Government bails out AIG with $85 billion loan

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Government bails out AIG with $85 billion loan stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

JEANNINE AVERSA, IEVA M. AUGSTUMS and STEPHEN BERNARD | September 16, 2008 11:29 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Businessmen leave an American International Group office building, Tuesday, Sept. 16, 2008 in New York. Worries about AIG's well-being intensified Monday and early Tuesday after several ratings agencies downgraded the company. Lower ratings can add to the amount of money the already cash-strapped company has to set aside. (AP Photo/Mark Lennihan)

WASHINGTON — For the second time this month, the U.S. government put taxpayer money on the hook to rescue a private financial company, saying the failure of the huge insurer American International Group Inc. would further disrupt markets and threaten the already fragile economy.

The Federal Reserve said Tuesday it would provide up to $85 billion in an emergency, two-year loan to rescue AIG, which teetered on the edge of failure because of stresses caused by the collapse of the subprime mortgage market and the credit crunch that ensued. In return, the government will get a 79.9 percent stake in AIG and the right to remove senior management.

The move was similar to government's seizure on Sept. 7 of mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, where the Treasury Department said it was prepared to put up as much as $100 billion over time in each of the companies if needed to keep them from going broke.

Both moves were bound to raise questions about the use of taxpayer money to bail out private firms.

The Fed said it determined that a disorderly failure of AIG could hurt the already delicate financial markets and the economy. Although little known off Wall Street, AIG does business with almost every financial institution in the world and insures $88 billion worth of assets including mortgages and corporate loans.

Its failure could also "lead to substantially higher borrowing costs, reduced household wealth and materially weaker economic performance," the Fed said in a statement.

The decision to help AIG reversed the government's stance over the weekend, when it refused to use taxpayer money to bail out Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. Lehman, which filed for bankruptcy protection Monday, collapsed under the weight of mounting losses related to its real estate holdings.

The White House said it backed the Fed's decision Tuesday.

Story continues below
advertisement

"These steps are taken in the interest of promoting stability in financial markets and limiting damage to the broader economy," White House spokesman Tony Fratto said.

After meeting with Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson and Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke in a late-night briefing on Capitol Hill, Congressional leaders said they understood the need for the bailout.

"The administration is approaching an unprecedented step, but unfortunately we are living in unprecedented times." said Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y. "Hearing of these plans, you have to stop to catch your breath. But upon reflection, the alternatives are much worse."

New York officials said the deal helps stave off a fiscal crisis for the state.

"Policy holders will be protected, jobs will be saved," New York Gov. David Paterson said Tuesday night.

The Fed's move was part of a concerted push to help calm jittery markets and investors around the world.

On Tuesday, the Fed decided to keep its key interest rate steady at 2 percent, but acknowledged stresses in financial markets have grown and hinted it stood ready to lower rates if needed.

The central bank also pumped $70 billion into the nation's financial system to help ease credit stresses. In emergency sessions over the weekend, the Fed expanded its loan programs to Wall Street firms, part of an ongoing effort to get credit flowing more freely.

The stock market, which Monday had its worst session since the Sept. 11 attacks, recovered Tuesday after the Fed's decision on interest rates. The Dow Jones industrials rose 141 points after losing 500 points on Monday.

AIG's shares swung violently, though, as rumors of potential deals involving the government or private parties emerged and were dashed. By late Tuesday, its shares had closed down 20 percent _ and another 45 percent after hours.

The problems at AIG stemmed from its insurance of mortgage-backed securities and other risky debt against default. If AIG couldn't make good on its promise to pay back soured debt, investors feared the consequences would pose a greater threat to the U.S. financial system than this week's collapse of the investment bank Lehman Brothers.

The worries were heightened Monday after Moody's Investor Service and Standard and Poor's lowered AIG's credit ratings, forcing AIG to seek more money for collateral against its insurance contracts. Without that money, AIG would have defaulted on its obligations and the buyers of its insurance _ such as banks and other financial companies _ would have found themselves without protection against losses on the debt they hold.

"It might not just bring down other financial institutions in the U.S. It could bring down overseas financial institutions," said Timothy Canova, a professor of international economic law at Chapman University School of Law. "If Lehman Brother's failure could help trigger AIG's going down, who knows who AIG's failure could trigger next."

New York-based AIG operates an insurance and financial services businesses ranging from property, casualty, auto and life insurance to annuity and investment services. Those traditional insurance operations are considered healthy and the National Association of Insurance Commissioners said "they are solvent and have the capability to pay claims."

WASHINGTON — For the second time this month, the U.S. government put taxpayer money on the hook to rescue a private financial company, saying the failure of the huge insurer American Internation...
WASHINGTON — For the second time this month, the U.S. government put taxpayer money on the hook to rescue a private financial company, saying the failure of the huge insurer American Internation...
Filed by Nick Graham  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
323
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next › Last » (12 pages total)

let them all fall and let's see if the king's men can put them back together again!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:47 PM on 09/17/2008
- loki I'm a Fan of loki 128 fans permalink
photo

Since the inception of Reaganomics and his Trainwreck policy to rid America of its social programs for the less fortunante runs rampit in the US, ( people wont willingly give up social programs, so to do so, reagan decided we needed to run the economy into a "trainwreck" to force the programs out" this has been coming for a long time thanks to the republican, and many democrats, policies and actions to follow the mantra of "free market capitalism" no rules for the market, and Reaganomics. These bail outs help maybe a million people, and cause 300+ million to suffer for the stupidity of these few. And all of this is being done by people who are highly educated by our ivy greed institutions like Harvard, and consider themselves experts and above criticisms or oversight by the government. Capitalism will not work when its an unregulated free for all. When there are no rules, everyone loses except those who cheat the greatest. And that is what we have here.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:37 PM on 09/17/2008
- iambusto I'm a Fan of iambusto 5 fans permalink

AIG is coming to the market soon to liquidate a lot of divisions in a yard sale. Just have some patience taxpayers. Remmeber, Govt. actually made money on the chrysler bailout. do your research.

Here is what could happen (my prediction).
1) AIG has to start liquidating divisions to raise cash to shore up capital pretty FAST.

2) Remember AIG has to pay 11.5% interest to FED over 2 years on that 85 billion loan. there is no way they can do that without liquidating businesses. there will be buyers all the world around waiting to snap up the empire AIG built over the years. Even Warren buffett is said to be interested in buying some (not all) of AIG businesses.

3) My prediction, FED will make money over this transaction.

My ONLY complaint (make that 2)
1) FED is charging too little interest. should be something like 15-18% interest on that loan.
2) FED should have acquired 100% stake for that loan, diluting the existing shareholders completely (instead of majorly).

Eat that you AIG shareholders :) too many stupid people bet on financials over last one year when it was clear, financials were in trouble.

they bet in the wrong directions. If you shorted top 5 banks, you would have made PLENTY of money by now. :)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:32 PM on 09/17/2008
- OldKnute I'm a Fan of OldKnute 101 fans permalink

Imbusto,,, you are 100% RIGHT.

BUT this need be done with utmost care,,, NO FIRE SALES,,,, and AIG need come totally CLEAN on all exposures.

Please,, as far as Investors,, let’s keep in mind that it was investors that were screaming for AIG to get into the Housing Bubble. They were threatening to divest if AIG didn’t.

Financials have been in trouble for 6 years. The BUSH,,,, Popcorn Economy,,,, to boost Numbers. Cooking the BOOKS, while true Productivity and Manufacturing fell through the floorboards.

Remember when Bush wanted to count working at McDonalds as a Manufacturing JOB????

No DUH.

All the best

Knute Neo-LIB

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:48 PM on 09/17/2008
- nanotubz I'm a Fan of nanotubz 7 fans permalink

Problem is there is very little liquidity out side the FED at this moment. So where are the fair market value dollars going to come from?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:59 PM on 09/17/2008
- iambusto I'm a Fan of iambusto 5 fans permalink

when AIG starts auctioning off its good businesses, we get paid first :). taxpayers will be actually making out better in this case (as opposed to bear stearns and frannie)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:22 PM on 09/17/2008

As a NEO-Liberal I suggest that we the people demand a that $3 Trillion dollars be spent properly:

TEN POINT PLAN:

One - put $1.5 Trillion in our Social Security fund so most people can retire at 50 not die waiting for it.
Two - put $500 Billion into Nat. Institute of Health Medical / Pharma research and cure some diseases.
Three - put $40 Billion in a college education fund guarantee all college bound education.
Four - put $500 Billion in National Health Care fund - provide universal health care.
Five- Make all care insurance national (Gov't run).
Six - Demand pension reform.
Seven - Develop a robust Dept. of Justice & prosecute these politician criminals.
Eight - Spend $1 Trillion on U.S. infrastructure - create jobs.
Nine - Cancel all foreign treaties that ship our jobs overseas. Also tarriff all imported goods.
Ten - Tax the HELL out of the wealthy in this country. Demand that the wealthy & corporations pay taxes. 2/3rds of the Corporations in this country don't pay ANY taxes. Take it all off the top!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:29 PM on 09/17/2008
- OldKnute I'm a Fan of OldKnute 101 fans permalink

I’ll take you on. NO PROBLEMO!


1. BULL. 90% America Retireees don’t even know how to play GOLF, They would be BORED out of their Mindss. Most would start part-time Businesses anyway. Just don’t punish them when they DO!

2. Naaaa. Just remove Tax Burdents and Idological Prohibitions that stifel Pharmasuticals..
.
3. Yep,,,Only 50 Billion though, in OUR Children.

4. Nope,, Just work closly with Traditional Insurances and Private enterprise to solve Health Care. With Limited Oversight, but controls with TEETH.

5. NOPE,, too BIG!!!.We need didtrabution of RISK.

6, No,, We just need to get Pensions Funds to have the ability to seek OPEN Investments on their OWN. Not just be turned over to Money Managers.

7. YES, an Independent Judiciary with BALLS!

8. Yes,, but only about 20 Billion a year.

9. NOPE,, just bring in mandates that protect workers equally. Theirs and OURS. Set terrifs by what they charge US.

10. NOPE,, Taxes Just pass on Consumers as a cost of doing business. Clean up the LOOPHOLES,, YES.

150 Billion Max.

Knutes Tax Form.

Line A “I made this much”
Line B.“It cost me this much to make that much.”
Line C. “Here is what I REALLY MADE.”
Line D. “Here is 20% of Line C.”
Line E. “Here is a listing of all I payed money to on line B.”

Line G. “Thank you,,, for letting me contribute to America.”

All the best

Knute Neo-LIB

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:36 PM on 09/17/2008
- OldKnute I'm a Fan of OldKnute 101 fans permalink

Oh WAIT!!!!

I forgot Line F!

Line F. “Here is a list of everyone that F**ked Me,, deduct from Line A. and recalculate.

All the best

Knute Neo-LIB

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:51 PM on 09/17/2008

NEW SARAH PALIN HIP HOP ANTHEM!!

DOWNLOAD NOW:

"SARAH PALIN (I WANNA LAY PIPE)"
http://www.zshare.net/audio/1887629822a542de/

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:27 PM on 09/17/2008



TOO BIG TO FAIL......­..........­..........­..........­.......TOO DUMB TO DIE!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:17 PM on 09/17/2008
- bola47 I'm a Fan of bola47 6 fans permalink
photo

does this mean that martin sullivan, pres. & ceo will not make $21 million this year? what about his severance deal that is worth $20 million. how much will all of these brilliant financial execs receive in bonuses this year? since we, the taxpayers now own aig, i suggest that every single executive be fired for incompetence.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:31 PM on 09/17/2008
- ccpostman I'm a Fan of ccpostman 22 fans permalink
photo

He wants it in Euros or gold now.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:58 PM on 09/17/2008
- mabinog I'm a Fan of mabinog 38 fans permalink
photo

Part of the deal for the bailout money should be the executives give up their compensation packages as oh call it a down payment. I doubt a one of them will go hungry or have to give up their vacation home in whatever exotic locale (like the republican exotic locale of HI) they might have one.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:06 PM on 09/17/2008

Our economic geniuses are backing market debt with money from a government that is already in debt and is headed towards massive future debt from many variables. We are financing debt with money that is not there. This is one reason why the dollar has lost historic value. The more the fed uses tax dollars to finance the bail out of companies that are over leveraged. They are adding to the devaluing dollar. Another reason for the decline in dollar value is that without tariffs on imports the government budget has to rely on tax revenue for funding. So when there is even a slight economic slow down revenue evaporates, spending remains the same, while debt conversely increases. Our national debt devalues the dollar while debt from war during a weak dollar episode along with individuals being over mortgaged or upside down in their finances creates rocket fuel for rapid loss of value. Now top that all off with Geopolitical conflict constraining energy supply while demand for energy increases (China & India) place further pressure on the economy via reduced consumer spending power due to the price of energy. I did not forget to add that the other market forces that initiated the fall of the dollar also factor in the inflation of the price of energy, but it is not the only factor that stimulates how the price of oil or energy resources are set. Do not forget that wages have also been on the decline for quite some

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:23 PM on 09/17/2008
- metalpipe I'm a Fan of metalpipe 10 fans permalink
photo

Great post!

I would add that baby boomers retireing enmass foretell the impending doom of our Soc Sec fund and a crushing blow to Medicare. What ever will we do when all this comes to fruition in two years?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:54 PM on 09/17/2008

My $.02,
Monday morning quarterbacking. Good grief !!
While we're watching the "Game"; our cars in the parking lot are being looted! "They" LOVE IT!!
"The Fox Watching The Henhouse"----Only now, the FOX has had 230 years to hone his skills.
I'm guilty of being "Asleep At The Wheel" too, I know!
We're about $85,000,000,000 from becoming a "Third--(or fourth) world country!
We need to "STOP" trying to "MICRO-MANAGE" someone elses Screw-up!!


"WAKE UP !!!!!"

THE PARTY "IS OVER"

There; I feel better.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:44 PM on 09/17/2008

As a Nation we have allowed businesses to become free-floating entities with no direct allegiance to the country (the Multinational Corporation). With off shore tax shelters and registration of the incorporation of business going off shore we have created a process where finished products are imported and raw materials are exported at an imbalance. We export more raw materials than finished quality products. Our independence of having manufacturing in the US has been exported with the raw materials. One reason Manufacturing has gone off shore is cheap NAFTA foreign labor access but also much of our Nation’s raw material resources are in the hands of foreign sovereign funds or companies with licensing of the rights to those resources being basically given away at pennies on the dollar. Thus, the US looses out on the potential revenue from land rights or mineral rights and so on this is due to the thought that more money would be generated by business spending in the US rather than on the charge for resource licensing rights of use of Federal Land. We

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:23 PM on 09/17/2008

We as Americans are loosing ownership of the capital held within the US. With more foreign ownership comes investment but at what point does the US have nothing left to sell? The issue with the fed backing bailouts of financial sector companies is a grave one. My fear is that with more foreign sovereign fund investment if the market collapsed further those same investors may want repayment for their financial backing of our banking system. That means sovereign funds from foreign nations could call in the notes on property to recoup any losses. Fed action is like taking out a 2nd mortgage on the US. With all these factors and those not mentioned we need a shift in how we view free, unencumbered, unregulated market. Unfortunately this has been the dominant ideology championed by modern economic leaders and politicians on both sides of the isle. We cannot return to more of business as usual otherwise history shall repeat.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:23 PM on 09/17/2008

Our current financial dilemma is so convoluted that we the people cannot get a strait answer from either our deregulation loving leaders or so called economic experts. The fed may be a creation of Congress but it is not under direct federal control. It is a private enterprise, point blank. The fed, captains of finance, or industry are led by Free Market, no oversight, let the market give us solutions private industry ideologies. I would argue that the current financial erosion we have experienced is the culmination of allowing the Market to police themselves, their actions and their evasion of regulation or oversight. It is not a failure of Government programs; rather it is the lack of government regulation that is responsible for the devalued property, devalued dollar, and massive corporate or personal debt. It is the failure of free market ideology that industry should be left alone when clearly when they are saddled with bringing about solutions, the solutions is purely self-serving. We

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:22 PM on 09/17/2008

We forget that the US experienced deregulated markets, which lead to the Great Depression. The government put in place legislation that put limits on what the Market could get away with. The balance of legislation now places limits on the protection of the people and their government’s ability to police corruption, greed, market manipulation, monopolies, shaky business models, and the ability for citizens to redress their grievances against industry ran amok. We have done away with the legislation tools that were put in place to guard against market collapse. Every President in modern times from Nixon, Carter, Regan, Clinton, Bush Sr., and Bush Jr. have had a hand in deregulation. The majority of the Depression Era protections and government regulation of the Market came from Regan, Clinton, Bush Sr., and mostly from Bush Jr. It is not a failure of Programs; it is a failure of a lack of belief in the role of government in the market place. If you do not believe in government of course it will fail to live up to the responsibility of the protection of We the People from threats foreign or domestic. One domestic threat is a market place that answers to no one.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:22 PM on 09/17/2008
photo

I am not sure I understand. The AIG holding company owns a lot of "regulated" insurance companies. Is that correct? AIG, through one or more of its subsidiary companies wrote insurance on mortgage backed securities. Now, since the mortgages are defaulting at a higher rate than expected, AIG needs more cash to pay potential claims. AIG charged inadequate premiums for the risk assumed.
So in effect, by loaning money to AIG, the government is protecting investors who bought these mortgage backed securities. And why is the US doing this?
It seems to me that protecting AIG from bankruptcy is not going to be helpful.
Are there strings attached to the loan? Will management be fired? Will AIG be forced to stop writing insurance on mortgages? Will AIG be reorganized?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:16 PM on 09/17/2008


AIG insures everyone and anyone in so many different ways. Name a risk, and AIG has a policy to cover any loss. It's huge and global.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:20 PM on 09/17/2008
photo

Yes, but.... I may be naive, but AIG's traditional lines of regulated insurance like life and auto insurance companies are solvent and profitable. They could be sold or spun off under the regulatory overcite of the US states and other foreign states that may exert regulatory control. AIG would be left with its unregulated lines of insurance (which should be self supporting.)
Does AIG write insurance on mortgage backed securities in foreign countries?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:55 PM on 09/17/2008
- OldKnute I'm a Fan of OldKnute 101 fans permalink


LOOK,, 80% of AGI,,,,, is GOOD.

It was just too difficult for ANYONE to manage. TOO BIG!

What AGI need do is,,, assess that witch Solid and Solvent!

Compartmentalize, and Sell OFF,,,,, that which has TRUE Market Value, under reorganization. With these PROFITS,,, pay down their DEBT.

Once pruned down to the CORE and manageable Central Business of ,,,, Insurance,,,,, they need to come back,, onto the Market,,, and take their LICKS right along with everyone else. They WILL SURVIVE.

BUT,, it is time for AGI to get back to BASICS!

All the best

Knute Neo-LIB

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:30 PM on 09/17/2008
- iambusto I'm a Fan of iambusto 5 fans permalink

AIG will be holding a yard sale pretty soon. I am reading that the leading insurance company of Australia are interested. so is Berkshire hathaway.

the FED will get its money guys. this is not FNM and FRE bailout ok.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:37 PM on 09/17/2008
- ccpostman I'm a Fan of ccpostman 22 fans permalink
photo

Time is up turn in your papers.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:33 PM on 09/17/2008

Live by the sword, die by the sword. But instead oh wait , please help us. What a bunch of garbage these very same people Phil Gramm in particular, caused this and now they insist that the govt that they once wanted to "drown in a bathtub" has to help bail out Wall Street? Welfare for Wall Street, the hypocrisy of it would be amusing if it wasn't going to be so costly to the taxpayers.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:07 PM on 09/17/2008
- dolphy I'm a Fan of dolphy 46 fans permalink

I heard that part of the bailout money which is running now at plus or minus 930 billion will come from the ss funds. Does anyone know what percentage of the total bailout comes from the ss funds? This is making my blood boil since I'm looking at pay stub right now.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:06 PM on 09/17/2008
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next › Last » (12 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect