Stocks soar as investors bet on gov't rescue plan

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Stocks soar as investors bet on gov't rescue plan stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

TIM PARADIS | September 19, 2008 06:58 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Banc of America Specialists' Peter Giacchi, right, and Michael Bonanno work at the post where Goldman Sachs is traded on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange, Friday, Sept. 19, 2008 in New York. Wall Street extended a huge rally as investors stormed back into the market, relieved that the government plans to rescue banks from billions of dollars in bad debt. (AP Photo/Henny Ray Abrams)

NEW YORK — Wall Street had another extraordinary rally Friday as investors stormed back into the market, relieved that the government plans to restore calm to the financial system by rescuing banks from billions of dollars in bad debt. The Dow Jones industrials soared about 370 points, giving them a gain of about 780 over two days, and Treasurys fell as money flowed into equities.

The government's proposal, while still a work in progress, has placated investors who worried that a continuum of bad bets on mortgages would hobble more financial companies and cause further damage to the strained banking system and the overall economy.

"If a solid plan is put in place, it's definitely going to be a positive in easing the pain," said Stephen Carl, principal and head of equity trading at The Williams Capital Group. He added, though, that the set-up of any plan will determine its success.

A new government ban on short selling, or placing bets that a stock will fall, likely added to the market's gains as traders adjusted their positions. "A big chunk of this is scaring all the shorts to cover their bets," said Joe Battipaglia, market strategist at Stifel, Nicolaus & Co., referring to short sellers.

Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson, speaking about the rescue plan, said a bold approach is needed to remove troubled assets from the books of financial firms. He offered few details, but said he would working through the weekend with congressional leaders to assemble a remedy.

The plan could help neutralize a yearlong credit crisis that intensified this week. Wall Street suffered massive losses Monday and Wednesday, and credit markets essentially seized up following this week's bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. and the bailout of teetering insurer American International Group Inc.

Analysts said it was the first government response decisive enough to restore confidence in the markets; in the past, it has relied largely on steps like injecting cash into the banking system that, at least until now, had a limited impact.

"Everything they had done had been a Band-Aid approach, at the margins," said Jay Mueller, economist at Strong Capital Management. "Now we're dealing with the root problem."

Story continues below
advertisement

The government took other steps Friday to restore stability to the financial system. The Federal Reserve said it will expand its emergency lending and let commercial banks finance purchases of asset-backed paper from money market funds. The Fed injected more money into the U.S. financial system, as it had done earlier in the week. The central bank also said it will buy short-term debt obligations issued by mortgage giants Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and the Federal Home Loan Banks.

To further ease investors' anxieties and bolster tattered investor confidence, the Treasury Department has decided to use a Depression-era fund to provide guarantees for U.S. money market mutual funds. Money market mutual funds are typically considered safe, but some investors have been fleeing them, fearing that the funds' holdings included souring corporate debt.

And to help limit the freefall in financial stocks, the Securities and Exchange Commission on Friday enacted a ban until next month on the short-selling of nearly 800 financial stocks. Short-selling is the common practice of betting against a stock by borrowing shares and then selling them in the open market. A short-seller's hope is the stock will fall; if it does, the stock can be bought back at the lower price. Those cheaper shares can be returned to the lender, allowing the investor to pocket the profits. Traders can lose, however, if the stock rises.

Wall Street observers have disagreed over the extent to which pressure from all those bets that a stock will fall shaped investor sentiment and strangled some financial stocks, like those of Lehman Brothers last week. Some say the fundamental problems with overleveraged financial companies warranted the pessimism while others say the short selling was a death knell for some financial names.

"The federal government has been petitioned by Wall Street to take evasive action in the money markets, the stock and bond markets, to avoid a complete meltdown of the credit system," said Battipaglia. "Once the credit system melts down, the economy falls. We can hand-wring about if this is the proper thing for the government to do, or if Wall Street pulled the panic button too soon, but that's something for the historians to sort out."

It's difficult to quantify how much of the market's gains reflected short sellers who are forced to step in and cover their bets by buying now rising stocks that had predicted would fall. While that appeared to play some role in the advances Thursday and Friday, the Nasdaq composite index _ dominated by big technology stocks, not financials _ showed big gains along with the Dow and the Standard & Poor's 500 index.

The Dow rose 368.75, or 3.35 percent, to 11,388.44 after having been up as much as 463.36.

Friday was a quarterly "quadruple witching" day, which marks the simultaneous expiration of options contracts, an event that often adds to volatility and heavy volume. Still, much of the market's moves were due to the government's actions Friday.

Broader stock indicators also surged. The S&P 500 index rose 48.57, or 4.03 percent, to 1,255.08, and the Nasdaq composite index rose 74.80, or 3.40 percent, to 2,273.90.

Even with Friday's big gains, stocks didn't end the week with much change after the whipsaw sessions. The Dow slipped 0.29 percent, the S&P 500 rose 0.27 percent and the Nasdaq added 0.56 percent.

Treasury prices dropped as investors poured money back into stocks. The yield on the 3-month Treasury bill _ a safe investment to which investors have rushed this week _ rose to 0.95 percent from 0.07 percent late Thursday. Yields move opposite from price. The yield on the benchmark 10-year Treasury note shot up to 3.81 percent from 3.53 percent late Thursday.

The stock market's enormous swings during the week reveal how anxious investors have been about the tightness in the credit markets the possibility that other financial companies might succumb to the difficulties in the markets.

The only lasting move in a week of intense volatility came late in Thursday's session when reports emerged that the government was considering a plan that would shift soured debt off financials' books. A wobbly market rocketed higher, giving the Dow a 410-point gain for the session, buying that continued through Friday.

The dollar rose against most other major currencies in Friday trading, while gold prices jumped. Light, sweet crude rose $6.67 to settle at $104.55 a barrel on the New York Mercantile Exchange.

Advancing issues outnumbered decliners by about 7 to 1 on the New York Stock Exchange, where consolidated volume came to a heavy 9.1 billion shares compared with 10.3 billion shares traded Thursday.

The Russell 2000 index of smaller companies rose 30.06, or 4.15 percent, to 753.74.

Overseas stock markets soared. Japan's Nikkei stock average jumped 3.8 percent, and Hong Kong's Hang Seng index surged 9.61 percent. In Europe, Britain's FTSE 100 jumped 8.84 percent, Germany's DAX index advanced 5.56 percent, and France's CAC-40 rose 9.27 percent.

___

The Dow Jones industrial average ended the week down 33.55, or 0.29 percent, at 11,388.44. The Standard & Poor's 500 index finished up 3.38, or 0.27 percent, at 1,255.08. The Nasdaq composite index ended the week up 12.63, or 0.56 percent, at 2,273.90.

The Russell 2000 index finished the week up 33.48, or 0.27 percent, at 753.74.

The Dow Jones Wilshire 5000 Composite Index _ a free-float weighted index that measures 5,000 U.S. based companies _ ended at 12,882.14, up 117.26 points, or 0.92 percent, for the week. A year ago, the index was at 15,371.29.

___

On the Net:

New York Stock Exchange: http://www.nyse.com

Nasdaq Stock Market: http://www.nasdaq.com

NEW YORK — Wall Street had another extraordinary rally Friday as investors stormed back into the market, relieved that the government plans to restore calm to the financial system by rescuing ba...
NEW YORK — Wall Street had another extraordinary rally Friday as investors stormed back into the market, relieved that the government plans to restore calm to the financial system by rescuing ba...
Filed by Katherine Thomson  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
132
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next › Last » (5 pages total)
- BOBONDE I'm a Fan of BOBONDE 4 fans permalink

IF THINGS WERE OK THEN WALL ST. WOULD NOT BE THRASHING BACK AND FORTH LIKE AN OVERLOADED WASHING MACHINE!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:26 PM on 09/19/2008
- Lazslo I'm a Fan of Lazslo 9 fans permalink

Ah - you see McCain was right! The fundamentals of the economy is the American worker (a.k.a SLAVES). Once wall street got the word that the slaves will be the ones to pay for Wall streets mistakes, the stock market goes up. Why should I pay for what someone else did? The stock market is too quick to react this way. It is not yet determined if the American people will agree to pay for Wall street excesses and mistakes. I'm not paying one red cent, no matter what the government tells me. Enough is enough.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:24 PM on 09/19/2008
- All in All I'm a Fan of All in All 62 fans permalink

That's a Very Telling Picture that's being used for this Article...­..

When is the last time most Middle-Class Americans felt like those two Guys in that Picture...­....

We all should all be Happy & as Jubilant as the People whom can actually afford too put their extra Money into the Stock Markets, and We should thank Our Government for putting some of Our Essential Companies/needs on/into the Stock Market, I hope they put Social Security on/into the Stock Market next....

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:02 PM on 09/19/2008

Do I see this right? The Dow is now where it was in August of 2006?

:-)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:59 PM on 09/19/2008

so you're content with regression?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:38 PM on 09/19/2008

by promising to dump "hundreds of billions of Taxpayer Dollars into the "free" market, they pushed the Dow back to where it was on June 30, almost. Heck of a job.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:55 PM on 09/19/2008
- NicoleAnon I'm a Fan of NicoleAnon 9 fans permalink

But what do Bernanke and Paulson and all their corrupt buddies always tell us?

"The markets will work it out! Don't regulate us! The markets can take care of it's own problems!"

That is what they say when they're making money but when they're losing money they say "The world is going to end unless taxpayers save the stock market! We need your help! The government must save us!"

Of course nobody has ANY proof that something HORRIBLE was about to happen in the next few days unless congress bailed out the banks IMMEDIATELY RIGHT NOW DON'T WAIT OR IT WILL BE TOO LATE OUR COUNTRY WILL BE DESTROYED because we don't know what the Fed and Treasury knows. But they had to make sure something is done RIGHT NOT because there is an election in a few weeks and the next President might actually hire an honest person with integrity to be in charge of the Fed and Treasury so they did it now.

And of course they realize nobody in cogress really understands the economy so of course they believe them.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:04 PM on 09/19/2008

Perhaps you've just woken up from a 3 years nap? The Feds and the "market" knew this was going to happen. It's been in the works for 8 to 9 years when Phil Gramm repealed the last bit of Depression era regulation that would not have allowed this to happen to begin with.

They broke the very thing that caused the Great Depression: removed well-established boundaries that kept banks from turning into gambling casinos that basically gambled that the housing market would continue to grow and grow and grow.

That in turn allowed them to offer loans to people who, like the banks themselves, chose not to live within their means based on banks rapacious market fantasies.

This bail out was completely preventable but I guess the GOP wanted to prove that their hatred towards FDR was warranted.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:05 PM on 09/19/2008
- MikeDu I'm a Fan of MikeDu 147 fans permalink
photo

This stock surge (gotta love that word 'surge') means less than nothing. Stocks crash, the vultures swoop in and pick up deals at cut-rate-prices, the marked rebounds as a result, the vultures bali out and walk away with some quick cash. I think the technical term is a dead cat bounce.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:43 PM on 09/19/2008
- Big0725 I'm a Fan of Big0725 23 fans permalink
photo

Oh, I like that! Very colorful and descriptive.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:31 PM on 09/19/2008

Exactly- and banning short selling is a way to mask corporate accounting fraud. It was the short sellers that warned of Enron...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:41 PM on 09/19/2008
- NicoleAnon I'm a Fan of NicoleAnon 9 fans permalink

I hope everyone here remembers the name of very person in congress who votes to approve this. Maybe someone will have the integrity to ask for Bernanke and Paulson to resign but I doubt it.

Of course lots of Americans don't have health insurance and Bernanke and Paulson don't care about extending unemployment benefits or helping your elderly parents pay for someone to help them live with dignity because you have to work and can't do it but at least Goldman Sachs has been saved.

Seriously, Thank G-d for that. Because I was really worried that Bernanke and Paulson would lose money on the stocks they own. And Paulson only has a half billion - honestly that isn't really that much when you consider the cost of living increases.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:13 PM on 09/19/2008
- Lazslo I'm a Fan of Lazslo 9 fans permalink

I suggest ransacking their homes and bank accounts.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:26 PM on 09/19/2008
- NicoleAnon I'm a Fan of NicoleAnon 9 fans permalink

That is illegal. I'm not like Bernanke and Paulson - I don't steal money that I haven't earned.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:32 PM on 09/19/2008
- dolphy I'm a Fan of dolphy 46 fans permalink

I suggest putting all of them, bankers, hedge fund managers, speculators, the criminal Bush family, the current administration and Ceo's who made out like bandits, in jail for the rest of their corrupt lives.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:25 PM on 09/19/2008

We've seen this movie before, and we know how it ends. In 1932 FDR inherited a financial system in crisis and a country in depression. His administration put in these agencies to provide regulation and return confidence to the financial system. The system has worked pretty well to keep us out of a depression and provide the basis for economic growth. Imagine, the 30 year mortgage did not exist before that time.
Then, in the 80s, some geniuses thought the S & Ls should be deregulated. It worked so well, that the industry was bankrupt before Reagan left office and required a federal bailout.
Now, it appears that all the agencies that were created to regulate and prevent the current crisis will require a $1 trillion bailout. FDR must be spinning in his grave.
Bridge to Nowhere, let me introduce you to War to Nowhere and Deregulator to Nowhere. Bush not only doubled the national debt to $10 trillion, he has created future obligations for war - $1 or 2 trillion and the financial system - $1 trillion. How is it possible that one president can run up 2/3 of the national debt?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:14 PM on 09/19/2008

The country's economy is in crisis, and you are going down memory lane from 1932. US economy is dynamic, and never ever at a stand still. 'Am not concern about 1932 or the 80's or for that matter, sentimentality. So you'd rather sit there and point at fingers.

US economy at that point and time were so different, and I don't see any significant similarity. Right now, it's important that we respond to the crisis, one that you and past generations had created. So don't rehash yesterday's stupidity because, it's you and your generation's mistakes. Frankly, at this point, I don't want to rehash history. There's hardly 1 party to blame and to be blunt, there's plenty to faults to be owned by both A-hole parties.

Any indecision on your part is a condemnation of mine and future generations. Sorry Vietnam Vet, but right now everyone in your generation is responsible for this mess, that we, the 30 and under are inheriting. That national debt is a burden that mine and future generations will have to carry. As it is, our future is already leveraged. So quit moaning and go forward for a decisive resolution.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:07 PM on 09/19/2008
- BethStuart I'm a Fan of BethStuart 13 fans permalink

As Tom Delay (republican house whip) said a few years back when ramming the ruinously expensive Medicare drug program through the House, "numbers don't matter."

http://www.salon.com/opinion/conason/2006/02/17/medicare_fiasco/

That is how one president can run up 2/3 of the national debt.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:49 PM on 09/19/2008
- boing007 I'm a Fan of boing007 9 fans permalink

What a haul!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:27 PM on 09/19/2008

How is it possible? Because we let him and his enablers do it right under our noses. We voted (well, not me, although Diebold may have changed that) for this administration TWO TIMES. We (again, not me) voted for REAGAN TWO TIMES. We put in a Democrat between times, Clinton, who allowed the two sides of banking to merge to our detriment. We voted for a former head of the CIA to be President. We failed to keep raising the minimum wage. We failed to invest in infrastructure. We de-taxed what have now proven to be the most sycophantic of the rich. We DID NOT IMPEACH. WE let Nixon get pardoned and did not follow the money. We allowed Rove, a Nixon operative, to run the Republican party vote getting machine. We dumbed down the population so that it responded like Pavlov's dogs to anything Frank Luntz' words transformed into talking points wanted it to do. We let our prejudices and our fears and our religious beliefs determine our politics instead of thinking about our futures and the futures of our grandchildren as the basis for our political actions. We adhered to stupid ideological dogma spouted by megaradio corporations instead of thinking for ourselves. There's lots of answers, and it's not just possible, it HAPPENED.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:19 PM on 09/19/2008
- adl I'm a Fan of adl 6 fans permalink

Many on this site are against the bailouts, and understandably so since we the taxpayers have to pay for it. However, I don't see how the government had any choice. They had to either bail these companies out or allow the whole economy to collapse into a depression (which I'm not yet sure won't happen anyway), but it looks like they had to do something. What shouldn't happen is for the top executives of these companies to receive multi-million dollar golden parachutes. They should get very little as far as I'm concerned.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:11 PM on 09/19/2008

I agree that the current situation means we have to bail these companies out, otherwise the whole economy would crash. But we need to look at who caused this mess (deregulation championing Republicans) and how to prevent this from happening again. The statement we keep hearing is these companies are too big to fail, that's why we need to bail them out. Maybe when the crisis is over we need to do some good old fashioned trust busting. These giant corporations need to be broken up into much smaller components, and prevent them from merging back together in the future so we never have a "too big to fail" situation ever again.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:43 PM on 09/19/2008

Still below what it was 2 weeks ago before Europe and Japan bailed you guys out.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:42 PM on 09/19/2008

How is the rich getting richer, the poor get poorer Socialism? The profit is Privatized the loss Socialized­..... The middle class is going to die.... it's the Oligarchy of America...­.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:31 PM on 09/19/2008
- PDXKevin I'm a Fan of PDXKevin 7 fans permalink
photo

When the profits are private, and the debt is public, and we need to keep working low wage job(s) in order to survive... it isn't socialism. It's fascism.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:49 PM on 09/19/2008
- fumerunner I'm a Fan of fumerunner 4 fans permalink

Once the dust settles, once Congress puts through this latest, necessary evil, there will be such anger at the perception that taxes will be higher all for the sake of Wall St. I wholly realize that this is an incredibly complex issue, but the penny version synopsis will be that Main St. bails out Wall St. And I can't imagine the transcendental resentment that will come from all this.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:11 PM on 09/19/2008

Gee! This is going to cost almost as much as the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:06 PM on 09/19/2008

And slightly more than what we spend on oil imports. Did anybody notice that we are about to blow 15% of our GDP on wars, oil and bailouts this year?

I think people need to vote for John McCain. We need four more years.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:01 PM on 09/19/2008
- PDXKevin I'm a Fan of PDXKevin 7 fans permalink
photo

Yeah, because getting rid of earmarks is the way to solve this problem.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:50 PM on 09/19/2008
- JonRaymond I'm a Fan of JonRaymond 4 fans permalink
photo

Welcome to the new American socialism. Fund the very rich, Screw everyone else.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:00 PM on 09/19/2008
- ishok I'm a Fan of ishok 9 fans permalink

Could Marx have dreamed that unregulated free-market conditions along with modern mass media/tele­communicat­ions along with global competition would produce a socialist transitional state in the US?

Social Security, Nationalized Healthcare, Nationalize Insurance (AIG), Nationalized Banking System?

I'm not judging whether it's bad or good... I just think that the very people who are so opposed to "commies" and "marxists" have pushed our country to the brink of being an economic Socialist state.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:54 PM on 09/19/2008

Well, Marxism does predict that socialism is an inescapable endpoint of history... so why not give up the fight and do the inescapable while making the rich even richer?

:-)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:04 PM on 09/19/2008
- boing007 I'm a Fan of boing007 9 fans permalink

KillTheMessenger

Well, Marxism does predict that socialism is an inescapable endpoint of history... so why not give up the fight and do the inescapable while making the rich even richer?

That wasn't his idea at all.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:06 PM on 09/19/2008
- Rule Of Law I'm a Fan of Rule Of Law 146 fans permalink

They are buying those things with our money, alright, but they are not being nationalized. Their new owner is the Federal Reserve Bank--which is neither federal or owned by the people. Enough folks have written here about the FED and how it was behind the last Depression and this one too. If you have doubts, do some research--it's all on Google. You Tube has a fine short film on the creation of banking and central banks and it should be viewed by everyone who posts here. The FED has just bought up America using our money and will now sell it off to the highest surviving bidders. Look for Goldman-Sachs to emerge from this as the rulers of the world they always fashioned themselves as.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:40 PM on 09/19/2008
- Lazslo I'm a Fan of Lazslo 9 fans permalink

Not so fast - no one is going to buy Treasury bills with a weakening dollar.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:30 PM on 09/19/2008
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next › Last » (5 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect