Bush Asking For $700 Billion Bailout

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Bush Asking For $700 Billion Bailout stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

TOM RAUM and JEANNINE AVERSA | September 19, 2008 11:32 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
President Bush, flanked by, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke, left, and Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson, delivers a statement about the economy and government efforts to remedy the crisis, Friday, Sept. 19, 2008, in the Rose Garden of the White House in Washington. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais)

WASHINGTON — Struggling to stave off financial catastrophe, the Bush administration on Friday laid out a radical bailout plan with a jawdropping price tag _ a takeover of a half-trillion dollars or more in worthless mortgages and other bad debt held by tottering institutions.

Relieved investors sent stocks soaring on Wall Street and around the globe. The Dow-Jones industrials average rose 368 points after surging 410 points the day before on rumors the federal action was afoot.

A grim-faced President Bush acknowledged risks to taxpayers in what would be the most sweeping government intervention to rescue failing financial institutions since the Great Depression. But he declared, "The risk of not acting would be far higher."

The administration is asking Congress for far-reaching new powers to take over troubled mortgages from banks and other companies, including purchasing sour mortgage-backed securities. Administration officials and congressional leaders are to work out details over the weekend.

Congressional officials said they expected a request for legal authority to buy up the bad loans, at a cost in excess of $500 billion to the government. Democrats were discussing whether to try to attach middle class assistance to the legislation, despite a request from Bush to avoid adding controversial items that could delay action. An expansion of jobless benefits was one possibility.

In other major steps, the Treasury Department and Federal Reserve moved to give money-market mutual funds the same kind of federal protection, at least temporarily, that now applies to savings and checking accounts and certificates of deposit at banks. Money-market accounts sold through retail banks are already FDIC insured.

The spreading global selling panic had started to threaten some money-market funds, usually thought of as rock-solid investments. Administration officials feared a run on these funds, held by millions of Americans.

"Every American should know that the federal government continues to enforce laws and regulations protecting your money," Bush said at the White House. The 75-year-old Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation now insures savings and checking accounts and certificates of deposit up to $100,000.

Story continues below
advertisement

Separately, the Securities and Exchange Commission acted to block short-selling in financial securities. That is a trading method that bets the value of stocks will go down. It has been blamed for accelerating the plunge in stock prices of banks and other financial institutions.

"This is a pivotal moment for America's economy," Bush said. "In our nation's history, there have been moments that require us to come together across party lines to address major challenges. This is such a moment."

Congressional leaders of both parties welcomed the administration's bold moves, after a series of ad hoc rescues.

The talk on the presidential campaign trail, barely six weeks before the election, was of bipartisanship, too.

Democrat Barack Obama said it was critical that leaders in both parties work in concert. "Truly, we are all in this together," he said.

GOP presidential nominee John McCain said leaders should put aside partisan differences and "any action should be designed to keep people in their homes and safeguard the life savings of all Americans."

The federal government already has pledged more than $600 billion in the past year to bail out, or help bail out, some of the biggest names in American finance. That includes the rescue of investment bank Bear Stearns in March, the takeover of mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac earlier this month and the takeover of the world's largest insurance company, American International Group, just this week.

But the contagion continued to spread, bringing political consensus that drastic and comprehensive federal action was needed.

There are precedents for such a federal takeover.

In the late 1980s, the government created the Resolution Trust Corporation to tackle the savings and loan crisis. It acquired the defaulted mortgages, foreclosed real estate and other assets of nearly a thousand failed S&Ls, restoring order and stability to the system. Resolving that crisis took six years and $125 billion in taxpayer money _ roughly equal to $200 billion in today's dollars.

And there was the Reconstruction Finance Corporation, a Depression-era relief program formed in 1932 by President Hoover that tried to revive the market by giving loans to banks and other businesses.

On Friday, Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson gave few details about the structure of the new program. Asked about an overall price tag, he said, "hundreds of billions" of dollars.

Congressional leaders said they were ready to move quickly but still needed details of the administration plan. For instance, there was no indication of what the government would get in return from financial companies for the federal assistance.

Paulson and Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke briefed lawmakers in both parties on the idea by conference call Friday.

In a session with House Democrats, they described a plan where the government would in essence set up reverse auctions, putting up money for a class of distressed assets _ such as loans that are delinquent but not in default _ and financial institutions would compete for how little they would accept for the investments, said Rep. Brad Sherman, D-Calif., who participated in the call.

"You give them good cash; they give you the worst of the worst," Sherman said of the plan, which he complained that Bush and his economic advisers were trying to panic lawmakers into rubber-stamping.

Paulson rejected Democrats' calls to include tighter regulations, corporate reforms or limits on executive compensation as part of the measure, Sherman said. "He's doing his best to paint a picture of the sky falling, and then he says, because the sky's falling, you have to do it my way."

Paulson said the new troubled-asset relief program that he wants Congress to enact must be large enough to have the necessary impact while protecting taxpayers as much as possible.

"I am convinced that this bold approach will cost American families far less than the alternative _ a continuing series of financial institution failures and frozen credit markets unable to fund economic expansion," Paulson. "The financial security of all Americans ... depends on our ability to restore our financial institutions to a sound footing."

Bush said simply, "We must act now."

"America's economy is facing unprecedented challenges. We're responding with unprecedented measures," Bush declared, standing in the White House Rose Garden with Paulson, Bernanke and Christopher Cox, chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Shortly after his remarks, Bush called congressional leaders with whom the administration will be working on the final plan. He spoke to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky and House GOP leader John Boehner of Ohio.

The administration wants to see a package emerge from the weekend, to lend calm to Monday morning's market openings, said Keith Hennessey, the director of the president's economic council. The goal is to have something passed by Congress by the end of next week, when lawmakers recess for the elections.

Paulson said Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac will step up their purchases of mortgage-backed securities to help provide support to the crippled housing market. He also said the Treasury Department will expand a program, announced earlier this month, to buy mortgage-backed securities, which have been badly hurt by the housing and credit crises.

"As we all know, lax lending practices earlier this decade led to irresponsible lending and irresponsible borrowing. This simply put too many families into mortgages they could not afford," Paulson said.

Bush authorized Treasury to tap up to $50 billion from a Depression-era fund to insure the holdings of eligible money-market mutual funds. And the Federal Reserve announced it would expand its emergency lending program to help support the $3.4 trillion in total assets of the funds.

On Wednesday alone, investors had pulled more than $89 billion from money-market funds, according to iMoneyNet, publisher of the newsletter Money Fund Report.

The government's actions could help alleviate the uncertainty that has been sending the markets into tumult over the past week. Lending has come to a virtual standstill in the wake of the bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.

European Central Bank, Swiss National Bank and Bank of England also offered up more cash Friday. The three banks put a combined $90 billion into money markets.

___

Associated Press writers Julie Hirschfeld Davis, Martin Crutsinger, Andrew Taylor, Marcy Gordon, David Espo and Jim Abrams in Washington and Joe Bel Bruno in New York contributed to this report.

WASHINGTON — Struggling to stave off financial catastrophe, the Bush administration on Friday laid out a radical bailout plan with a jawdropping price tag _ a takeover of a half-trillion dollars...
WASHINGTON — Struggling to stave off financial catastrophe, the Bush administration on Friday laid out a radical bailout plan with a jawdropping price tag _ a takeover of a half-trillion dollars...
Filed by Nick Sabloff  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
2081
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next › Last » (61 pages total)
- dotmafia I'm a Fan of dotmafia 43 fans permalink
photo

Blackmail against the American people. Nothing more, nothing less.

Chalk up another crime of historic proportions to this so-called "administration".

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:48 AM on 09/21/2008

The biggest crime spree in history,
all perfectly legal.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:10 PM on 09/21/2008

This is nothing less than an economic "Shock and Awe" attack on the American public by a despicable administration in the last throws of its pathetic existence. They want nothing more than a Dem. stamp of approval on a rushed bill to address this mess.



"Johnnie Mac" and side kick "2 Bushies for the price of one" are required to respond. They will excel at shooting themselves in the face given the chance to pontificate on how they would pick up this pile of crap they and their Republican pals dropped on the floor.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:17 AM on 09/21/2008
- Darkdonnie I'm a Fan of Darkdonnie 5 fans permalink

“President Bush in 2003 tried desperately to stop Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac from metastasizing into the problem they have since become.
Here's the lead of a New York Times story on Sept. 11, 2003: "The Bush administration today recommended the most significant regulatory overhaul in the housing finance industry since the savings and loan crisis a decade ago."
Bush tried to act. Who stopped him? Congress, especially Democrats with their deep financial and patronage ties to the two government­-sponsored enterprises, Fannie and Freddie.
"These two entities — Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac — are not facing any kind of financial crisis," said Rep. Barney Frank, then ranking Democrat on the Financial Services Committee. "The more people exaggerate these problems, the more pressure there is on these companies, the less we will see in terms of affordable housing."

It's pretty clear who was on the right side of that debate.

http://www.ibdeditorials.com/IBDArticles.aspx?id=306632135350949

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:29 PM on 09/20/2008
- doogiedude I'm a Fan of doogiedude 8 fans permalink

Also from the New York Times (excerpted, link to full article below):

"The Bush administration is proposing the broadest overhaul of Wall Street regulation since the Great Depression. But the plan, to be unveiled on Monday, has its genesis in a yearlong effort to limit Washington’s role in the market."

"But Mr. Levitt said he was concerned by proposals to expand the authority of self-regulatory organizations, like stock exchanges. As an interim step, Mr. Paulson proposed allowing those organizations to change their rules without seeking explicit approval from regulators.

“They have acted in their own self interest too often to allow them to get out from under the oversight process,” Mr. Levitt said."

Under the Treasury proposal, while the Fed would have some authority to stop financial institutions from taking on too much risk through the use of exotic financial instruments, it appears that little would be done to limit the flow of such new products.

The Treasury says that it and other federal regulators still believe a principle it enunciated a year ago, “that market discipline is the most effective tool to limit systemic risk.”


http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/30/business/30regulate.html?_r=1&oref=slogin

Just sayin

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:11 AM on 09/21/2008
photo

Dems need to insist on Main Street relief, and have it carved into the initial legislation in detail. Once "We" - the government - own those ridiculous securities, we should restructure the underlying mortgages to keep homeowners in their homes, and keep neighborhoods from collapsing. And then, make sure nothing like this can ever happen again.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:20 PM on 09/20/2008
- Darkdonnie I'm a Fan of Darkdonnie 5 fans permalink

Do you mean keep deadbeats who can not pay there bills get a free ride on the government?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:30 PM on 09/20/2008
- doogiedude I'm a Fan of doogiedude 8 fans permalink

Deadbeats like AIG, Bear Stearns, etc...?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:07 AM on 09/21/2008
- doogiedude I'm a Fan of doogiedude 8 fans permalink

IMHO it appears the administration is using the shock of the financial crisis to set up a $700 billion hedge fund in case there is a non-Republican president.

I'm unclear exactly what the $700 billion is going to used for. As a tax payer who is funding this proposal, I feel it is my right to know specifics of how the $700 billion will be allocated.

I also think it is unacceptable to have no accountability for managing this proposal. Management of this proposal has to be accountable to the fund provider, the tax payer.

Isn't the lack of accountability and oversight what got us into this mess?

This would be like a friend asking for $10,000 from you and not saying what its for, saying payback is optional, and insisting on no written agreement. I imagine not many people would agree to those terms. If you would, send me a check for $10,000. I might or might not pay you back.

Hopefully, Congress is not asleep at the wheel on this one.

Just sayin

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:06 PM on 09/20/2008
- SCG I'm a Fan of SCG 110 fans permalink
photo

The only thing left for Calamity George, is for the locusts to attack.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:04 PM on 09/20/2008
photo

We need to start k i l l i n g people, and we need to do it soon.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:58 PM on 09/20/2008
- Danny I'm a Fan of Danny 5 fans permalink

go away, captain. you are embarrassing

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:05 PM on 09/20/2008
photo

I feel like a complete idiot for buying a house that I could afford.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:57 PM on 09/20/2008

doggiedude: He don't have to work: He will be a Multi Zillionaire out of this Tax Payer Rape and Plunder:
"LOOK"! If you had Goldman Sachs you would be a Zillionaire also!
""Paulson retired from Goldman Sachs (He was Chairman and CEO ) to Accept the Sect. of Treasury Job:""
Is Paulson Protecting Goldman Sachs"? were they coming up in the next wave of Bank Failures???
""His stock shares in Goldman Sachs reached a "LOW" of $85.88 Sep: 18th:: Then reached a "HIGH" of $144.91 Sep 19th: : After his announcement of the "BAIL OUT"
"GOOD Move HANK" Paulson, I bet you are a "HERO" at Goldman Sachs and the other "GOOD OLE BOY" Finanicial instutions:
YEP THAT'S ME A SHAFTED TAXPAYER"
Keep the "RICH" in "POWER":
'SHAFT THE MIDDLE CLASS TAXPAYERS".
THIS IS RIP-OFF TO BAIL OUT PAULSON AND BUSH'S RICH FRIENDS;"

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:35 PM on 09/20/2008
- doogiedude I'm a Fan of doogiedude 8 fans permalink

I agree Mr. Pauslon doesn't have to go back to work, but like most "zillionaires", I'm sure he'll want even more millions. I'm sure there will be a chair waiting for him at Goldman, and he'll park his butt right in it.

Just sayin

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:02 AM on 09/21/2008
photo

I think it's funny calling this a bailout... really it's just moving debt around from public debt and turning that into 700 Billion more in government foreign debt. How does that really help the US economy in the longer run?

It's kind of like using one credit card to pay another credit card bill. You haven't actually paid off the debt, you're just shuffling the same debt from one place to another and crossing your fingers.

Good to see the foundations of the economy are fundamentally sound. Cannot wait to count all the golden parachutes which come out of this "bail out".

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:34 PM on 09/20/2008
- ajax2 I'm a Fan of ajax2 22 fans permalink
photo

Bush Asking For $700 Billion Bailout For The Thieves

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:33 PM on 09/20/2008
- Darkdonnie I'm a Fan of Darkdonnie 5 fans permalink

"Since 1989, Fannie and Freddie have spent an estimated $140 million on lobbying Washington. They contributed millions to politicians, mostly Democrats, including Senator Chris Dodd (No. 1 recipient) and Barack Obama (No. 3 recipient, despite only three years in office).

The Clinton White House used Fannie and Freddie as a patronage job bank. Former executives and board members read like a who's who of the Clinton-era Democratic Party, including Franklin Raines, Jamie Gorelick, Jim Johnson and current Rep. Rahm Emanuel.

Collectively, they and others made well more than $100 million from Fannie and Freddie, whose books were cooked Enron-style during the late 1990s and early 2000s to ensure executives got their massive bonuses."

They got the bonuses. You get the bill.

http://www.ibdeditorials.com/IBDArticles.aspx?id=306632135350949

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:41 PM on 09/20/2008
- Madmac I'm a Fan of Madmac 17 fans permalink
photo

It's well past time Americans to tell your congressman or congresswoman to REJECT this plan and accept the 2nd Great Depression.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:30 PM on 09/20/2008
photo

Nope... it's well past time that we started k i l l i n g them.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:00 PM on 09/20/2008
- Madmac I'm a Fan of Madmac 17 fans permalink
photo

No. That's NEVER an option. You're better than that, at least better than them

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:50 AM on 09/21/2008
- wendynyc I'm a Fan of wendynyc 11 fans permalink

Please sign this and forward to as many people as possible:

CONGRESS must DEMAND Bush/Cheney RESIGN

http://www.democrats.com/resign

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:28 PM on 09/20/2008
- Darkdonnie I'm a Fan of Darkdonnie 5 fans permalink

Congressional democrats are complicit. They won't be asking for it. They will push for revision to the history books though.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:40 PM on 09/20/2008

We should all be outraged. First of all, the reason we are in this mess is because of government deregulation and mismanagement from our current Republican Leadership. The Victims of these bad loans, are now being asked to pay again along with everyone else to bail out these fat cats. Our founding fathers have to be rolling over in their graves. How could this great nation come to this?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:12 PM on 09/20/2008
photo


This is insane. The proposal as drafted gives these crooks a free pass. As drafted this is the most gigantic rip off of the American taxpayer I've seen to date. If congress bites on this proposal they are mooks.

I propose:

1) we seize the troubled assets of these companies, fire the BOD (Board of Directors) and the CEO (without any compensation). These assets would be handed over to the re-activated Resolution Trust Corporation. A temporary BOD and CEO would be appointed by the RTC. All revenue from the disposal of these assets are returned to the Federal treasury. The original company receives NO benefit except the removal of the liability from their books.

2) All officers including the CEO and BOD be subject to federal prosecution for fraud and any other crime we can think of and sent to Leavenworth maximum security.

3) All home loans (in the troubled assets) for owner occupied property be subject to review and re-negotiation. Investment properties are excluded.

Additional details worked out as required .

Release the Hounds

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:06 PM on 09/20/2008
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next › Last » (61 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect