09/07/2008
photo

Sen Obama's slip about his Muslim faith was not noted here. While it may have been a slip, it is funny to me that the senator is turning out to have as many slips as George Bush. Will we have another George Bush with regard to his speaking ability? Just funny that they are the same in slips of the tongue and mis speaking.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:13 PM on 09/07/2008

Jason, you definitely need more jokes in this blog, so here's one I made up:

What's the difference between an unvetted, unprepared, unqualified Republican veep candidate and a PIT BULL?

There's no muzzle on the pit bull.


Feel free to use it, but credit is always appreciated. LOL

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:06 PM on 09/07/2008
- NU81 I'm a Fan of NU81 permalink

ATTENTION! ATTENTION! SCHEMING POLITICAL SARAH PALIN MEDIA OP* ....nothing new for McCain.

****** "CNN confirms that Palin will sit down with Charles Gibson of ABC News later this week. According to the McCain campaign, Palin will stay on the campaign trail through this Wednesday and then return home to Alaska where she will speak at a ceremony marking the deployment of her eldest son"s Army unit to Iraq on September 11.

UPDATE, 3:15 p.m.: CNN Correspondent Dana Bash has confirmed additional details about the upcoming interview: According to a McCain aide, the plan is for Gibson to have time with Palin over two days " Thursday [September 11] and Friday of this coming week. The interview will be part sit-down, part walk-and-talk at various locations in Alaska." *******

Political scheming at its best. Only PART sit-down.....she'll no doubt showcase her so on the anniversary of 9/11 [don't dare attack a heartsick mom sending off her son on THAT day! ], and she has home court advantage [Alaska]. THIS ISN'T AN INTERVIEW---IT'S THE SAME OLD McCAIN-PALIN MANIPULATION!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:46 PM on 09/07/2008
photo

That's it. There's just too much hand ringing over what should be out there by the MSM on Palin/jmc. But it's not in their financial interest to put it out there. The story is for ratings. In the mean time, people need to stop responding to the trolls and focus on helping people in those swing states, those independents, everyone to pay attention on the issues and not make the same mistake for the 3rd presidential election in a row. We have the message, truth and the candidates on our side. But they have the MSM and the ignorance and fear card to play. Ignorance and fear is very powerful. As far as the MSM is concerned they need to start to pay with lower ratings for the awful coverage of this election. Most likely this will be the last election for MSM as we know it today.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:44 PM on 09/07/2008
photo

I agree. MSM has nothing to do with journalism. It's about selling advertising time. The exposure of the corruption in the Nixon White House was the result of two newspapermen just doggedly following leads. A little too much work for today's news agencies.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:05 PM on 09/07/2008
photo

If it is a corporation, it is in their short term best interest to support Republicans. It is in their overall best interest to support Democrats. Short term profit taking always leads to financial trouble later. Lower taxes and corporate loopholes encourage short term profit taking, not long term investment.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:41 PM on 09/07/2008

Ignorance is what you need to get Obama elected. The more his past is investigated, along with his radical new proposals, the scarier he gets.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:42 PM on 09/07/2008
- Deni I'm a Fan of Deni permalink

He's been vetted ad nauseum for more than 2 years. What sources of new information do you have that aren't right-wing troll sites???

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:17 PM on 09/07/2008
photo

You really shouldn't throw the word "ignorance" around. It overwhelms irony and plunges straight into tragedy.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:58 PM on 09/07/2008
photo

I know what you mean. I remember seeing signs at the convention that mentioned ameirca, mavrick and cathlick. These weren't typos, they were done in PAINT.

Oh wait, those signs were at the REPUBLICAN convention. Who is ignorant?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:12 PM on 09/07/2008

Bingo!!!

The MSM has to, first, do the job of building the Alaskan pitbull up before tearing her down. The question only speaks to will this happen in enough time to sway the election. Depending on what party you belong to, the good or bad news is the independents (who will have a huge say in this election) are smarter than the average right-wing Jesus freak or the far left lunatic and will be made privy to who Sarah Palin and Barack Obama really are.

The conservatives have an advantage in that they are willing to define Obama in a way that is provocative and, hence, newsworthy. If Obama chooses to only wage this battle on policy only, he will lose. Surely his camp isn't naive enough to believe that voters choose candidates on policy stances alone. They're too dumb to discern how different stances on policy will effect them. But they do understand personality and character.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:53 AM on 09/08/2008
photo

That's it. There's just too much hand ringing over what should be out there by the MSM on Palin/jmc. But it's not in their financial interest to put it out there. The story is sex and old man and it gets ratings. In the mean time, people need to stop responding to the trolls and focus on helping people in those swing states, those independents, everyone to pay attention on the issues and not make the same mistake for the 3rd presidential election in a row. We have the message, truth and the candidates on our side. But they have the MSM and the ignorance and fear card to play. Ignorance and fear is very powerful. As far as the MSM is concerned they need to start to pay with lower ratings for the awful coverage of this election. Most likely this will be the last election for MSM as we know it today.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:43 PM on 09/07/2008
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (13 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in  or  Connect

 
Right Now on HuffPost
ALASKA GOP SENATOR RIPS PALIN: YOU ABANDONED US

Alaska's Republican Sen. Lisa Murkowski issued a...

Sarah Palin Turns Pro

I wish Hunter S. Thompson had lived to see this. As...

Send us tips and comments:

huffpolitics@huffingtonpost.com
GTalk/AIM: NicoPitneyIM


2007-09-27-feed.jpg FEED

HuffPost Reporters
Nico Pitney is National Editor at the Huffington Post.
Read More

Thomas B. Edsall is the Political Editor of the Huffington Post. He is also Joseph Pulitzer II and Edith Pulitzer Moore Professor at the Columbia Graduate School of Journalism.
Read More

Sam Stein is the White House correspondent for the Huffington Post. Previously he worked for Newsweek Magazine, the New York Daily News and the investigative journalism group Center for Public Integrity.
Read More

Ryan Grim is the senior congressional correspondent for the Huffington Post. He is a former staff reporter with Politico.com and Washington City Paper.
Read More

Jason Linkins is editor of Huffington Post's media commentary blog Eat the Press. He is based in Washington, DC, and previously contributed to DCist and Wonkette.
Read More

Rachel Weiner is Associate Politics Editor at the Huffington Post.
Read More

Katharine Zaleski is the Senior News Editor at the Huffington Post. She is based in New York.
Read More