Paulson On Bailout: "We're Talking Hundreds Of Billions"

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Paulson On Bailout: "We're Talking Hundreds Of Billions" stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

TOM RAUM and JEANNINE AVERSA | September 19, 2008 11:32 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
President Bush, flanked by, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke, left, and Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson, delivers a statement about the economy and government efforts to remedy the crisis, Friday, Sept. 19, 2008, in the Rose Garden of the White House in Washington. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais)

WASHINGTON — Struggling to stave off financial catastrophe, the Bush administration on Friday laid out a radical bailout plan with a jawdropping price tag _ a takeover of a half-trillion dollars or more in worthless mortgages and other bad debt held by tottering institutions.

Relieved investors sent stocks soaring on Wall Street and around the globe. The Dow-Jones industrials average rose 368 points after surging 410 points the day before on rumors the federal action was afoot.

A grim-faced President Bush acknowledged risks to taxpayers in what would be the most sweeping government intervention to rescue failing financial institutions since the Great Depression. But he declared, "The risk of not acting would be far higher."

The administration is asking Congress for far-reaching new powers to take over troubled mortgages from banks and other companies, including purchasing sour mortgage-backed securities. Administration officials and congressional leaders are to work out details over the weekend.

Congressional officials said they expected a request for legal authority to buy up the bad loans, at a cost in excess of $500 billion to the government. Democrats were discussing whether to try to attach middle class assistance to the legislation, despite a request from Bush to avoid adding controversial items that could delay action. An expansion of jobless benefits was one possibility.

In other major steps, the Treasury Department and Federal Reserve moved to give money-market mutual funds the same kind of federal protection, at least temporarily, that now applies to savings and checking accounts and certificates of deposit at banks. Money-market accounts sold through retail banks are already FDIC insured.

The spreading global selling panic had started to threaten some money-market funds, usually thought of as rock-solid investments. Administration officials feared a run on these funds, held by millions of Americans.

"Every American should know that the federal government continues to enforce laws and regulations protecting your money," Bush said at the White House. The 75-year-old Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation now insures savings and checking accounts and certificates of deposit up to $100,000.

Story continues below
advertisement

Separately, the Securities and Exchange Commission acted to block short-selling in financial securities. That is a trading method that bets the value of stocks will go down. It has been blamed for accelerating the plunge in stock prices of banks and other financial institutions.

"This is a pivotal moment for America's economy," Bush said. "In our nation's history, there have been moments that require us to come together across party lines to address major challenges. This is such a moment."

Congressional leaders of both parties welcomed the administration's bold moves, after a series of ad hoc rescues.

The talk on the presidential campaign trail, barely six weeks before the election, was of bipartisanship, too.

Democrat Barack Obama said it was critical that leaders in both parties work in concert. "Truly, we are all in this together," he said.

GOP presidential nominee John McCain said leaders should put aside partisan differences and "any action should be designed to keep people in their homes and safeguard the life savings of all Americans."

The federal government already has pledged more than $600 billion in the past year to bail out, or help bail out, some of the biggest names in American finance. That includes the rescue of investment bank Bear Stearns in March, the takeover of mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac earlier this month and the takeover of the world's largest insurance company, American International Group, just this week.

But the contagion continued to spread, bringing political consensus that drastic and comprehensive federal action was needed.

There are precedents for such a federal takeover.

In the late 1980s, the government created the Resolution Trust Corporation to tackle the savings and loan crisis. It acquired the defaulted mortgages, foreclosed real estate and other assets of nearly a thousand failed S&Ls, restoring order and stability to the system. Resolving that crisis took six years and $125 billion in taxpayer money _ roughly equal to $200 billion in today's dollars.

And there was the Reconstruction Finance Corporation, a Depression-era relief program formed in 1932 by President Hoover that tried to revive the market by giving loans to banks and other businesses.

On Friday, Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson gave few details about the structure of the new program. Asked about an overall price tag, he said, "hundreds of billions" of dollars.

Congressional leaders said they were ready to move quickly but still needed details of the administration plan. For instance, there was no indication of what the government would get in return from financial companies for the federal assistance.

Paulson and Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke briefed lawmakers in both parties on the idea by conference call Friday.

In a session with House Democrats, they described a plan where the government would in essence set up reverse auctions, putting up money for a class of distressed assets _ such as loans that are delinquent but not in default _ and financial institutions would compete for how little they would accept for the investments, said Rep. Brad Sherman, D-Calif., who participated in the call.

"You give them good cash; they give you the worst of the worst," Sherman said of the plan, which he complained that Bush and his economic advisers were trying to panic lawmakers into rubber-stamping.

Paulson rejected Democrats' calls to include tighter regulations, corporate reforms or limits on executive compensation as part of the measure, Sherman said. "He's doing his best to paint a picture of the sky falling, and then he says, because the sky's falling, you have to do it my way."

Paulson said the new troubled-asset relief program that he wants Congress to enact must be large enough to have the necessary impact while protecting taxpayers as much as possible.

"I am convinced that this bold approach will cost American families far less than the alternative _ a continuing series of financial institution failures and frozen credit markets unable to fund economic expansion," Paulson. "The financial security of all Americans ... depends on our ability to restore our financial institutions to a sound footing."

Bush said simply, "We must act now."

"America's economy is facing unprecedented challenges. We're responding with unprecedented measures," Bush declared, standing in the White House Rose Garden with Paulson, Bernanke and Christopher Cox, chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Shortly after his remarks, Bush called congressional leaders with whom the administration will be working on the final plan. He spoke to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky and House GOP leader John Boehner of Ohio.

The administration wants to see a package emerge from the weekend, to lend calm to Monday morning's market openings, said Keith Hennessey, the director of the president's economic council. The goal is to have something passed by Congress by the end of next week, when lawmakers recess for the elections.

Paulson said Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac will step up their purchases of mortgage-backed securities to help provide support to the crippled housing market. He also said the Treasury Department will expand a program, announced earlier this month, to buy mortgage-backed securities, which have been badly hurt by the housing and credit crises.

"As we all know, lax lending practices earlier this decade led to irresponsible lending and irresponsible borrowing. This simply put too many families into mortgages they could not afford," Paulson said.

Bush authorized Treasury to tap up to $50 billion from a Depression-era fund to insure the holdings of eligible money-market mutual funds. And the Federal Reserve announced it would expand its emergency lending program to help support the $3.4 trillion in total assets of the funds.

On Wednesday alone, investors had pulled more than $89 billion from money-market funds, according to iMoneyNet, publisher of the newsletter Money Fund Report.

The government's actions could help alleviate the uncertainty that has been sending the markets into tumult over the past week. Lending has come to a virtual standstill in the wake of the bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.

European Central Bank, Swiss National Bank and Bank of England also offered up more cash Friday. The three banks put a combined $90 billion into money markets.

___

Associated Press writers Julie Hirschfeld Davis, Martin Crutsinger, Andrew Taylor, Marcy Gordon, David Espo and Jim Abrams in Washington and Joe Bel Bruno in New York contributed to this report.

WASHINGTON — Struggling to stave off financial catastrophe, the Bush administration on Friday laid out a radical bailout plan with a jawdropping price tag _ a takeover of a half-trillion dollars...
WASHINGTON — Struggling to stave off financial catastrophe, the Bush administration on Friday laid out a radical bailout plan with a jawdropping price tag _ a takeover of a half-trillion dollars...
Filed by Katherine Thomson  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
436
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (15 pages total)

Disaster Capitalism strikes again. First create a crisis, then profit from it.

Same old saw: the Corporatists, with the aid of armies of lobbyists and well-connected former government officials, promote socialized financial medicine for themselves -- leaving us with the check. When are we supposed to get some help for our own situations, rather than just keep paying, to support an ideologically corrupt system of (falsely-claimed) "free" markets?

I have no big problem with the idea of bailing out rich fools with my tax dollars -- provided I get something for the expense. I say that if the public saves their butts, the public owns a share of them, as in a percentage of their stock. I further say that I don't want the government selling off my shares afterward, but keeping them as a way to channel stock dividends into private citizens' hands. They say we should be an "ownership society." Well, it's time to back up those words.

Alaskans get a check every year because the state wisely invested on behalf of the citizens. Time to take the same model to Wall Street, and start building up the US Permanent Fund.

See you at the bank!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:17 PM on 09/22/2008

Well, here they go again. Those wacky fellows who brought us deregulation and myopic oversight of our financial institutions, which has brought us to the brink of a financial calamity the size of which hasn’t been seen since the great depression want another bite of the credulity apple.

Those hail fellow, well met guys have a new scheme to soak the American tax payer. Those bodacious boys of bungle want 700 Billion of our Nation’s future to buy up all those bad mortgages and financial instruments that is clogging the system.

But, that’s not audacious enough for those esteemed characters that we have entrusted with the government of this great country. No, the real impudence is that they want more of our money without, are you ready for it, OVERSIGHT! The proposal, that is on the table from the Bush Administration and is being touted by Republicans, will give Secretary Paulson $800,000,000,000 to use as he sees fit, without Executive oversight, Legislative oversight, or Judicial Review. Are you kidding me? Giving those cast of characters that kind of money without oversight is like letting the fox eat the eggs after he has barbequed the hens.

We have watched this group of incompetent criminals raid the treasury of the United States long enough. We need to shout NO, you don’t get our money without rigorous regulation and oversight. The conventional wisdom is we can’t say no to the bail out, but we can say no to the blank check

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:14 AM on 09/22/2008
- WillNYC I'm a Fan of WillNYC 8 fans permalink
photo

I hope everyone scrubs through this legislation... This smells like the Iraq war vote... panic legislation.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:21 PM on 09/21/2008
- d18v I'm a Fan of d18v permalink

It appears that the Republicans are asking the tax payers to bail out the very institutions that are throwing them out of their homes. Dems want some protection for home owners while Repubs want a "clean bill"

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:51 PM on 09/21/2008

Look at the Dems, they can't even explain their own financial accountability. Rengal, Biden (limited $ donations to charity, yet wants to TAKE my money(his words). Pelosi supports Rengal and only supports energy reforms that benefit her interests.. Dems aren't showing they can handle themselves, let alone the country...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:30 PM on 09/21/2008

Where is the accountability? If we must bail these firms out then fine, but for my money I want a few things.
First -I want to know who is responsable for this mess, it is not "complex", "dificult" or any other adjative one wishes to use, somebody gave the pitch for these irresponsable practices, then someone else gave the okay. Who are they? These individuals need to be held to account, if I were to do something that cost my employer say a few nights of room revenue rest assured that I would be held accountable and rightly so.

Second -Who will make up the new leadership of the banks and insurance companies? Surely the feds are not going to just turn over the just rescued firms to the same brilliant group that put the ship on the rocks in the first place?

Third- What regulations are going to be put in place to protect both the employees of these firms and we, the American taxpayer from this sort of fidicuary malfesience and criminal incompetance in the future?

Fourth- What are we, the general public getting out of this? will the profits generated by the investment of the government be applied to say public healthcare for all? what about Social Security funding? or Medicare? I ask this because there is a huge number of people about to hit both SS and Medicare age and this needs to be addressed.

So, let's demand some answers for our money.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:43 AM on 09/21/2008
- DCX2 I'm a Fan of DCX2 6 fans permalink

As a pre-condition to the use of taxpayer money, every single last ill-gotten gain for the last decade should be appropriated by the government. Every CEO, CFO, and any other employee who made over one million dollars per year should be brought back down into the real world with the rest of us middle-class folk who worry about paying our bills. Only then will I consent to this waste of my money.

Everyone should all refuse to file their taxes in protest. Congress no longer represents the People. No taxation without representation.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:20 AM on 09/21/2008
- Ddayv825 I'm a Fan of Ddayv825 4 fans permalink

So why so quiet be the republican mantra of " LESS GOVERNMENT NOW " You've had it under both Bush administrations and both have cost us dearly . Can anyone imagine how much better our AMERICA would have been if a Bush were never elected ? Their pensions and entitlements should be immediately terminated. They are deserving of nothing more than a jail term.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:59 AM on 09/21/2008

Barack Obama on Wall Street:

September 17, 2007
http://ca.youtube.com/watch?v=b6PPZMpc-e0

He called almost one year to the day.
Pesky foresight

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:31 PM on 09/20/2008
    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:09 AM on 09/23/2008

How about a trillion? Add that to the trillion dollar Iraq war...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:19 PM on 09/20/2008
- grf67 I'm a Fan of grf67 40 fans permalink

More of the bush legacy. A colapsing credit market and a bush bailout with the taxpayers money. The republicans are very cavalier with the taxpayers money.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:46 PM on 09/20/2008
- rwe2late I'm a Fan of rwe2late 44 fans permalink

Actually, borrowed money that citizens will have to pay for by the stealth tax of inflation, and by reduced vital government services.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:33 PM on 09/20/2008
- BADEN I'm a Fan of BADEN 9 fans permalink

WAS HE LICKING HIS GOLDMAN SACHS LIPS AS HE SPOKE?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:33 PM on 09/20/2008
- Galt907 I'm a Fan of Galt907 5 fans permalink

I'm not certain I have this right: Our employees messed up, their plans and theories failed, now those same bad employees claim to have the solution and all we need do is turn over another trillion dollars of OUR money, and the next two or three generation's money, to them, oh yes, and we have to do it this week, without stopping to think or debate?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:27 PM on 09/20/2008
- wordvarc I'm a Fan of wordvarc 32 fans permalink

.

Maybe Palin can sell distressed financial institutions on e-bay...

.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:56 PM on 09/20/2008
- NickSoCal I'm a Fan of NickSoCal 3 fans permalink

am convinced that this was their plan all along.

I saw this comming YEARS ago and I am no financial expert.just not DUMB

Now we know why so many EXPERTS took so much RISK and made so many BILLIONS in profits.

THEY KNEW BUSH WOULD COVER THEIR DEBTS IN ADVANCE!

2 months before BUSH leaves office he gives all of our money to his supporters in the biggest act of FINANCIAL PARDON IN HISTORY!!!

Or would you rather beleive that EVERY EXPERT in Finance was WRONG??

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:47 PM on 09/20/2008
- eman I'm a Fan of eman 2 fans permalink

its amazing how absolutely wrong the republicans can be about everything .

i mean, whats the odds of so called , educated people, being so wrong.

they were wrong about the mid east - - the whole neo con , freedom domino effect.

and now . the whole ... deregulate EVERYTHING in the financial markets.

no one could be SO wrong about SO MANY THINGS. could it have been a plan?? to rip us off coming and going ?? that would make more sense. but who knows.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:24 PM on 09/20/2008
- allwrite I'm a Fan of allwrite 16 fans permalink

Bring the troops home now. Use the savings to fund this bailout. Lobby your congress reps.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:14 PM on 09/20/2008
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (15 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect