Bush Cancels Russian Nuclear Deal As Consequence Of Russia-Georgia Conflict

JENNIFER LOVEN | September 8, 2008 05:13 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
President Bush speaks on the state of volunteerism in America, Monday, Sept. 8, 2008, during a ceremony on the South Lawn of the White House in Washington. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)

WASHINGTON — In a pointed but mostly symbolic expression of displeasure with Moscow, President Bush on Monday canceled a once-celebrated civilian nuclear cooperation deal with Russia.

Bush had sent the agreement to Congress for approval in May, after a much-heralded signing by the two nations that capped two years of tough negotiations. On Monday, he officially pulled it back, a move announced by Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice.

"We make this decision with regret," said Rice, in a statement read by spokesman Sean McCormack. "Unfortunately, given the current environment, the time is not right for this agreement."

The action combines with a recently announced $1 billion foreign aid package for tiny, West-leaning Georgia and the time Vice President Dick Cheney spent last week railing against Russia in its backyard to form the U.S. administration's punishment of Moscow for its invasion of Georgia. The nuclear deal was highly unlikely to win approval on Capitol Hill this year anyway, but Bush decided to actively withdraw it to make a loud statement.

Moscow, though, might not be much inclined to hear it.

Newly flush with riches from sales of its vast energy resources, Russia appears to feel it no longer has as much need for the potentially billions in revenue the deal would have provided it by allowing Moscow to establish a lucrative business as the center for the import and storage of spent nuclear fuel from American-supplied reactors around the world. The Russian Embassy in Washington said there would be no comment on Bush's action.

The deal's disappearance hampers some important global goals for Bush. It would have given Washington access to state-of-the-art Russian nuclear technology, while helping it address climate change by increasing civilian nuclear energy use worldwide and keeping nuclear material out of terrorists' hands.

"The U.S. non-proliferation goals contained in the agreement remain valid: to provide a sound basis for U.S.-Russian civilian nuclear cooperation, create commercial opportunities and enhance cooperation with Russia on important global non-proliferation issues," said Rice.

But in a sign of the almost Cold War-like state of U.S.-Russia relations right now, Bush determined the extensive and unprecedented cooperation spelled out in the agreement is no longer in the national security interests of the United States.

Neither Rice nor McCormack would discuss whether the Georgia invasion was the impetus for the decision but Bush was blunt. He said in the formal notice to Congress that he was withdrawing the deal "in view of recent actions by the government of the Russian Federation incompatible with peaceful relations with its sovereign and democratic neighbor Georgia."

One advantage of pulling the deal rather than allowing it to die on Capitol Hill as it surely would have is that it now remains effectively on ice. The president _ or his successor _ could determine the deal is once again in U.S. interests and resubmit it for approval. Bush signaled this by saying the administration will resubmit the agreement if circumstances, which he did not specify, "should permit."

Key lawmakers were suspicious of the deal from the start, fearing it could undermine U.S. efforts to rein in Iran's nuclear program, because of Russia's extensive business and energy _ including nuclear _ ties with Tehran.

After the disastrous Georgia-Russia war, the deal's outlook became even more grim, with some lawmakers asking Bush to pull it to show Moscow its actions wouldn't be tolerated. There also isn't enough time left in the fall legislative calendar for the required review period to run out _ the kind of scenario that would result in it taking effect without congressional action.

The Georgia-Russia fighting began Aug. 7 when Georgia's military tried to re-establish control over its breakaway, pro-Russian province of South Ossetia. Russia joined the battle, brutally repelled the Georgian offensive and then pushed deep into Georgia proper, where many of its forces remain nearly a month later.

Further inviting international condemnation, Moscow has recognized South Ossetia and Georgia's other separatist province of Abkhazia as independent states.

Administration officials determined almost immediately that Russia must suffer some consequences for its bloody use of force in a sovereign, Western-allied neighbor, but wanted to take punitive measures in concert with Europe. They have been frustrated, though, at the lack of similar resolve among allies, who have offered criticism of Russia but little else.

There may be more actions to come from Washington.

The $1 billion economic recovery package for Georgia puts the impoverished Black Sea nation in the top tier of U.S foreign aid recipients. Though it does not include any military aid, U.S. officials have indicated some will probably be added in the future.

The U.S. had been helping the Georgian military modernize and it is likely the U.S. will help the Georgian forces rebuild again after their near-total rout by Russia. That effort could be given more punch _ and will likely be greeted angrily in Moscow _ if Washington agrees to start selling sophisticated anti-aircraft and anti-tank military hardware to Georgia.

Moscow has already accused the U.S. of instigating or even helping Georgia make its ill-fated incursion into South Ossetia.

___

Associated Press Writer Desmond Butler contributed to this story.

WASHINGTON — In a pointed but mostly symbolic expression of displeasure with Moscow, President Bush on Monday canceled a once-celebrated civilian nuclear cooperation deal with Russia. Bush had ...
WASHINGTON — In a pointed but mostly symbolic expression of displeasure with Moscow, President Bush on Monday canceled a once-celebrated civilian nuclear cooperation deal with Russia. Bush had ...
Filed by Dan Duray  |  Report Corrections
 
 
  • Comments
  • 99
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
11:49 PM on 09/08/2008
I don't think that Bush really wanted to have a Nuclear arms reduction, he wanted Russia to reduce, offering Aid for War heads. The initial agreement or proposal was for both US and Russia to reduce the Nuclear Weapons I believe as a part of a UN res... If my memory serve me right , Bush was resistant to it, suggesting that the US would stock pile the weapons instead of destroying them... Don't forget he wants to develop new war heads to replace the existing ones " were old". .. Now he has an excuse...
08:05 PM on 09/08/2008
Russia will be conducting Naval excercises with Venezuela in November.
Could a base down there be far behind ?
Also, what about the old Soviet Sub Base at Cienfuegos, Cuba abandoned in the early 90's; could that also be far behind ?
The Chess Game has begun; they're playing white, we're playing black this time.
Should be interesting.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:36 PM on 09/08/2008
Bush realized the nuclear (no, not nucular) agreement was unnecessary since neither side will believe the other is restricting weapons production or dismantling nuclear weapons. As for the stockpiling of spent nuclear fuel, who needs to dispose of it when we can just package it onto more depleted uranium shells to be hurled at our enemies. The press has stopped following up on the links between depleted uranium and Gulf War Syndrome so it's all good.
07:32 PM on 09/08/2008
Bookies at Ladbrookes now taking odds on there will be NO election due to WWIII.
photo
piul05
Can I have a biscuit yet?
08:43 PM on 09/08/2008
And are they better or worse than the odds on the end of the world being caused by the Hadron Collider?
12:16 AM on 09/09/2008
Very Good!

We are so totally screwed.
07:22 PM on 09/08/2008
America is once again the war mongering trash and the world is really taking notice now.

You folks are pathetic little basturds.
06:29 PM on 09/08/2008
Hey Jennifer,

You should have opened with 'Moscow has already accused the U.S. of instigating or even helping Georgia make its ill-fated incursion into South Ossetia'

Wag the dog.
06:16 PM on 09/08/2008
Since Putin obviously wants that pushover Obama as the next POTUS, it is your civil duty to vote for McCain. Either that or get ready to add borscht to your daily diet.
06:43 PM on 09/08/2008
go back to the beach, dude.

Bush and McCain prodded Georgia into attacking Ossetia so they can help McCain win, or else start world war three and the rapture, to prevent the election.
07:19 PM on 09/08/2008
How is this for a scenario...

In October the USA launches attack on Iran and starts WWIII. Palin drops out of race.........Mc Cain is taken ill, Bush and Cheney enact martial law and suspend election indefinetly.
09:38 PM on 09/08/2008
Get real! Who in their right mind wants to engage in another dangerous and costly cold war that we can ill-afford? The critical issue of this election is not about a Russian invasion of Georgia (and it appears the Georgian military provoked the attack), or Iraq war tactics (the "surge"), or whether you were a POW in previous ill-advised, disastrous war, it's about which candidate demonstrates the most tempered and reasoned judgment to create sound foreign policy decisions. Any idiot can start an unprovoked war of occupation (Bush, Cheney & McCain). The old adage: "Fools rush in where wise men fear to tread" certainly applies here! Obama has displayed reasoned judgment and the courage to speak out against the Iraq debacle before the cowboys rushed in with guns blazing! And, let's not forget the thousands of American and Iraqi casualties and the $10-$12 billion/mo of our precious tax money being squandered. What do you think the McCain/Palin team would do about Iran, or Russia? What do you suppose would happen to pump prices if we "bomb, bomb, bomb" Iran?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
bascombe
Send the kids off to die, bleed their country dry.
05:59 PM on 09/08/2008
this was the plan all along: to develop another major conflict to support mcWarmonger and his foreign affairs lobbyist, er, advisor scheuerman, who happens to be a lobbyist for Georgia.

putin was right.

I wonder.....
After the anger-prone mcKeatingFive passes suddenly from that family-inherited myocardial infarction, will palin be able to face putin by drawing on her vast foreign policy experience obtained during her 19 months of staring across the bering straight?
05:33 PM on 09/08/2008
Common George get us into a Nuclear war! If anyone's stupid enough to do it, its you!!
05:46 PM on 09/08/2008
Agreed ! If we make it thru to January without him or Cheney pushing that little red button , it'll be a wonder. He's been itchin' for a fight with them for some time now --- and nobody in Washington seems to care (de je vu).
07:32 PM on 09/08/2008
How is this for a scenario...

In October the USA launches attack on Iran and starts WWIII. Palin drops out of race.........Mc Cain is taken ill, Bush and Cheney enact martial law and suspend election indefinetly.
05:31 PM on 09/08/2008
One thing the republicans are good at.......it's spinning the heads of the dim wits. Sadly...there are many dim wits in our country.......and the repubs know this.


First Cindy goes over there to put the spotlight on it all....then during the RNC Cheney tipped toed over to Georgia, Ukraine.....now this.
This will be the October surprise....this will scare them into voting for McCain.

Geez do these idiots not realize that McCain will reinstate a Military draft? what do they use for brains? Gee they will vote for someone because they can skin a moose.......ohhhhhh my sons thank you idiots.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
StaggerLee
Oceania Has Always Been at War With Eurasia
05:29 PM on 09/08/2008
"It would have given Washington access to state-of-the-art Russian nuclear technology"
Really? "State of the art" and "Russian nuclear technology" two things I never could have imagined being in the same sentence.
What have we been doing?
05:56 PM on 09/08/2008
Barhroom stall visits, prayer circles, converting gays, and illegally invading countries.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
HC4BO
Far-Left Socialist
05:24 PM on 09/08/2008
Well , color me astonished ...

BUT the people who are raising the hype value of a Palin press interview may be setting up the Republicans for a HUGE gain in voter confidence considering the fact that she is NOT that bad at interviews ...

http://marcambinder.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/09/palin_on_cspan.php

Granted she may NOT be good at Foreign Policy but when it comes to Energy and Domestic Issues she seems to know something ...

Personally I have this feeling the whole MSM in America are setting us up for another GOP victory this fall and that is royally pissing me off ...
05:29 PM on 09/08/2008
Yeh, the media (and even you), are missing more important stories with consequences unknown. Like what do you think about Bush supporting Georgia. Forget Palin - NOT INTERESTED- DIVERSION.

Stop Bush !!!
Viper
Former repub, still repenting
05:43 PM on 09/08/2008
She knows energy.. A degree In journalism... her husband works in the Oil field or because Alaska has oil... Well heck I live in Texas and therefore I must be an oil expert... I have an oil rig on my property! So there! I know Oil and own OIL!

So she thinks oil was made in 6,000 years or less! Lots of laughter... and that dinosuars and man coexisted... And that the solution to our healthcare is the laying on of hands...

Oh she believes in demons and witchcraft... maybe thats where oil comes from..

Eh gads... the only thing she knows about oil is that they put in their snowmobils!


Do you think that any other state has a solely oil based economy that is doing well because the price of oil went up 278% due to do Repug Deregulation and the rest of the states are paying for that. Do you think that knowledge applies to the rest of the country which is getting killed because of of that high price she is living off of.

Regards

Regards

Regards
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
HC4BO
Far-Left Socialist
05:24 PM on 09/08/2008
Well , color me astonished ...

BUT the people who are raising the hype value of a Palin press interview may be setting up the Republicans for a HUGE gain in voter confidence considering the fact that she is NOT that bad at interviews ...

http://marcambinder.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/09/palin_on_cspan.php

Granted she may NOT be good at Foreign Policy but when it comes to Energy and Domestic Issues she seems to know something ...

Personally I have this feeling the whole MSM in America are setting up for another GOP victory this fall and that is royally pissing me off ...
05:30 PM on 09/08/2008
Diversion.
05:19 PM on 09/08/2008
We can fight Cold War II and the War on Terror.

Two ideological wars we can NEVER win.

So I won't be getting my social security when the time comes, is what you are saying.
photo
Whinger
I'm Just Me!
05:15 PM on 09/08/2008
George is clearing the road for McCain, this people, will herald the start of a new arms race!

Russia will pick up the gauntlet without hesitation!