Bailout Package: Congress Promises Quick Action

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Bailout Package: Congress Promises Quick Action stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

TOM RAUM and JEANNINE AVERSA | September 19, 2008 11:32 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
President Bush, flanked by, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke, left, and Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson, delivers a statement about the economy and government efforts to remedy the crisis, Friday, Sept. 19, 2008, in the Rose Garden of the White House in Washington. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais)

WASHINGTON — Struggling to stave off financial catastrophe, the Bush administration on Friday laid out a radical bailout plan with a jawdropping price tag _ a takeover of a half-trillion dollars or more in worthless mortgages and other bad debt held by tottering institutions.

Relieved investors sent stocks soaring on Wall Street and around the globe. The Dow-Jones industrials average rose 368 points after surging 410 points the day before on rumors the federal action was afoot.

A grim-faced President Bush acknowledged risks to taxpayers in what would be the most sweeping government intervention to rescue failing financial institutions since the Great Depression. But he declared, "The risk of not acting would be far higher."

The administration is asking Congress for far-reaching new powers to take over troubled mortgages from banks and other companies, including purchasing sour mortgage-backed securities. Administration officials and congressional leaders are to work out details over the weekend.

Congressional officials said they expected a request for legal authority to buy up the bad loans, at a cost in excess of $500 billion to the government. Democrats were discussing whether to try to attach middle class assistance to the legislation, despite a request from Bush to avoid adding controversial items that could delay action. An expansion of jobless benefits was one possibility.

In other major steps, the Treasury Department and Federal Reserve moved to give money-market mutual funds the same kind of federal protection, at least temporarily, that now applies to savings and checking accounts and certificates of deposit at banks. Money-market accounts sold through retail banks are already FDIC insured.

The spreading global selling panic had started to threaten some money-market funds, usually thought of as rock-solid investments. Administration officials feared a run on these funds, held by millions of Americans.

"Every American should know that the federal government continues to enforce laws and regulations protecting your money," Bush said at the White House. The 75-year-old Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation now insures savings and checking accounts and certificates of deposit up to $100,000.

Story continues below
advertisement

Separately, the Securities and Exchange Commission acted to block short-selling in financial securities. That is a trading method that bets the value of stocks will go down. It has been blamed for accelerating the plunge in stock prices of banks and other financial institutions.

"This is a pivotal moment for America's economy," Bush said. "In our nation's history, there have been moments that require us to come together across party lines to address major challenges. This is such a moment."

Congressional leaders of both parties welcomed the administration's bold moves, after a series of ad hoc rescues.

The talk on the presidential campaign trail, barely six weeks before the election, was of bipartisanship, too.

Democrat Barack Obama said it was critical that leaders in both parties work in concert. "Truly, we are all in this together," he said.

GOP presidential nominee John McCain said leaders should put aside partisan differences and "any action should be designed to keep people in their homes and safeguard the life savings of all Americans."

The federal government already has pledged more than $600 billion in the past year to bail out, or help bail out, some of the biggest names in American finance. That includes the rescue of investment bank Bear Stearns in March, the takeover of mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac earlier this month and the takeover of the world's largest insurance company, American International Group, just this week.

But the contagion continued to spread, bringing political consensus that drastic and comprehensive federal action was needed.

There are precedents for such a federal takeover.

In the late 1980s, the government created the Resolution Trust Corporation to tackle the savings and loan crisis. It acquired the defaulted mortgages, foreclosed real estate and other assets of nearly a thousand failed S&Ls, restoring order and stability to the system. Resolving that crisis took six years and $125 billion in taxpayer money _ roughly equal to $200 billion in today's dollars.

And there was the Reconstruction Finance Corporation, a Depression-era relief program formed in 1932 by President Hoover that tried to revive the market by giving loans to banks and other businesses.

On Friday, Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson gave few details about the structure of the new program. Asked about an overall price tag, he said, "hundreds of billions" of dollars.

Congressional leaders said they were ready to move quickly but still needed details of the administration plan. For instance, there was no indication of what the government would get in return from financial companies for the federal assistance.

Paulson and Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke briefed lawmakers in both parties on the idea by conference call Friday.

In a session with House Democrats, they described a plan where the government would in essence set up reverse auctions, putting up money for a class of distressed assets _ such as loans that are delinquent but not in default _ and financial institutions would compete for how little they would accept for the investments, said Rep. Brad Sherman, D-Calif., who participated in the call.

"You give them good cash; they give you the worst of the worst," Sherman said of the plan, which he complained that Bush and his economic advisers were trying to panic lawmakers into rubber-stamping.

Paulson rejected Democrats' calls to include tighter regulations, corporate reforms or limits on executive compensation as part of the measure, Sherman said. "He's doing his best to paint a picture of the sky falling, and then he says, because the sky's falling, you have to do it my way."

Paulson said the new troubled-asset relief program that he wants Congress to enact must be large enough to have the necessary impact while protecting taxpayers as much as possible.

"I am convinced that this bold approach will cost American families far less than the alternative _ a continuing series of financial institution failures and frozen credit markets unable to fund economic expansion," Paulson. "The financial security of all Americans ... depends on our ability to restore our financial institutions to a sound footing."

Bush said simply, "We must act now."

"America's economy is facing unprecedented challenges. We're responding with unprecedented measures," Bush declared, standing in the White House Rose Garden with Paulson, Bernanke and Christopher Cox, chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Shortly after his remarks, Bush called congressional leaders with whom the administration will be working on the final plan. He spoke to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky and House GOP leader John Boehner of Ohio.

The administration wants to see a package emerge from the weekend, to lend calm to Monday morning's market openings, said Keith Hennessey, the director of the president's economic council. The goal is to have something passed by Congress by the end of next week, when lawmakers recess for the elections.

Paulson said Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac will step up their purchases of mortgage-backed securities to help provide support to the crippled housing market. He also said the Treasury Department will expand a program, announced earlier this month, to buy mortgage-backed securities, which have been badly hurt by the housing and credit crises.

"As we all know, lax lending practices earlier this decade led to irresponsible lending and irresponsible borrowing. This simply put too many families into mortgages they could not afford," Paulson said.

Bush authorized Treasury to tap up to $50 billion from a Depression-era fund to insure the holdings of eligible money-market mutual funds. And the Federal Reserve announced it would expand its emergency lending program to help support the $3.4 trillion in total assets of the funds.

On Wednesday alone, investors had pulled more than $89 billion from money-market funds, according to iMoneyNet, publisher of the newsletter Money Fund Report.

The government's actions could help alleviate the uncertainty that has been sending the markets into tumult over the past week. Lending has come to a virtual standstill in the wake of the bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.

European Central Bank, Swiss National Bank and Bank of England also offered up more cash Friday. The three banks put a combined $90 billion into money markets.

___

Associated Press writers Julie Hirschfeld Davis, Martin Crutsinger, Andrew Taylor, Marcy Gordon, David Espo and Jim Abrams in Washington and Joe Bel Bruno in New York contributed to this report.

WASHINGTON — Struggling to stave off financial catastrophe, the Bush administration on Friday laid out a radical bailout plan with a jawdropping price tag _ a takeover of a half-trillion dollars...
WASHINGTON — Struggling to stave off financial catastrophe, the Bush administration on Friday laid out a radical bailout plan with a jawdropping price tag _ a takeover of a half-trillion dollars...
Filed by Katharine Zaleski  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
3284
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 (69 pages total)
- danoj I'm a Fan of danoj 17 fans permalink

This bailout is getting a little over the top. Are we, the tax payers, goin to end up footing a trillion dollar bailout? I say no bailout what so ever. Let the markest do what they are goping to do. It will be ugly for a little while, but all we are doing right now is putting off disaster until tomorrow with this bailout.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:52 AM on 09/19/2008
- MIMom I'm a Fan of MIMom 110 fans permalink
photo

I would assume, then, that you are financially solvent?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:34 AM on 09/19/2008
- Kassandra I'm a Fan of Kassandra 107 fans permalink
photo

So, how much is THIS going to cost taxpayers? Which "Depression Era" fund are they taking this out of? Social Security????

Seems a bit like shutting the barn door after the horse is out. This will only work, to some degree, if regulations are put back in place permanently.

Right now, it looks like trying to put a bandage on a hemorrhage. And the American people will still lose our homes.........and the "American Dream".

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:50 AM on 09/19/2008
photo

Don't forget people, that when u file your tax returns this year to take capital gain/losses for the new companies that u own. I mean, if we have to bail them out with our tax dollars, we should be able to get the benefit of the write-off on our tax returns.......

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:50 AM on 09/19/2008
- ema I'm a Fan of ema 23 fans permalink
photo

If the gov't had stepped in sooner to create a fund to rescue homeowners facing foreclosure, this would never have happened and been a lot cheaper. But that would have been (eek) socialism.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:49 AM on 09/19/2008

I agree completely, I wonder how much the bailout would have been if we had offered more assistance to homeowners so they could stay in their homes? That is after all why this mess is so big in the first place. Good Mortgage = Good Assets so no bailout needed. Am I missing something?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:07 AM on 09/19/2008
- MIMom I'm a Fan of MIMom 110 fans permalink
photo

Ding ding ding!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:32 AM on 09/19/2008
- WFV I'm a Fan of WFV 13 fans permalink
photo

The fact that they're going to these measures proves the crisis is more dire than they originally described. Where will all this money come from, and where will the next pot o' cash come from when we need it?

This is a huge band-aid, but it doesn't sound like the wound is closed.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:48 AM on 09/19/2008
- MIMom I'm a Fan of MIMom 110 fans permalink
photo

Large wounds usually need stitching first, then the bandage.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:31 AM on 09/19/2008
- Gipper44 I'm a Fan of Gipper44 4 fans permalink

Is this a joke?

Dodd should be headed for jail; had Pelosi & Reid done what Bush & McCain proposed many, many times, none of this would have happened.

The greatone's main concern is that one of his primary sources of funds, Fannie Mae & Freddie Mac, has dried up.

When a homeowner looks at his decreased home value or his decreased 401K, "Democrat" should immediately come to mind.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:48 AM on 09/19/2008
- ema I'm a Fan of ema 23 fans permalink
photo

And what did Bush and McCain propose? I'll wait for your answer.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:51 AM on 09/19/2008
- Gipper44 I'm a Fan of Gipper44 4 fans permalink

danoj "bet me to the punch"

Raines is now a "high-up" in the greatone's ring of buffoons; Raines should be in jail as well as he pilfered 100 million form FM & FM.

Ditto for his successor, Daniel Mudd who made off with 40 million. It would be 50 million, but the great one & Schumer have sent a letter to Paulson requesting that Mudd's last ten million be cancelled. How very damn convenient.

Of course it does make for great comedy: "What about the AIG bailout, oh great one? "

"No comment."

The first rule in crisis management is to show up.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:00 AM on 09/19/2008
- dawp I'm a Fan of dawp permalink

Deregulation caused this, a favorite of your republican friends.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:56 AM on 09/19/2008

Yes, it is a joke. Thank you for posting it. You're a richly comic person.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:59 AM on 09/19/2008
- Tropiholic I'm a Fan of Tropiholic 20 fans permalink

YOU are the joke gipper, you think anyone is buying your doody? we all KNOW who is responsible for this mess!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:06 AM on 09/19/2008

Or one could be looking at one's decreased Social Security, if Double Talk had had his way.

However, it would appear that Double Talk should be leading this - As an expert in "bailouts", he could prove a fine leader.

Now, Gipper, take your wheel barrow full of cash and don't be late for the Hampton parties.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:06 AM on 09/19/2008
- EattheRich I'm a Fan of EattheRich 3 fans permalink

Corporate Socialism = National Socialism = Nazism

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:48 AM on 09/19/2008
- Clairvaux I'm a Fan of Clairvaux 80 fans permalink
photo

"The federal government already has pledged more than $600 billion in the past year to bail out, or help bail out, some of the biggest names in American finance. There was no immediate word on how much the new rescue plan might cost."

Everett Dirksen used to say, "A billion here, a billion there, pretty soon you are talking about real money."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:46 AM on 09/19/2008
- MIMom I'm a Fan of MIMom 110 fans permalink
photo

Can we use Monopoly money instead?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:30 AM on 09/19/2008

I don't suppose any oil companies are gonna help with this bailout with their record profits?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:45 AM on 09/19/2008
- danoj I'm a Fan of danoj 17 fans permalink

Why the hell would they, it's not there mess.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:50 AM on 09/19/2008

There mess? Where mess?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:08 AM on 09/19/2008
- MIMom I'm a Fan of MIMom 110 fans permalink
photo

It might not be "there" mess, but what is wrong with helping our the country? If no one can afford oil, then they won't be very happy, will they?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:28 AM on 09/19/2008
- MIMom I'm a Fan of MIMom 110 fans permalink
photo

OUT the country - sorry.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:29 AM on 09/19/2008

The money is coming from the pockets of the middle class.....
as usual.
Crime does pay for the fat cats.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:51 AM on 09/19/2008
- ex-pat I'm a Fan of ex-pat 19 fans permalink

Maybe Iraq will chip in some of their 58 Billion Surplus

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:55 AM on 09/19/2008

You don't suppose correctly.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:00 AM on 09/19/2008
Page: « First ‹ Previous 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 (69 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect