Government bails out AIG with $85 billion loan

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Government bails out AIG with $85 billion loan stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

JEANNINE AVERSA, IEVA M. AUGSTUMS and STEPHEN BERNARD | September 16, 2008 11:29 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Businessmen leave an American International Group office building, Tuesday, Sept. 16, 2008 in New York. Worries about AIG's well-being intensified Monday and early Tuesday after several ratings agencies downgraded the company. Lower ratings can add to the amount of money the already cash-strapped company has to set aside. (AP Photo/Mark Lennihan)

WASHINGTON — For the second time this month, the U.S. government put taxpayer money on the hook to rescue a private financial company, saying the failure of the huge insurer American International Group Inc. would further disrupt markets and threaten the already fragile economy.

The Federal Reserve said Tuesday it would provide up to $85 billion in an emergency, two-year loan to rescue AIG, which teetered on the edge of failure because of stresses caused by the collapse of the subprime mortgage market and the credit crunch that ensued. In return, the government will get a 79.9 percent stake in AIG and the right to remove senior management.

The move was similar to government's seizure on Sept. 7 of mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, where the Treasury Department said it was prepared to put up as much as $100 billion over time in each of the companies if needed to keep them from going broke.

Both moves were bound to raise questions about the use of taxpayer money to bail out private firms.

The Fed said it determined that a disorderly failure of AIG could hurt the already delicate financial markets and the economy. Although little known off Wall Street, AIG does business with almost every financial institution in the world and insures $88 billion worth of assets including mortgages and corporate loans.

Its failure could also "lead to substantially higher borrowing costs, reduced household wealth and materially weaker economic performance," the Fed said in a statement.

The decision to help AIG reversed the government's stance over the weekend, when it refused to use taxpayer money to bail out Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. Lehman, which filed for bankruptcy protection Monday, collapsed under the weight of mounting losses related to its real estate holdings.

The White House said it backed the Fed's decision Tuesday.

Story continues below
advertisement

"These steps are taken in the interest of promoting stability in financial markets and limiting damage to the broader economy," White House spokesman Tony Fratto said.

After meeting with Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson and Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke in a late-night briefing on Capitol Hill, Congressional leaders said they understood the need for the bailout.

"The administration is approaching an unprecedented step, but unfortunately we are living in unprecedented times." said Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y. "Hearing of these plans, you have to stop to catch your breath. But upon reflection, the alternatives are much worse."

New York officials said the deal helps stave off a fiscal crisis for the state.

"Policy holders will be protected, jobs will be saved," New York Gov. David Paterson said Tuesday night.

The Fed's move was part of a concerted push to help calm jittery markets and investors around the world.

On Tuesday, the Fed decided to keep its key interest rate steady at 2 percent, but acknowledged stresses in financial markets have grown and hinted it stood ready to lower rates if needed.

The central bank also pumped $70 billion into the nation's financial system to help ease credit stresses. In emergency sessions over the weekend, the Fed expanded its loan programs to Wall Street firms, part of an ongoing effort to get credit flowing more freely.

The stock market, which Monday had its worst session since the Sept. 11 attacks, recovered Tuesday after the Fed's decision on interest rates. The Dow Jones industrials rose 141 points after losing 500 points on Monday.

AIG's shares swung violently, though, as rumors of potential deals involving the government or private parties emerged and were dashed. By late Tuesday, its shares had closed down 20 percent _ and another 45 percent after hours.

The problems at AIG stemmed from its insurance of mortgage-backed securities and other risky debt against default. If AIG couldn't make good on its promise to pay back soured debt, investors feared the consequences would pose a greater threat to the U.S. financial system than this week's collapse of the investment bank Lehman Brothers.

The worries were heightened Monday after Moody's Investor Service and Standard and Poor's lowered AIG's credit ratings, forcing AIG to seek more money for collateral against its insurance contracts. Without that money, AIG would have defaulted on its obligations and the buyers of its insurance _ such as banks and other financial companies _ would have found themselves without protection against losses on the debt they hold.

"It might not just bring down other financial institutions in the U.S. It could bring down overseas financial institutions," said Timothy Canova, a professor of international economic law at Chapman University School of Law. "If Lehman Brother's failure could help trigger AIG's going down, who knows who AIG's failure could trigger next."

New York-based AIG operates an insurance and financial services businesses ranging from property, casualty, auto and life insurance to annuity and investment services. Those traditional insurance operations are considered healthy and the National Association of Insurance Commissioners said "they are solvent and have the capability to pay claims."

WASHINGTON — For the second time this month, the U.S. government put taxpayer money on the hook to rescue a private financial company, saying the failure of the huge insurer American Internation...
WASHINGTON — For the second time this month, the U.S. government put taxpayer money on the hook to rescue a private financial company, saying the failure of the huge insurer American Internation...
Filed by Nick Graham  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
323
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next › Last » (12 pages total)
- Norge I'm a Fan of Norge 22 fans permalink

In the trillions of dollars class, 85 billion is just wallnuts.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:50 AM on 09/17/2008
- FatherWolf I'm a Fan of FatherWolf 21 fans permalink

Imagine if they put that $85 billion into public education or alternative energy research or repairing bridges or a hundred things that need to be done in this country.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:28 AM on 09/17/2008

Or all the money BUSH/CHENEY/NOE CONS put into IRAQ......­..........

HEALTH CARE......­..........­......... SOLVED
CANCER....­..........­..........­..........­.. SOLVED
RENEWABLE ENERGY....­...... SOLVED
GLOBAL WARMING...­..........­.... SOLVED
AFGHANISTA­N.........­..........­.......SOL­VED

Bin Laden is laughing his head off today

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:36 AM on 09/17/2008
- JamesMo I'm a Fan of JamesMo 2 fans permalink

Out of hand! Too little way too late - and to the wrong people. How about bailing out the poorer middle class from foreclosures that's now led to this horrific snowball effect. Whose saying this $83b is going to be enought to sustain them for another 1 - 2 years as the economy gets progressively worse anyhow.

Really people - if you want the economy to go further down the drain just vote McCain/Palin - and don't complain when it does.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:49 AM on 09/17/2008
- huffnpuffn I'm a Fan of huffnpuffn 8 fans permalink

Some numbers:

$85 billion / 300 million people in the USA = $283.33 per person spent on this loan

Current AIG stock price - $2.55 per share

Congratulations fellow American! You now own 111 shares of AIG! Good luck getting back your investment!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:43 AM on 09/17/2008

Thanks for the tip, I`ll remember to take it as a deduction

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:42 AM on 09/17/2008
- Erdgeist I'm a Fan of Erdgeist 81 fans permalink
photo

SEC Commissioner Christopher Cox (former Repubican Congressman) bears a lot of the blame for what has happened recently on Wall Street, including AIG. Hedge funds took down these companies by what is termed "naked short selling". Since 2005 it has been illegal to naked short sell any stock. So the pertinent question is this: Why didn't SEC Commissioner Cox enforce the rules on his books three years ago that would have prevented this? And why did Cox repeal the uptick rule that requires short sellers to wait for an increase in a stock before selling it short? Methinks the Senate had better investigate Cox's role in this.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:37 AM on 09/17/2008

The BIG BOYS had him looking for the GOLDEN RIVET

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:47 AM on 09/17/2008
- huffnpuffn I'm a Fan of huffnpuffn 8 fans permalink

What's the plan now federal people? You just promised AIG enough money to fund the war in Iraq for nine months, and now you own 80% of the company? If they're still stuck backing bad mortgages, is this not good money after bad? When AIG eventually goes down, maybe you can donate the office space to the Smithsonian and open up the National Museum of Wasted Taxpayer Dollars.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:33 AM on 09/17/2008
- javaman I'm a Fan of javaman 5 fans permalink

yet the millions that lost their homes are just peanuts. nothing but corporate welfare.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:31 AM on 09/17/2008

Alright ... now when the Government start to bail out all the fine hard-working Barneys in this country ???

http://img154.imageshack.us/img154/3631/mccain01vl7.jpg

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:20 AM on 09/17/2008
- mrJJ I'm a Fan of mrJJ 23 fans permalink

Financial reward has always been associated with assumption of risk, but what the republicans have managed to do is divorce the two and in doing so they have managed to hold the rewards for themselves while transfering the risk to all of us.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:15 AM on 09/17/2008
- mrJJ I'm a Fan of mrJJ 23 fans permalink

Ineresting question..­.

Would you agree with these four words?

"They , (being the Fed & Treasury) have socialized risk."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:12 AM on 09/17/2008
- BexSF I'm a Fan of BexSF 4 fans permalink

I agree 100%

I would add... and Privatized Profits.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:14 AM on 09/17/2008
- Mahi Joe I'm a Fan of Mahi Joe 49 fans permalink

This bailout really sends a great message. Message: If you are a large company and support the GOP, then don't worry if you screwup because we will make sure you can get the hard working shlubs tax money to bail you out so you can continue to send your kids to Ivy League schools.

AIG should go to their CEO and Board of Directors for a personal loan, NOT U.S. Taxpayers. Let AIG go under and maybe, just maybe, this will send a message that if you are greedy and fail at running your PRIVATELY OWNED COMPANY, then you lose. All the U.S. Taxpayers are doing is rewarding incompetency, and even that is not considered Captialism but rather CORRUPTION.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:00 AM on 09/17/2008
- BethStuart I'm a Fan of BethStuart 13 fans permalink

Morgen Stanley is apparently next on the list. They appear to have decided it's better to find a white night now than be pushed into a shotgun marriage at the 11th hour like Merrill Lynch.

Here is the link:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26753521

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:30 AM on 09/17/2008

Ok let's see!

1 - The big insurance company takes money from old people to give them a small life insurance so that their spouse can at least pay the funeral once they are gone.

2 - They take the money for years and then facing bankruptcy and if they do go bankrupt, those people will have paid for years for nothing.

3 - The government takes public funds to recompensate greedy know nothing CEO's who made money and big bonuses for years.

4 - Since the money comes from the taxpayers, it will just be added to the enormous debt : What's another couple of billions, only pocket change right?

I guess this is how Republicans are taking money out of the pocket of future generations. Now I understand why old people are voting for McCain/Palin, they don't give a damn about the future since they won't even be part of it. This is why McCain choosed Palin for his running mate : He doesn't care what happens after he is gone!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:29 AM on 09/17/2008

Bravo

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:54 AM on 09/17/2008
- Mahi Joe I'm a Fan of Mahi Joe 49 fans permalink

This is so totally unfair, not to mention unethical, to bail out private companies. Why should taxpayers money be spent on bailing out private companies when small businesses fail every day and no one is there to provide them any financial help? If you are an owner of a small company and it bottoms out, you cannot even apply for unemployment compensation. This corrupt administration is all about keeping the wealthy intact at the expense of the hard working middle class. Instead of big business giving out immoral salaries to these CEOs who run their businesses into the ground, maybe they should look to getting competent, less greedy people to run their companies. Rather than reward a failing business with taxpayer money they should hold the executives accountable and should penalize them with fines (taken from their personal assets) and/or jail time. This is totally immoral and corrupt and no one is being held accountable. This is what Bush/McCain is all about and could care less about the average American. How pathetic.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:25 AM on 09/17/2008
- BethStuart I'm a Fan of BethStuart 13 fans permalink

The $85 billion is indeed a bridge loan and will be paid back if and only if the assets on AIG's balance sheet are really worth what AIG thinks they're worth. That is the problem. No one including AIG really knows how to value these assets given that that they're tied to a declining real estate market.

The taxpayers could still be on the hook for a greal deal of money.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:25 AM on 09/17/2008
- ccpostman I'm a Fan of ccpostman 22 fans permalink
photo

Who is going to prison for this??? This is INSANE!

The Fed just handed over 85 billion without flinching, so this AIG company can cover shady investment firms and banks assets of rotten home mortgages that they GALDLY TOOK! Crooks covering for crooks!

This is what we get when we give these three-piece-suit republican crooks all the deregulation they wanted. We had thieves running the economy for eight years! What we got in return was debt and more debt. While these CEOs and junk bond managers are out ordering new Patek Philippe watches, Range Rovers, Feadship Yachts, and going shopping for another 50 million dollar penthouse with our money!

Again, who is going to prison??? I know who is going to pay for this mess....My­self and 230 million suckers in taxes!

Someone should throw a net over lower Manhattan and haul them ALL off!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:17 AM on 09/17/2008
- mrJJ I'm a Fan of mrJJ 23 fans permalink

Our Money?? ROFLMAO err it's "THEIR money" THEY bought and paid for the seat at the table. Didn't you get the memo?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:27 AM on 09/17/2008
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next › Last » (12 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect