Chrysler Unveils Electric Cars That Americans Will Recognize

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

TOM KRISHER | September 23, 2008 04:54 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »

Chrysler LLC Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Bob Nardelli introduces three electric prototypes: an electric Dodge sports car, shown behind Nardelli, a Jeep and a Chrysler minivan, in Auburn Hills, Mich., Tuesday, Sept. 23, 2008. (AP Photo/Paul Sancya)

AUBURN HILLS, Mich. — Chrysler LLC charged up the electric car race Tuesday, muscling in on General Motors Corp.'s Chevrolet Volt by unveiling three electric-powered models and promising to put one of them on sale in the U.S. sometime in 2010.

The company showed reporters three prototypes: a Dodge sports car, a four-door Jeep Wrangler and a Chrysler minivan. Chrysler's product development chief, Frank Klegon, said the automaker hasn't decided which one it will roll out first.

The Dodge sports car is completely electric and based on Lotus Europa underpinnings, but the Wrangler and the Town & Country minivan will be extended-range vehicles similar to the Volt, which GM has said will go on sale in November 2010.

Like the Volt, all three Chrysler vehicles are recharged by plugging them into a standard wall outlet. The sports car is supposed to have a range of up to 200 miles, while the minivan and Jeep will be able to go 40 miles on battery power alone, with a small engine kicking in after that to recharge the batteries and extend the range to about 400 miles.

The automaker wouldn't reveal pricing, but GM's Volt is expected to cost $30,000 to $40,000 initially, far more expensive than most conventional cars. Chrysler officials said they hope to drive down the cost as more vehicles are sold.

With gasoline near $4 per gallon, all automakers have scrambling to roll out more efficient small cars and eventually electric vehicles. But even their new fuel-efficient gas-powered vehicles are about two years away, leaving struggling automakers to scrap for buyers in a shrinking U.S. market that has shifted dramatically from trucks to cars.

Chrysler's sales have taken the hardest hit, and the automaker appeared to be behind other manufacturers that have touted plans to launch electric vehicles in the next few years. But Vice Chairman Tom LaSorda said Tuesday that Chrysler is further ahead on developing electric vehicles than many had thought, though it kept the cars secret until recently.

"We believe in the saying, 'Actions speak louder than words,'" LaSorda said.

Story continues below
advertisement

Chrysler Chief Executive Bob Nardelli denied that Chrysler showed off its electric prototypes now because Congress is considering a $25 billion loan program to help automakers and their suppliers modernize plants to make more fuel-efficient vehicles.

Vice Chairman Jim Press said the timing of the announcement also had nothing to do with the publicity GM gained last week by revealing the production version of the Volt.

"This shows that our commitment is not to public relations, but to actually advancing technology and putting it in the hands of customers in an affordable manner," Press said. "These are vehicles that are being engineered to move from the laboratory into the street and the showroom. This isn't just for publicity. This is part of our development process."

Nardelli told reporters the government loans would help speed the technology to market. But if they aren't approved, Chrysler will have to spend limited resources on developing new technology and would have to make cuts elsewhere, possibly in employment and development of conventional products.

"Unfortunately we have had to furlough many families as a result of the economy turmoil and certainly the downward spiraling in the industry," he said. "I'd like to make sure that we don't have to go further to be able to support advanced technology work."

The three vehicles displayed Tuesday at Chrysler's Auburn Hills headquarters complex were second-generation prototypes, built largely on existing models in order to speed them to market, Klegon said.

Chrysler also unveiled the Peapod, a new small "neighborhood electric vehicle" that can go up to 30 miles on a charge, and said it would sell an electric vehicle in Europe sometime after 2010.

Klegon said Chrysler is still working with several partners on the battery technology for its vehicles. The company has an agreement with General Electric Corp. and the U.S. Department of Energy, and also is working with battery maker A123 Systems Inc.

Press said the electric minivan shows great promise because most minivan trips are close to home, so it could operate almost solely on electricity.

"People that buy it, families, need help with fuel costs," he said. "A lot of van use is in city cycle, going back and forth to school or the grocery store."

The Chrysler executives said the day is coming when the whole Chrysler fleet has electric powertrains.

"The goal is to achieve fundamental technology, get economies of scale, improve our ability to make the future generations more robust, less cost, smaller, more powerful, better performance," Press said. "Ultimately it will lead to a transformation of our entire fleet that will be in some manner electric drive."

Toyota Motor Corp. also is pushing to get a plug-in electric vehicle to market in 2010, while Ford Motor Co., which is testing 20 on roads in California, says it is five years away from producing them in significant numbers.

___

On the Net:

Chrysler electric vehicle site: http://www.chryslergoeselectric.com

AUBURN HILLS, Mich. — Chrysler LLC charged up the electric car race Tuesday, muscling in on General Motors Corp.'s Chevrolet Volt by unveiling three electric-powered models and promising to put ...
AUBURN HILLS, Mich. — Chrysler LLC charged up the electric car race Tuesday, muscling in on General Motors Corp.'s Chevrolet Volt by unveiling three electric-powered models and promising to put ...
 
Comments
48
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)

If they bring out an E-Rev Wrangler for less than $50K, I'll be first in line for it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:13 PM on 09/26/2008

it may be too little too late to save detroit.
if these new electrics are not mass produced & made affordable,then it will be too little too late.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:36 PM on 09/26/2008
    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:52 AM on 09/25/2008

Tesla and HT make toys for rich boys. No solutions there. I bet the ecological impact of these efforts is actually negative because most of their customers have half a dozen vehicles in their garages "for fun" and these things are just another collectible for them.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:18 PM on 09/25/2008

I agree with you on this. Tata motors and Zenn motors is where the masses will get their EVs. And if EEstor's ultra-cap tech comes to fruition in the next year or so, the world is in for BIG change. Change I can BELIEVE in.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:15 AM on 09/27/2008
photo

There are articles saying that GM is whining because the Volt will cost $40,000 and won't generate an instant profit...

What a bunch of whiners.

I must stop watching FOX sitcoms like "Married with Children"...

Which reminds me, while GM whines that their Volt car won't bring in an instant buck, Rupert Murdoch's FOX network from the late 1980s took several years before he made even. He didn't stop, so why is GM whining? (Point being, LONG HAUL. It's this short term gibber that got our economy into this near-train-wreck in the first place.)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:30 PM on 09/24/2008

The Volt will generate instant profit. It's their advertising vehicle to get a $20 billion government bailout. You have to understand why they are designing it. It's not about the sales which will not make even a dent in their revenues. It's all about corporate image and lobbying.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:20 PM on 09/25/2008

Ooops... too late. It just happened.

Cool, isn't it, how you can get money for nothing and the roulette chips for free?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:25 PM on 09/25/2008

I love it when they say stuff like "five years away". Both Ford and GM already had all electric vehicles on the road and performing really well 5 yrs ago. They both trashed them on purpose even though all the people leasing them LOVED Them, and their only excuse was that no one wanted to buy in big enough numbers to warrent producing them, and then they refused to allow the public to buy the existing ones, and ordered most of them off the roads and had them destroyed. Cept Ford did bend to some pressure and allowed some odd vehicles to be purchased by private persons.

But they are so full of it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:19 PM on 09/24/2008

How do you know they were performing "really well"? Given what we know about the laws of nature and the state of technology, they could not have been performing well by any standard. Just because these prototype vehicles are not around and people can not test drive them to experience them first hand is no reason to apply a bias in favor of the technology.

Every time I turn on one of my old computers (and I have a few of those, the oldest ones going back decades), I am amazed how poor the performance was. But still, in my memory, the computers I had in the past were so much better than the one I am using now.

Except, of course, that they weren't. They were just so much better than what came before them that we remember the excitement of having the new one. But while those perceptions are very strong, they do not reflect reality.

Even a poorly performing EV prototype in the past was exciting. But that does not make it either viable or well performing by today's standards.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:02 PM on 09/24/2008

The automotive "captains of industry" appear to be morons.

Energy costs are volatile, and have been recognized as such for decades.

Petroleum, electricity, and compressed natural gas have been feasible energy sources for cars for decades.

A rational auto maker would have models with each power source fully developed for each market year. Exactly which ones to roll out from production in any year would be decided by market conditions. They shouldn't need "new technology" before rolling out such cars.

Every model should be designed with the option of engine and fuel storage system as modular components. Consumers should be able to pick fuel system exactly as they pick paint color.

Government intervention in the system may not need to be much more than tax credits to filling stations for installing systems for fuelling CNG cars and recharging or swapping exhausted batteries with charged ones for electric cars.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:23 PM on 09/24/2008

As you can see, Toyota and Honda acted over a decade ago, albeit with vastly different economic success. They are now working towards shipping the third generation hybrids and the true first generation PHEVs.

I have to agree with you about the state of American "captains of industry", though.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:04 PM on 09/24/2008

And, sometime in 2027 we may actually get a first glimpse of teh mythical Toyota PHEV. Until then, nary so much as a prototype or concept car.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:16 PM on 09/26/2008

However, Toyota will be happy to sell you a Sequia, 4Runner, LX, Landcruiser or Tundra until the mythical Toyota PHEV materializes out of the vapor.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:17 PM on 09/26/2008

We have done what we could to make our house more efficient (at the risk of repeating what i have said here before). We are a moderate/lower income house hold. We planted a garden, we swapped Incandescents for CFLs , we bought the 3 4 or 5 packs on sale at lowes, added insulation where we could get at it, sealed air leaks using our vcr cameras night vision mode to spot where cold air was leaking in, we put up insulated curtain liners (20-25$ per single window) I use a convection toaster oven when i can and use covered pots/pans to cook in (faster and uses up to 30% less power) bought a medium price Bosch Nexxt500 series) uses 50% less electric and 60% less water, saving 40-50 per month, also uses less juice for drying as we hang out clothes , and when we use the dryer it take about 1/2 the time to dry, our deep freezer is energystar it uses about 1/2 the power as our old one did. We plan on a an induction cooktop and convection oven to replace the standard one we have (about 75% savings on energy for the cooktop and 40% less with convection oven) We are struggling but each thing we replace gives us more room in the budget and it all pays for itself in savings.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:13 AM on 09/24/2008

We put in low restriction air filters in the truck , wash and wax with Teflon , the truck is paid for , but with all that i have done , low resistance Michelin tires it gets 22.5 mpg over the 16mpg from before. Our old minivan (15mpg) was on last legs barely made it to the Nissan dealer to trade Versa 37mpg. 16,999$ over 5 years..We heat with wood , kero and the heat pump and the added insulation cut what we use by about 1/3.
We plan on metal roofing and siding to replace asphalt shingles and vinyl, and add several more inches of high density stryo/foil back foam. Also change to LEDs for lights , flat screen tv/ led/ screens over the crt screens.
We have plug strips to eliminate phantom loads and we recycle everything, paper we shred and add to garden as mulch
We plan on going to solar wind system we have cut overall energy use and it has cost less than 3000$ over 2 years 1200$ was the washer, 300 was the freezer the rest was incidental here and there. We are not sacrificing we are more cozy and eventually want to be as near to 0% fossil fuel.
It is just good Conservative Economics.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:21 AM on 09/24/2008

Let's see. Rush some mew products to market that are going to be overpriced and suspect as to longterm maintenance issues: meanwhile better technologies are being applied in foreign markets. But the conventional wisdom is that Americans won't go for clean diesel vehicles, even as a stopgap until better battery technology can be developed/implemented and subsidized further by the Fed. Oh yeah, they're a little busy right now. And the US automakers want to be given some kinda credit for their "innovations" and helping to solve a problem they are directly responsible for having exacerbated, if not colluded on creating: with Big Oil. I would love to buy a quality American automotive product. Unfortunately the products highlighted in this article don't qualify.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:12 AM on 09/24/2008

I hate Chevy. And Ford. Where is my Nissan electric car?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:21 PM on 09/23/2008
- RJC I'm a Fan of RJC permalink

It's about time. We've long been the worldwide leader in electric chair technology, so why not expand a car?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:09 PM on 09/23/2008

It's about time they make these cars look like cars instead of spaceships . . . just because it is a hybrid or electric doesn't mean it has to look like garbage.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:09 PM on 09/23/2008

Once again bass ackwards capitalist thinking rules the day.
"The automaker wouldn't reveal pricing, but GM's Volt is expected to cost $30,000 to $40,000 initially, far more expensive than most conventional cars. Chrysler officials said they hope to drive down the cost as more vehicles are sold."
At that price the automakers will only sell a limited number of the cars because the average American household can't afford a $30 - 40K car. Sooooo, only the upper income brackets will buy the cars and we will still run out of oil (gas) before any significant or measurable conservation can be achieved. Brilliant. Henry Ford knew enough to offer his automobiles at a price that his workers could afford. Try that visionary thinking today You would be laughed off of Wall Street.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:49 PM on 09/23/2008

Now is a good time to remind everybody to be sure and rent/borrow/buy the documentary "Who killed the Electric Car?" We could all be driving electric cars by now if GM hadn't destroyed the whole fleet that had been rolled out in California in the mid 1990s, and they, the EVs, were very popular .

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:38 PM on 09/23/2008
photo

I have 24 solar panels and make my own electricity so when I can get an EV I will power it with the SUN. How great will that be?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:04 PM on 09/23/2008
- RJC I'm a Fan of RJC permalink

That won't be allowed until corporate America can figure a way for monthly recurring charges for sunlight

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:06 PM on 09/23/2008

LOL..nice one

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:23 AM on 09/24/2008
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in  or  Connect