EPA Won't Remove Rocket Fuel From Drinking Water

RSS stumble digg reddit del.ico.us news trust mixx.com Share this on Facebook

ERICA WERNER | September 22, 2008 10:01 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »

Show your support.
Buzz this article up.

WASHINGTON — The Environmental Protection Agency has decided there's no need to rid drinking water of a toxic rocket fuel ingredient that has fouled public water supplies around the country.

EPA reached the conclusion in a draft regulatory document not yet made public but reviewed Monday by The Associated Press.

The ingredient, perchlorate, has been found in at least 395 sites in 35 states at levels high enough to interfere with thyroid function and pose developmental health risks, particularly for babies and fetuses, according to some scientists.

The EPA document says that mandating a clean-up level for perchlorate would not result in a "meaningful opportunity for health risk reduction for persons served by public-water systems."

The conclusion, which caps years of dispute over the issue, was denounced by Democrats and environmentalists who accused EPA of caving to pressure from the Pentagon.

"This is a widespread contamination problem, and to see the Bush EPA just walk away is shocking," said Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., who chairs the Senate's environment committee.

Lenny Siegel, director of the Center for Public Environmental Oversight in Mountain View, Calif., added: "This is an unconscionable decision not based upon science or law but on concern that a more stringent standard could cost the government significantly."

The Defense Department used perchlorate for decades in testing missiles and rockets, and most perchlorate contamination is the result of defense and aerospace activities, congressional investigators said last year.

Story continues below
advertisement

The Pentagon could face liability if EPA set a national drinking water standard that forced water agencies around the country to undertake costly clean-up efforts. Defense officials have spent years questioning EPA's conclusions about the risks posed by perchlorate.

The Pentagon objected strongly Monday to the suggestion that it sought to influence EPA's decision.

"We have not intervened in any way in EPA's determination not to regulate perchlorate. If you read their determination, that's based on criteria in the Safe Drinking Water Act," Paul Yaroschak, Pentagon deputy director for emerging contaminants, said in an interview.

Yaroschak said the Pentagon has been working for years to clean up perchlorate at its facilities. He also contended that the Pentagon wasn't the source of as much perchlorate contamination as once believed, noting that it also comes from fireworks, road flares and fertilizer.

Benjamin Grumbles, EPA's assistant administrator for water, said in a statement that "science, not the politics of fear in an election year, will drive our final decision."

"We know perchlorate in drinking water presents some degree of risk, and we're committed to working with states and scientists to ensure public health is protected and meaningful opportunities for reducing risk are fully considered," Grumbles said.

Grumbles said the EPA expected to seek comment and take final action before the end of the year. The draft document was first reported Monday by the Washington Post.

Perchlorate is particularly widespread in California and the Southwest, where it's been found in groundwater and in the Colorado River, a drinking-water source for 20 million people. It's also been found in lettuce and other foods.

In absence of federal action, states have acted on their own. In 2007, California adopted a drinking water standard of 6 parts per billion. Massachusetts has set a drinking water standard of 2 parts per billion.

WASHINGTON — The Environmental Protection Agency has decided there's no need to rid drinking water of a toxic rocket fuel ingredient that has fouled public water supplies around the country. EP...
WASHINGTON — The Environmental Protection Agency has decided there's no need to rid drinking water of a toxic rocket fuel ingredient that has fouled public water supplies around the country. EP...
 
 

Comments
57
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 Next › Last » (3 pages total)
- ivoteforsmartpeople See Profile I'm a Fan of ivoteforsmartpeople permalink

BUSINESS as usual in the Bush Administration.

ENOUGH!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:53 PM on 09/25/2008
- hypnotoad72 See Profile I'm a Fan of hypnotoad72 permalink

Talk about an explosive bombshell... :rotfl:

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:41 AM on 09/25/2008
- Kassandra See Profile I'm a Fan of Kassandra permalink

But, but, if this harms FETUSES! Shouldn't it be given TOP priority????

Speaking of which, where is that "I heart tapwater" campaign been?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:11 AM on 09/25/2008
- elbzee See Profile I'm a Fan of elbzee permalink

OK, here's the truth. ...

"The Pentagon objected strongly Monday to the suggestion that it sought to influence EPA's decision.

"We have not intervened in any way in EPA's determination not to regulate perchlorate."

Just insert the words did indeed wher the words "have not" appear above. See, I've figured out da chimp's secret code!!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:11 AM on 09/25/2008
- JBryan See Profile I'm a Fan of JBryan permalink

Yet another example of the Republicans twisting, bending, ignoring, and denying science to satisfy their own greed.

Take it from someone who has lived in the shadow of ROCKETDYNE for fourteen years the time has come to really put country first and vote the Republican liars and deniers out.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:25 PM on 09/24/2008
- LeeCalif See Profile I'm a Fan of LeeCalif permalink

It's in everything in Calif. That's why those cancer benefits always p-ss me off.
Instead of finding a cure for cancer how about zeroing in on the cause(s).
Perhaps, rocket fuel could go on that list. Ya think?!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:11 PM on 09/24/2008
- IndependenceDame See Profile I'm a Fan of IndependenceDame permalink

Benzoate and ascorbic acid combined may produce benzene, which is carcinogenic and maybe found in Coca Cola and is found in gasoline. So, why aren't we surprised that the EPA, particularly the Bush League EPA, thinks a little rocket fuel in the water is acceptable? I'm beginning to think we should fire all our representatives in D.C., and rethink this notion of a central government which clearly doesn't work for we the people.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:53 PM on 09/24/2008
- ibsteve2u See Profile I'm a Fan of ibsteve2u permalink

Wonder why Republicans never apply that "What doesn't kill you, makes you stronger." philosophy to themselves and their own children?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:49 PM on 09/24/2008
- JohnnieP See Profile I'm a Fan of JohnnieP permalink

That's really healthy, isn't it? Has anyone tested the water supply at EPA headquarters, lately?
I'll bet my last dollar that it's 100% pure.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:56 PM on 09/24/2008
- wolfmason See Profile I'm a Fan of wolfmason permalink

There's gotta be some way to spin this off as a new "energy drink" or something...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:45 PM on 09/24/2008
- lokywoky See Profile I'm a Fan of lokywoky permalink
    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:12 PM on 09/25/2008
- Bobrobert See Profile I'm a Fan of Bobrobert permalink

We are all gonna die.

The earth is dead - we are just taking a while to notice.

I can see the oceans rising from here in my home - 30 miles from the shore!!!!

Death to all life forms!!!!!!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:27 PM on 09/24/2008
- nowliveit See Profile I'm a Fan of nowliveit permalink

You mean that Bush's administrative appointees do not protect the American people over corporate and military industrial interests? Food, finance, health, bankruptcy reversals, insurance, credit markets, outsourcing, airline, corporate interests, on and on... There has never been a single act pushed by this administration that was pro-American people. We are cultivated and grown to be the people in Bush's Soylent Green-style global corporate system.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:29 PM on 09/24/2008
- Hydrophidian See Profile I'm a Fan of Hydrophidian permalink

We seem to live in a giant concentration labor camp. The AMA and FDA experiment on their subjects without their knowledge and consent.
Isnt' the point of government to create corruption? Is anybody suprised?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:50 AM on 09/24/2008
- ebanks84 See Profile I'm a Fan of ebanks84 permalink

This is just another form of depopulation the shadow government has been doing for years to keep the masses under control. Investigate! Search Google for depopulation techniques and read people.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:57 AM on 09/24/2008
- ebanks84 See Profile I'm a Fan of ebanks84 permalink

Also search under "illuminati depopulation" and learn even more.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:00 AM on 09/24/2008
- rr52 See Profile I'm a Fan of rr52 permalink

It's worse then people think. It's not just rocket fuel, it's jet fuel. There is a blanket of this stuff across the entire country. I did a blog about this a year ago called "Jet Fuel Additive Widespread in Our Food Supply." http://www.blogsmonroe.com/world/?p=150.

The FDA has never tested perchlorate, not that we can do anything about it now.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:14 AM on 09/24/2008
Page: 1 2 3 Next › Last » (3 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in