EDITION: U.S.
 
CONNECT    

EPA Won't Remove Rocket Fuel From Drinking Water

ERICA WERNER | September 22, 2008 10:01 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
?>

WASHINGTON — The Environmental Protection Agency has decided there's no need to rid drinking water of a toxic rocket fuel ingredient that has fouled public water supplies around the country.

EPA reached the conclusion in a draft regulatory document not yet made public but reviewed Monday by The Associated Press.

The ingredient, perchlorate, has been found in at least 395 sites in 35 states at levels high enough to interfere with thyroid function and pose developmental health risks, particularly for babies and fetuses, according to some scientists.

The EPA document says that mandating a clean-up level for perchlorate would not result in a "meaningful opportunity for health risk reduction for persons served by public-water systems."

The conclusion, which caps years of dispute over the issue, was denounced by Democrats and environmentalists who accused EPA of caving to pressure from the Pentagon.

"This is a widespread contamination problem, and to see the Bush EPA just walk away is shocking," said Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., who chairs the Senate's environment committee.

Lenny Siegel, director of the Center for Public Environmental Oversight in Mountain View, Calif., added: "This is an unconscionable decision not based upon science or law but on concern that a more stringent standard could cost the government significantly."

The Defense Department used perchlorate for decades in testing missiles and rockets, and most perchlorate contamination is the result of defense and aerospace activities, congressional investigators said last year.

The Pentagon could face liability if EPA set a national drinking water standard that forced water agencies around the country to undertake costly clean-up efforts. Defense officials have spent years questioning EPA's conclusions about the risks posed by perchlorate.

The Pentagon objected strongly Monday to the suggestion that it sought to influence EPA's decision.

"We have not intervened in any way in EPA's determination not to regulate perchlorate. If you read their determination, that's based on criteria in the Safe Drinking Water Act," Paul Yaroschak, Pentagon deputy director for emerging contaminants, said in an interview.

Yaroschak said the Pentagon has been working for years to clean up perchlorate at its facilities. He also contended that the Pentagon wasn't the source of as much perchlorate contamination as once believed, noting that it also comes from fireworks, road flares and fertilizer.

Benjamin Grumbles, EPA's assistant administrator for water, said in a statement that "science, not the politics of fear in an election year, will drive our final decision."

"We know perchlorate in drinking water presents some degree of risk, and we're committed to working with states and scientists to ensure public health is protected and meaningful opportunities for reducing risk are fully considered," Grumbles said.

Grumbles said the EPA expected to seek comment and take final action before the end of the year. The draft document was first reported Monday by the Washington Post.

Perchlorate is particularly widespread in California and the Southwest, where it's been found in groundwater and in the Colorado River, a drinking-water source for 20 million people. It's also been found in lettuce and other foods.

In absence of federal action, states have acted on their own. In 2007, California adopted a drinking water standard of 6 parts per billion. Massachusetts has set a drinking water standard of 2 parts per billion.

WASHINGTON — The Environmental Protection Agency has decided there's no need to rid drinking water of a toxic rocket fuel ingredient that has fouled public water supplies around the country. EP...
WASHINGTON — The Environmental Protection Agency has decided there's no need to rid drinking water of a toxic rocket fuel ingredient that has fouled public water supplies around the country. EP...
Filed by Nick Graham  |  Report Corrections
 
  • Comments
  • 57
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ivoteforsmartpeople
There Ain't No Such Thing As A Free Lunch!
03:53 PM on 09/25/2008
BUSINESS as usual in the Bush Administra­tion.

ENOUGH!
photo
hypnotoad72
Real democracy = living wages.
11:41 AM on 09/25/2008
Talk about an explosive bombshell.­.. :rotfl:
photo
Kassandra
Idiot savant artistic genius
10:11 AM on 09/25/2008
But, but, if this harms FETUSES! Shouldn't it be given TOP priority??­??

Speaking of which, where is that "I heart tapwater" campaign been?
photo
elbzee
push, pull, our get outta the way
09:11 AM on 09/25/2008
OK, here's the truth. ...

"The Pentagon objected strongly Monday to the suggestion that it sought to influence EPA's decision.

"We have not intervened in any way in EPA's determinat­ion not to regulate perchlorat­e."

Just insert the words did indeed wher the words "have not" appear above. See, I've figured out da chimp's secret code!!!!
08:25 PM on 09/24/2008
Yet another example of the Republican­s twisting, bending, ignoring, and denying science to satisfy their own greed.

Take it from someone who has lived in the shadow of ROCKETDYNE for fourteen years the time has come to really put country first and vote the Republican liars and deniers out.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:11 PM on 09/24/2008
It's in everything in Calif. That's why those cancer benefits always p-ss me off.
Instead of finding a cure for cancer how about zeroing in on the cause(s).
Perhaps, rocket fuel could go on that list. Ya think?!
03:53 PM on 09/24/2008
Benzoate and ascorbic acid combined may produce benzene, which is carcinogen­ic and maybe found in Coca Cola and is found in gasoline. So, why aren't we surprised that the EPA, particular­ly the Bush League EPA, thinks a little rocket fuel in the water is acceptable­? I'm beginning to think we should fire all our representa­tives in D.C., and rethink this notion of a central government which clearly doesn't work for we the people.
photo
ibsteve2u
Someone who cares - to his unending regret
03:49 PM on 09/24/2008
Wonder why Republican­s never apply that "What doesn't kill you, makes you stronger." philosophy to themselves and their own children?
02:56 PM on 09/24/2008
That's really healthy, isn't it? Has anyone tested the water supply at EPA headquarte­rs, lately?
I'll bet my last dollar that it's 100% pure.
02:45 PM on 09/24/2008
There's gotta be some way to spin this off as a new "energy drink" or something.­..
photo
Bobrobert
Go God... Jesus rocks... the Spirit is very cool..
02:27 PM on 09/24/2008
We are all gonna die.

The earth is dead - we are just taking a while to notice.

I can see the oceans rising from here in my home - 30 miles from the shore!!!!

Death to all life forms!!!!!­!!!
01:29 PM on 09/24/2008
You mean that Bush's administra­tive appointees do not protect the American people over corporate and military industrial interests? Food, finance, health, bankruptcy reversals, insurance, credit markets, outsourcin­g, airline, corporate interests, on and on... There has never been a single act pushed by this administra­tion that was pro-Americ­an people. We are cultivated and grown to be the people in Bush's Soylent Green-styl­e global corporate system.
10:50 AM on 09/24/2008
We seem to live in a giant concentrat­ion labor camp. The AMA and FDA experiment on their subjects without their knowledge and consent.
Isnt' the point of government to create corruption­? Is anybody suprised?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ebanks84
Grandma knows best!
08:57 AM on 09/24/2008
This is just another form of depopulati­on the shadow government has been doing for years to keep the masses under control. Investigat­e! Search Google for depopulati­on techniques and read people.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ebanks84
Grandma knows best!
09:00 AM on 09/24/2008
Also search under "illuminat­i depopulati­on" and learn even more.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rr52
06:14 AM on 09/24/2008
It's worse then people think. It's not just rocket fuel, it's jet fuel. There is a blanket of this stuff across the entire country. I did a blog about this a year ago called "Jet Fuel Additive Widespread in Our Food Supply." http://www­.blogsmonr­oe.com/wor­ld/?p=150.

The FDA has never tested perchlorat­e, not that we can do anything about it now.