Bailout Package: Congress Promises Quick Action

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Bailout Package: Congress Promises Quick Action stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

TOM RAUM and JEANNINE AVERSA | September 19, 2008 11:32 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
President Bush, flanked by, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke, left, and Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson, delivers a statement about the economy and government efforts to remedy the crisis, Friday, Sept. 19, 2008, in the Rose Garden of the White House in Washington. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais)

WASHINGTON — Struggling to stave off financial catastrophe, the Bush administration on Friday laid out a radical bailout plan with a jawdropping price tag _ a takeover of a half-trillion dollars or more in worthless mortgages and other bad debt held by tottering institutions.

Relieved investors sent stocks soaring on Wall Street and around the globe. The Dow-Jones industrials average rose 368 points after surging 410 points the day before on rumors the federal action was afoot.

A grim-faced President Bush acknowledged risks to taxpayers in what would be the most sweeping government intervention to rescue failing financial institutions since the Great Depression. But he declared, "The risk of not acting would be far higher."

The administration is asking Congress for far-reaching new powers to take over troubled mortgages from banks and other companies, including purchasing sour mortgage-backed securities. Administration officials and congressional leaders are to work out details over the weekend.

Congressional officials said they expected a request for legal authority to buy up the bad loans, at a cost in excess of $500 billion to the government. Democrats were discussing whether to try to attach middle class assistance to the legislation, despite a request from Bush to avoid adding controversial items that could delay action. An expansion of jobless benefits was one possibility.

In other major steps, the Treasury Department and Federal Reserve moved to give money-market mutual funds the same kind of federal protection, at least temporarily, that now applies to savings and checking accounts and certificates of deposit at banks. Money-market accounts sold through retail banks are already FDIC insured.

The spreading global selling panic had started to threaten some money-market funds, usually thought of as rock-solid investments. Administration officials feared a run on these funds, held by millions of Americans.

"Every American should know that the federal government continues to enforce laws and regulations protecting your money," Bush said at the White House. The 75-year-old Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation now insures savings and checking accounts and certificates of deposit up to $100,000.

Story continues below
advertisement

Separately, the Securities and Exchange Commission acted to block short-selling in financial securities. That is a trading method that bets the value of stocks will go down. It has been blamed for accelerating the plunge in stock prices of banks and other financial institutions.

"This is a pivotal moment for America's economy," Bush said. "In our nation's history, there have been moments that require us to come together across party lines to address major challenges. This is such a moment."

Congressional leaders of both parties welcomed the administration's bold moves, after a series of ad hoc rescues.

The talk on the presidential campaign trail, barely six weeks before the election, was of bipartisanship, too.

Democrat Barack Obama said it was critical that leaders in both parties work in concert. "Truly, we are all in this together," he said.

GOP presidential nominee John McCain said leaders should put aside partisan differences and "any action should be designed to keep people in their homes and safeguard the life savings of all Americans."

The federal government already has pledged more than $600 billion in the past year to bail out, or help bail out, some of the biggest names in American finance. That includes the rescue of investment bank Bear Stearns in March, the takeover of mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac earlier this month and the takeover of the world's largest insurance company, American International Group, just this week.

But the contagion continued to spread, bringing political consensus that drastic and comprehensive federal action was needed.

There are precedents for such a federal takeover.

In the late 1980s, the government created the Resolution Trust Corporation to tackle the savings and loan crisis. It acquired the defaulted mortgages, foreclosed real estate and other assets of nearly a thousand failed S&Ls, restoring order and stability to the system. Resolving that crisis took six years and $125 billion in taxpayer money _ roughly equal to $200 billion in today's dollars.

And there was the Reconstruction Finance Corporation, a Depression-era relief program formed in 1932 by President Hoover that tried to revive the market by giving loans to banks and other businesses.

On Friday, Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson gave few details about the structure of the new program. Asked about an overall price tag, he said, "hundreds of billions" of dollars.

Congressional leaders said they were ready to move quickly but still needed details of the administration plan. For instance, there was no indication of what the government would get in return from financial companies for the federal assistance.

Paulson and Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke briefed lawmakers in both parties on the idea by conference call Friday.

In a session with House Democrats, they described a plan where the government would in essence set up reverse auctions, putting up money for a class of distressed assets _ such as loans that are delinquent but not in default _ and financial institutions would compete for how little they would accept for the investments, said Rep. Brad Sherman, D-Calif., who participated in the call.

"You give them good cash; they give you the worst of the worst," Sherman said of the plan, which he complained that Bush and his economic advisers were trying to panic lawmakers into rubber-stamping.

Paulson rejected Democrats' calls to include tighter regulations, corporate reforms or limits on executive compensation as part of the measure, Sherman said. "He's doing his best to paint a picture of the sky falling, and then he says, because the sky's falling, you have to do it my way."

Paulson said the new troubled-asset relief program that he wants Congress to enact must be large enough to have the necessary impact while protecting taxpayers as much as possible.

"I am convinced that this bold approach will cost American families far less than the alternative _ a continuing series of financial institution failures and frozen credit markets unable to fund economic expansion," Paulson. "The financial security of all Americans ... depends on our ability to restore our financial institutions to a sound footing."

Bush said simply, "We must act now."

"America's economy is facing unprecedented challenges. We're responding with unprecedented measures," Bush declared, standing in the White House Rose Garden with Paulson, Bernanke and Christopher Cox, chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Shortly after his remarks, Bush called congressional leaders with whom the administration will be working on the final plan. He spoke to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky and House GOP leader John Boehner of Ohio.

The administration wants to see a package emerge from the weekend, to lend calm to Monday morning's market openings, said Keith Hennessey, the director of the president's economic council. The goal is to have something passed by Congress by the end of next week, when lawmakers recess for the elections.

Paulson said Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac will step up their purchases of mortgage-backed securities to help provide support to the crippled housing market. He also said the Treasury Department will expand a program, announced earlier this month, to buy mortgage-backed securities, which have been badly hurt by the housing and credit crises.

"As we all know, lax lending practices earlier this decade led to irresponsible lending and irresponsible borrowing. This simply put too many families into mortgages they could not afford," Paulson said.

Bush authorized Treasury to tap up to $50 billion from a Depression-era fund to insure the holdings of eligible money-market mutual funds. And the Federal Reserve announced it would expand its emergency lending program to help support the $3.4 trillion in total assets of the funds.

On Wednesday alone, investors had pulled more than $89 billion from money-market funds, according to iMoneyNet, publisher of the newsletter Money Fund Report.

The government's actions could help alleviate the uncertainty that has been sending the markets into tumult over the past week. Lending has come to a virtual standstill in the wake of the bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.

European Central Bank, Swiss National Bank and Bank of England also offered up more cash Friday. The three banks put a combined $90 billion into money markets.

___

Associated Press writers Julie Hirschfeld Davis, Martin Crutsinger, Andrew Taylor, Marcy Gordon, David Espo and Jim Abrams in Washington and Joe Bel Bruno in New York contributed to this report.

WASHINGTON — Struggling to stave off financial catastrophe, the Bush administration on Friday laid out a radical bailout plan with a jawdropping price tag _ a takeover of a half-trillion dollars...
WASHINGTON — Struggling to stave off financial catastrophe, the Bush administration on Friday laid out a radical bailout plan with a jawdropping price tag _ a takeover of a half-trillion dollars...
Filed by Katharine Zaleski  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
3284
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next › Last » (69 pages total)
- aubrey8 I'm a Fan of aubrey8 5 fans permalink

Stocks soar on the backs of us taxpayers who are going to pay off the trillion dollar bill.

Not a bad deal for the greedy guys who made billions on the same people they scammed...­..us.

It's like sending the victim to prison while the criminals go live in your house. Something wrong with that picture.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:21 PM on 09/19/2008
- SCG I'm a Fan of SCG 110 fans permalink
photo

Yep, you'll pay in inflation or taxes, or declining job market. Or all of the above.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:23 PM on 09/19/2008
- ZHarris I'm a Fan of ZHarris 48 fans permalink
photo

Sort of like having a r ape victim pay for her r ape kit...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:23 PM on 09/19/2008
photo

And then pay to support her rapist if he goes to prison.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:26 PM on 09/19/2008
- Pronto I'm a Fan of Pronto 32 fans permalink

What do you care? It's not going to negatively impact earmarks in any way.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:23 PM on 09/19/2008
photo

Earmarks are such a de minimus amout of the overall budget, it's barely worth basing an entire campaign on.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:26 PM on 09/19/2008
- SCG I'm a Fan of SCG 110 fans permalink
photo

Pronto what percentage of the budget goes to "earmarks"?

Another red herring.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:26 PM on 09/19/2008
photo

Earmarks account for less than one per cent of the federal budget.

Try again, troII.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:28 PM on 09/19/2008

Un-f**king believable! Welfare checks to private corporations to the tune of an estimated trillion dollars.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:20 PM on 09/19/2008
- Crog63 I'm a Fan of Crog63 5 fans permalink

Yup, yup. Bail out the rich, screw the poor. That's the conservative mantra.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:22 PM on 09/19/2008

Come on guys -- it's gonna trickle down, doncha know!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:28 PM on 09/19/2008
- tomfl78 I'm a Fan of tomfl78 2 fans permalink

indisguise thanks for speaking the truth

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:19 PM on 09/19/2008

My portfolio went up six percent in the last two days.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:19 PM on 09/19/2008

But from what baseline???

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:20 PM on 09/19/2008
photo

Go back and read the demagogue thread!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:21 PM on 09/19/2008
- liseworks I'm a Fan of liseworks 143 fans permalink
photo

We're not here for you -

GOP : mememememememe ......ME, ME, ME, WHATABOUT ME ??

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:20 PM on 09/19/2008

Good then go away.

Buh, bye!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:31 PM on 09/19/2008
- Crog63 I'm a Fan of Crog63 5 fans permalink

How much did the national debt just go up? As long as you are profiting that's all that matters, isn't it?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:21 PM on 09/19/2008

I am not going to hang around and wait for the nanny to provide my SS check when I retire.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:31 PM on 09/19/2008
- WLA I'm a Fan of WLA 323 fans permalink
photo

"F U, I got mine"

Yer a fine republican, phony rev.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:21 PM on 09/19/2008

You choose not to invest and you cuss me out?

How does that work?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:30 PM on 09/19/2008
- suzyhein I'm a Fan of suzyhein 63 fans permalink
photo

socialist!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:21 PM on 09/19/2008

Anybody really believe this bail out package is going to fix what's wrong ... remember these are the same "smart" people that caused the crisis in the first place.

They can't fix it. Why ... because they can't admit that the policies they believe in from Friedman to Adam smith to nations as "holders of taxpayers" rather than competitors is wrong.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:18 PM on 09/19/2008
photo

Fact is, whoever is president will have to raise taxes on the wealthy to pay for these baliouts of the wealthy.

SOT

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:17 PM on 09/19/2008
- liseworks I'm a Fan of liseworks 143 fans permalink
photo

GOOD !!!

As it should be - !!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:19 PM on 09/19/2008
- gladys46 I'm a Fan of gladys46 244 fans permalink

Music to my ears !!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:23 PM on 09/19/2008
- Crog63 I'm a Fan of Crog63 5 fans permalink

Thing is, McCain won't admit to that and his delusional followers actually believe that he won't.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:26 PM on 09/19/2008

Great. So because these giant banks can't afford all their bad mortgages from people who spent like mad and lived beyond their means.....

....that means that *I* can and I am going to be forced into paying for them? Wonderful. Pushing the junk debt from the corporations to the taxpayer. What an idea.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:17 PM on 09/19/2008

Not you ... republicans are much more clever than to stick it to you. No ... they're going after your children ... and your childrens children ... and their children.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:20 PM on 09/19/2008
- gladys46 I'm a Fan of gladys46 244 fans permalink

Stay informed on who will bailout our country contrasted with who won't ... Palin/McCain won't !!!

http://lcv.org/

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:17 PM on 09/19/2008

BIll Clint0n out there saying that Sp was a great choice and not to be underestimated.

Hmmm! He IS campaigning for Zero,is he not?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:16 PM on 09/19/2008

FLAGGED OFF TOPIC

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:17 PM on 09/19/2008
- SCG I'm a Fan of SCG 110 fans permalink
photo

gopSTEALSy­ourTAXmone­y

^ isn't that the truth.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:21 PM on 09/19/2008
- Pigliacci I'm a Fan of Pigliacci 9 fans permalink

Zero...isn­'t that one of Sister Sarah's kids?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:18 PM on 09/19/2008
- JamesR. I'm a Fan of JamesR. 202 fans permalink
photo

LOL

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:19 PM on 09/19/2008
photo

You people really are disparate to change the subject.

It's the economy, stupid.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:19 PM on 09/19/2008
- suzyhein I'm a Fan of suzyhein 63 fans permalink
photo

Joe Biden said the same thing. It's called setting expectations so high that she can't possibly meet them. Genius strategy actually. Thanks for pointing that out DL;)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:21 PM on 09/19/2008
- liseworks I'm a Fan of liseworks 143 fans permalink
photo

FLAGGED for too much needy-ness.

WE'RE NOT HERE FOR YOU , YOUYOUYOU ....

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:21 PM on 09/19/2008
- All in All I'm a Fan of All in All 63 fans permalink

At the moment I'm mostly thinking who's the individuals that are going to get too buy-up all of these "so-called worthless assets", those are the People whom are going too make a lot of Money in the long-run!!

Oh-well, By Monday things should be clear enough for most shareholders, and they'll be right-back at it again, which they should be, hopefully with more sound Economics & other People in mind for now on.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:16 PM on 09/19/2008
- noneIn2008 I'm a Fan of noneIn2008 27 fans permalink

You think this is bad? What about Social Security. Yet the Federal Government sits on its hands on Social Security, waiting until the bottom falls out.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:15 PM on 09/19/2008
- SCG I'm a Fan of SCG 110 fans permalink
photo

See post below.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:18 PM on 09/19/2008

Flagged for being C R A P.

Get a new schtick, noneyah.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:21 PM on 09/19/2008
- RedEyes I'm a Fan of RedEyes 3 fans permalink
photo

Exactly. Because the socialist mindset that has permeated our government causes our leaders to spend, spend, spend. They borrow from the Social Security fund regularly to keep on spending, excuse me, wasting money.

Bush tried to reform Social Security. The Dems boo'd and stuck their heads in the sand.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:22 PM on 09/19/2008

Yet the Republicans can't come up with anything better but
try to con people into putting all your eggs in one basket----
A DEPRESSION ala 1930's---------

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:27 PM on 09/19/2008
- grizhead63 I'm a Fan of grizhead63 16 fans permalink
photo

More deflection. The USA is being sold down the river by the radical Right and Righteous and all they do is deflect the truth.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:28 PM on 09/19/2008
- WLA I'm a Fan of WLA 323 fans permalink
photo

Good gravy, some of you tr0lls are stupid. What does it take to show you mo-rons that privatizing SS would be the worst mistake ever made?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:29 PM on 09/19/2008

How is it that you buddy Bush could not do as say when the reps. controlled everything for 6 Years. For 8 year the reps and Bushie has blocked everything get ur hear out of your BUTT.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:32 PM on 09/19/2008

He wanted to take the money that I've worked hard for since 1972 and give it to rich people who have never done a day's work in their lives. That's your idea of reform? No thank you!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:41 PM on 09/19/2008
- SCG I'm a Fan of SCG 110 fans permalink
photo

Why should we all suffer potential run away inflation or such a slow economy with unemployment to pay for this bailout?

Who should pay for this? Who should bear the taxes?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:15 PM on 09/19/2008
- mrJJ I'm a Fan of mrJJ 23 fans permalink

McCain & The GOP Own This Financial Mess

Gramm-Leach-Bliley Financial Services Modernization Act.

53 Republican Senators plus one Democrat - AYE

44 Democrats no Republicans - NAY

Economist Robert Kuttner has criticized the repeal of the Glass-Steagall Act as contributing to the 2007 subprime mortgage financial crisis. Economists Robert Ekelund and Mark Thornton have made similar criticisms, arguing that while "in a world regulated by a gold standard, 100% reserve banking, and no FDIC deposit insurance" the Financial Services Modernization Act would have made "perfect sense" as a legitimate act of deregulation, under the present fiat monetary system it "amounts to corporate welfare for financial institutions and a moral hazard that will make taxpayers pay dearly".

"John McCain voted FOR the bank laws that led to the current credit crisis. John Mccain's economic advisor (Gramm) WROTE the law. 53 Republicans voted YES to the law. When you're in danger of losing your house & savings, can you take a chance on more of the same from those who wrecked out economy?"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kJ2eayWR3dU

Financial reward has always been associated with assumption of risk, but what the republicans have managed to do is divorce the two and in doing so they have managed to hold the rewards for themselves while transfering the risk to all of us.

How The Senate voted

http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=106&session=1&vote=00105

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:14 PM on 09/19/2008
- WLA I'm a Fan of WLA 323 fans permalink
photo

Please remind the brainwashed thugs of this repeatedly throughout the day.

Thank you.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:15 PM on 09/19/2008
photo

Thank you! Please inform these people stuck on stoopid.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:17 PM on 09/19/2008

Bu, bu, bu, but Obama single-handedly created this mess!!!! And I know how to fix it!! I just haven't felt like fixing it for 26 years!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:22 PM on 09/19/2008
- Clairvaux I'm a Fan of Clairvaux 75 fans permalink
photo

Don't you love the smell of facts in the afternoon.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:22 PM on 09/19/2008

Not one dime for CEOs to get golden parachutes. Bail out working people instead.

For this price tag, we should get re-regulation New Deal style.

And since Republicans have given up their opposition to "socialism", we should get universal health care too.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:14 PM on 09/19/2008
- dolphy I'm a Fan of dolphy 46 fans permalink

How putting them all in jail too?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:15 PM on 09/19/2008
photo

No, our country's proft-making prisons are reserved for the unproductive poor. Can't have the rich people taking up that valuable cell space.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:20 PM on 09/19/2008
- liseworks I'm a Fan of liseworks 143 fans permalink
photo

YEP, DESERVEDLY.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:23 PM on 09/19/2008
- liseworks I'm a Fan of liseworks 143 fans permalink
photo

NO MORE SOCIALISM FOR THE GREEDY RICH -
ENOUGH !!

It's time for a NEW DEAL !!

OBAMA / BIDEN

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:16 PM on 09/19/2008

I second that motion!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:22 PM on 09/19/2008

Rightwing american s h i t eh ea ds think we are 'socialists' here in Europe. Let me explain to those numbnuts the difference between US and YOU. IN Europe, CEO's can only afford to have 2 luxury homes and 2 yachts and 5 luxury cars while their employees get 5 weeks a year vacation and work 38 hour work week and can afford to drive a Mercedes. IN America, a CEO can afford 10 luxury homes, 5 yachts and 20 luxury cars while their employees work their a z z off and can only afford to drive a Ford. Oddly enough those European companies STILL make large profits while American companies have to be bailed out by the taxpayers.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:14 PM on 09/19/2008
- jpcline004 I'm a Fan of jpcline004 11 fans permalink

where you at? Need a roomate?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:15 PM on 09/19/2008
- Crog63 I'm a Fan of Crog63 5 fans permalink

That's it! I'm moving to Europe. I think I'll choose Spain since Johnny doesn't like it too much and Sarah can't see it from Alaska.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:16 PM on 09/19/2008
- WLA I'm a Fan of WLA 323 fans permalink
photo

McBush will never find us there! Heh.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:24 PM on 09/19/2008
- andvoodoo2 I'm a Fan of andvoodoo2 122 fans permalink
photo

Actually, Spain isn't a bad choice. I've been researching which European countries might take my family and I and Spain has fairly lax immigration policies.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:25 PM on 09/19/2008
- andvoodoo2 I'm a Fan of andvoodoo2 122 fans permalink
photo

Actually, Spain is a good choice. They have lax immigration policies. I've been considering Spain, too.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:29 PM on 09/19/2008
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next › Last » (69 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect