Bush Asking For $700 Billion Bailout

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Bush Asking For $700 Billion Bailout stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

TOM RAUM and JEANNINE AVERSA | September 19, 2008 11:32 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
President Bush, flanked by, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke, left, and Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson, delivers a statement about the economy and government efforts to remedy the crisis, Friday, Sept. 19, 2008, in the Rose Garden of the White House in Washington. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais)

WASHINGTON — Struggling to stave off financial catastrophe, the Bush administration on Friday laid out a radical bailout plan with a jawdropping price tag _ a takeover of a half-trillion dollars or more in worthless mortgages and other bad debt held by tottering institutions.

Relieved investors sent stocks soaring on Wall Street and around the globe. The Dow-Jones industrials average rose 368 points after surging 410 points the day before on rumors the federal action was afoot.

A grim-faced President Bush acknowledged risks to taxpayers in what would be the most sweeping government intervention to rescue failing financial institutions since the Great Depression. But he declared, "The risk of not acting would be far higher."

The administration is asking Congress for far-reaching new powers to take over troubled mortgages from banks and other companies, including purchasing sour mortgage-backed securities. Administration officials and congressional leaders are to work out details over the weekend.

Congressional officials said they expected a request for legal authority to buy up the bad loans, at a cost in excess of $500 billion to the government. Democrats were discussing whether to try to attach middle class assistance to the legislation, despite a request from Bush to avoid adding controversial items that could delay action. An expansion of jobless benefits was one possibility.

In other major steps, the Treasury Department and Federal Reserve moved to give money-market mutual funds the same kind of federal protection, at least temporarily, that now applies to savings and checking accounts and certificates of deposit at banks. Money-market accounts sold through retail banks are already FDIC insured.

The spreading global selling panic had started to threaten some money-market funds, usually thought of as rock-solid investments. Administration officials feared a run on these funds, held by millions of Americans.

"Every American should know that the federal government continues to enforce laws and regulations protecting your money," Bush said at the White House. The 75-year-old Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation now insures savings and checking accounts and certificates of deposit up to $100,000.

Story continues below
advertisement

Separately, the Securities and Exchange Commission acted to block short-selling in financial securities. That is a trading method that bets the value of stocks will go down. It has been blamed for accelerating the plunge in stock prices of banks and other financial institutions.

"This is a pivotal moment for America's economy," Bush said. "In our nation's history, there have been moments that require us to come together across party lines to address major challenges. This is such a moment."

Congressional leaders of both parties welcomed the administration's bold moves, after a series of ad hoc rescues.

The talk on the presidential campaign trail, barely six weeks before the election, was of bipartisanship, too.

Democrat Barack Obama said it was critical that leaders in both parties work in concert. "Truly, we are all in this together," he said.

GOP presidential nominee John McCain said leaders should put aside partisan differences and "any action should be designed to keep people in their homes and safeguard the life savings of all Americans."

The federal government already has pledged more than $600 billion in the past year to bail out, or help bail out, some of the biggest names in American finance. That includes the rescue of investment bank Bear Stearns in March, the takeover of mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac earlier this month and the takeover of the world's largest insurance company, American International Group, just this week.

But the contagion continued to spread, bringing political consensus that drastic and comprehensive federal action was needed.

There are precedents for such a federal takeover.

In the late 1980s, the government created the Resolution Trust Corporation to tackle the savings and loan crisis. It acquired the defaulted mortgages, foreclosed real estate and other assets of nearly a thousand failed S&Ls, restoring order and stability to the system. Resolving that crisis took six years and $125 billion in taxpayer money _ roughly equal to $200 billion in today's dollars.

And there was the Reconstruction Finance Corporation, a Depression-era relief program formed in 1932 by President Hoover that tried to revive the market by giving loans to banks and other businesses.

On Friday, Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson gave few details about the structure of the new program. Asked about an overall price tag, he said, "hundreds of billions" of dollars.

Congressional leaders said they were ready to move quickly but still needed details of the administration plan. For instance, there was no indication of what the government would get in return from financial companies for the federal assistance.

Paulson and Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke briefed lawmakers in both parties on the idea by conference call Friday.

In a session with House Democrats, they described a plan where the government would in essence set up reverse auctions, putting up money for a class of distressed assets _ such as loans that are delinquent but not in default _ and financial institutions would compete for how little they would accept for the investments, said Rep. Brad Sherman, D-Calif., who participated in the call.

"You give them good cash; they give you the worst of the worst," Sherman said of the plan, which he complained that Bush and his economic advisers were trying to panic lawmakers into rubber-stamping.

Paulson rejected Democrats' calls to include tighter regulations, corporate reforms or limits on executive compensation as part of the measure, Sherman said. "He's doing his best to paint a picture of the sky falling, and then he says, because the sky's falling, you have to do it my way."

Paulson said the new troubled-asset relief program that he wants Congress to enact must be large enough to have the necessary impact while protecting taxpayers as much as possible.

"I am convinced that this bold approach will cost American families far less than the alternative _ a continuing series of financial institution failures and frozen credit markets unable to fund economic expansion," Paulson. "The financial security of all Americans ... depends on our ability to restore our financial institutions to a sound footing."

Bush said simply, "We must act now."

"America's economy is facing unprecedented challenges. We're responding with unprecedented measures," Bush declared, standing in the White House Rose Garden with Paulson, Bernanke and Christopher Cox, chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Shortly after his remarks, Bush called congressional leaders with whom the administration will be working on the final plan. He spoke to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky and House GOP leader John Boehner of Ohio.

The administration wants to see a package emerge from the weekend, to lend calm to Monday morning's market openings, said Keith Hennessey, the director of the president's economic council. The goal is to have something passed by Congress by the end of next week, when lawmakers recess for the elections.

Paulson said Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac will step up their purchases of mortgage-backed securities to help provide support to the crippled housing market. He also said the Treasury Department will expand a program, announced earlier this month, to buy mortgage-backed securities, which have been badly hurt by the housing and credit crises.

"As we all know, lax lending practices earlier this decade led to irresponsible lending and irresponsible borrowing. This simply put too many families into mortgages they could not afford," Paulson said.

Bush authorized Treasury to tap up to $50 billion from a Depression-era fund to insure the holdings of eligible money-market mutual funds. And the Federal Reserve announced it would expand its emergency lending program to help support the $3.4 trillion in total assets of the funds.

On Wednesday alone, investors had pulled more than $89 billion from money-market funds, according to iMoneyNet, publisher of the newsletter Money Fund Report.

The government's actions could help alleviate the uncertainty that has been sending the markets into tumult over the past week. Lending has come to a virtual standstill in the wake of the bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.

European Central Bank, Swiss National Bank and Bank of England also offered up more cash Friday. The three banks put a combined $90 billion into money markets.

___

Associated Press writers Julie Hirschfeld Davis, Martin Crutsinger, Andrew Taylor, Marcy Gordon, David Espo and Jim Abrams in Washington and Joe Bel Bruno in New York contributed to this report.

WASHINGTON — Struggling to stave off financial catastrophe, the Bush administration on Friday laid out a radical bailout plan with a jawdropping price tag _ a takeover of a half-trillion dollars...
WASHINGTON — Struggling to stave off financial catastrophe, the Bush administration on Friday laid out a radical bailout plan with a jawdropping price tag _ a takeover of a half-trillion dollars...
Filed by Nick Sabloff  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
2081
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next › Last » (61 pages total)
- robynuva I'm a Fan of robynuva 5 fans permalink

Naked power grab
Decisions by the Secretary pursuant to the authority of this Act are non-reviewable and committed to agency discretion, and may not be reviewed by any court of law or any administrative agency.

And that is just the beginning!­!!!!!!!!!! Read it all, and it will terrify you!

Call your congressman, call your Senator. This is a power grab in the middle of a crisis as bad as the Patriot Act.

Fight people or it will be too late!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:28 PM on 09/20/2008
- robbep I'm a Fan of robbep 23 fans permalink

Paulson has some balls dont he? How in the hell can he ask us for money to bail out wall street with no conditions? Does this bail out of Wall street mean that capitalism has failed? We always like to boast about the fall of communism so what does this say about us? The same people who argue against socialize medicine has no prblms with socialized bailouts, it is a joke. Now is the time for the market to work its way out of this mess.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:18 PM on 09/20/2008
- SCG I'm a Fan of SCG 110 fans permalink
photo

" Oligarchs, Monopolists, Lobbyists and Speculators ".... Unite!

Set the Enron wheels free!

Vote Mc Cain/ Palin O8'!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:09 PM on 09/20/2008
- Darkdonnie I'm a Fan of Darkdonnie 5 fans permalink

funny you should say Enron.

Since 1989, Fannie and Freddie have spent an estimated $140 million on lobbying Washington. They contributed millions to politicians, mostly Democrats, including Senator Chris Dodd (No. 1 recipient) and Barack Obama (No. 3 recipient, despite only three years in office).

The Clinton White House used Fannie and Freddie as a patronage job bank. Former executives and board members read like a who's who of the Clinton-era Democratic Party, including Franklin Raines, Jamie Gorelick, Jim Johnson and current Rep. Rahm Emanuel.

Collectively, they and others made well more than $100 million from Fannie and Freddie, whose books were cooked Enron-style during the late 1990s and early 2000s to ensure executives got their massive bonuses.

They got the bonuses. You get the bill.

http://www.ibdeditorials.com/IBDArticles.aspx?id=306632135350949

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:45 PM on 09/20/2008

Could he possibly have screwed things up worse? Even if his intention was to bankrupt this country and ruin our credibility around the world, he couldn't have made things worse. And why in the world can't people see that McCain is either lying or saying what is politically expedient (same thing). How can things possibly be made better by ANOTHER guy that doesn't get it.

This country used to be great. Admired throughout the world. The leading economy. Now look at the absolute travesty that the electorate has brought down on us. Yeah, go have a beer with him, I'm sure he's been driven to drink if he has any conscience at all.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:44 PM on 09/20/2008
- Darkdonnie I'm a Fan of Darkdonnie 5 fans permalink

blame the congressional dems.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:47 PM on 09/20/2008
- doogiedude I'm a Fan of doogiedude 8 fans permalink

This bailout plan looks like classic "Shock Doctrine".

Under ordinary circumstances, the general public would be outraged at any proposal that gave anyone oversight of this amount of money (Section 6) without any accountability (Section 8.)

The crisis has provided a window of opportunity for the administration to further their agenda. Much like the 9/11 crisis was used to further the Iraq agenda.

IMHO this plan seems like a vehicle for the wealthy to remain in control even under a democratic presidency.

Hopefully, Congress learned its lesson well from the Iraq experience. Otherwise, fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice......

Just sayin

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:35 PM on 09/20/2008

I think Bush may have actually taken the Shock Doctrine one step further.

In the Shock Doctrine, the right wing waits for a tragedy and then takes advantage of it.

Bush has actually caused all of the disasters he has used to embezzle trillions from the American people, either intentionally or through negligence or incompetency.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:00 AM on 09/21/2008
- doogiedude I'm a Fan of doogiedude 8 fans permalink

Actually, the Shock Doctrine does discuss how disaster capitalist evolved into creating disasters as a means to their ends. The Asian currency crisis is an example. I agree the administration appears to have mastered this strategy.

Just sayin

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:55 AM on 09/21/2008


Is Paulson pushing this bail out to"PROTECT HIS OLD COMPANY GOLDMAN SACHS?? Were they coming up in the next round of failures??
PAULSON IS ONLY INTERESTED IN KEEPING THIS THING GOING UNTIL HE AND BUSH SAY SO-LONG SUCKERS IN JAN 2009;
HE ALSO IS PROTECTING GOLDMAN SACHS. WOW GS STOCK WENT THRU THR ROOF SEP: 19th.
WAY TO GO "HANK' YOU A HERO AT GS;
Financial Instutions should be held accountable: "HANK DON'T THINK SO"
This "Monster Is Growing" they keep adding to it hourly.
First they needed $85. Bn then Add $100.Bn then needs $500.Bn more now they need $700.Bn instead of the $500.Bn.
"ALREADY PUT UP $85bn+$100bn and NOW ADD $700bn === $885bn
It is a "FACT" they don't know how much they need:
They don't have a "CLUE" as to how to "SOLVE" this problem:
They are "CLUTCHING" straws, hoping something will work:
"BAILOUT" "RIPOFF": "A SHAFTED TAXPAYER";

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:22 PM on 09/20/2008
- doogiedude I'm a Fan of doogiedude 8 fans permalink

Gee, I wonder where Paulson is going to go work when he has completed his term?

Just sayin

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:37 PM on 09/20/2008

BULLSHIT..­..........­..........­..........­..........­...stop low balling WE THE PEOPLE....­..........­..........­....and give us the TRUE amount....­..........­..........­......STOP LYING!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:34 PM on 09/20/2008
- doogiedude I'm a Fan of doogiedude 8 fans permalink

I assume they are not going to take the bailout money and stick in a furncae. So in whose pocket does the $700 billion land?

Just sayin

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:27 PM on 09/20/2008
- Actionman I'm a Fan of Actionman 5 fans permalink
photo

friends of bush and company, they are the ones who created this mess.

Keating 5 again but better executed, no direct trail back to the culprits.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:00 PM on 09/20/2008

Come on Florida! Yes You Can!

Obama08!

Mcbush can eat my undercooked turkey!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:23 PM on 09/20/2008
- Mason I'm a Fan of Mason 38 fans permalink
photo

On second thought, I suppose a democratic majority in both houses could repeal or amend the statute, after Obama is sworn in, but what is the point in tying the new President's hands this close to the election?

Perhaps, this sell-out speaks volumes about the panic that is gripping Washington and the financial markets.

Methinks this proposed statute is the equivalent of screaming "FIRE" in a crowded theatre.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:22 PM on 09/20/2008
- Danny I'm a Fan of Danny 5 fans permalink

yep.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:06 PM on 09/20/2008

Republicans = rich people and or rich people want-a-be

This is their mess. So, let them pay for it. I have the solution. I propose a super tax on the Republican rich. But, don't tax them on profit or income. They always claim zero profit or income.Tax the rich on their net worth. Let's give them their flat tax they've wanting. Tax them 10% of their net worth every year until this mess they created is cleaned up. It will teach them to get rid of regulation.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:22 PM on 09/20/2008
- gmlaster I'm a Fan of gmlaster 38 fans permalink

So what do the American people get for buying up all this bad debt, because it sounds like the bankers are getting a pretty sweet deal but the American people are getting stuck with a $700B lemon. There have to be some consequences this time, and the American people should get something big for the money we're spending, since most of us got NO say in the risk and absolutely NONE of the reward.

These guys should NOT get to keep the trillions they made personally from crashing the economy because it's TREASON, and for profit. There should be long-term jail for this, and the money they made profiting off of bad home loans should be confiscated and returned to the American people. Let their families see what it's like to suddenly find themselves struggling, like the rest of us. We have got to send a message to these pigs that cheating the American people will be dealt with in the harshest possible terms.

And since the American people have to buy these bad loans, we should get something in return. All those bad ARM loans should be converted to fixed-rate loans at the original sale price so people can keep their homes. All those empty houses we're buying should be auctioned off to families and private individuals who need a place to live, NOT to speculators trying to make a buck.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:20 PM on 09/20/2008

I like the way you put it, in plain language, and I think a lot of regular americans could understand and see your point and position. It appears that Pelosi is being quoted as saying that the bailout presented to Congress is not focused enough on the homeowner. I hope she realizes that there are many more millions of American who want to help their neighbors and their community rather than the Wall Street gamblers who want the taxpayer to cover their bad bets. I notice that the SEC is suddenly talking about investigating certain trading practices that also affected the market negatively. Economic crimes should be punished just as harshly as any other. Certainly some message needs to get to the democratic leadership that makes it clear that if they get suckered in by this republican bill they will pay dearly at the polls. Hope the voices I hear in these blogs can get out to the man in the street in every city in every state. Maybe this is a chance to make this a country of the people, by the people, and for the people again.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:26 AM on 09/21/2008
- JMorgan I'm a Fan of JMorgan 3 fans permalink

This $700 billion is just for this, for now, for getting through the next several days. Nobody knows how much debt is really out there. $500 trillion is the figure most economists have come up with as the real number.

http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/derivatives-new-ticking-time-bomb/story.aspx?guid={B9E54A5D-4796-4D0D-AC9E-D9124B59D436}&dist=TNMostRead

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:17 PM on 09/20/2008
- Mauimom I'm a Fan of Mauimom 13 fans permalink
photo

Please note also that Paulson is demanding that Wall Street executives, who drove this nation into a ditch, be allowed to keep their multi-million dollar salaries & golden parachutes as a condition of the bail-out.

See http://firedoglake.com/2008/09/20/hank-paulson-to-dems-not-allowing-ceos-to-keep-multi-million-dollar-salaries-is-a-poison-pill/

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:16 PM on 09/20/2008

What would you expect from a former Goldman Sachs CEO/elitis­t/republic­an ?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:27 PM on 09/20/2008
- Mason I'm a Fan of Mason 38 fans permalink
photo

This proves where his allegiances are and, as far as I'm concerned, establishes that he is unfit to be given dictatorial powers to solve this mess.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:13 PM on 09/20/2008
- Mason I'm a Fan of Mason 38 fans permalink
photo

May I remind the Congress that we are not a dictatorship. Whatever we know about Paulsen, we don't know enough to confer dictatorial powers on him to fix this mess.

UNDER THIS PROPOSAL, IF OBAMA IS ELECTED PRESIDENT AND SWORN IN NEXT JANUARY, HE HAS NO SAY IN THIS MATTER UNTIL 2 YEARS AFTER THIS STATUTE GOES INTO EFFECT.

Obama presumably could replace Paulsen with his own choice, I think, athough that is not clear under this statute.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:14 PM on 09/20/2008
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next › Last » (61 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect