Bush To Address Nation At 9: Administration Said To Yield On Executive Pay Cuts

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Bush To Address Nation At 9: Administration Said To Yield On Executive Pay Cuts stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

JULIE HIRSCHFELD DAVIS and DAVID ESPO | September 24, 2008 11:30 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson, left, accompanied by Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke, testifies on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, Sept. 24, 2008, before the House Financial Services Committee. (AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta)

WASHINGTON — President Bush summoned Barack Obama, John McCain and legislative leaders to an extraordinary White House summit, warning Americans and Congress on Wednesday night that failing to act on a $700 billion financial industry bailout could lead to "a long and painful recession."

Earlier, Bush bowed to Democratic demands to limit the pay of executives whose tottering companies would be rescued, and appeared to be softening his resistance to Democrats' demand that the eye-popping cost be phased in rather than approved all at once.

Democrats and Republicans were nearing agreement on the rescue legislation, the most sweeping government intervention in the market since the Great Depression, and set a meeting early Thursday to begin drafting a bipartisan bill.

Bush acknowledged in a prime time television address Wednesday night that the bailout would be a "tough vote" for lawmakers.

"Without immediate action by Congress, America could slip into a financial panic, and a distressing scenario would unfold," Bush said as he worked to resurrect the unpopular bailout package.

The president's dire warning came not long after he invited Obama and McCain, one of whom will inherit the economic mess in four months, as well as key congressional leaders to a White House meeting on Thursday to work on a compromise.

Bush strongly urged Congress to act quickly to pass the plan, warning Americans in his 12-minute speech that failing to act fast risked dire economic consequences such as disappearing retirement savings, rising foreclosures, lost jobs and closed businesses.

With the administration's original proposal considered dead in Congress _ even McCain called it flawed _ top House leaders issued an upbeat statement late Wednesday saying there was progress toward revised legislation that could pass.

Story continues below

"We are committed to continuing to work cooperatively and on a bipartisan basis to safeguard the interests of the American taxpayers," said Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., and House Republican leader John Boehner of Ohio.

Sen. Dick Durbin of Illinois, the Senate's No. 2 Democrat, expressed optimism that Congress could work through the weekend and pass the measure, possibly by the time markets open on Monday.

Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., a lead negotiator on the package, said given the progress of the talks, the White House meeting scheduled for Thursday afternoon was a distraction.

"We're going to have to interrupt a negotiating session tomorrow between the Democrats and Republicans on a bill where I think we are getting pretty close, and troop down to the White House for their photo op," said Frank, the House Financial Services Committee chairman. "I wish they'd checked with us."

The heart of the unprecedented plan, unveiled less than a week ago, involves the government buying up sour assets of shaky financial firms in a bid to keep them from going under and to stave off a potentially severe recession.

Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson and Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke spent most of the day at the Capitol, shuttling between public hearings on the proposal and private meetings with lawmakers.

Presidential politics intruded, as well, when McCain said he intended to return to Washington and was asking Obama to agree to delay their first debate, scheduled for Friday, to deal with the meltdown.

Obama said the debate should go ahead.

The rivals issued a joint statement calling for a bipartisan effort to deal with the crisis.

"The plan that has been submitted to Congress by the Bush administration is flawed, but the effort to protect the American economy must not fail," the two candidates said. "This is a time to rise above politics for the good of the country. We cannot risk an economic catastrophe."

Pelosi and Boehner said they, too, agreed that "key changes" were needed in Bush's plan.

"It must include basic good-government principles, including rigorous and independent oversight, strong executive compensation standards, and protections for taxpayers."

Earlier, Paulson agreed to demands from critics in both parties to limit the pay packages of Wall Street executives whose companies would benefit from the proposed bailout.

Acknowledging the concession in his speech, Bush said the rescue "should make certain that failed executives do not receive a windfall from your tax dollars."

The administration and congressional negotiators also were nearing accord on parceling out the $700 billion so it would not be available all at once, although key details remained to be worked out.

"People understand it's not going to be a straight $700 billion," Frank said.

Paulson also was said to have accepted the idea of allowing the government to take an equity stake in some of the companies aided _ rather than just purchasing their bad assets, as Bush originally proposed _ but there was no agreement yet on how the plan would work.

Lawmakers in both parties have strenuously objected to the plan over the past two days, Republicans complaining about federal intervention in private business and Democrats pressing to tack on help for beleaguered homeowners. But many appear to be open to legislation, although on different terms than the White House has proposed.

"There's politically a lot of pessimism because the American people are pushing back," said Rep. Spencer Bachus of Alabama, the senior Financial Services Committee Republican. But, he added, "There's a realization that we have to do something, and that we can't leave town until we do."

Polls in the past several days have provided mixed messages about the public's view.

An ABC News-Washington Post poll said Wednesday the public is split about evenly over whether it supports federal "steps" to handle the financial crisis. In a survey released Tuesday by the nonpartisan Pew Research Center, there was nearly 2-1 support for the government "potentially investing" billions to try securing the markets.

Democrats insist Republican lawmakers must stand up for their own president's proposal, but they appear anything but eager to do so.

"It's a tough sell to most of our members," Rep. Tom Davis, R-Va., said after a closed-door meeting with Paulson and Bernanke. "It's a terrible plan, but I haven't heard anything better."

Compounding the administration's challenge, Republicans and Democrats both say Bush has lost credibility, particularly in cases where he argues there will be dire consequences if Congress doesn't act.

"They sold the war, they sold the stimulus package and some other things. It's the 'wolf at the door'" argument, Davis said.

Democrats are pushing to allow bankruptcy judges to rewrite mortgages to ease the burden on consumers who are facing foreclosure as part of the plan. But Obama told reporters the provision "is probably something that we shouldn't try to do in this piece of legislation."

Other Democratic demands, to give Congress greater authority over the bailout and require that the government help homeowners avoid foreclosures, already have been accepted in principle.

___

Associated Press writers Jennifer Loven, Martin Crutsinger, Jeannine Aversa and Alan Fram contributed to this report.

WASHINGTON — President Bush summoned Barack Obama, John McCain and legislative leaders to an extraordinary White House summit, warning Americans and Congress on Wednesday night that failing to a...
WASHINGTON — President Bush summoned Barack Obama, John McCain and legislative leaders to an extraordinary White House summit, warning Americans and Congress on Wednesday night that failing to a...
Filed by Dan Duray  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
636
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next › Last » (26 pages total)
photo

Jack Cafferty is asking what do we want to hear Bush say tonight in his speech?

Loads are already saying that they want to hear that he and his administration are resigning.

Link to comment:

http://caffertyfile.blogs.cnn.com/2008/09/24/what-do-you-want-to-hear-from-bush-tonight-about-the-economy/#comment-622681

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:49 PM on 09/24/2008
- one4obama I'm a Fan of one4obama 11 fans permalink

This is not a question I would ask Bush - just a suggestion about the bail-out

Whatever the final decision should be, it should include that every taxpayer will be given collateral of a five year $4,500 in US Savings Bonds to back up their loan for this bailout. The bonds could not be cashed in until the end of the 5 years. And these bonds should be guaranteed! No funny paper.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:05 PM on 09/24/2008
- Dynamohum I'm a Fan of Dynamohum 62 fans permalink

Holy smokes batman, most of the comments on CNN do call for his resignation and taking Cheney with him.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:59 PM on 09/24/2008
- ObamAtomic I'm a Fan of ObamAtomic 172 fans permalink
photo

Where the uproar when the were Fisanging you America,again?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:49 PM on 09/24/2008
- TullyMars I'm a Fan of TullyMars 3 fans permalink
photo

We are all on pins and needles waiting for 43 to guide us in this economic crisis... and somewhere in a back corner of the West Wing, a tree falls...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:48 PM on 09/24/2008
- truthyguy I'm a Fan of truthyguy 42 fans permalink

Pay cuts? Oh, $100 Million down to $50 Million. And for lower level execs who have screwed up it would be $20 Million to $10 Million. Wow. How can a guy get by on that?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:45 PM on 09/24/2008
photo

Someone made a very insightful comment here yesterday, saying at the closing on his $74,000 house, he walked out with a stack of papers weighing about a pound, and yet Paulson offers up two pages outlining the "details" of a $700 billion (lopsided) deal that is being given serious consideration by "our representatives."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:44 PM on 09/24/2008

In every big deal you always ask for the most without strings.... and hope to get at least half. My question is why $700 billion? Why that amount? I watched both days of the Senate Bank hearings and no one has asked that question. There should be mortgage backed insurance ( AIG), but they sold fraudulent contracts so there is not enough capital reserves to save the lenders -- we have to do it for them and we should be demanding strings, and all kinds of regulation, and punitive damages and our own bailout in the form of LOW credit rates on all credit ..... http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=94928783

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:53 PM on 09/24/2008
- Trolmaster I'm a Fan of Trolmaster 8 fans permalink

The only good thing Bush can say is that him and Cheney are going to resign.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:44 PM on 09/24/2008

As long as he reminds us that the fundamentalists, er fundamentals, of our economy, are strong, everything is going to be all right.

He will remind us that a clean and quick slaughter of our American Taxpayer herd is called for and will be a lot less painful than a real recovery. (So keep the bill clean and give us an up or down vote tomorrow or else).

A real recovery will only be allowed to happen if his friends fail and he fails, so he can't let that happen. Unfortunately I think that means we will go to war if this ploy does not work for him.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:43 PM on 09/24/2008

"Paulson agreed to executive pay cuts"... Damn, aren't we lucky. Thank god that he is such a reasonable man!

Wake up congress!

This issue deserves public hearings, long investigation and NO immediate Bailout!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:42 PM on 09/24/2008
- ObamAtomic I'm a Fan of ObamAtomic 172 fans permalink
photo

October surprise in September,,Where is Sarah? anything the *moose**Expalin*

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:41 PM on 09/24/2008
- OkieMon I'm a Fan of OkieMon 34 fans permalink

bank robbers go to jail, right? I mean we don't give another 100 grand or so to a bank robber after he is caught and tell him he did a good job, right? well then bankers who robbed their own banks need to go to jail, and they do not need to be given taxpayer megabucks and a pat on the back.....

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:41 PM on 09/24/2008
- Earl I'm a Fan of Earl 112 fans permalink
photo

Who in the h3ll is Paulson to be accepting or rejecting proposals from congress?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:41 PM on 09/24/2008
photo

From a posting elsewhere on this site:

"So I'm reading an article about Hank Paulson on the bus today in the October 2008 issue of Bloomberg Markets (pg 46). And why was I not surprised to see this?

" Paulson sold his 3.23 million shares in Goldman, worth about $500 million at the time, when he took the Treasury job, according to regulatory filings. He was exempted from paying capital gains tax on the sale of those stakes under a rule meant to avoid penalizing wealthy people who take government jobs and are forced to sell assets."

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&refer=home&sid=a8w9MI4Btco4

When his position was announced, I remember reading that he made $40 million the previous year and wondered why he took a job that may only pay $150K a year, now I understand."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:50 PM on 09/24/2008

A critical - and radical - component of the bailout package proposed by the Bush administration has thus far failed to garner the serious attention of anyone in the press. Section 8 (which ironically reminds one of the popular name of the portion of the 1937 Housing Act that paved the way for subsidized affordable housing ) of this legislation is just a single sentence of thirty-two words, but it represents a significant consolidation of power and an abdication of oversight authority that's so flat-out astounding that it ought to set one's hair on fire. It reads, in its entirety:

"Decisions by the Secretary pursuant to the authority of this Act are non-reviewable and committed to agency discretion, and may not be reviewed by any court of law or any administrative agency."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:56 PM on 09/24/2008
- jdw1981 I'm a Fan of jdw1981 44 fans permalink
photo

NO BAILOUT. NO COMPROMISE. NO SOCIALIST CORPORATE WELFARE, PERIOD.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:41 PM on 09/24/2008

Even if that means the stock market tanks in a huge way? Even if it means more companies go out of business and more people lose their jobs?

I don't think anyone really wants to spend 700B on this, but you have to consider the alternative. Is "no compromise" really worth the possibility (and sure, this is worst case scenario) another great depression?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:53 PM on 09/24/2008
photo

The timing of this BAILOUT is interesting DID YOU READ THE PAPERWORK??

Here's a snippet from the bail out proposal sent to congress:

“Decisions by the [Treasury] Secretary pursuant to the authority of this Act are non-reviewable and committed to agency discretion, and may not be reviewed by any court of law or any administrative agency.”

With Paulson, Bernanke and Bush screaming we need to act NOW, it seems they had time to cover their asses. Not only are they looking for a welfare check, they want a "Get Out Of Jail Free" card too.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:38 PM on 09/24/2008
- Trolmaster I'm a Fan of Trolmaster 8 fans permalink

Democrats should demand the Bush admin scrap this part of the bill before they even start to work on a deal.

The fact they even put this in there in the first place shows what scum they are.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:47 PM on 09/24/2008
- DocJerome I'm a Fan of DocJerome 22 fans permalink

No bailout.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:47 PM on 09/24/2008

The only bigger f'o'o'l's than B=oo=sh= are the s'ub-hu=m=an i'ntel'letcs' that voted for the j'e'r'k.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:37 PM on 09/24/2008

Screw the dumb sh**.

NO packages AT ALL for the companies CEO's. You get rewarded for a job well done, what the heck are they doing, rewarding them for having this happen in an election year??

NO BONUSES
NO PARACHUTES
NO BAILOUT

We should just start over rather then trying to stop something that has ALREADY happened.
Think about it.....This is like trying to stop a hurricane after it has already destroyed everything.....
We have lost our retirement money, our insurances, our homes, there is no gas in parts of the south, gas prices are off the hook, food prices are out of control and most of America are struggling just to make it from day to day.
Why are we trying to save a sinking ship?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:37 PM on 09/24/2008
- Earl I'm a Fan of Earl 112 fans permalink
photo

I have an idea - how about a REFUND from the thieves who have already parachuted?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:42 PM on 09/24/2008
photo

Absolutely!!!

We want our money BACK.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:52 PM on 09/24/2008
- DocJerome I'm a Fan of DocJerome 22 fans permalink

I'm with you, no bailout. This is a white collar terrorism and extortion. Scrap the system and start over.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:46 PM on 09/24/2008
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next › Last » (26 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect