EPA Won't Remove Rocket Fuel From Drinking Water

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - EPA Won't Remove Rocket Fuel From Drinking Water stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

ERICA WERNER | September 22, 2008 10:01 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It

WASHINGTON — The Environmental Protection Agency has decided there's no need to rid drinking water of a toxic rocket fuel ingredient that has fouled public water supplies around the country.

EPA reached the conclusion in a draft regulatory document not yet made public but reviewed Monday by The Associated Press.

The ingredient, perchlorate, has been found in at least 395 sites in 35 states at levels high enough to interfere with thyroid function and pose developmental health risks, particularly for babies and fetuses, according to some scientists.

The EPA document says that mandating a clean-up level for perchlorate would not result in a "meaningful opportunity for health risk reduction for persons served by public-water systems."

The conclusion, which caps years of dispute over the issue, was denounced by Democrats and environmentalists who accused EPA of caving to pressure from the Pentagon.

"This is a widespread contamination problem, and to see the Bush EPA just walk away is shocking," said Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., who chairs the Senate's environment committee.

Lenny Siegel, director of the Center for Public Environmental Oversight in Mountain View, Calif., added: "This is an unconscionable decision not based upon science or law but on concern that a more stringent standard could cost the government significantly."

The Defense Department used perchlorate for decades in testing missiles and rockets, and most perchlorate contamination is the result of defense and aerospace activities, congressional investigators said last year.

Story continues below
advertisement

The Pentagon could face liability if EPA set a national drinking water standard that forced water agencies around the country to undertake costly clean-up efforts. Defense officials have spent years questioning EPA's conclusions about the risks posed by perchlorate.

The Pentagon objected strongly Monday to the suggestion that it sought to influence EPA's decision.

"We have not intervened in any way in EPA's determination not to regulate perchlorate. If you read their determination, that's based on criteria in the Safe Drinking Water Act," Paul Yaroschak, Pentagon deputy director for emerging contaminants, said in an interview.

Yaroschak said the Pentagon has been working for years to clean up perchlorate at its facilities. He also contended that the Pentagon wasn't the source of as much perchlorate contamination as once believed, noting that it also comes from fireworks, road flares and fertilizer.

Benjamin Grumbles, EPA's assistant administrator for water, said in a statement that "science, not the politics of fear in an election year, will drive our final decision."

"We know perchlorate in drinking water presents some degree of risk, and we're committed to working with states and scientists to ensure public health is protected and meaningful opportunities for reducing risk are fully considered," Grumbles said.

Grumbles said the EPA expected to seek comment and take final action before the end of the year. The draft document was first reported Monday by the Washington Post.

Perchlorate is particularly widespread in California and the Southwest, where it's been found in groundwater and in the Colorado River, a drinking-water source for 20 million people. It's also been found in lettuce and other foods.

In absence of federal action, states have acted on their own. In 2007, California adopted a drinking water standard of 6 parts per billion. Massachusetts has set a drinking water standard of 2 parts per billion.

WASHINGTON — The Environmental Protection Agency has decided there's no need to rid drinking water of a toxic rocket fuel ingredient that has fouled public water supplies around the country. EP...
WASHINGTON — The Environmental Protection Agency has decided there's no need to rid drinking water of a toxic rocket fuel ingredient that has fouled public water supplies around the country. EP...
Filed by Nick Graham  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
57
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 Next › Last » (3 pages total)
photo

As someone who just underwent an expensive ultrasound guided thyroid biopsy in the presence of an oncologist, I'm happy to say that for now at least, I don't have cancer -- but I do have an inflamed thyroid with nodules and a thyroid disease that makes me fatigued and sick all the time. I wish I could say that I find the decision by the EPA to leave perchlorate in my drinking water stupefying, but no.

This is the BUSH EPA, so of course, the cost is passed along to my BODY and my healthcare provider.

The Bush/Cheney federal government -- shifting the cost and the blame for 8 long years!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:31 AM on 09/24/2008
photo

It's not just Bush/Cheney. It's the whole lot of 'em.

I'm sure they're thinking that if fluorine in the water hasn't dumbed us down enough perhaps the jet fuel will.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:21 PM on 09/24/2008
photo

I just had my thyroid removed a year ago because of cancer. So I sympathize - Perchlorate is also used by dry cleaners to clean our clothes. The bad thing about it is that it is very expensive to clean up because it is heavier than water and sinks in the water table - unlike gasoline that floats and is easier to clean up. Perc sinks into crevices and drilling deeper wells don't do any good since perc continues to sink. I have spent the last 10 years working in the environmental industry in Texas cleaning up gasoline and diesel contamination. Millions of dry cleaners have underground storage tanks that stores these chemicals like perchlorate. Look before you buy property near these kinds of places.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:51 PM on 09/24/2008

You can joke about this or you can do something about it, or at least try to do something. Start with your representatives in your state and in Washington. Go to websites that are pro environmental, read about what's happening and sign petitions that demand an investigation of the EPA's decision.

Wow. A more stringent standard would cost the government considerably!!!!!! Is the health of our people, particularly the children not worth the cost? Isn't that what the EPA's job is to protect us, our environment? Isn't that what we pay taxes for? Government services for the people.
On the other hand, the taxpayers, the unprotected people, are expected to pay for costly government screw-ups like administrations that don't do their jobs, play to their cronies, look the other way when the bad guys are friends, lie to the American people and end up spending trillions on a war without end and bailouts for a false (paper) economy that caters to lobbyists, unscrupulous CEO's, profiteers and "their party base."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:22 PM on 09/23/2008

Installment #8342: Government against the people. Let 'em drink rocket fuel.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:32 PM on 09/23/2008

Foxes in charge of every henhouse

Oversight by cronies only......­.

Incompetence, corruption, conflits-o­f-interest­.....stand­ard operating procedure.­...

Government OF the corporations, BY the corporations, and FOR the corporations

Forever and ever
Amen
tm

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:20 PM on 09/23/2008
photo

I love my rocket water!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:14 PM on 09/23/2008
photo

We are in a time of war, people! Sacrifices must be made!

[/sarcasm]

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:19 PM on 09/23/2008
- Mattjoe I'm a Fan of Mattjoe 3 fans permalink

Hey, why all the fuss?

Agencies like the EPA and FDA are the ones that brought us fluoride and aspartame.

However, Codex Alimentarius Commission (courtesy of FAO) and the World Health Organization (WHO) make EPA and FDA look like boy scouts.

http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/

How else can this colluded clan, from Multinational Pharmaceuticals to governments, control the food supply?

But more importantly.

Us.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:31 PM on 09/23/2008
- darthdarcy I'm a Fan of darthdarcy 48 fans permalink
photo

They should bottle it and call it..."Afte­rburner"..­!

Designer water EPA approved..­.

Keep away from open flames..

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:18 PM on 09/23/2008
- Manx I'm a Fan of Manx 18 fans permalink

Marie Antoinette may never have said, "Let them eat cake," but the EPA is saying, "Let them drink rocket fuel."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:37 PM on 09/23/2008
photo

When asked by Congress to account for children's unique exposure and vulnerabilities, including making adjustments for infants and children's weight and the lack of a biological reserve of thyroid hormone to off-set potential exposures to perchlorate, EPA's Office of Water said:

"The Drinking Water Equivalent Level (DWEL) is a lifetime exposure concentration protective of non-cancer health effects that assumes all of the exposure to a contaminant is from drinking water. The DWEL is based on the Reference Dose (RfD), body weight (BW) and Drinking Water Intake (DWI).

DWEL = (RfD) x (BW) / (DWI)

The RfD is an estimate of a daily oral exposure to the human population (including sensitive subgroups, including infants and children) that is likely to be without an appreciable risk of adverse effects during a lifetime. To develop the RfD for perchlorate, EPA consulted the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) to ensure a thorough, unbiased application of science. ... Because the NAS determined that the most sensitive subpopulation is the fetuses of iodide deficient or hypothyroid pregnant women, EPA uses the body weight (70 kg) and the drinking water intake (2 liters/day) for the pregnant female to derive the DWEL."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:12 PM on 09/23/2008
photo

Lenny Siegel, whom I know and believe, said when EPA accepted the NRC RfD: “I am troubled … by the language in the EPA press release that the new RfD "translates to a Drinking Water Equivalent Level (DWEL) of 24.5 ppb [parts per billion]." That may be true for a healthy, 70-kilogram adult, but most Americans - regardless of ideology or political party - believe that drinking water should be safe enough for babies and pregnant women to drink. Without any further adjustments -such as for the accumulation of perchlorate in the food supply - the new RfD would translate to a drinking water exposure of 4 or 5 ppb, because babies drink more for their body weights than healthy adults ... the drinking water standard should be calculated so that a typical baby will not be exposed to more than that amount on a daily basis. That's why 24.5 ppb is far from protective.

Kevin Mayer, EPA perchlorate coordinator for the Pacific Southwestern states, said his interpretation of the National Academy's work would put the safe level at 4.3 parts per billion for babies because they consume more liquid per unit of body weight than adults do. "I'm just not able to explain with any clarity from a professional standpoint how the agency arrived at this (24.5 ppb) conclusion," said Mayer, perchlorate coordinator for more than seven years.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:04 PM on 09/23/2008
photo

See www.epa.gov/fedfac/pdf/nasrprt0305.pdf for National Resource Council report on Health Implications of Perchlorate Ingestion.
The Wall St Jnl said:
…the EPA, in translating the NRC's reference dose into a drinking-water limit, said it wasn't following the guidance for how to apply the panel's reference dose that was issued by the NRC panel's chairman, Richard Johnston of the University of Colorado. Dr.Johnsto­n, in public comments last month and again in an interview Friday, stated that in order to translate the NRC reference dose into a
drinking-water limit, it is necessary to adjust the NRC dose for an individual's body weight and water-consumption level -- in the same way dosages of medicines are routinely adjusted for particular patients' weights.

The Texas Department of Health (TDH) Division of Environmental Epidemiology and Toxicology issued a fact sheet on what that state found out about the risk presented by perchlorate: see www.epa.gov/fedfac/pdf/tdh_phys_perch_fs.pdf
The fact sheet states: "Perchlorate interferes with iodide uptake into the thyroid gland. Because iodide is needed to make thyroid hormones, it may affect how the thyroid functions. Adverse health effects associated with exposure to perchlorates are expected to be similar to those caused by iodine deficiency.

What's so bad about iodine deficiency? Iodine is an essential trace element. Iodine deficiency gives rise to goiter (so-called endemic goitre), as well as cretinism, which results in developmental delays and other health problems.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:01 PM on 09/23/2008
- nintynine I'm a Fan of nintynine 4 fans permalink
photo

Another government agency, that’s not protecting our health and welfare. The 4 things most vital to a healthy life are hydrating with H2O, clean air, nutritional foods and sound sleep. Three of the four are under the EPA’s jurisdiction. It’s no wonder that 70 million American don’t sleep soundly at night and the majority of sickness and disease in our country is caused by the chemicals found in our food, water and air.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:19 PM on 09/23/2008

What good is the EPA if they don't do anything to protect the environment? Did the GWB administration fill it with more cronies? Did they EVER do the job their name would imply? I don't know.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:57 AM on 09/23/2008
- gifu I'm a Fan of gifu 14 fans permalink

No Child Left Benign.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:27 AM on 09/23/2008
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 Next › Last » (3 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect