Bush Asking For $700 Billion Bailout

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Bush Asking For $700 Billion Bailout stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

TOM RAUM and JEANNINE AVERSA | September 19, 2008 11:32 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
President Bush, flanked by, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke, left, and Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson, delivers a statement about the economy and government efforts to remedy the crisis, Friday, Sept. 19, 2008, in the Rose Garden of the White House in Washington. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais)

WASHINGTON — Struggling to stave off financial catastrophe, the Bush administration on Friday laid out a radical bailout plan with a jawdropping price tag _ a takeover of a half-trillion dollars or more in worthless mortgages and other bad debt held by tottering institutions.

Relieved investors sent stocks soaring on Wall Street and around the globe. The Dow-Jones industrials average rose 368 points after surging 410 points the day before on rumors the federal action was afoot.

A grim-faced President Bush acknowledged risks to taxpayers in what would be the most sweeping government intervention to rescue failing financial institutions since the Great Depression. But he declared, "The risk of not acting would be far higher."

The administration is asking Congress for far-reaching new powers to take over troubled mortgages from banks and other companies, including purchasing sour mortgage-backed securities. Administration officials and congressional leaders are to work out details over the weekend.

Congressional officials said they expected a request for legal authority to buy up the bad loans, at a cost in excess of $500 billion to the government. Democrats were discussing whether to try to attach middle class assistance to the legislation, despite a request from Bush to avoid adding controversial items that could delay action. An expansion of jobless benefits was one possibility.

In other major steps, the Treasury Department and Federal Reserve moved to give money-market mutual funds the same kind of federal protection, at least temporarily, that now applies to savings and checking accounts and certificates of deposit at banks. Money-market accounts sold through retail banks are already FDIC insured.

The spreading global selling panic had started to threaten some money-market funds, usually thought of as rock-solid investments. Administration officials feared a run on these funds, held by millions of Americans.

"Every American should know that the federal government continues to enforce laws and regulations protecting your money," Bush said at the White House. The 75-year-old Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation now insures savings and checking accounts and certificates of deposit up to $100,000.

Story continues below
advertisement

Separately, the Securities and Exchange Commission acted to block short-selling in financial securities. That is a trading method that bets the value of stocks will go down. It has been blamed for accelerating the plunge in stock prices of banks and other financial institutions.

"This is a pivotal moment for America's economy," Bush said. "In our nation's history, there have been moments that require us to come together across party lines to address major challenges. This is such a moment."

Congressional leaders of both parties welcomed the administration's bold moves, after a series of ad hoc rescues.

The talk on the presidential campaign trail, barely six weeks before the election, was of bipartisanship, too.

Democrat Barack Obama said it was critical that leaders in both parties work in concert. "Truly, we are all in this together," he said.

GOP presidential nominee John McCain said leaders should put aside partisan differences and "any action should be designed to keep people in their homes and safeguard the life savings of all Americans."

The federal government already has pledged more than $600 billion in the past year to bail out, or help bail out, some of the biggest names in American finance. That includes the rescue of investment bank Bear Stearns in March, the takeover of mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac earlier this month and the takeover of the world's largest insurance company, American International Group, just this week.

But the contagion continued to spread, bringing political consensus that drastic and comprehensive federal action was needed.

There are precedents for such a federal takeover.

In the late 1980s, the government created the Resolution Trust Corporation to tackle the savings and loan crisis. It acquired the defaulted mortgages, foreclosed real estate and other assets of nearly a thousand failed S&Ls, restoring order and stability to the system. Resolving that crisis took six years and $125 billion in taxpayer money _ roughly equal to $200 billion in today's dollars.

And there was the Reconstruction Finance Corporation, a Depression-era relief program formed in 1932 by President Hoover that tried to revive the market by giving loans to banks and other businesses.

On Friday, Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson gave few details about the structure of the new program. Asked about an overall price tag, he said, "hundreds of billions" of dollars.

Congressional leaders said they were ready to move quickly but still needed details of the administration plan. For instance, there was no indication of what the government would get in return from financial companies for the federal assistance.

Paulson and Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke briefed lawmakers in both parties on the idea by conference call Friday.

In a session with House Democrats, they described a plan where the government would in essence set up reverse auctions, putting up money for a class of distressed assets _ such as loans that are delinquent but not in default _ and financial institutions would compete for how little they would accept for the investments, said Rep. Brad Sherman, D-Calif., who participated in the call.

"You give them good cash; they give you the worst of the worst," Sherman said of the plan, which he complained that Bush and his economic advisers were trying to panic lawmakers into rubber-stamping.

Paulson rejected Democrats' calls to include tighter regulations, corporate reforms or limits on executive compensation as part of the measure, Sherman said. "He's doing his best to paint a picture of the sky falling, and then he says, because the sky's falling, you have to do it my way."

Paulson said the new troubled-asset relief program that he wants Congress to enact must be large enough to have the necessary impact while protecting taxpayers as much as possible.

"I am convinced that this bold approach will cost American families far less than the alternative _ a continuing series of financial institution failures and frozen credit markets unable to fund economic expansion," Paulson. "The financial security of all Americans ... depends on our ability to restore our financial institutions to a sound footing."

Bush said simply, "We must act now."

"America's economy is facing unprecedented challenges. We're responding with unprecedented measures," Bush declared, standing in the White House Rose Garden with Paulson, Bernanke and Christopher Cox, chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Shortly after his remarks, Bush called congressional leaders with whom the administration will be working on the final plan. He spoke to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky and House GOP leader John Boehner of Ohio.

The administration wants to see a package emerge from the weekend, to lend calm to Monday morning's market openings, said Keith Hennessey, the director of the president's economic council. The goal is to have something passed by Congress by the end of next week, when lawmakers recess for the elections.

Paulson said Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac will step up their purchases of mortgage-backed securities to help provide support to the crippled housing market. He also said the Treasury Department will expand a program, announced earlier this month, to buy mortgage-backed securities, which have been badly hurt by the housing and credit crises.

"As we all know, lax lending practices earlier this decade led to irresponsible lending and irresponsible borrowing. This simply put too many families into mortgages they could not afford," Paulson said.

Bush authorized Treasury to tap up to $50 billion from a Depression-era fund to insure the holdings of eligible money-market mutual funds. And the Federal Reserve announced it would expand its emergency lending program to help support the $3.4 trillion in total assets of the funds.

On Wednesday alone, investors had pulled more than $89 billion from money-market funds, according to iMoneyNet, publisher of the newsletter Money Fund Report.

The government's actions could help alleviate the uncertainty that has been sending the markets into tumult over the past week. Lending has come to a virtual standstill in the wake of the bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.

European Central Bank, Swiss National Bank and Bank of England also offered up more cash Friday. The three banks put a combined $90 billion into money markets.

___

Associated Press writers Julie Hirschfeld Davis, Martin Crutsinger, Andrew Taylor, Marcy Gordon, David Espo and Jim Abrams in Washington and Joe Bel Bruno in New York contributed to this report.

WASHINGTON — Struggling to stave off financial catastrophe, the Bush administration on Friday laid out a radical bailout plan with a jawdropping price tag _ a takeover of a half-trillion dollars...
WASHINGTON — Struggling to stave off financial catastrophe, the Bush administration on Friday laid out a radical bailout plan with a jawdropping price tag _ a takeover of a half-trillion dollars...
Filed by Nick Sabloff  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
2081
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next › Last » (61 pages total)
- Darkdonnie I'm a Fan of Darkdonnie 5 fans permalink

“President Bush in 2003 tried desperately to stop Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac from metastasizing into the problem they have since become.
Here's the lead of a New York Times story on Sept. 11, 2003: "The Bush administration today recommended the most significant regulatory overhaul in the housing finance industry since the savings and loan crisis a decade ago."
Bush tried to act. Who stopped him? Congress, especially Democrats with their deep financial and patronage ties to the two government­-sponsored enterprises, Fannie and Freddie.
"These two entities — Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac — are not facing any kind of financial crisis," said Rep. Barney Frank, then ranking Democrat on the Financial Services Committee. "The more people exaggerate these problems, the more pressure there is on these companies, the less we will see in terms of affordable housing."

It's pretty clear who was on the right side of that debate.

http://www.ibdeditorials.com/IBDArticles.aspx?id=306632135350949

You can try to throw your revisionist history at us now!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:59 AM on 09/21/2008

Name the democrats in congress of 2003 that stopped W. In 2003 the congress was in republican control, so who were they?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:01 PM on 09/21/2008
- Boboday555 I'm a Fan of Boboday555 116 fans permalink
photo

Dearest Dimmest DarkieDonnie,
Here's a little history lesson 'fer Y'ALL'
The Dems didn't gain a numerical advantage in congress until 2006 so how on Earth could they have stopped AWOL Bush in 2003?
These kinds of lies might cut in FOX-KIDS or CNN but we deal with facts here.

The BUSH White House gave special dispensation to five brockergae houses to increase their legal leverage from 12 : 1 to the unsustainable ratio of 100 : 1.
Can Y'ALL guess which houses had that special dispensation to increase their leverage ratio Non-Enlisting DarkDonnie?
Yup..you guessed it!
Merrill Lynch, Lehman Brothers, Bears and Sterans and Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac!

Now go enlist Bushy!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:01 PM on 09/21/2008
- cigi I'm a Fan of cigi 36 fans permalink

This NONSENSE appeared in the Investors Business Dailey...w­here is your NYT story???? Don't worry, I will google that for myself. The Dems were not in power of the house or the senate at that time...thi­s changed two years ago in the off season elections and they only hold a slim majority to have changed much of anything the last two years. You are WRONG here and LYING in the process. Get real, you folks have controlled the House since 1994 when Newt Gingrich, Phil Graham, Tom Delay, and all their ilk put a "CONTRACT ON AMERICA". In 2006, the Dems made a samll comeback, but nothing to really clean up the mess two terms of Bush has made. Phil Graham wrote the vast majority of legislation in 1998 and 1999 that allowed the financial debacle we are not witnessing to even happen. His wife, Wendy Graham, also wrote the rules when she was head of the Commerce Dept. that gave special dispensations to the energy industry that allowed Enron's colossal collapeses to happen....­hurting mainly the investors and employees of that defunct company. The Republican party stands for BIGGER BUSINESS and the common Joe, like most of us out here outside of the Beltway, are just fodder for their financial cannons. You need to quit reading the biased likes of the IBD and switch off the FAUX FOX NEWS who has obviously "brain washed" what little you have, quite thoroughly.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:13 PM on 09/21/2008
- LeonBNJ I'm a Fan of LeonBNJ 23 fans permalink

In the later 20th century many governments, particulary in Europe, ended up with ownership and dumping many billions in failing manufacturing and resrouces industries. For example, the UK spent many billions of taxpayer dollars in takeovers of UK based car makers, steel producers, coal mining companies, mainly to keep jobs in critical areas for politicans from them and in the country as well as preserve it's financial status. In the end, it didn't work and started to dismantle their control in the 1980's to the present, bringing in buyers and industrial companies from outside the country, and in the end losing millions of high paying jobs that were never going to last anyway.

Now we see the USA doing this to what is the new 'industries' in America, financial services, also to perserve jobs and protect it's finanical system. Will the outcome be the same? Foreign takeovers of key financial services? More jobs shipped out to 3rd world countries and the remaining ones at much lower pay leading to a decline to 1930's standard of living of the working classes?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:55 AM on 09/21/2008

The USA is now the biggest communist country of the 21st century, Castro must be laughing so hard.
2 months ago Bush was assuring he would never bail out any company, 2 months later, he bails out an entire industry !!!
700 billion to nationalize the bank and to clean the incompetency of some incompetent capitalists.
Viva Bush ! Viva neocon Chaos !
What's next Mr Bush ? nationalize Ford, GM ?
Americans, please keep the world laughing, elect McCain in 08 !

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:03 AM on 09/21/2008
- viflyer I'm a Fan of viflyer 27 fans permalink

fillou you don't get it!!! They aren't going to nationalize ANYTHING. They are just going to use OUR money to bail out their thieving friends then but them back in charge again with our money. We aren't going to keep the assets, that would be natiuonalizing them.

If we nationalized them and regulated them then their shiester friends wouldn't be able to STEAL again. If they couldn't steal from their own country, life wouldn't be worth living!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:47 AM on 09/21/2008

Right you are.
We only get the bad debt, the fat cats keep the assets and profits.

We are idiots.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:28 PM on 09/21/2008
- Darkdonnie I'm a Fan of Darkdonnie 5 fans permalink

Thank your congress for the financial mess. Especially Barnyard Frank, Chuckie schumer, Chrissy Dodd.
They should go to jail for lack of oversight and any republicans who are complicit.
McCain and Bush are not among them.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:52 AM on 09/21/2008

Follow the Money....
"Decisions by the Secretary pursuant to the authority of this Act are non-reviewable and committed to agency discretion, and may not be reviewed by any court of law or any administrative agency."
Of course, anything you say, no problem...­...
NOT

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:00 AM on 09/21/2008
- rwe2late I'm a Fan of rwe2late 22 fans permalink

Not only is the public credit card to be used to borrow cash to be given to the banksters.
Not only is the amount to be handed the banksters so large we may never be able to pay it off.

But we are also to surrender the public card to be used at the banksters discretion whenever they desire a new infusion of cash to maintain their portfolios.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:17 AM on 09/21/2008

And we are to ask no questions, and make no conditions.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:29 PM on 09/21/2008
- partyofone I'm a Fan of partyofone 45 fans permalink

Why are tax dollars the only resources being discussed to bail out these companies? What about the personal assets of their officers and directors? The people would made the reckless decisions that created this mess have made HUGE profits, salaries and bonuses for years. What about pulling some of those billions back?

The reports of the "demands" by the banking industry are laughable. Give us a trillion dollars, no conditions, no regulation, anything less will be "unacceptable", "a deal breaker." Scott Talbott, senior vice president of government affairs at the Financial Services Roundtable, whose members include the nation's largest banks, securities firms and insurers. should be on his knees begging the government to help, and begging forgiveness, not arrogantly dictating terms.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:55 AM on 09/21/2008
- ricitizen I'm a Fan of ricitizen 17 fans permalink
photo

Wake up people. Frank Rich writes another great column. It's the about the lies and the lying liars who tell them. Namely: JmC and his ties to Keating Five and all the rest of it. Makes me want to go the church on Sunday and give a little more to the collection plate. Enjoy the read

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/21/opinion/21rich.html?hp

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:45 AM on 09/21/2008
- Carolab I'm a Fan of Carolab 365 fans permalink
photo

I would add to my post, below, this quote from the article in the WaPo:

"Morgan Stanley chief executive John Mack has been in contact with the China Investment Corp., the sovereign wealth fund that manages $200 billion, and with China's Citic Group. La Compagnie Financière Edmond de Rothschild on Thursday announced that it had sold a 20 percent, $340 million stake to Bank of China. "

I note that article came out yesterday on Dow Jones wires said the CIC rejected the "offer" to buy up 49% in Morgan Stanley. I caught it on a cached page. The CIC said that "Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs have sound capital adequacy ratios. They can solve the problems on their own".

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:32 AM on 09/21/2008
- Carolab I'm a Fan of Carolab 365 fans permalink
photo

http://news.morningstar.com/newsnet/ViewNews.aspx?article=/DJ/200809190845DOWJONESDJONLINE000504_univ.xml

"There are many rumors in the market about CIC's plans to buy into U.S. financial institutions," the Xinhua report said, citing the official.

Morgan Stanley has been forced into merger discussions after losing more than 40% of its value in the past week. The range of options include a full merger, as well as a large minority investment meant to restore confidence to the firm. At the same time, Goldman Sachs Group Inc. (GS) slumped below $100 this week, the first time since June 2005.

"CIC has always adopted a prudent approach concerning overseas investments," the report said, citing the official.

Also, U.S. regulations regarding foreign investments would be a big hurdle...T­he systemic problems in the U.S. financial market can't be solved simply through capital injection from any single overseas financial institution, unless the U.S. government takes actions, he said.

CIC's December investment in Morgan Stanley has aroused widespread concern in the U.S. about national economic security.

Chinese government departments also appear to be more prudent in approving new overseas investments by local firms, after CIC made a few loss-making deals since its establishment last September.

The Xinhua report also cited an unnamed press officer at Citic Group as saying that the press department wasn't aware that the group was in talks to buy a stake in Morgan Stanley, contrary to reports of a planned merger between the two companies.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:45 AM on 09/21/2008
- Carolab I'm a Fan of Carolab 365 fans permalink
photo

The Chinese have a gun to their heads.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/09/19/AR2008091902012_2.html?hpid=topnews&sid=ST2008092001054&s_pos=

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:17 AM on 09/21/2008
- BigBagel I'm a Fan of BigBagel 29 fans permalink
photo

The looting of the US Treasury reaches a crescendo.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:13 AM on 09/21/2008

These people are SOCIOPATHS.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:00 AM on 09/21/2008

Correct.
What we are seeing is the result of letting sociopaths run
our country and major financial institutions.

A completely legal crime spree.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:31 PM on 09/21/2008

There's plenty to argue about concerning Bush, but Bush a criminal and his administration soley to blame for the mortgage mess? Come on, stop being ridiculous. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac's problems started well before Bush's tenure.

For those who actually care about how all this came about, the Investor's Business Daily editorial has about the best, most concise researched history:

http://www.ibdeditorials.com/IBDArticles.aspx?id=306632135350949

It is hard to find good well-researched information in the current partisan environment. IBD's agenda is business and not Obama or McCain so they have not taken sides. If you don't care to do any research and continue to spout incorrect information or blind talking points, well, I guess that says more about you than anything else. One big problem in this country is the amount of tolerated ignorance. Some say ignorance is the most expensive thing we have in this country. The older I get, the more I tend to agree.

Here's something to consider: If the Bush Administration was to blame for this, wouldn't you think his enemies in Congress, namely Reid and Pelosi, would be calling for immediate hearings on this mess? Instead, they announce they're going to adjourn. Now why would they do that? They have been doing everything they can for years trying to make Bush look bad. Don't you think this would be their chance to take him down?? Hmm.... Maybe they and their friend's hands aren't so clean after all? Just a thought.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:56 AM on 09/21/2008

Bush and Cheney opened the door for big corporations's executives/CEO's to loot Fannie and Freddie. These thieves came and raided the Treasury. Stop defending them.

Reid-Pelos­i-DO-NOTHI­NG-CONGRES­S ransacked the walls, trashed any and all regulations, the let all the CEO, Executives, Speculators, Gamblers, had their hands on anything and everything they can have, and the provide them with tanker haulers to make sure every penny is hauled out of the banking and investment systems.

Then the Banking Comm chaired by DODD, Treasury Sec PAULSON, SEC Chair FOX, FED RES Chair BERNANKE, members of Congress, PELOSI and REID all said in unison OMG, " We are stunned by the extent of the meltdown ?

Arrogant-G­reedy-Inco­mpetent leaders ((((((((((( Shaking my head))))))))))))).

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:37 AM on 09/21/2008
- Darkdonnie I'm a Fan of Darkdonnie 5 fans permalink

How did? "Bush and Cheney opened the door for big corporations's executives/CEO's to loot Fannie and Freddie. These thieves came and raided the Treasury."

What did they do (bill, law, Presidential fiat) to cause banks to offer ridiculous loans to non creditworthy people!

Do you have anything to back up your rhetoric?

You can find that Carter did and then Clinton really did!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:50 AM on 09/21/2008
- connski I'm a Fan of connski 11 fans permalink

Nightmare of Paulson's fiscal blackmail

You've been sleeping. A kid from you past appears, a kid who tormented you, who bullied you and who you avoided whenever you could. Now he's getting out of an old beat-up car, he's standing in front of the door. You see the car's interior, tattered and filthy. The kid, a man now, with menacing lear pulls a gun from his coat and holds it to your head.
"I want a new car - buy this car for the price of a new one, $700 billion."
You break out in a cold sweat. Though he's holding the gun, you try to run. You can't move, like your feet are glued to the earth. You look at him, he's laughing, though you can hear no sound. His hand is on the trigger. He's squeezing the
trigger. You try to scream opening you mouth as wide as you can. No sound comes out. He squeezes. You realize its a nightmare and try to awake. But you can't.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:23 AM on 09/21/2008
- BluePride I'm a Fan of BluePride 6 fans permalink
photo

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=59mOukUZNUo

Everybody RUN...

HomeComing Queen Palin's got a GUN!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:17 AM on 09/21/2008
- PT6 I'm a Fan of PT6 25 fans permalink

Helping the Banks is a short term band-aid and they will be back in a few months as the underlying problem continues.

The FUEL on the fire is the tens of thousands of people "walking away from their homes" because of the ridiculous interest they are forced to pay on "tricky loans."

We need to stop the hemorrhaging of "walk away home owners" that is adding major fuel to the fire by helping them with new and reasonable refinancing to at below market fixed interest rates (or at least market rates).

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:11 AM on 09/21/2008
- darthdarcy I'm a Fan of darthdarcy 48 fans permalink
photo

Just remember $1 billion dollars is equal too $1000.00 dollar bills stacked 63 miles high...tha­t's how much $1Billion dollars is...

So $700 Billion is $1,000.00 dollar bills stacked up 44,100 miles..!

And if you add in the Fannie and Freddie Mac bail out that's another 50,400 miles of $1,000.00 dollar bills...

So we just blew 94,500 miles high of $1,000.00 bills...

Man those guys from Texas are really smart aren't they, Bush, Phil Gramm, Dick Armey...re­al bunch of Conservatives, yup you betch-ya..­.real conservati­ve...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:06 AM on 09/21/2008
- Darkdonnie I'm a Fan of Darkdonnie 5 fans permalink

Thank your congress for the financial mess. Especially Barnyard Frank, Chuckie schumer, Chrissy Dodd. They should go to jail for lack of oversight and any republicans who are complicit. McCain and Bush are not among them.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:54 AM on 09/21/2008
- Carolab I'm a Fan of Carolab 365 fans permalink
photo

Not only are McCain and Bush "among them", they lead the band. McCain's top economic adviser is Phil Gramm, who pushed this mess. Look up McCain's involvement of the Keating Five savings and loan scandal in the late '80s. Wake up.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:04 PM on 09/21/2008
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next › Last » (61 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect