Bush Asking For $700 Billion Bailout

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Bush Asking For $700 Billion Bailout stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

TOM RAUM and JEANNINE AVERSA | September 19, 2008 11:32 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
President Bush, flanked by, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke, left, and Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson, delivers a statement about the economy and government efforts to remedy the crisis, Friday, Sept. 19, 2008, in the Rose Garden of the White House in Washington. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais)

WASHINGTON — Struggling to stave off financial catastrophe, the Bush administration on Friday laid out a radical bailout plan with a jawdropping price tag _ a takeover of a half-trillion dollars or more in worthless mortgages and other bad debt held by tottering institutions.

Relieved investors sent stocks soaring on Wall Street and around the globe. The Dow-Jones industrials average rose 368 points after surging 410 points the day before on rumors the federal action was afoot.

A grim-faced President Bush acknowledged risks to taxpayers in what would be the most sweeping government intervention to rescue failing financial institutions since the Great Depression. But he declared, "The risk of not acting would be far higher."

The administration is asking Congress for far-reaching new powers to take over troubled mortgages from banks and other companies, including purchasing sour mortgage-backed securities. Administration officials and congressional leaders are to work out details over the weekend.

Congressional officials said they expected a request for legal authority to buy up the bad loans, at a cost in excess of $500 billion to the government. Democrats were discussing whether to try to attach middle class assistance to the legislation, despite a request from Bush to avoid adding controversial items that could delay action. An expansion of jobless benefits was one possibility.

In other major steps, the Treasury Department and Federal Reserve moved to give money-market mutual funds the same kind of federal protection, at least temporarily, that now applies to savings and checking accounts and certificates of deposit at banks. Money-market accounts sold through retail banks are already FDIC insured.

The spreading global selling panic had started to threaten some money-market funds, usually thought of as rock-solid investments. Administration officials feared a run on these funds, held by millions of Americans.

"Every American should know that the federal government continues to enforce laws and regulations protecting your money," Bush said at the White House. The 75-year-old Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation now insures savings and checking accounts and certificates of deposit up to $100,000.

Story continues below
advertisement

Separately, the Securities and Exchange Commission acted to block short-selling in financial securities. That is a trading method that bets the value of stocks will go down. It has been blamed for accelerating the plunge in stock prices of banks and other financial institutions.

"This is a pivotal moment for America's economy," Bush said. "In our nation's history, there have been moments that require us to come together across party lines to address major challenges. This is such a moment."

Congressional leaders of both parties welcomed the administration's bold moves, after a series of ad hoc rescues.

The talk on the presidential campaign trail, barely six weeks before the election, was of bipartisanship, too.

Democrat Barack Obama said it was critical that leaders in both parties work in concert. "Truly, we are all in this together," he said.

GOP presidential nominee John McCain said leaders should put aside partisan differences and "any action should be designed to keep people in their homes and safeguard the life savings of all Americans."

The federal government already has pledged more than $600 billion in the past year to bail out, or help bail out, some of the biggest names in American finance. That includes the rescue of investment bank Bear Stearns in March, the takeover of mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac earlier this month and the takeover of the world's largest insurance company, American International Group, just this week.

But the contagion continued to spread, bringing political consensus that drastic and comprehensive federal action was needed.

There are precedents for such a federal takeover.

In the late 1980s, the government created the Resolution Trust Corporation to tackle the savings and loan crisis. It acquired the defaulted mortgages, foreclosed real estate and other assets of nearly a thousand failed S&Ls, restoring order and stability to the system. Resolving that crisis took six years and $125 billion in taxpayer money _ roughly equal to $200 billion in today's dollars.

And there was the Reconstruction Finance Corporation, a Depression-era relief program formed in 1932 by President Hoover that tried to revive the market by giving loans to banks and other businesses.

On Friday, Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson gave few details about the structure of the new program. Asked about an overall price tag, he said, "hundreds of billions" of dollars.

Congressional leaders said they were ready to move quickly but still needed details of the administration plan. For instance, there was no indication of what the government would get in return from financial companies for the federal assistance.

Paulson and Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke briefed lawmakers in both parties on the idea by conference call Friday.

In a session with House Democrats, they described a plan where the government would in essence set up reverse auctions, putting up money for a class of distressed assets _ such as loans that are delinquent but not in default _ and financial institutions would compete for how little they would accept for the investments, said Rep. Brad Sherman, D-Calif., who participated in the call.

"You give them good cash; they give you the worst of the worst," Sherman said of the plan, which he complained that Bush and his economic advisers were trying to panic lawmakers into rubber-stamping.

Paulson rejected Democrats' calls to include tighter regulations, corporate reforms or limits on executive compensation as part of the measure, Sherman said. "He's doing his best to paint a picture of the sky falling, and then he says, because the sky's falling, you have to do it my way."

Paulson said the new troubled-asset relief program that he wants Congress to enact must be large enough to have the necessary impact while protecting taxpayers as much as possible.

"I am convinced that this bold approach will cost American families far less than the alternative _ a continuing series of financial institution failures and frozen credit markets unable to fund economic expansion," Paulson. "The financial security of all Americans ... depends on our ability to restore our financial institutions to a sound footing."

Bush said simply, "We must act now."

"America's economy is facing unprecedented challenges. We're responding with unprecedented measures," Bush declared, standing in the White House Rose Garden with Paulson, Bernanke and Christopher Cox, chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Shortly after his remarks, Bush called congressional leaders with whom the administration will be working on the final plan. He spoke to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky and House GOP leader John Boehner of Ohio.

The administration wants to see a package emerge from the weekend, to lend calm to Monday morning's market openings, said Keith Hennessey, the director of the president's economic council. The goal is to have something passed by Congress by the end of next week, when lawmakers recess for the elections.

Paulson said Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac will step up their purchases of mortgage-backed securities to help provide support to the crippled housing market. He also said the Treasury Department will expand a program, announced earlier this month, to buy mortgage-backed securities, which have been badly hurt by the housing and credit crises.

"As we all know, lax lending practices earlier this decade led to irresponsible lending and irresponsible borrowing. This simply put too many families into mortgages they could not afford," Paulson said.

Bush authorized Treasury to tap up to $50 billion from a Depression-era fund to insure the holdings of eligible money-market mutual funds. And the Federal Reserve announced it would expand its emergency lending program to help support the $3.4 trillion in total assets of the funds.

On Wednesday alone, investors had pulled more than $89 billion from money-market funds, according to iMoneyNet, publisher of the newsletter Money Fund Report.

The government's actions could help alleviate the uncertainty that has been sending the markets into tumult over the past week. Lending has come to a virtual standstill in the wake of the bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.

European Central Bank, Swiss National Bank and Bank of England also offered up more cash Friday. The three banks put a combined $90 billion into money markets.

___

Associated Press writers Julie Hirschfeld Davis, Martin Crutsinger, Andrew Taylor, Marcy Gordon, David Espo and Jim Abrams in Washington and Joe Bel Bruno in New York contributed to this report.

WASHINGTON — Struggling to stave off financial catastrophe, the Bush administration on Friday laid out a radical bailout plan with a jawdropping price tag _ a takeover of a half-trillion dollars...
WASHINGTON — Struggling to stave off financial catastrophe, the Bush administration on Friday laid out a radical bailout plan with a jawdropping price tag _ a takeover of a half-trillion dollars...
Filed by Nick Sabloff  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
2081
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next › Last » (61 pages total)

Sounds good (low-interest loans). Page from credit card rescue outfits: instead of bankruptcy and instant relief, lower interest and 5 or 6 years of struggle which does pay off.

Just don't know enough. I need to understand what has happened, what are the alternatives, risks and benefits? Think it is time to introduce critical thinking in schools (do need math and language to be able to do it). Any society like ours has always been been manipulated by rhetoric that mostly addresses fears and offers easy solutions--presents issues as having right/wrong solutions. Our whole society needs to be reprogrammed to think; the leaders and the media need to be reprogrammed to provide real information. It is most likely way too late.

When our republic was started, our leaders really didn't need to know that much about economics and foreign policy, and while the need for knowledge has changed, the system has not. I have never even heard a suggestion that our lawmakers be required to have an understanding of the underlying forces of economics, culture, foreign policy. The fact that Ms. Palin is not only a heartbeat from the Presidency, but has been enthusiastically supported, is as frightening as the fact that Bush was re-elected. Not that the alternatives (Obama, etc) are that great.

The scariest thought of all--maybe we are very close to economic collapse--maybe the buyout is the only thing that will even remotely buy us a bit of time??

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:53 PM on 09/20/2008
- kfdan I'm a Fan of kfdan 21 fans permalink
photo

Is this crisis the straw that breaks the camels back? Is it the cap that snaps shut the Bush administration's genie bottle of lies, idiotic policies and moves toward a Banana Republic? Is it the final legacy of the Bush administration? This is an administration that has loosened the dogs of war bases on lies, that has spent the treasury in pursuit of an wasteful dream to control the world ... wait a minute, didn't Hitler try to do that, that has supported and engaged in the torture of prisoners of war, that has downgraded the Constitution in the name of 'national security,' that has pretty much turned the countries fortunes and good will around the globe into a hurricane of destruction that even McKinley's administration would be hard pressed to equal ... and we are still listening to this man!
It's time for all Americans to realize we are lemmings at the cliff and I, for one, do not want to jump!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:52 PM on 09/20/2008
- tmo7734 I'm a Fan of tmo7734 17 fans permalink
photo

The Bush administration can find billions of dollars to bail out corporations, but no relief for struggling middle-class families who are shouldering the burden of mounting debt. No middle-class tax breaks. No universal healthcare. Exportation of jobs. Who does the Bush administration serve? The wealthy and corporations. End of story. Wake up America. Don't let blind patriotism fog your brain.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:42 PM on 09/20/2008
- Veri I'm a Fan of Veri 18 fans permalink

You do not get it yet? Our political and financial leadership care nothing for you.

When Nixon allowed the creation of the modern American health care disaster system, it was done through a Democratic Congress. The start of servitude through debt of the bottom 99% of Americans began with Reagan. And a Democratic Congress. NAFTA and the deregulation of the stock market was accomplished under a Republican Congress. And a Democrat as President. His name was Clinton.

The Democrats, since 2006, have given Bush everything. And now they promise change? No, only more indebtedness and servitude for you. Change that is promised will be superficial. You will get your table scraps from the Money Trust. That is, if there is anything left for you.

I have hope for Obama, that he will break this cycle. However, the forces arrayed against and real change are vast and well funded. And they just received an initial $1 trillion dollar cash infusion from you. In addition to the $900 billion received over the last six months.

Getting the picture yet?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:11 PM on 09/20/2008
- DMcD I'm a Fan of DMcD 11 fans permalink
photo

Time for a 'real' change ---- Nader. But of course , this will never happen ---- too bad. We had our chance (and blew it).

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:52 PM on 09/20/2008
- ccpostman I'm a Fan of ccpostman 22 fans permalink
photo

There is nothing wrong with free trade. That is NOT the problem.

The problem is they don't buy our goods, only our natural resources.

Also, U.S. companies are now all pocketing HUGE money and not passing it on to the U.S. consumers.

Here are a few examples -

Reyn Spooner Shirts, which used to be made all in Hawaii, are now made in Korea. Reyn has not lowered their name brand shirt prices one dime. In fact, they have raised the prices. The shirts now cost around 80 bucks! No savings for the buyer, but the owner is pocketing huge money while workers in hawaii lost their jobs and the shirt buyer does not benefit AT ALL from the outsourcing.

Buck Knives is another one. They used to make their knives in California. They then moved to Idaho. The owner still thought the wages there were to high so he outsources a lot to China now.

All the businesses in the U.S. do this to make the people at the top multi millionaires. We eat it on jobs and pay the same or higher prices.

I just bought some flatware from Oneida and it is rusting after a month!
It is all mostly junk China made Flatware now! I'm now going to have to pay a company here to do the proper passification on the stainless steel to seal/remove impurities, since they did not do it in China. This is insane!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:05 PM on 09/20/2008
- DMcD I'm a Fan of DMcD 11 fans permalink
photo

'Reason be damned' , they have not the "Foggiest" (nor do they wish to) --- ignorance is bliss and to them , a 'virtue'.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:31 PM on 09/20/2008

This is another one just like the other one. No matter how much Iraq is Bush's fault, we are stuck there and we are going to have to work together to get out without things getting even worse. Same with Bush's "Financial Iraq". Push untested derivitives, lower capital requirments, loosen regulation to create a credit-led boom. All it lacked was a "Mission Acomplished" banner across Wall Street when the Dow broke 14,000. We know whose fault it is but we are deep in it regardless. And now we have to use massive taxpayer funds to get out without things getting worse. Knowing who to blame doesn't make it easier to fix.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:41 PM on 09/20/2008
- Veri I'm a Fan of Veri 18 fans permalink

Ah, we are not stuck there. Not if you keep electing the same shills, those very self-same proclaimed agents of change. More like, agents of disaster.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:12 PM on 09/20/2008

Why is nobody talking about the real bad effect of this bailout in other media outlets? What does it mean by government is buying bad assets at penny on a dollar? If Wall Street firms are going to get only a penny for an asset worth of a dollar, then they should just write it off just like many other thing or are those pennies adds up to 700 billions? If that’s the case then GOD save us because it means that bad assets are close to 700 billions time 100, which is equal to 70 trillion dollars. It makes no sense.

I think Congress should not rush in authorizing this proposed bailout in haste, it should scrutinize it well, otherwise it will be just like days leading to Iraq war, when administration used broad power to wage war against terrorism to invade Iraq. We should watch !!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:35 PM on 09/20/2008

Great comment.

First, the questions--what does it all mean?

Second, let's THINK about it! What are the risks involved in spending a month getting feedback from economists, the public? Are there viable alternatives? What would happen if nothing was done? Could we weather the outcome? What are the risks/benefits of the buyout and possible alternative solutions?

Is this a true emergency? In other words, should we believe the administration that immediate steps must be taken? If it IS a true emergency, then the time taken to debate and explore the issue may not be available--which is what the administration would have us think. Umm...poin­t about the Iraq war is well taken.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:07 PM on 09/20/2008
photo

I am a middle class Joe who brings his lunch to work in a brown paper bag. I don't want to pay salaries to the former "masters of the universe" any higher than the top of the GS scale. Since these are now government owned companies they should get government pay. If they don't like it, walk. (Don't let the screen door hit you on the way out) and good luck finding a job in the banking/investment industry. If we can have GS employees running billion dollar programs, we can have people earning GS wages run so call banks, insurance comapnies, money market funds. "Incentive pay" for "critical staff" is a joke. They are the very ones responsible for the debacle. FIRE THEM!! I am sure most of the real technical work is done by much lower paid staff anyway. I am counting on you to hold their feet to the fire.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:21 PM on 09/20/2008
- Veri I'm a Fan of Veri 18 fans permalink

Ah, again, the government is now a Socialist government. They have let the wolves in among the sheep by socializing finance. The very same "masters of finance" will be employed by the government.

A marriage made in heaven for them. A marriage made in hell for you.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:14 PM on 09/20/2008
- SeaRover I'm a Fan of SeaRover 2 fans permalink

Hopefully, there will be someone in Congress who stands up and puts the brakes on Dubya's latest attempt to ram another "solution" to another dubious "crisis" down our throats. Why would anyone trust anything coming out of the Bush administration?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:14 PM on 09/20/2008
- Veri I'm a Fan of Veri 18 fans permalink

Fear not! This a Demo-Republican plan!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:14 PM on 09/20/2008
- huffy2001 I'm a Fan of huffy2001 50 fans permalink
photo

NO BAILOUT WITHOUT EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION CAPS!

I don't want my tax money going into the pockets of the executives who pillaged this country and put us into this mess in the first place. If we are going to bail them out, they should suffer right along with everyone else... PLUS, they ought to be prepared for HUGE tax increases on their excess income, their bonuses, their golden parachutes etc., etc.

For far too long the people who screwed us got the spoils. I am sick and tired of socialism for the rich and a hot poker up the ass for the rest of us.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:12 PM on 09/20/2008
- Mason I'm a Fan of Mason 43 fans permalink
photo

Amen!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:20 PM on 09/20/2008
- Veri I'm a Fan of Veri 18 fans permalink

Just keep chanting that as the bill becomes $4 trillion.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:15 PM on 09/20/2008
- ccpostman I'm a Fan of ccpostman 22 fans permalink
photo

If they can figure this bail out in three days, they can figure out who the crooks are and repo/freeze their money!

It most likely all offshore by now. Good job for Homeland Security. Track down these wire transfers.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:22 PM on 09/20/2008
- globality I'm a Fan of globality 18 fans permalink

1) If wall street fails there will be no credit available to mainstreet businesses

2) lets use taxpayer money to bail wall street out so that they can lend to mainstreet businesses


Why not just set ap a government trust to lend to mainstreet businesses at reasonable rates. They stay afloat, abd wall stree gets what it deserves

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:04 PM on 09/20/2008
- Veri I'm a Fan of Veri 18 fans permalink

The trust fund does not serve your masters.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:15 PM on 09/20/2008

I wonder if the French middle-class felt the same level of anger and frustration toward their leaders back in 1789, when they started the Revolution, as the American middle-class is feeling right now. Bush seems to have a LOT in common with Louis XVI, non?? The same vacant look, the same inability to see beyond their nose, the same sense of entitlement, the exact same level of dumbness. wait, I take that back...Lou­is XVI is smarter. I mean, he did not start a war coz his rich friends told him to!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:03 PM on 09/20/2008
- PT6 I'm a Fan of PT6 25 fans permalink

This is a band-aid on a hemorrhage and with tens of thousands of people losing their homes each month they will be back in a few months asking for more.

We need to help families refinance at a fixed low interest rate so they will not have to walk away from their homes causing more bailouts.

What are they doing bailing out the people that made Christmas bonuses of $30 to $100 million a year ago and living the high life on the beach on Long Island.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:00 PM on 09/20/2008
- mlaiuppa I'm a Fan of mlaiuppa 37 fans permalink
photo

Ah, legacy.

Who knew Bush could bankrupt the United States in 8 years and destroy every scrap of dignity and honor we have in the eyes of other nations?

Well, *I* did. Didn't vote for him....twi­ce.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:59 PM on 09/20/2008
- huffy2001 I'm a Fan of huffy2001 50 fans permalink
photo

I KNEW! I knew as soon as he stole the election from Gore that we were in a world of hurt.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:31 PM on 09/20/2008
- Veri I'm a Fan of Veri 18 fans permalink

Every time America has revalued the dollar, we have declared bankruptcy. 1933. 1973. 1979. 1992. 2008.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:16 PM on 09/20/2008
- telebob59 I'm a Fan of telebob59 14 fans permalink

"Mark my words. He (Bush 43) will leave office the most unpopular president in history. The (oil and gas) junta has done too much wreckage. They were suspiciously very ready with the Patriot Act as soon as we were hit. Ready to lift habeas corpus, due process, the attorney-client privilege. They were ready...co­ntempt for the American people has been made more vivid by the two Bushes than all of the presidents before them. Although many of them had the same contempt. But they were more clever about concealing it...I think it is time we roll back the empire -- it is doing no one any good. It has cost us trillions of dollars, which makes me feel it's going to fold on its own because there isn't going to be enough money left to run it...The liberals always say, '...they will take away the Bill Of Rights (in a populist constitutional convention­).' But they have already done it! It is gone, hardly any of it is left. "
Gore Vidal, LA Weekly July 2002

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:55 PM on 09/20/2008
- Beninn I'm a Fan of Beninn 33 fans permalink
photo

Private Equity and the Current Financial Crisis -

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OBJ7NSmKAgY

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:53 PM on 09/20/2008
- partyofone I'm a Fan of partyofone 45 fans permalink

Hank Paulsen is the former Chairman of Goldman Sachs, not exactly someone who has any knowledge, experience or any former caring for average Americans. He mission in life has been to serve the very rich, and this is his greatest achievement, insulating them from the damage of unchecked greed and high risk investing gone bad.

The Bush administration is playing on the fears of average citizens to give billionaires another trillion dollars.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:49 PM on 09/20/2008

Hank the fox guarding the hen house? Ingenious

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:58 PM on 09/20/2008
- Veri I'm a Fan of Veri 18 fans permalink

Notice how Goldman Sachs made money packaging these CDO disasters? Then, they made even betting against them while selling them. Insider trading or planned disaster?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:18 PM on 09/20/2008
- SeaRover I'm a Fan of SeaRover 2 fans permalink

Furthermore, take a look at Paulsen's Wikipedia page. You'll see that he has extensive ties to China. Since the Chinese are major creditors of the financial institutions that Paulsen wants to "bail out", isn't Paulsen's plan really a bail out of the Chinese? I don't trust anything coming out of the Bush Administration. Something smells very rotten here. The sense of urgency and the secrecy with which the Bushies are handling this situation smell too much like all the other crap they've shoved down out throats.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:09 PM on 09/20/2008
- Veri I'm a Fan of Veri 18 fans permalink

Now you are getting the picture.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:17 PM on 09/20/2008
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next › Last » (61 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect