Bush Asking For $700 Billion Bailout

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Bush Asking For $700 Billion Bailout stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

TOM RAUM and JEANNINE AVERSA | September 19, 2008 11:32 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
President Bush, flanked by, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke, left, and Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson, delivers a statement about the economy and government efforts to remedy the crisis, Friday, Sept. 19, 2008, in the Rose Garden of the White House in Washington. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais)

WASHINGTON — Struggling to stave off financial catastrophe, the Bush administration on Friday laid out a radical bailout plan with a jawdropping price tag _ a takeover of a half-trillion dollars or more in worthless mortgages and other bad debt held by tottering institutions.

Relieved investors sent stocks soaring on Wall Street and around the globe. The Dow-Jones industrials average rose 368 points after surging 410 points the day before on rumors the federal action was afoot.

A grim-faced President Bush acknowledged risks to taxpayers in what would be the most sweeping government intervention to rescue failing financial institutions since the Great Depression. But he declared, "The risk of not acting would be far higher."

The administration is asking Congress for far-reaching new powers to take over troubled mortgages from banks and other companies, including purchasing sour mortgage-backed securities. Administration officials and congressional leaders are to work out details over the weekend.

Congressional officials said they expected a request for legal authority to buy up the bad loans, at a cost in excess of $500 billion to the government. Democrats were discussing whether to try to attach middle class assistance to the legislation, despite a request from Bush to avoid adding controversial items that could delay action. An expansion of jobless benefits was one possibility.

In other major steps, the Treasury Department and Federal Reserve moved to give money-market mutual funds the same kind of federal protection, at least temporarily, that now applies to savings and checking accounts and certificates of deposit at banks. Money-market accounts sold through retail banks are already FDIC insured.

The spreading global selling panic had started to threaten some money-market funds, usually thought of as rock-solid investments. Administration officials feared a run on these funds, held by millions of Americans.

"Every American should know that the federal government continues to enforce laws and regulations protecting your money," Bush said at the White House. The 75-year-old Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation now insures savings and checking accounts and certificates of deposit up to $100,000.

Story continues below
advertisement

Separately, the Securities and Exchange Commission acted to block short-selling in financial securities. That is a trading method that bets the value of stocks will go down. It has been blamed for accelerating the plunge in stock prices of banks and other financial institutions.

"This is a pivotal moment for America's economy," Bush said. "In our nation's history, there have been moments that require us to come together across party lines to address major challenges. This is such a moment."

Congressional leaders of both parties welcomed the administration's bold moves, after a series of ad hoc rescues.

The talk on the presidential campaign trail, barely six weeks before the election, was of bipartisanship, too.

Democrat Barack Obama said it was critical that leaders in both parties work in concert. "Truly, we are all in this together," he said.

GOP presidential nominee John McCain said leaders should put aside partisan differences and "any action should be designed to keep people in their homes and safeguard the life savings of all Americans."

The federal government already has pledged more than $600 billion in the past year to bail out, or help bail out, some of the biggest names in American finance. That includes the rescue of investment bank Bear Stearns in March, the takeover of mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac earlier this month and the takeover of the world's largest insurance company, American International Group, just this week.

But the contagion continued to spread, bringing political consensus that drastic and comprehensive federal action was needed.

There are precedents for such a federal takeover.

In the late 1980s, the government created the Resolution Trust Corporation to tackle the savings and loan crisis. It acquired the defaulted mortgages, foreclosed real estate and other assets of nearly a thousand failed S&Ls, restoring order and stability to the system. Resolving that crisis took six years and $125 billion in taxpayer money _ roughly equal to $200 billion in today's dollars.

And there was the Reconstruction Finance Corporation, a Depression-era relief program formed in 1932 by President Hoover that tried to revive the market by giving loans to banks and other businesses.

On Friday, Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson gave few details about the structure of the new program. Asked about an overall price tag, he said, "hundreds of billions" of dollars.

Congressional leaders said they were ready to move quickly but still needed details of the administration plan. For instance, there was no indication of what the government would get in return from financial companies for the federal assistance.

Paulson and Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke briefed lawmakers in both parties on the idea by conference call Friday.

In a session with House Democrats, they described a plan where the government would in essence set up reverse auctions, putting up money for a class of distressed assets _ such as loans that are delinquent but not in default _ and financial institutions would compete for how little they would accept for the investments, said Rep. Brad Sherman, D-Calif., who participated in the call.

"You give them good cash; they give you the worst of the worst," Sherman said of the plan, which he complained that Bush and his economic advisers were trying to panic lawmakers into rubber-stamping.

Paulson rejected Democrats' calls to include tighter regulations, corporate reforms or limits on executive compensation as part of the measure, Sherman said. "He's doing his best to paint a picture of the sky falling, and then he says, because the sky's falling, you have to do it my way."

Paulson said the new troubled-asset relief program that he wants Congress to enact must be large enough to have the necessary impact while protecting taxpayers as much as possible.

"I am convinced that this bold approach will cost American families far less than the alternative _ a continuing series of financial institution failures and frozen credit markets unable to fund economic expansion," Paulson. "The financial security of all Americans ... depends on our ability to restore our financial institutions to a sound footing."

Bush said simply, "We must act now."

"America's economy is facing unprecedented challenges. We're responding with unprecedented measures," Bush declared, standing in the White House Rose Garden with Paulson, Bernanke and Christopher Cox, chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Shortly after his remarks, Bush called congressional leaders with whom the administration will be working on the final plan. He spoke to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky and House GOP leader John Boehner of Ohio.

The administration wants to see a package emerge from the weekend, to lend calm to Monday morning's market openings, said Keith Hennessey, the director of the president's economic council. The goal is to have something passed by Congress by the end of next week, when lawmakers recess for the elections.

Paulson said Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac will step up their purchases of mortgage-backed securities to help provide support to the crippled housing market. He also said the Treasury Department will expand a program, announced earlier this month, to buy mortgage-backed securities, which have been badly hurt by the housing and credit crises.

"As we all know, lax lending practices earlier this decade led to irresponsible lending and irresponsible borrowing. This simply put too many families into mortgages they could not afford," Paulson said.

Bush authorized Treasury to tap up to $50 billion from a Depression-era fund to insure the holdings of eligible money-market mutual funds. And the Federal Reserve announced it would expand its emergency lending program to help support the $3.4 trillion in total assets of the funds.

On Wednesday alone, investors had pulled more than $89 billion from money-market funds, according to iMoneyNet, publisher of the newsletter Money Fund Report.

The government's actions could help alleviate the uncertainty that has been sending the markets into tumult over the past week. Lending has come to a virtual standstill in the wake of the bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.

European Central Bank, Swiss National Bank and Bank of England also offered up more cash Friday. The three banks put a combined $90 billion into money markets.

___

Associated Press writers Julie Hirschfeld Davis, Martin Crutsinger, Andrew Taylor, Marcy Gordon, David Espo and Jim Abrams in Washington and Joe Bel Bruno in New York contributed to this report.

WASHINGTON — Struggling to stave off financial catastrophe, the Bush administration on Friday laid out a radical bailout plan with a jawdropping price tag _ a takeover of a half-trillion dollars...
WASHINGTON — Struggling to stave off financial catastrophe, the Bush administration on Friday laid out a radical bailout plan with a jawdropping price tag _ a takeover of a half-trillion dollars...
Filed by Nick Sabloff  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
2081
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next › Last » (61 pages total)
- adzeman I'm a Fan of adzeman 24 fans permalink
photo

If we get off for 700 billion it will be a miracle. Like all government pronouncements this is probably one third of the lowball guestimate. Bet the ranch that it will be closer to three trillion.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:13 PM on 09/20/2008
- JMorgan I'm a Fan of JMorgan 3 fans permalink

No, $700 billion is just to get us past these next few days. This just the beginning. WaMu is next on the horizon.

Nobody knows how much debt is really out there. $500 trillion is the figure most economists have come up with as the real number.

http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/derivatives-new-ticking-time-bomb/story.aspx?guid={B9E54A5D-4796-4D0D-AC9E-D9124B59D436}&dist=TNMostRead

This didn't happen out of nowhere. This was warned about every deregulating step of the way. I've known this was happening (and I'm nobody special) for the last two years.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:22 PM on 09/20/2008
- gmlaster I'm a Fan of gmlaster 43 fans permalink

That sounds about right.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:02 PM on 09/20/2008
photo

My letter to my congress critters:

Dear Senator __:

I am writing in very deep concern over the Wall Street Bailout Act, currently entitled as "LEGISLATIVE PROPOSAL FOR TREASURY AUTHORITY TO PURCHASE MORTGAGE-RELATED ASSETS".

This is, to say the least, a deeply troubling bill. Specifically:

1. There is little to no oversight. Furthermore, section 8 ensures that any oversight is crippled from the start, as it states, and I quote from the text of the act: "Decisions by the Secretary pursuant to the authority of this Act are non-reviewable and committed to agency discretion, and may not be reviewed by any court of law or any administrative agency."

2. The floating amount controlled by the Secretary of the Treasury is $700B is effectively a blank check as there is no hard limit.

3. It appears that the power of the Secretary extends to no-bid contracts.

4. It provides no restoration of the provisions of the Glass-Steagall Act, modernized or otherwise, that were stripped away by the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act. It does absolutely nothing to change the fundamental problems that led us to this situation.

I strongly urge you to vote against this bill. I know that we need to prevent the complete disintegration of our economy, but this is not the solution. This is a blank check to the executive; it is the abdication of the financial powers granted to the legislative branch in Article 1, Section 8 of the constitution.

Sincerely,

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:04 PM on 09/20/2008
- MsMontana I'm a Fan of MsMontana 8 fans permalink
photo

Great letter. May we use it?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:13 PM on 09/20/2008
photo

Thank you, and by all means, use it! And encourage others too as well.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:31 PM on 09/20/2008
- gmlaster I'm a Fan of gmlaster 43 fans permalink

Thank you so much. I'm sending this today.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:52 PM on 09/20/2008
- Jessegirl I'm a Fan of Jessegirl 49 fans permalink

Republicans and all their goddam bright ideas and beliefs...
They can all kiss my a***s!!!
I can't even consider being the least bit fair when listening to them anyomre...
When you hear one talking, it's like "oh okay...don­'t worry, I'm listening to ya freak!".
What a disgraceful laughing stock.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:57 PM on 09/20/2008

If we are going to spend a few trillion, at least lets spend it on things that are important like health care, education, alternative energy, retirement security and so on, not bailing out the Las Vegas on the Hudson.

Time is on our side. We should not allow the very people who created the financial mess we are in to put together the solution.

Companies holding toxic paper deserve to fail. Their officers and directors should be sued and forced to disgorge the fees they have already pocketed. Taxpayers should not be forced to buy their losses.

They are trying to get this done before they are kicked out of Washington. I don't accept that taking the time to do it right is worst than letting them hang us.

Time is on our side. They are desperate. Hold the line and lets exact a little justice as well as make wise investments in our country.

Letting them get away this would be pure insanity. Just say no to the bailout!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:54 PM on 09/20/2008
- Danny I'm a Fan of Danny 5 fans permalink

Time is on our side. Yes. Let us do it right. For us. The people.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:12 PM on 09/20/2008

If corporate welfare is what this nation wants, then ____ (you fill in the blank).

Check out Keith Olbermann's Msnbc clip obout Palin's pastor, Thomas Muthee, it magnifies Mccain's appalling stupidity for his pick as VP.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:54 PM on 09/20/2008
- Mason I'm a Fan of Mason 43 fans permalink
photo

Wow, I just took a look at the proposed new legislation and it grants basically unreviewable authority to Treasury Secretary Paulson for 2 years to do anything he wants to fix this mess so long as he considers:

"(1) providing stability or preventing disruption to the financial markets or banking system; and

(2) protecting the taxpayer."

Does he have to report to anyone?

"Within three months of the first exercise of the authority granted in section 2(a), and semiannually thereafter, the Secretary shall report to the Committees on the Budget, Financial Services, and Ways and Means of the House of Representatives and the Committees on the Budget, Finance, and Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate with respect to the authorities exercised under this Act and the considerations required by section 3."

What limitations are placed on his discretionary decisions?

Section 6 reads:

"The Secretary’s authority to purchase mortgage-related assets under this Act shall be limited to $700,000,000,000 outstanding at any one time."

And Section 8 reads:

"Decisions by the Secretary pursuant to the authority of this Act are non-reviewable and committed to agency discretion, and may not be reviewed by any court of law or any administrative agency."

How much can he increase the public debt?

Section 10 reads:

"$11,315,0­00,000,000­."

Uhm, Paulson isn't an elected official and this most definitely isn't what I had mind. How about you?

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/9/20/132020/495/381/604752

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:51 PM on 09/20/2008
- MsMontana I'm a Fan of MsMontana 8 fans permalink
photo

I am shaking, I'm so upset. 8 years of tearing away one right after another, putting a war of choice over needs of Americans, and now this? I hope everyone who is outraged sends their message to anyone and everyone they can think of who MIGHT STAND UP FOR US!!!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:04 PM on 09/20/2008
- gmlaster I'm a Fan of gmlaster 43 fans permalink

They're not trying to fix this at all! They're still trying to figure out how they can make a profit off of this situation. They actually think we're sleeping through this. Thanks for sharing this. I think some serious jail time is in order here. In fact, if Congress can find the balls to really investigate this, they should throw every one of these guys into the nastiest federal prison in the country for TREASON, as a lesson to the next 100 generations that if you steal from the American people, you will rot in jail and all your money will go back to the people.

If all the people responsible for this disaster were prosecuted and their money seized (all of it), how many trillions do you think we could put back into the Treasury?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:43 PM on 09/20/2008
- MsMontana I'm a Fan of MsMontana 8 fans permalink
photo

Not only all of this, read what else he is trying to do:

Decisions by the Secretary pursuant to the authority of this Act are non-reviewable and committed to agency discretion, and may not be reviewed by any court of law or any administrative agency.

Time to stand up to this crap. Write Pelosi.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:46 PM on 09/20/2008

Check out Keith Olbermann's (MSNBC) coverage of Sarah Palin's Pastor, Thomas Muthee at (MSNBC)!

The republican indignation about Rev. Wright cant hold a candle to this one and is silently praying this wont be covered by mainstream media.

This should be covered because it magnifies McCain's stupidity for picking Palin!

I will be talking in tongues now....

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:46 PM on 09/20/2008
photo

While I'd rather have a bailout vs. a financial meltdown, I'll bet Osama Bin Laden must be dancing in his cave. Wasn't it his stated goal to trap us into an endless guerilla war in the middle east and bankrupt the U.S. treasury the same way the Mujahadeen did in Afghanistan with the former Soviet Union?

Mission Accomplished?

Is everyone ready to join Todd Palin and succeed from the union yet? LOL

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:45 PM on 09/20/2008
- DMcD I'm a Fan of DMcD 11 fans permalink
photo

Temporarily setting aside important questions relating to "how these acquired mortgages will be administered by the Fed" (a scary thought in itself) , the question of "what regulations should be enacted to prevent this in the future" , remains. May I suggest that they merely hit the "go-back" button and return to the very effective regulations enacted after the Great Depression ---- they did the job for 6 decades and we prospered like no country in history as long as they were in effect. Those regulations were there for a reason --- 'smart people' "learn from history" , they don't 'repeat it'.

Now , on the subject of 'accountability' ----------­----------
.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:24 PM on 09/20/2008

I should learn more about the Great Depression to appreciate that "go-back" button. You make it sound so simple. Our country is dynamic, and 'am not sure if there are manufacturing industries left to trigger prosperity, as they did during the GD, They have all been ship to Asia and mainline China. Then, the USA did not borrow from China, nor India; no globalization, no oil crisis etc.

I question your premise - if smart people learned from their mistake and "learned from history", and "they don't repeat it", then why are back in same Depression again. Aren't Bernanke, Paulson, Cox, Pelosi, Reid, Dodd "smart people'? Didn't they say " stunned", overwhelmed and flabbergasted as to the extent of this meltdown ?

The truth is - they don't have a clue !

For as long as we, the people, and our leaders remain arrogant, greedy and incompetent, then in another 80 years, it may be that "History will repeat itself".

Too bad for my generation who will carry the brunt of these past mistakes. I am no genius, but I can do my budget, and have enough "smarts' not to spend more than I my budget.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:34 PM on 09/20/2008
- gmlaster I'm a Fan of gmlaster 43 fans permalink

How about PRISON? No possibility of parole? Living out your life with hardened criminals with no possibility of ever getting free?

Combined with strict regulation and oversight, it might just help to clean up Wall Street a bit.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:59 PM on 09/20/2008

This bill is another Executive Branch Power Grab ala The Patriot Act:
Shock Doctrine:
Read Krugman and dairy for leaked draft of the bill:
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/9/20/132020/495/381/604752

contact your congressmen/women and senators- NO DEAL

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:08 PM on 09/20/2008
- Veri I'm a Fan of Veri 18 fans permalink

Title of the article should be, "Bush Asks for $700 Billion Dollar Welfare Fund for Friends".

America is an empire in name only. Washington, D.C., is burning. The only power America has is its military and nuclear arsenal.

You are the new peasants, serfs, and slaves. And you paid for your enslavement through debt.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:06 PM on 09/20/2008

One Trillion is one thousand billions. Numerically this is 67.866 miles times 1000 – one trillion One Dollar Bills stacked one on top of another is 67,866 miles. The circumference of the earth at the equator is 24,901.55 miles. A one trillion dollar stack of One Dollar Bills would circumnavigate the globe, at the equator, 2.73 times. 2 ¾ times. Around the globe. And that is just ONE trillion dollars.

Our current national debt cap is 10.3 trillion dollars. A stack of One Dollar Bills that totaled 10.6 trillion dollars would go around the equator 28.93 times. 28.93 times. 720,601 miles of One Dollar Bills. That is our CURRENT cap. The proposed cap would be 11.3 trillion dollars. A stack of One Dollar Bills that travels around the equator 30.85 times. This is what is being proposed. Can we as a nation afford to make our debt the equivalent of a stack of One Dollar Bills that would stretch 31 times around the planet?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:56 PM on 09/20/2008

I've run these numbers as well, and I also include the numbers for that many one dollar bills laid end to end. One trillion one dollar bills laid end to end would reach to the other side of the sun, at very nearly 97 million miles...or how bout circumnavigating the Earth 3892 times? At 11.3 trillion you get 43,975 circumnavigation's. That many one dollar bills would also completely cover the Earth 14 times, including the oceans! Can we have our debt create a pile of one dollar bills 14 deep, that could cover the entire planet?!

That's a lotta money.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:36 PM on 09/20/2008

Taking this analogy to the next logical step would be to move from one thousand dollars to one million dollars. One million is one thousand thousands, so the thickness of $1,000,000 is a thousand times thicker than the stack of $1000.00 – or 4300 inches. Convert this number to feet (divide by 12) and this becomes 358.3 feet. A football field is 360 feet, so one million dollars in One Dollar Bills stacked one on top of the other would be 1 foot 9 inches shy of an entire football field, and yes, that includes the end zones.

One billion -- $1,000,000,000 would again be one thousand times thicker than one million, or 358,333.3 feet, a little more than 995 football fields with their end zones. In miles (divide the number of feet by 5280) this is 67.866 miles – the approximate driving distance from New York, New York to Milford, Connecticut. That is a stack of One Dollar Bills that is nearly 70 miles high, and this analogy has only gone to one billion dollars.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:56 PM on 09/20/2008

The United States Government is capitalizing on a comprehensional failure of the human mind – the inability to fully grasp the magnitude of large numbers. Upon hearing numbers beyond a few thousand, say ‘three billion, nine hundred eighty seven million, six hundred forty-two thousand, nine hundred fifty seven dollars and sixty-seven cents’ and our brains interpret it as, “Wow, that’s a big number” with no true handle on exactly how big. Therefore, I feel it is time to give the minds of the American public a real grasp on large numbers.

According to the United States treasury, a One Dollar Bill has a thickness of 0.0043 inches – top to bottom, less than five thousandths of an inch. One thousand One Dollar Bills would be one thousand times thicker. Therefore, $1000.00 would be 4.3 inches thick, or the diagonal screen measurement of many popular navigation devices.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:55 PM on 09/20/2008

I am impressed by all your analytic mind, but do tell this 27-year-old kid how the thickness of a 1-dollar bill help my generation of under 27-30 carry the brunt of arrogance, mismanagement, greed, and icompetence of past generations and their leaders.

Not to brag but according to the Labor Dept, we are more productive and educated workers. But we are faced with inflation and high cost of living. So why should we be burdened with these crap !

I don't like the bailout anymore than you do, but it's time our Nation to make these painful decisions, if only to save future generations. And I mean, not just a quickie band aid for political expediency now that we have a Presidential election, but one that is lasting and meaningful absence of pandering to voters.

You'd be surprised but we do have the ability to comprehend large numbers - i.e National Debt. And not only that - we know what arrogance, greed and incompetence when we see one.

Just look at Paulson, Cox, Bernanke, Pelosi, Reid, Bush, Cheney et al - very concrete meaning of arrogance, greed and incompetence.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:07 PM on 09/20/2008
- Mason I'm a Fan of Mason 43 fans permalink
photo

Warning: Snarky comment!

Go forth and multiply . . . and multiply . . . . and multiply. Until there are enough of you to each contribute 0ne dollar bill that is a mere 0.0043 inches thick, or if that's too sexually scandalous, then until there are enough of you to each contribute two dollar bills that are 0.0086 inches thick, and so on.

And for God's Sake, women, don't use contraceptives, eschew abortions, and continue to have beautiful little human babies well into your forties.

If you want to get rich, start a diaper cleaning business.

Do you want starch on that order, ma'am?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:39 PM on 09/20/2008
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next › Last » (61 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect