Teen Driving Age Should Be Raised, Says Auto Safety Group

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

MARTHA IRVINE | September 9, 2008 06:37 AM EST | AP

Compare other versions »

REMOVES GUIDE LAYER; map shows legal driving age in the U.S. by state;

CHICAGO — Taking aim at a longstanding rite of passage for 16-year-olds, an influential auto safety group is calling on states to raise the age for getting a driver's license to 17 or even 18.

Adrian Lund, president of the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, a research group funded by the auto insurance industry, acknowledged the idea is "a tough sell," but noted that car crashes are the leading cause of death among teenagers.

"The bottom line is that when we look at the research, raising the driving age saves lives," Lund said. He plans to present the proposal Tuesday at the annual conference of the Governors Highway Safety Association in Scottsdale, Ariz.

Not surprisingly, a lot of teens hate the idea.

"I would really be upset because I've waited SO long to drive," said Diamante White, a 16-year-old in Reading, Pa., who got her permit in July. She said learning to drive is a "growing-up experience."

Many parents agree. They also like not having to chauffeur their teens to school, sporting events and any number of other places.

"Do we really want our kids dependent upon parents for virtually everything until they go to college, can vote and serve their country?" asked Margaret Menotti, a mother in Uxbridge, Mass.

She argued that keeping teens from driving would only make them less responsible. Some parents also find it ironic that this conversation is happening just as a group of college presidents have proposed lowering the drinking age to 18.

Story continues below
advertisement

Among other things, institute researchers have compiled decades worth of data from New Jersey, the only state that issues licenses at 17. Various studies have shown that the overall rate of teens killed in crashes in New Jersey has been consistently lower than in some nearby states.

One study from the 1990s found that the rate of crash-related deaths among 16- and 17-year olds were 18 per 100,000 in New Jersey, compared with 26 per 100,000 in Connecticut. Those rates, researchers said, have dropped even further since both states instituted graduated driver's license programs.

Graduated licensing, which has become the standard across the country in the past 15 years, requires teens to spend more time driving with a parent or other responsible adult before they go solo. Though these rules are sometimes difficult to enforce, many states tie these more stringent standards to declining teen crash rates.

More than 5,000 U.S. teens die each year in car crashes. The rate of crashes, fatal and nonfatal, per mile driven for 16-year-old drivers is almost 10 times the rate for drivers ages 30 to 59, according to the National Highway Safety Administration. Many industrialized countries in Europe and elsewhere have a driving age of 17 or 18.

Barbara Harsha, executive director of the Governors Highway Safety Association, said she welcomes a debate on raising the driving age _ as do many who deal with public health.

"Getting the highest of the high-risk drivers away from the wheel probably isn't a bad idea," said Dr. Barbara Gaines, trauma director at Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPMC.

But she and others _ even the Insurance Institute officials who propose raising the driving age _ agreed it is not the only option.

Gaines noted that teen drivers in the Pittsburgh area who have committed moving violations must attend a "reality education" program at her hospital. They tour the intensive care unit and talk with young drivers who have been in serious crashes.

Andrea Summers, coordinator of the teen driving program for the Delaware Office of Highway Safety, said her state and others have chosen to toughen laws without raising the driving age _ by banning teens from using cell phones while driving, imposing stricter driving curfews and expanding supervised driving time. Even New Jersey is considering lengthening the time a young driver has a permit, from six months to 12.

Still others say we are worrying too much about teen drivers, and not enough about others who cause serious problems on the road.

Karen Sternheimer, a University of Southern California sociologist who studies accident statistics, cited federal data from 2007 showing that drivers ages 25 to 34, as well as those ages 45 to 64, were nearly twice as likely to be involved in alcohol-related fatalities as 16- to 20-year-old drivers.

"The intense focus on teens diverts our attention from the real threats to public safety: speeding and driving while intoxicated," she said.

___

On the Net:

IIHS: http://www.iihs.org

Driving skills for teens: http://www.drivingskillsforlife.com

___

Martha Irvine is an AP national writer. She can be reached at mirvine(at)ap.org or via http://myspace.com/irvineap

CHICAGO — Taking aim at a longstanding rite of passage for 16-year-olds, an influential auto safety group is calling on states to raise the age for getting a driver's license to 17 or even 18. ...
CHICAGO — Taking aim at a longstanding rite of passage for 16-year-olds, an influential auto safety group is calling on states to raise the age for getting a driver's license to 17 or even 18. ...
 
Comments
21
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
photo

None of us will be able to afford cars anyway, the way things are going....

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:19 PM on 09/11/2008
- DFL I'm a Fan of DFL permalink
photo

IT'S FUNNY TO SEE THE YOUNG AIRHEADS WITH THE BOOM CARS, THEY ARE TRYING TO CALL ATTENTION TO THEMSELVES AND AT THE SAME TIME THEY ARE ADVERTISING HOW DUMB THEY ARE.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:38 PM on 09/11/2008
photo

All of these so-called studies fail to separate inexperience from age. Would an inexperienced driver at age 18 be any better than an inexperienced driver at 16? The so-called studies that conclude age is the only factor do not answer this question. They should before further restricting young Americans' rights.

The first person who writes "driving is a privilege not a right" will be exiled to Orem, Utah for remainder of his or her life.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:00 PM on 09/10/2008

Saving a few lives isn't worth the inconvenience - I mean that seriously. And what about teen workers?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:59 AM on 09/10/2008

I think 16 is an appropriate age for teens to start to learn how to drive and this is coming from a 25 year old who just got her learner's permit. Raising the age to 18 means that teens are learning to drive and leaving for college at the same time. That's just stupid for a lot of reasons.

Additionally, I've always maintained that the gap between the driving age and the drinking age is essential. Kids are getting it drilled in from before they can legally drink that drinking and driving is bad. And the idiots that are stupid enough to do it anyway, well at least they have five years of driving experience under their belt.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:44 AM on 09/10/2008
photo

ok, all of you who are for raising the driving age ..... how old were you when you got your license????

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:10 PM on 09/09/2008
photo

College Presidents want to lower the drinking age to 18 ????

What a hoot !!

The kids pay college tutition and then get drunk flunk out after atteneing very few classes because they are drunk.

Schools make a killing and the colleges can sell beer at the sporting events to even more kids.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:21 PM on 09/09/2008

While you're at, it raise it to 30, for males. This will reduce deadly accidents by a lot....
:-)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:11 PM on 09/09/2008

well females talk on the phone and put there makeup on when driving so make it illegal

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:03 PM on 09/16/2008
photo

and while they're at it, make it illegal to drive while talking on the cell phone.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:01 PM on 09/09/2008

It is in many states. The feds have been talking about making it a federal law for years now.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:47 PM on 09/10/2008

No matter how much the driving age is raised, the statistic will simply shift up to the next corresponding age level. It's not just about being a teenager, but learning to drive in general.

I also agree with a previous poster to ban cell phone use while driving until 18. That would make a difference. I'm scared to drive around most adults using a cell while driving.

Parents, take control and make sure your kids get properly trained to drive. Society and laws can only protect your children so much.

If we overprotect children from everything it will only make it harder for them when they become an adult.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:45 PM on 09/09/2008
photo

I grew up in New Jersey and 17 was fine, any younger is crazy and I would agree to 18 for sure...

At 17 your brain isn't even fully developed yet, driving is a very real threat to life and limb and the lives of others..

18 is adult and that's when you should be allowed to drive on the open road not sooner...around the farm or ranch that's different, but the open road make it 18 and save lives..!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:10 PM on 09/09/2008

What do you see as wrong with this statement?

"One study from the 1990s found that the rate of crash-related deaths among 16- and 17-year olds were 18 per 100,000 in New Jersey, compared with 26 per 100,000 in Connecticut. Those rates, researchers said, have dropped even further since both states instituted graduated driver's license programs."

The driving age in Connecticut is 16. The driving age in New Jersery is 17. Assuming the law is followed, the crash-related deaths in New Jersey had BETTER fall because 16 year old ARE NOT LEGALLY ALLOWED to drive unsupervised in New Jersey! Heck, I can drop the number of crash-related deaths among teens to zero by PROHIBITING them from being in a car!

In truth, these figures prove NOTHING. I want to know what the deaths are for 16 year olds in Connecticut and 17 year olds in New Jersey (individuals with a maximum of 1 year of driving experience). IF AND ONLY IF that figure is lower in New Jersey can I buy the argument that it makes sense to delay licensing. Otherwise, all you might end up with is DELAYING death by 1 year because it very well might be the LACK OF EXPERIENCE as opposed to the age of the driver that is driving these statistics. In other words, raise the minimum driving age to 25 (for example) and you might be horrified at the increase in deaths in the 25-26 year old range....

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:00 PM on 09/09/2008
photo

Forget the driving, concentrate on raising the intelligence level!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:32 PM on 09/09/2008

Finally. This would solve numerous problems. Fewer cars on the road. Lower gas usage. Less traffic at the morning and afternoon drive times. Lower teen death rate. Lower insurance rates. Less land needed for High School parking lots and all the hassles they create. And a virtual elimination of the school pecking order based on whose daddy can buy them the hottest car.

And on a sociological note--teens without the ability to travel the great distances that cars allow, would be forced to spend more time not just at home, but in their own neighborhoods which would be a positive benefit. You'd also eliminate the numbers of 16 year olds cruising at 2am or being involved in drive bys. Yeah, I know they can still get rides with older people, but it's a step in the right direction.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:03 PM on 09/09/2008
photo

Society is getting ridiculous.

Parents ... let go.

Maybe it's time to raise the age for military service to 25?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:26 AM on 09/09/2008

1rew, I know you're joking, but---I think it's a great Idea. A 25 year old mind is a lot less impressionable and more able to reason than an 18 year old one, which is exactly why the military likes to get 'em young!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:11 PM on 09/09/2008
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in  or  Connect