Stocks soar as investors bet on gov't rescue plan

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Stocks soar as investors bet on gov't rescue plan stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

TIM PARADIS | September 19, 2008 06:58 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Banc of America Specialists' Peter Giacchi, right, and Michael Bonanno work at the post where Goldman Sachs is traded on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange, Friday, Sept. 19, 2008 in New York. Wall Street extended a huge rally as investors stormed back into the market, relieved that the government plans to rescue banks from billions of dollars in bad debt. (AP Photo/Henny Ray Abrams)

NEW YORK — Wall Street had another extraordinary rally Friday as investors stormed back into the market, relieved that the government plans to restore calm to the financial system by rescuing banks from billions of dollars in bad debt. The Dow Jones industrials soared about 370 points, giving them a gain of about 780 over two days, and Treasurys fell as money flowed into equities.

The government's proposal, while still a work in progress, has placated investors who worried that a continuum of bad bets on mortgages would hobble more financial companies and cause further damage to the strained banking system and the overall economy.

"If a solid plan is put in place, it's definitely going to be a positive in easing the pain," said Stephen Carl, principal and head of equity trading at The Williams Capital Group. He added, though, that the set-up of any plan will determine its success.

A new government ban on short selling, or placing bets that a stock will fall, likely added to the market's gains as traders adjusted their positions. "A big chunk of this is scaring all the shorts to cover their bets," said Joe Battipaglia, market strategist at Stifel, Nicolaus & Co., referring to short sellers.

Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson, speaking about the rescue plan, said a bold approach is needed to remove troubled assets from the books of financial firms. He offered few details, but said he would working through the weekend with congressional leaders to assemble a remedy.

The plan could help neutralize a yearlong credit crisis that intensified this week. Wall Street suffered massive losses Monday and Wednesday, and credit markets essentially seized up following this week's bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. and the bailout of teetering insurer American International Group Inc.

Analysts said it was the first government response decisive enough to restore confidence in the markets; in the past, it has relied largely on steps like injecting cash into the banking system that, at least until now, had a limited impact.

"Everything they had done had been a Band-Aid approach, at the margins," said Jay Mueller, economist at Strong Capital Management. "Now we're dealing with the root problem."

Story continues below

The government took other steps Friday to restore stability to the financial system. The Federal Reserve said it will expand its emergency lending and let commercial banks finance purchases of asset-backed paper from money market funds. The Fed injected more money into the U.S. financial system, as it had done earlier in the week. The central bank also said it will buy short-term debt obligations issued by mortgage giants Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and the Federal Home Loan Banks.

To further ease investors' anxieties and bolster tattered investor confidence, the Treasury Department has decided to use a Depression-era fund to provide guarantees for U.S. money market mutual funds. Money market mutual funds are typically considered safe, but some investors have been fleeing them, fearing that the funds' holdings included souring corporate debt.

And to help limit the freefall in financial stocks, the Securities and Exchange Commission on Friday enacted a ban until next month on the short-selling of nearly 800 financial stocks. Short-selling is the common practice of betting against a stock by borrowing shares and then selling them in the open market. A short-seller's hope is the stock will fall; if it does, the stock can be bought back at the lower price. Those cheaper shares can be returned to the lender, allowing the investor to pocket the profits. Traders can lose, however, if the stock rises.

Wall Street observers have disagreed over the extent to which pressure from all those bets that a stock will fall shaped investor sentiment and strangled some financial stocks, like those of Lehman Brothers last week. Some say the fundamental problems with overleveraged financial companies warranted the pessimism while others say the short selling was a death knell for some financial names.

"The federal government has been petitioned by Wall Street to take evasive action in the money markets, the stock and bond markets, to avoid a complete meltdown of the credit system," said Battipaglia. "Once the credit system melts down, the economy falls. We can hand-wring about if this is the proper thing for the government to do, or if Wall Street pulled the panic button too soon, but that's something for the historians to sort out."

It's difficult to quantify how much of the market's gains reflected short sellers who are forced to step in and cover their bets by buying now rising stocks that had predicted would fall. While that appeared to play some role in the advances Thursday and Friday, the Nasdaq composite index _ dominated by big technology stocks, not financials _ showed big gains along with the Dow and the Standard & Poor's 500 index.

The Dow rose 368.75, or 3.35 percent, to 11,388.44 after having been up as much as 463.36.

Friday was a quarterly "quadruple witching" day, which marks the simultaneous expiration of options contracts, an event that often adds to volatility and heavy volume. Still, much of the market's moves were due to the government's actions Friday.

Broader stock indicators also surged. The S&P 500 index rose 48.57, or 4.03 percent, to 1,255.08, and the Nasdaq composite index rose 74.80, or 3.40 percent, to 2,273.90.

Even with Friday's big gains, stocks didn't end the week with much change after the whipsaw sessions. The Dow slipped 0.29 percent, the S&P 500 rose 0.27 percent and the Nasdaq added 0.56 percent.

Treasury prices dropped as investors poured money back into stocks. The yield on the 3-month Treasury bill _ a safe investment to which investors have rushed this week _ rose to 0.95 percent from 0.07 percent late Thursday. Yields move opposite from price. The yield on the benchmark 10-year Treasury note shot up to 3.81 percent from 3.53 percent late Thursday.

The stock market's enormous swings during the week reveal how anxious investors have been about the tightness in the credit markets the possibility that other financial companies might succumb to the difficulties in the markets.

The only lasting move in a week of intense volatility came late in Thursday's session when reports emerged that the government was considering a plan that would shift soured debt off financials' books. A wobbly market rocketed higher, giving the Dow a 410-point gain for the session, buying that continued through Friday.

The dollar rose against most other major currencies in Friday trading, while gold prices jumped. Light, sweet crude rose $6.67 to settle at $104.55 a barrel on the New York Mercantile Exchange.

Advancing issues outnumbered decliners by about 7 to 1 on the New York Stock Exchange, where consolidated volume came to a heavy 9.1 billion shares compared with 10.3 billion shares traded Thursday.

The Russell 2000 index of smaller companies rose 30.06, or 4.15 percent, to 753.74.

Overseas stock markets soared. Japan's Nikkei stock average jumped 3.8 percent, and Hong Kong's Hang Seng index surged 9.61 percent. In Europe, Britain's FTSE 100 jumped 8.84 percent, Germany's DAX index advanced 5.56 percent, and France's CAC-40 rose 9.27 percent.

___

The Dow Jones industrial average ended the week down 33.55, or 0.29 percent, at 11,388.44. The Standard & Poor's 500 index finished up 3.38, or 0.27 percent, at 1,255.08. The Nasdaq composite index ended the week up 12.63, or 0.56 percent, at 2,273.90.

The Russell 2000 index finished the week up 33.48, or 0.27 percent, at 753.74.

The Dow Jones Wilshire 5000 Composite Index _ a free-float weighted index that measures 5,000 U.S. based companies _ ended at 12,882.14, up 117.26 points, or 0.92 percent, for the week. A year ago, the index was at 15,371.29.

___

On the Net:

New York Stock Exchange: http://www.nyse.com

Nasdaq Stock Market: http://www.nasdaq.com

NEW YORK — Wall Street had another extraordinary rally Friday as investors stormed back into the market, relieved that the government plans to restore calm to the financial system by rescuing ba...
NEW YORK — Wall Street had another extraordinary rally Friday as investors stormed back into the market, relieved that the government plans to restore calm to the financial system by rescuing ba...
Filed by Katherine Thomson  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
132
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next › Last » (5 pages total)
- NicoleAnon I'm a Fan of NicoleAnon 9 fans permalink

I know this has never been done before but couldn't they have just shut down the stock market for a few days and requested other countries do the same thing? That would have stopped all trading while they had a "time out" and just took a step back to figure out what was happening.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:42 PM on 09/19/2008
- k6007 I'm a Fan of k6007 237 fans permalink
photo

Anti-socialist!!
~snark~

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:49 PM on 09/19/2008
- pakaal I'm a Fan of pakaal 38 fans permalink
photo

The problem isn't that they don't know what's happening, the problem is they don't WANT certain things to happen, so they're manipulating the market to accommodate their needs. Ugly, but true.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:52 PM on 09/19/2008

I have much less confidence in Wall Street now. I don't trust many bankers who work there.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:21 PM on 09/19/2008
- boing007 I'm a Fan of boing007 9 fans permalink

They're happier than pigs in slop and they will probably do the same again if you let them.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:55 PM on 09/19/2008
- Dynamohum I'm a Fan of Dynamohum 62 fans permalink

It will happen again. History just keeps repeating itself, over and over again. Our collective shortsightedness blinds us to this reality.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:02 PM on 09/19/2008

Wait until the prime conventional loans start to go into default, we ain't seen nothin yet

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:42 PM on 09/19/2008
- dolphy I'm a Fan of dolphy 46 fans permalink

Friedman, where are you? P a l in should ask his books to be b u r n ed.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:40 PM on 09/19/2008
- GeoLee I'm a Fan of GeoLee 67 fans permalink

LIke she knows who Friedman is...a journalism major, poli sci minor who does not even know the Pledge of Alegiance was not written until the late 1890's and that under God did not get incoluded until 1954...that Sarah Palin?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:43 PM on 09/19/2008
- Paralogos I'm a Fan of Paralogos 12 fans permalink

THE QUESTION NO ONE SEEMS TO DARE ASK:

What are the American taxpayers getting in return for this unprecedentedly huge bailout? If this done as a "debt for equity swap", where the US Treasury gets a chunk of ownership in each financial institution in return for soaking up the bad debt, and where the dividends and/or eventual resale from that stock go to pay back the treasury, maybe it's a good thing. Anything else is just the largest and perhaps final step of Bush-era plundering of the public purse for the benefit of a small number of wealthy and powerful supporters.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:32 PM on 09/19/2008
- Big0725 I'm a Fan of Big0725 23 fans permalink
photo

This just goes to prove one thing. You can't trust a free market. Human nature will ALWAYS look for a way to cheat the system.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:23 PM on 09/19/2008
- NicoleAnon I'm a Fan of NicoleAnon 9 fans permalink

But it's not just investment bankers who were taking advantage of the system - lots of people lied about their income so they could get home loans when they knew they couldn't afford them.

The problem is most Americans are honest but we have to pay for crimes of people who aren't.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:56 PM on 09/19/2008
- skahimself I'm a Fan of skahimself 4 fans permalink

Most Americans aren't honest. Most Americans aren't bright.

Let's be real here:

You have an opportunity to buy a home but it's a little out of your price range. Your mortgage broker tells you, "that's not a problem. we'll just fudge a little. you should be getting a raise anyways right?". He then sells you (or you sell yourself) on a house and loan combo that you shouldn't have even been offered in the first place.

You let your greed get the best of you. So did the mortgage broker. So did those backing the securities.

Every single person involved is just as greedy and shortsighted as the rest.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:19 PM on 09/19/2008
- GeoLee I'm a Fan of GeoLee 67 fans permalink

Well, why don't people do basic checking on what someone says they earn? By the way there are many unethical real estate agents who when they learn what you make or how much in debt you are, tell you little tricks to do to raise your credit score. I was asked about one by someone looking for a house and I told the potential home buyer that, 1. she clearly did not have enough money to sustain a debt for a house as expensive as what the person was trying to sell her and 2. once the realtor got her money at the closing she would not care if my friend lost her house one bit and would blame her and 3. the agent was acting not only unethically, but quite possible illegally by abetting fraud. My friend got the message and bought a house in a less desirable neighborhood at a price she could afford. Let us not assume the buyer is always the one lying. Maybe they were just gullible because real estate information is not usually one of the subjects school can really prepare you for dealing with. If half the people in the country were gullible enough in 2000 and 2004 to believe all Bush said, then I rest my case about the gullibility of the typical American consumer

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:52 PM on 09/19/2008
- bhshore I'm a Fan of bhshore 5 fans permalink
photo

Facts:

Bush has gotten every spending request and or any supplemental request past or rubber stamped by the spineless democratic and republican congress and senate over the last 8 years.

This is a result of Bush's reckless spending and lase fare or private approach to sub contracting government to the rich power brokers - themselves.

waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa waaaaaaaaaaaaaa bail us out georgie......

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:22 PM on 09/19/2008
- GeoLee I'm a Fan of GeoLee 67 fans permalink

laissez- faire is the spelling, but the thought is soooooo accurate.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:55 PM on 09/19/2008
- dolphy I'm a Fan of dolphy 46 fans permalink

We're talking about hundreds of billions here.....(for Booosh's base). Part in ( ) is in Paulson's thought bubble. I'm really steaming. I want to yell and pull my hair.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:20 PM on 09/19/2008
- Big0725 I'm a Fan of Big0725 23 fans permalink
photo

The Treasury will make it up next year when the op tax rate goes back up to 75% and the capital gains tax goes up to 20%.

And if that doesn't do it, with the usury rates being charged by the Treasury for these loans, we should be able to make that money back up in a few years!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:27 PM on 09/19/2008
- dolphy I'm a Fan of dolphy 46 fans permalink

Lat I heard, cap tax is 28% max

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:28 PM on 09/19/2008
- nomoredead I'm a Fan of nomoredead 12 fans permalink

A tax on stock trades like England. That would bring in 100 billion a year. ( Heard last night on TV)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:45 PM on 09/20/2008
photo

Libs crack me up. After a century of America growing individual prosperity derived from free-market principles, they say we now need a socialist system to take care of all the low income people and more government to control all the "greedy rich people".

Libs draw this conclusion, but fail to admit that a century and trillions of dollars spent fighting the war on hunger and poverty has failed to solve the problem.

Be honest. The real reason that libs want socialism is that they are too lazy or think they are too well educated to work hard, or are stuck in some public sector job and are bitter that other people are happier and more prosperous. Either that, or they have money but didn't earn it though hard work and feel guitly about it.

Socialism does not work. Ask the French.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:03 PM on 09/19/2008

That's funny because the French seem to be doing fine. According to the dozen or so people I know over there, they are quite happy with their system. Go troll somewhere else.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:10 PM on 09/19/2008
- dolphy I'm a Fan of dolphy 46 fans permalink

So you're saying that we did not improve life expectancy, poverty, infant mortalitality.... etc. for MOST of the population from Dickens era?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:17 PM on 09/19/2008
photo

So, you want to compare today with the turn of the century. I can tell your standards are pretty low.

You tell me. I keep hearing from libs that we still have too many hungry and poor that need to be saved. So, how much moeny is enough before we "win" that war.

Libs may have a problem with how much we are spending on "Bush's" war, but we appear to have won that one. The war on hunger and poverty seems to be a perpetual one that libs can never win... and is costing us more than all wars past and present. Why not own up to this?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:27 PM on 09/19/2008
- Paralogos I'm a Fan of Paralogos 12 fans permalink

Actually, having lived in France through both socialist and center-right governments, it's worth noting that economic growth was better, and public finances were healthier, under the socialists. It's been a lot like the US: The right-wing parties decry left-wing "tax-and-spend" policies, but once they're in power, they spend even more, they just don't tax. They run up debts instead.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:36 PM on 09/19/2008
photo

I am not really saying a socialists system is the way to go, however I do think some more socialism would be good. But geez, if your hero's keep having their way there wont be an industry that isn't socialized. What's it been, 2 in a month now? First Freddie and Fannie, now the insurance, baking looks to be getting close.

Not really the ones I would want to be socialized, but again your hero's have brought this one about.

And you all clamor how bad a universal health care system would be.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:07 PM on 09/19/2008

The "libs" as you call us don't want corporate bailouts: they want re-regulation.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:36 PM on 09/19/2008
- BethStuart I'm a Fan of BethStuart 13 fans permalink

Supply-Side Economics: May it rest in peace forever.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:43 PM on 09/19/2008
- boing007 I'm a Fan of boing007 9 fans permalink

BethStuart

Supply-Side Economics: May it rest in peace forever.

I'd rather see it burn in hell forever.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:52 PM on 09/19/2008

The movie Blade has what I think the best summary of how government is using the middle class and lower income taxpayers to support the mistakes and income of the upper 2%:

“These people are our food, not our allies.”

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:42 PM on 09/19/2008

It's a great line, but in this case it means they are going to to starve.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:54 PM on 09/19/2008

yeah they just made teh stock market into a big hedgefund with our money; wait til the ban on shorts is up...the whole thing will tank.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:55 PM on 09/19/2008

Since all these bailouts are happening because these companies are "too big to fail", don't you think it's time we bring back some good old fashioned trust busting and break these giant corporations up so they will never be "too big to fail" ever again?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:32 PM on 09/19/2008
- Big0725 I'm a Fan of Big0725 23 fans permalink
photo

The laws are still on the books, it's just that the Shrub had absolutely no desire to enforce them.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:21 PM on 09/19/2008
- dolphy I'm a Fan of dolphy 46 fans permalink

Good point.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:21 PM on 09/19/2008

"too big to fail" = Republican for corporate welfare
Will they use it again when BofA and Citi start crying poor...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:35 PM on 09/19/2008
- boing007 I'm a Fan of boing007 9 fans permalink

bushflipflops

Since all these bailouts are happening because these companies are "too big to fail", don't you think it's time we bring back some good old fashioned trust busting and break these giant corporations up so they will never be "too big to fail" ever again?

AIG should be first.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:56 PM on 09/19/2008
- Moxo I'm a Fan of Moxo 12 fans permalink

See, Welfare does make people happier!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:29 PM on 09/19/2008
- Lucille I'm a Fan of Lucille 35 fans permalink
photo

Corporate giants, the world over, are gettingj in on part of the action at American taxpayer's expense.

I smell a rat in this so called "bail out." What if this was planned like so much of what the Bush administration has done. For example, what if this entire “deliberate collapse” of some choice firms on Wall Street, is just a ruse to transfer trillions, literally trillions of American dollars into the hands of other corporate giants, similar to what Enron has gained through the Iraq war?

McCain is playing the role of the Trojan horse right now. If he gets into the White House he will endorse non-regulating the corporate sectors as he has previously done for the last 26 years. Only in the last couple of days has he been for regulating Wall Street. Straight talk? Ha, he's as much as a con artist as the Wall Street CEOs who despite their failure will walk away with millions of our dollars in their pockets.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:26 PM on 09/19/2008
- NicoleAnon I'm a Fan of NicoleAnon 9 fans permalink

Actually McCain has said he thinks the bailouts are wrong. It's YOUR candidate who said today he supports Ivan Boesky...sorry I mean Henry Paulson...and he thinks taxpayers need to save the banks again.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:36 PM on 09/19/2008

See: Keating 5, Phil Gramm, Jack Abramoff, Carl Lindner

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:37 PM on 09/19/2008
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next › Last » (5 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect