Large Hadron Collider, The Big Bang Machine That Can Destroy The Earth, Passes First Tests

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

ALEXANDER G. HIGGINS | September 10, 2008 11:15 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »

A European Center for Nuclear Research (CERN) scientist controls a computer screen showing traces on Atlas experiment of the first protons injected in the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) during its switch on operation at the Cern's press center on Wednesday, Sept. 10, 2008 near Geneva, Switzerland. Scientists fired a first beam of protons around a 27-kilometer (17 mile) tunnel housing the Large Hadron Collider (LHC). They hope to recreate conditions just after the so-called Big Bang. The international group of scientists plan to smash particles together to create, on a small-scale, re-enactments of the Big Bang. (AP Photo/Fabrice Coffrini, Pool)

GENEVA — A small blip on a computer screen sent champagne corks popping among physicists in Switzerland. Near Chicago, researchers at a "pajama party" who watched via satellite let out an early morning cheer.

The blip was literally of cosmic proportions, representing a new tool to probe the birth of the universe.

The world's largest atom smasher passed its first test Wednesday as scientists said their powerful tool is almost ready to reveal how the tiniest particles were first created after the "big bang," which many theorize was the massive explosion that formed the stars, planets and everything.

Rivals and friends turned out in the wee hours at Fermilab in Batavia, Ill., in pajamas to watch the event by a special satellite connection. Joining in from around the world were other physicists _ many of whom may one day work on the new Large Hadron Collider.

Tension mounted in the five control rooms at CERN, the European Organization for Nuclear Research, as scientists huddled around computer screens. After a few trial runs, they fired a beam of protons clockwise around the 17-mile tunnel of the collider deep under the rolling fields along the Swiss-French border. Then they succeeded in sending another beam in the opposite, counterclockwise direction.

The physicists celebrated with champagne when the white dots flashed on the blue screens of the control room, showing a successful crossing of the finish line on the $10 billion machine under planning since 1984.

"The first technical challenge has been met," said a jubilant Robert Aymar, director-general of CERN. "What you have just seen is the result of 20 years of effort. It all went like clockwork. Now it's for the physicists to show us what they can do.

"They are ready to go for discoveries," Aymar said. "Man has always shown he wants to know where he comes from and where he will go, where the universe comes from and where it will go. So here we're looking at essential questions for mankind."

Story continues below
advertisement

The beams will gradually be filled with more protons and fired at near the speed of light in opposite directions around the tunnel, making 11,000 circuits a second. They will travel down the middle of two tubes about the width of fire hoses, speeding through a vacuum that is colder than outer space. At four points in the tunnel, the scientist will use giant magnets to cross the beams and cause protons to collide. The collider's two largest detectors _ essentially huge digital cameras weighing thousands of tons _ are capable of taking millions of snapshots a second.

It is likely to be several weeks before the first significant collisions.

The CERN experiments could reveal more about "dark matter," antimatter and possibly hidden dimensions of space and time. It could also find evidence of a hypothetical particle _ the Higgs boson _ which is sometimes called the "God particle" because it is believed to give mass to all other particles, and thus to matter that makes up the universe.

Smaller colliders have been used for decades to study the makeup of the atom. Scientists once thought protons and neutrons were the smallest components of an atom's nucleus, but experiments have shown that protons and neutrons are made of quarks and gluons and that there are other forces and particles.

The LHC provides much greater power than earlier colliders.

Its start came over the objections of some who feared the collision of protons could eventually imperil the Earth by creating micro black holes _ subatomic versions of collapsed stars whose gravity is so strong they can suck in planets and other stars.

"It's nonsense," said James Gillies, chief spokesman for CERN, which also received support for the project by leading scientists such as Britain's Stephen Hawking.

Gillies said the only risk would be if a beam at full power were to go out of control, and that would only damage the accelerator itself and burrow into the rock around the tunnel. No one would be endangered because the tunnel is evacuated when beams are being fired.

No such problem occurred Wednesday, although the accelerator is still probably a year away from full power.

The project organized by the 20 European member nations of CERN has attracted researchers from 80 nations. Some 1,200 are from the United States, an observer country that contributed $531 million. Japan, Canada, Russia and India _ also observers _ are other major contributors.

Some scientists have been waiting for 20 years to use the LHC.

The complexity of manufacturing it required groundbreaking advances in the use of supercooled, superconducting equipment. The 2001 start and 2005 completion dates were pushed back by two years each, and the cost of the construction was 25 percent higher than originally budgeted in 1996, said Luciano Maiani, who was CERN director-general at the time.

Maiani and the other three former directors-general attended Wednesday's experiment.

___

On the Net:

CERN: http://www.cern.ch

The U.S. at the LHC: http://www.uslhc.us/

GENEVA — A small blip on a computer screen sent champagne corks popping among physicists in Switzerland. Near Chicago, researchers at a "pajama party" who watched via satellite let out an early ...
GENEVA — A small blip on a computer screen sent champagne corks popping among physicists in Switzerland. Near Chicago, researchers at a "pajama party" who watched via satellite let out an early ...
 
Comments
5
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:

CERN says that Protons collide at near light velocities all the time, so nothing to worry about.

But protons are positively charged and repel one another, hence the need for the massive LHC to cause it to happen. The original atom bomb research failed because they tried to collide protons, they only succeeded when they switched to neutrons.

If they could observer these collisions in nature, they would not need the LHC. So how do you know it happens if you cannot observe it?

Some answers are in order. For great minds, their reasoning fails a simple logic check.
Something is not right here.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:45 PM on 09/14/2008

The machine that can destroy Earth? Now I am really scared. I am really scared that the headline writer completely lost it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:48 PM on 09/10/2008
photo

"The 'God Particle' or Higgs boson was invented by Peter Higgs to explain why other particles exhibit mass. He starts with assuming the existence of a particle that has only mass and no other characteristics, such as charge. So the Higgs particle is like no other in our experience, since all normal matter is composed of electric charges that respond to electromagnetic influences. (Dark matter falls into the same category.) However, we observe that the mass of a charged subatomic particle is altered by the application of electromagnetic forces. At its simplest (and Nature is economical in our experience) it indicates that mass is related to the storage of energy within a system of electric charges inside the particle. That"s what E = mc^2 is telling us. So how can a massive particle be constructed without electric charge? It shows the problem inherent in leaving physics to mathematicians " there is a disconnect between mathematical concepts and reality."

A "disconnect between mathematical concepts and reality," indeed! They are chasing ghosts. Or worse, fairies!

More: http://www.holoscience.com/news.php?article=gzhqr188

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:11 PM on 09/10/2008

People can't invent particles. Only nature can. People can, at best, discover the particles nature has invented.

Dr. Higgs simply discovered a mathematical model that can, in an extremely crude and ugly way, explain particle masses within a theory which is otherwise limited to describing massless particles and thus would be an awful failure that couldn't be used at all to describe nature even approximately (which is probably the kindest of characterizations one can find for the standard model).

To make a connection between the Higgs mechanism and God is pretty much the worst scientific insult to God that one can imagine. Which is probably the main reason why it is so popular a nonsense.

Your characterization of matter as being composed of electric charge misses the mark by about a parsec. It fails to mention any of the other charge properties of matter/the vacuum, of which the electromagnetic charge is only one of many.

"It shows the problem inherent in leaving physics to mathematicians"

As if anybody had ever done that... physics is all about observation and it was never about deriving structure from a set of axioms, ever. The Higgs mechanism, on the other hand, just as quantum field theory as a whole, is not mathematics. If you ever talk to a mathematician about any of this being math, be prepared to catch an ugly look that says "Why are all these idiots talking to me?".

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:11 PM on 09/10/2008
photo

Did you even browse the link I provided?

I *know* that people cannot invent ACTUAL particles--duh. Higgs DID invent the "God Particle" in that he (and others) have dubbed his hypothetical mass-only particle thus.

You write, "Dr. Higgs simply discovered a mathematical model..." Then later you write, "The Higgs mechanism...is not mathematics."

Which is it? Is all this Higgs boson business math, or isn't it? This is precisely my (and the linked page's author's) point: "Dr. Higgs simply discovered a MATHEMATICAL MODEL..." and here we are spending upwards of $6B to chase something that may only exist in a math equation--that may not even describe actual reality!

Technically, you are right. Physics SHOULD BE all about observation, and it WAS never about "deriving structure from a set of axioms," but it has increasingly become more and more about that and about *fixing* the theory to fit observations. Easy to do when your theory only LIVES as a math equation. Much of physics HAS largely been taken over by scientific technicians whose language is the math of gravity. How else do we get outrageous ideas like "black holes" and "God Particles?" The gravity-only math equations said that that's what SHOULD be there. But, what if gravity does NOT rule the Universe? What else could it be lurking in the centers of galaxies? What else could be holding matter together? (What IS matter?) What else could be the Universe's ultimate driving force?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:18 PM on 09/11/2008
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in  or  Connect